Abstract
Background: Occurrence of tumor relapse is frequent in patients with carcinoma of the papilla of Vater despite the absence of residual tumor detectable at primary surgery. Therefore it has to be assumed that current tumor staging procedures fail to identify minimal amounts of tumor cells disseminated to secondary organs, which might be precursors of subsequent metastatic relapse. The aim of the study was to assess the frequency and prognostic impact of minimal tumor cell spread in lymph nodes classified as ‘tumor-free’ in routine histopathologic evaluation. Materials and methods: A total of 41 ‘tumor-free’ lymph nodes from 23 patients with adenocarcinoma of the papilla of Vater who underwent curative tumor resection (R0) were examined by immunohistochemistry with the monoclonal anti-EpCAM antibody Ber-EP4 for minimal disseminated tumor cells. Results: Twelve (29.3%) of the 41 ‘tumor-free’ lymph nodes obtained from 9 (39.1%) of the 23 patients displayed EpCAM-positive cells. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis revealed that patients with EpCAM-positive cells in lymph showed a clearly reduced relapse-free and overall survival compared with patients without such cells. However, these differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.13 for relapse-free survival, p = 0.11 for overall survival). Discussion: Immunohistochemical assessment may refine the staging of resected lymph nodes in patients with carcinoma of the papilla of Vater. However, the presence of minimal disseminated tumor cells in lymph nodes had no significant impact on the prognosis in these patients.
Keywords: micrometastasis, lymph nodes, carcinoma of the papilla of Vater, minimal residual disease, immunohistochemistry
Introduction
Adenocarcinomas of the papilla of Vater are highly aggressive malignancies with an unchanged poor prognosis. Although postoperative mortality has declined and resection rates have improved considerably, the reported 5-year survival rates after complete tumor resection (R0) still range between 45% and 65% 1. Early metastatic relapse after the complete resection of an apparently localized primary tumor indicates an occult tumor cell dissemination or micrometastatic disease, which cannot be detected by current staging procedures. Therefore, more sensitive immunohistochemical and nucleic acid-based assays have been developed that are based on the detection of epithelial cell or tumor-associated markers and are able to detect disseminated tumor cells in lymph nodes classified as ‘tumor-free’ by conventional histopathologic examination 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16. However, although an increasing number of published studies indicate that immunohistochemically detected minimal tumor cell deposits in ‘tumor-free’ lymph nodes appeared to be strong and independent predictors of tumor relapse in several carcinoma entities 5,6,11,14,16,17,18,19,20, little is known about the prognostic value of these cells in patients with carcinoma of the papilla of Vater.
In order to identify patients with a high risk for tumor relapse we applied an immunohistochemical assay to assess the frequency and prognostic value of immunohistochemically detectable tumor cells in lymph nodes in 23 patients with completely resected (R0) adenocarcinoma of the papilla of Vater.
Materials and methods
Patients
This study was approved by the ethics committee of the chamber of physicians in Hamburg. Informed consent was obtained from all the patients before their inclusion in the study. Lymph nodes were prospectively collected from 23 consecutive patients with adenocarcinoma of the papilla of Vater without overt metastases (M0) who underwent radical pancreatoduodenectomy with tumor-free resection margins (R0) at the University Hospital Hamburg during March 1993 and April 2002. In each patient reconstruction was performed with a pancreatojejunostomy according to Whipple-Kausch 21. None of the 23 study patients received a neoadjuvant treatment.
The clinical and histopathological data of the 23 patients analyzed in this study are summarized in Table I.
Table I. Characteristics of patients and tumors.
| Variable | No. (%) of patients | No. (%) of patients with EpCAM + cells in LN | p value |
|---|---|---|---|
| All patients | 23 | 9 (39.1) | |
| Male | 12 (52.2) | 3 (25) | |
| Female | 11 (47.8) | 6 (54.5) | 0.2 |
| Median age 66 years (47–83) | |||
| < 60 years | 7 (30.4) | 3 (42.9) | |
| ≥ 60 years | 16 (69.6) | 6 (37.5) | 0.6 |
| Primary tumor | |||
| pT1 | 3 (13) | 1 (33.3) | |
| pT2 | 8 (34.8) | 4 (50) | |
| pT3 | 11 (47.8) | 4 (36.4) | |
| pT4 | 1 (4.3) | 0 | 0.8 |
| Lymph nodes | |||
| pN0 | 14 (60.9) | 5 (28.6) | |
| pN1 | 9 (39.1) | 4 (44.4) | 0.5 |
| Tumor grade | |||
| G1 | 3 (13) | 0 | |
| G2 | 12 (52.2) | 7 (58.3) | |
| G3 | 8 (34.8) | 2 (25) | 0.1 |
Patient survival was determined from the time of primary surgery to the time of death or last follow-up. The median postoperative observation time was 20 months (range 6–118 months).
Lymph node preparation and immunohistochemical detection of tumor cells
During the systematic lymphadenectomy the surgeon randomly collected lymph nodes that were macroscopically unsuspicious and divided them into two parts, as described previously 17. One part of each lymph node was embedded in paraffin for routine histopathological examination, whereas the other part was snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C for immunohistochemical analysis. If a lymph node was ‘positive’ on routine histopathology, it was excluded from the immunohistochemical analysis. The remaining nodes, which were ‘negative’ on routine histopathology, were further analyzed immunohistochemically. From each of these nodes cryostat sections of 6–8 µm thickness were cut at three different levels. Two consecutive samples obtained at each level were stained immunohistochemically with the monoclonal antibody (mAb) Ber-EP4 (IgG1; Dako, Hamburg Germany and Carpinteria, CA, USA) for the presence of disseminated tumor cells. This mAb detects the epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM), also known as 17-1A or EPG40, which is frequently expressed by epithelial cells and epithelial-derived tumors 9,22. We and other groups previously demonstrated that immunohistochemical analysis with anti-EpCAM antibodies is a sensitive and specific method for detecting disseminated tumor cells in lymph nodes in a variety of carcinoma entities 5,6,9,14,17,23,24. Visualization of antibody binding was performed by the alkaline phosphatase-antialkaline phosphatase (APAAP) technique 14. Sections of normal colonic mucosa served as positive controls, and isotype-matched, irrelevant murine monoclonal antibodies (MOPC-21; Sigma, Germany) were used for negative controls. The immunostained slides were evaluated in a blinded fashion by two observers working independently.
Statistical analysis
Associations between categorical parameters were assessed via Fisher's exact test. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to analyze overall survival and relapse-free survival times. Log-rank tests were performed for comparison purposes. Differences between groups were considered significant if the p values were <0.05 for a two-tailed test (software SPSS 10.0, SPSS Inc. 1999).
Results
The clinical data of the analyzed patients are summarized in Table I. Routine histopathologic examination of the resected lymph nodes revealed lymph node metastases in 23 (8.5%) of 270 resected lymph nodes from 9 (39.1%) of the 23 patients. Of 247 lymph nodes judged as ‘tumor-free’ by routine histopathology, 41 lymph nodes (mean 1.8 lymph nodes per patient) were further analyzed by immunohistochemistry. This analysis revealed EpCAM-positive cells in 12 (29.3%) of 41 lymph nodes from 9 (39.1%) of the 23 patients (Table I). Five (28.6%) of these patients were classified as pN0. These cells presented as isolated tumor cells or small tumor cell clusters located in the sinuses or the lymphoid interstitium.
There was no correlation between the presence of EpCAM-positive cells in lymph nodes and clinicopathologic parameters, such as primary tumor stage (pT), lymph node stage (pN), or grading (G) (Table I).
All 23 patients were available for Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. Five (55.9%) of nine patients with EpCAM-positive cells in lymph nodes developed tumor relapse within a median time of 14 months and 6 (66.7%) of them died in the course of their disease within a median time of 12 months, compared with 4 (28.6%) and 5 (35.7) of 14 patients without such cells within a median relapse-free survival of > 15 months and a median overall survival of >20 months (Table III, Figures 1 and 2). However, these differences were not statistically significant for both the relapse-free survival (p = 0.13) and overall survival (p = 0.11). The prognostic value of the other established clinicopathologic parameters is summarized in Table III.
Table III. Prognostic value of various clinicopathologic factors in univariate survival analysis.
| Variable | value* |
|---|---|
| Relapse-free survival | |
| Sex | 0.06 |
| Age (<60 vs ≥60 years) | 0.2 |
| pT3–4 vs pT1–2 | 0.08 |
| pN1 vs pN0 | 0.03 |
| Grade III vs grade I–II | 0.1 |
| Overall survival | |
| Sex | 0.08 |
| Age (<60 vs ≥60 years) | 0.1 |
| pT3–4 vs pT1–2 | 0.2 |
| pN1 vs pN0 | 0.1 |
| Grade III vs grade I–II | 0.3 |
*Log-rank test.
Figure 1. .
Relapse-free survival of patients with and without EpCAM-positive cells in lymph nodes.
Figure 2. .
Overall survival of patients with and without EpCAM-positive cells in lymph nodes.
Table II. Prognostic value of EpCAM-positive cells in lymph nodes.
| Survival | Patients without EpCAM + cells in LN | Patients with EpCAM + cells in LN | p value* |
|---|---|---|---|
| Relapse-free | |||
| All patients' events (%) | 5/14 (35.7) | 6/9 (66.7) | |
| Months† | >15 | 12 | 0.13 |
| Overall | |||
| All patients' events (%) | 4/14 (28.6) | 5/9 (55.9) | |
| Months† | >20 | 14 | 0.11 |
*Log-rank test.
†Median value.
Discussion
Despite improvements in surgical treatment, the prognosis of patients with adenocarcinoma of the papilla of Vater has not changed remarkably over the last decades and is known to be correlated with the presence of lymph node metastasis 1. Since sensitive immunohistochemical or nucleic acid-based approaches have been introduced for tumor cell detection, several investigators have demonstrated the frequent presence of minimal tumor cell deposits in lymph nodes previously judged as ‘tumor-free’ on routine histopathologic examination in many types of malignant tumors 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,25,26. However, the clinical and biological significance of such immunohistochemically detected cells is still controversially discussed. Some authors have reported a lack of significant impact of these cells on prognosis 12,13,25, whereas others described a strong effect on postoperative outcome 4,5,6,9,16,17,19,20,26. However, according to a recent Medline search (June 2006) there are no data published regarding the frequency and prognostic value of immunohistochemically detected tumor cells in lymph nodes in patients with adenocarcinoma of the papilla of Vater. We therefore analyzed a total of 41 ‘tumor-free’ lymph nodes from 23 patients with completely resected (R0) cancer of the papilla of Vater and found disseminated tumor cells in 9 (39.1%) of these patients. Five (55.6%) of these patients displaying disseminated tumor cells in lymph nodes were judged as pN0 on routine histopathology. Although patients with disseminated tumor cells in lymph showed a clearly reduced relapse-free and overall survival compared with patients without such cells, these differences were not of statistical significance.
Most studies examining pathohistologically ‘tumor-free’ lymph nodes in carcinoma patients by immunohistochemistry have applied antibodies against a broad spectrum of cytokeratins (CKs) (e.g. mAb AE1/AE3) 2,3,4,16,19,20,25,26. However, described irregular CK expression (e.g. CK18) in normal lymphatic reticulum cells 27 can lead to false positive results. Therefore we used a monoclonal antibody against EpCAM, which is more specific for tumor cell detection in lymph nodes 5,6,9,14,17,23,24 since it is not expressed in lymphatic tissues 14,22. Applying this approach, we and other groups were able to demonstrate that detection of EpCAM-positive cells in ‘tumor-free’ lymph nodes was of independent prognostic significance for a worse postoperative prognosis in patients with carcinoma of the pancreas 6,24, esophagus 5,17, and lung 9,14. The lack of significance of disseminated tumor cells in lymph nodes in the present study can be mainly attributed to the low number of patients analyzed. Therefore, further studies with larger numbers of patients are needed to resolve the question of the prognostic value of minimal disseminated tumor cells in lymph nodes in patients with carcinoma of the papilla of Vater. If these analyses reveal a significant impact of these cells, immunohistochemical assessment of lymph nodes could be used to refine the staging system for cancer of the papilla of Vater and help to identify patients at a high risk of tumor recurrence, which cannot be cured by surgery alone. The detection of the earliest manifestations of tumor cell dissemination is an extremely promising approach, which might enable us to identify suitable candidates for adjuvant treatment strategies, for instance with humanized therapeutic anti-EpCAM antibodies.
References
- 1.Beger HG, Thorab FC, Liu Z, Harada N, Rau BM. Pathogenesis and treatment of neoplastic diseases of the papilla of Vater: Kausch-Whipple procedure with lymph node dissection in cancer of the papilla of Vater. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2004;11:232–8. doi: 10.1007/s00534-004-0895-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bonavina L, Ferrero S, Midolo V, Buffa R, Cesana B, Peracchia A. Lymph node micrometastases in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. J Gastrointest Surg. 1999;3:468–76. doi: 10.1016/s1091-255x(99)80099-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Calaluce R, Miedema BW, Yesus YW. Micrometastasis in colorectal carcinoma: a review. J Surg Oncol. 1998;67:194–202. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9098(199803)67:3<194::aid-jso11>3.0.co;2-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Greenson JK, Isenhart CE, Rice R, Mojzisik C, Houchens D, Martin EW., Jr Identification of occult micrometastases in pericolic lymph nodes of Duke's B colorectal cancer patients using monoclonal antibodies against cytokeratin and CC49. Correlation with long-term survival. Cancer. 1994;73:563–9. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19940201)73:3<563::aid-cncr2820730311>3.0.co;2-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hosch S, Kraus J, Scheunemann P, Izbicki JR, Schneider C, Schumacher U, et al. Malignant potential and cytogenetic characteristics of occult disseminated tumor cells in esophageal cancer. Cancer Res. 2000;60:6836–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hosch SB, Knoefel WT, Metz S, Stoecklein N, Niendorf A, Broelsch CE, et al. Early lymphatic tumor cell dissemination in pancreatic cancer: frequency and prognostic significance. Pancreas. 1997;15:154–9. doi: 10.1097/00006676-199708000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kano M, Shimada Y, Kaganoi J, Sakurai T, Li Z, Sato F, et al. Detection of lymph node metastasis of oesophageal cancer by RT-nested PCR for SCC antigen gene mRNA. Br J Cancer. 2000;82:429–35. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.1999.0938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Komukai S, Nishimaki T, Watanabe H, Ajioka Y, Suzuki T, Hatakeyama K. Significance of immunohistochemically demonstrated micrometastases to lymph nodes in esophageal cancer with histologically negative nodes. Surgery. 2000;127:40–6. doi: 10.1067/msy.2000.102754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kubuschok B, Passlick B, Izbicki JR, Thetter O, Pantel K. Disseminated tumor cells in lymph nodes as a determinant for survival in surgically resected non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:19–24. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.1.19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Liefers GJ, Cleton-Jansen AM, van de Velde CJ, Hermans J, van Krieken JH, Cornelisse CJ, et al. Micrometastases and survival in stage II colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:223–8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199807233390403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lindblom A. Improved tumor staging in colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:264–5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199807233390410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Millis RR, Springall R, Lee AH, Ryder K, Rytina ER, Fentiman IS. Occult axillary lymph node metastases are of no prognostic significance in breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2002;86:396–401. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Nakamura T, Ide H, Eguchi R, Hayashi K, Ota M, Takasaki K. Clinical implications of lymph node micrometastasis in patients with histologically node-negative (pN0) esophageal carcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2002;79:224–9. doi: 10.1002/jso.10080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Passlick B, Izbicki JR, Kubuschok B, Nathrath W, Thetter O, Pichlmeier U, et al. Immunohistochemical assessment of individual tumor cells in lymph nodes of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1994;12:1827–32. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.9.1827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sidransky D. Nucleic acid-based methods for the detection of cancer. Science. 1997;278:1054–9. doi: 10.1126/science.278.5340.1054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Cote RJ, Peterson HF, Chaiwun B, Gelber RD, Goldhirsch A, Castiglione-Gertsch M, et al. Role of immunohistochemical detection of lymph-node metastases in management of breast cancer. International Breast Cancer Study Group. Lancet. 1999;354:896–900. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(98)11104-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Izbicki JR, Hosch SB, Pichlmeier U, Rehders A, Busch C, Niendorf A, et al. Prognostic value of immunohistochemically identifiable tumor cells in lymph nodes of patients with completely resected esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:1188–94. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199710233371702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Pantel K, Cote RJ, Fodstad O. Detection and clinical importance of micrometastatic disease. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999;91:1113–24. doi: 10.1093/jnci/91.13.1113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lee E, Chae Y, Kim I, Choi J, Yeom B, Leong AS. Prognostic relevance of immunohistochemically detected lymph node micrometastasis in patients with gastric carcinoma. Cancer. 2002;94:2867–73. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Osaki T, Oyama T, Gu CD, Yamashita T, So T, Takenoyama M, et al. Prognostic impact of micrometastatic tumor cells in the lymph nodes and bone marrow of patients with completely resected stage I non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:2930–6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Jones L, Russell C, Mosca F, Boggi U, Sutton R, Slavin J, et al. Standard Kausch-Whipple pancreatoduodenectomy. Dig Surg. 1999;16:297–304. doi: 10.1159/000018739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Latza U, Niedobitek G, Schwarting R, Nekarda H, Stein H. Ber-EP4: new monoclonal antibody which distinguishes epithelia from mesothelial. J Clin Pathol. 1990;43:213–19. doi: 10.1136/jcp.43.3.213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hosch SB, Stoecklein NH, Izbicki JR. Molecular markers and staging of early esophageal cancer. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2003;388:77–82. doi: 10.1007/s00423-003-0353-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bogoevski D, Yekebas EF, Schurr P, Kaifi JT, Kutup A, Erbersdobler A, et al. Mode of spread in the early phase of lymphatic metastasis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: prognostic significance of nodal microinvolvement. Ann Surg 2004;240:993–1000; discussion 1000–1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Glickman JN, Torres C, Wang HH, Turner JR, Shahsafaei A, Richards WG, et al. The prognostic significance of lymph node micrometastasis in patients with esophageal carcinoma. Cancer. 1999;85:769–78. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Natsugoe S, Mueller J, Stein HJ, Feith M, Hofler H, Siewert JR. Micrometastasis and tumor cell microinvolvement of lymph nodes from esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: frequency, associated tumor characteristics, and impact on prognosis. Cancer. 1998;83:858–66. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Franke WW, Moll R. Cytoskeletal components of lymphoid organs. I. Synthesis of cytokeratins 8 and 18 and desmin in subpopulations of extrafollicular reticulum cells of human lymph nodes, tonsils, and spleen. Differentiation. 1987;36:145–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-0436.1987.tb00189.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


