Skip to main content
HPB : The Official Journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association logoLink to HPB : The Official Journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association
. 2004;6(1):25–27. doi: 10.1080/13651820310020846

Hepatic adenomas in male patients

M Ronald 1, J Woodfield 1, J McCall 1, J Koea 1,
PMCID: PMC2020650  PMID: 18333041

Abstract

Background

Hepatic adenomas are benign tumours of the liver most commonly seen in premenopausal women. However, it is now clear that adenomas may occur in males. This small series reviews the characteristics of hepatic adenomas in males.

Case outlines

Three cases of solitary hepatic adenoma occurring in otherwise well male patients (age 22–48 years) are presented. Two patients presented with abnormal liver function tests while one presented with abdominal pain. Imaging of the lesions demonstrated typical appearances of hepatocellular adenoma, resection was undertaken in all cases and all patients remain alive and well.

Discussion

Up to 20% of adenomas are documented as occurring in male patients. Most are solitary and occur in patients without recognised risk factors (steroid therapy and glycogen storage diseases types I and III). However, multiple adenomas are most commonly seen in male patients with risk factors. The imaging characteristics and presentation of adenomas in males are similar to female patients and, most importantly, intraperitoneal rupture and malignant transformation are documented in untreated adenomas in males.

Keywords: Liver adenoma, complications, demographics

Introduction

Hepatic adenomas are benign tumours of the liver, the growth of which may be positively influenced by oestrogenic hormones 1,2; they are most commonly seen in premenopausal women 1,2,3. A number of reports have documented adenomas in men undergoing steroid therapy 4, or in types I and III glycogen storage diseases 5. However, it is now clear that hepatic adenomas may also affect men without these risk factors 3,6,7,8,9. While the behaviour of hepatic adenomas in women has been closely evaluated, the specific characteristics of hepatic adenomas in men have not been described.

We report the presentation of hepatic adenoma in three men with no history of hormone use or glycogen storage disease and have reviewed the behaviour, diagnosis and management of these tumours.

Case reports

Case no. 1

A 48-year-old man presented with an incidental finding of abnormal liver function tests and an ultrasound scan showing a single mass in the right lobe of the liver measuring 7×6×6 cm. CT scan confirmed a solitary central hepatic lesion extending through segments I, IV and VIII. Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) was mildly raised at 158 U/L (normal range 40–130 U/L). Serum alpha-fetoprotein (αFP) was normal and there was no serological evidence of active hepatitis B or C. Percutaneous biopsy confirmed hepatocellular adenoma, with fatty change in the rest of the liver. Following an extended right hepatectomy 10 the patient remains alive and well at 36 months later with no evidence of recurrent disease.

Case no. 2

A 22-year-old man was noted to have mildly abnormal liver function tests while receiving isotretinoin for the treatment of acne. The medication was discontinued, and hepatic ultrasound scan and CT scan were performed. A 6-cm lesion was identified in segments VI and VII that enhanced briskly following the injection of intravenous contrast. The patient's liver function tests were normal apart from a gamma-glutamyl transferase (γGT) level of 110 U/L (normal range 0–60 U/L). There was no evidence of active hepatitis B or C, and αFP was within the normal range. A biopsy of the lesion was consistent with hepatocellular adenoma, and the rest of the liver showed mild macrovesicular fatty change. The patient was treated with a right posterior sectionectomy 10 (Couinaud segments VI and VII) and remains well without evidence of recurrent disease 18 months later.

Case no. 3

A 38-year-old male presented with intermittent right upper quadrant pain, and a liver mass was identified on ultrasound scan. There was no history of steroid use, his liver function tests were normal, hepatitis B and C serology was negative, and αFP was normal. Triphasic CT demonstrated a 12-cm exophytic mass in segment VI that was hypervascular in the arterial phase with no evidence of a central scar. He proceeded to segment VI resection and histology confirmed hepatic adenoma. He remains well with no evidence of recurrence at 31 months.

Discussion

Hepatic adenoma is widely regarded as a tumour that only affects women, or males who are on steroids or suffering from types I or III glycogen storage diseases. However, several series have documented that 16–20% of adenomas affect men (Table 1) 3,6,7,8,9,7,11,12. Most of these reports have been of single adenomas occurring in histologically normal livers without evidence of cirrhosis or fibrosis and in men without recognised risk factors 8,9,13,14. Although multiple adenomas are also recognised in men, most of these patients do have recognised risk factors 4,5,8. Of the six patients with multiple adenomas reported by Leese and colleagues 8, five were men and, of them, four of them suffered from glycogen storage disease. Male patients have also been reported with multiple adenomatosis (which is defined as the presence of >10 liver adenomas in an otherwise normal hepatic parenchyma, in patients without a history of glycogen storage disease or androgenic steroid therapy 4,5,8, and Flejou and associates 15 have emphasised that liver adenomatosis affects men and women equally.

Table 1. Summary of male patients with hepatic adenomas reported in the literature.

Reference Date Total Males Solitary vs multiple Steroic use Glycogen storage disease Diameter Comment
Wilkens et al. 11 2001 10 2 Solitary NS NS 6 cm 7.5 cm
Terkivatan et al. 12 2001 12 2 Solitary Yes No NS Presented with rupture
Mamada 9 2001 1 1 Solitary No No 4.5 cm Focal lesional haemorrhage
Ichikawa et al. 13 2000 25 4 Solitary No No NS
Weiman et al. 7 1997 44 9 NS NS NS NS
Nagorney 3 1995 24 2 NS NS NS NS
Arrive et al. 16 1994 29 2 Solitary NS NS NS
Foster and Berman 18 1994 5 1 Multiple Yes NS NS Developed HCC
Paulson et al. 6 1994 14 3 Solitary No Yes NS
Leese et al. 8 1988 18 3 Solitary No No 14 cm 13 cm 2 cm
6 5 Multiple No Yes NS Also ref. 18
Sale and Lerner 4 1977 1 1 Multiple Yes No NS
Foster and Berman 19 1977 37 2 Solitary No No 15 cm 23 cm Presented with rupture
1 Multiple No No 4 cm
Howell et al. 5 1976 8 6 Multiple No Yes NS

NS, not stated.

The typical symptomatology of hepatic adenomas is largely based on data from women whose lesions have been associated with oral contraceptive use. At least 50% of adenomas present as an incidental finding 16, as in two of the three cases reported here; acute or chronic abdominal pain or discomfort precipitate diagnosis in the remainder 3,8,16. Intra-tumoral or intra-peritoneal haemorrhage may be associated with acute abdominal pain in 39–50% of patients 3,12. Liver function tests in hepatic adenoma are seldom abnormal but mild elevations in γGT have been observed in 7% of patients and 7 ALP may be raised in up to 23% 15.

As in women hepatic adenomas are often first detected by ultrasound scan where they appear as well demarcated hyperechoic, hypoechoic or isoechoic lesions 2. The CT appearance is of hypervascular tumours with typical features of adenomata including sharply defined margins and smooth non-lobulate masses. Adenomas are encapsulated in 25% of cases and rarely show evidence of calcification 12. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) appearances are of well-defined contrast-enhancing lesions that are mostly hyperintense on T1 and T2-weighted images 6,13. The primary diagnostic consideration is to differentiate adenoma from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Small HCCs are more commonly seen in men, and most are associated with a raised serum αFP 17. The presence of a radiologically suspicious lesion in a male patient with a normal αFP is an indication for biopsy.

The risk of tumour rupture and malignant transformation are the most important complications of hepatic adenoma, both for men and women. Up to 50–60% of adenomas have evidence of intra-tumoral haemorrhage 9,12, and can present with haemoperitoneum, hypotension and shock 3,8 due to intraperitoneal rupture. While intraperitoneal rupture of a hepatic adenoma is classically seen in premenopausal women, it has been described in men 9,12. Although the size of the ruptured lesions was not specified, it is likely that the risk of rupture in males is related to lesional diameter as it is in females 8.

Malignant transformation of hepatic adenoma is a rare phenomenon. Foster and Berman 18 reviewed 76 adenomas treated non-operatively and reported malignant transformation in 5 out of 76 cases of adenoma occurring over a 30-year period. The specific risk of malignant transformation of hepatic adenoma in men is not known, but 1 of the 5 cases (20%) reported by Foster and Berman was male 8,18,19, suggesting a similar risk to that in women.

References

  • 1.Tao L-C. Oral contraceptive-associated liver cell adenoma and hepatocellular carcinoma. Cytomorphology and mechanism of malignant transformation. Cancer. 1991;68:341–7. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19910715)68:2<341::aid-cncr2820680223>3.0.co;2-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cherqui D, Rahmouni A, Charlotte F, et al. Management of focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatocellular adenoma in young women: a series of 41 patients with clinical, radiological, and pathological correlations. Hepatology. 1995;22:1674–81. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nagorney D. Benign hepatic tumors: focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatocellular adenoma. World J Surg. 1995;19:13–18. doi: 10.1007/BF00316973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sale GE, Lerner KG. Multiple tumors after androgen therapy. Arch Pathol lab Med. 1977;101:600–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Howell RR, Stevenson RE, Ben-Menachem Y, et al. Hepatic adenomata with type I glycogen storage disease. JAMA. 1976;236:1481–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Paulson E, McClellan J, Washington K, Spritzer W, Meyers W, Baker M. Hepatic adenoma: MR characteristics and correlation with pathologic findings. Am J Radiol. 1994;163:113–16. doi: 10.2214/ajr.163.1.8010195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Weiman A, Ringe B, Klempnauer J, et al. Benign liver tumors: differential diagnosis and indications for surgery. World J Surg. 1997;21:983–1. doi: 10.1007/s002689900337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Leese T, Farges O, Bismuth H. Liver cell adenomas. A 12-year surgical experience from a specialist hepatobiliary unit. Ann Surg. 1988;208:558–64. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198811000-00003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mamada Y, Onda M, Tajiri T, et al. Liver cell adenoma in a 26 year old man. J Nippon Med Sch. 2001;68:516–19. doi: 10.1272/jnms.68.516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Terminology Committee of the International Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary Association, The Brisbane 2000 Terminology of liver anatomy and resections. HPB 2000;2:333–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wilkens L, Bredt M, Flemming P, Becker T, Klempnauer J, Kreipe H. Differentiation of liver cell adenomas from well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinomas by comparative genomic hybridization. J Pathol. 2001;193:476–82. doi: 10.1002/path.825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Terkivatan T, de Wilt J, de Man R, van Rijn R, Tilanus H, Ijzermans J. Treatment of ruptured hepatocellular adenoma. BrJ Surg. 2001;88:207–9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01648.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ichikawa T, Federle M, Grazioli L, Nalesnik M. Hepatocellular adenoma: multiphasic CT and histopathologic findings in 25 patients. Radiology. 2000;214:861–8. doi: 10.1148/radiology.214.3.r00mr28861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kerlin P, Davis G, McGill D, Weiland L, Adson M, Sheedy P. Hepatic adenoma and focal nodular hyperplasia: clinical, pathologic and radiologic features. Gastroenterology. 1983;84:994–1002. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Flejou JF, Barge J, Menu Y, et al. Liver adenomatosis: an entity distinct from liver adenoma? Gastroenterology. 1985;89:1132–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Arrive L, Flejou J-F, Vilgrain V, et al. Hepatic adenoma: MR findings in 51 pathologically proven lesions. Radiology. 1994;193:507–12. doi: 10.1148/radiology.193.2.7972769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Maeda T, Takenaka K, Taguchi K, et al. Clinicopathological characteristics of surgically resected minute hepatocellular carcinomas. Hepato-Gastroenterology. 2000;47:498–503. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Foster J, Berman M. The malignant transformation of liver cell adenomas. Arch Surg. 1994;129:712–17. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1994.01420310044007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Foster J, Berman M. Saunders; Philadelphia: 1977. Solid liver tumors; pp. 138–78. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from HPB : The Official Journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES