Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1993 Feb;59(2):380–388. doi: 10.1128/aem.59.2.380-388.1993

Evaluation of commercial presence-absence test kits for detection of total coliforms, Escherichia coli, and other indicator bacteria.

J A Clark 1, A H el-Shaarawi 1
PMCID: PMC202116  PMID: 8434907

Abstract

Evaluations of several commercial presence-absence (P-A) test kits were performed over a 6-month period in 1990 by using the Ontario Ministry of the Environment (MOE) P-A test for comparison. The general principles of the multiple-tube fermentation technique formed the basis for conducting the product evaluations. Each week, a surface water sample was diluted and inoculated into 25 99-ml dilution blanks for each of three dilutions. The inoculated dilution blanks from each dilution series were randomly sorted into sets of five. Three of these sets were inoculated into the P-A test kits or vice versa, as required. The other two sets were passed through membrane filters, and one set of five membrane filters was placed onto m-Endo agar LES to give replicate total coliform counts and the other set was placed onto m-TEC agar to give replicate fecal coliform results. A statistical analysis of the results was performed by a modified logistic transform method, which provided an improved way to compare binary data obtained from the different test kits. The comparative test results showed that three of the four commercial products tested gave very good levels of recovery and that the fourth commercial product gave only fair levels of recovery when the data were compared with the data from MOE P-A tests and membrane filter tests. P-A bottles showing positive results after 18 h of incubation that were subcultured immediately in ECMUG tubes frequently could be confirmed as containing total coliforms, fecal coliforms, or Escherichia coli after 6 h of incubation; thus, the total incubation time was only 24 h.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Full text

PDF
380

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bancroft K., Nelson E. T., Childers G. W. Comparison of the presence-absence and membrane filter techniques for coliform detection in small, nonchlorinated water distribution systems. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989 Feb;55(2):507–510. doi: 10.1128/aem.55.2.507-510.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Clark D. L., Milner B. B., Stewart M. H., Wolfe R. L., Olson B. H. Comparative study of commercial 4-methylumbelliferyl-beta-D-glucuronide preparations with the Standard Methods membrane filtration fecal coliform test for the detection of Escherichia coli in water samples. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991 May;57(5):1528–1534. doi: 10.1128/aem.57.5.1528-1534.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Clark J. A., Burger C. A., Sabatinos L. E. Characterization of indicator bacteria in municipal raw water, drinking water, and new main water samples. Can J Microbiol. 1982 Sep;28(9):1002–1013. doi: 10.1139/m82-150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Covert T. C., Shadix L. C., Rice E. W., Haines J. R., Freyberg R. W. Evaluation of the Autoanalysis Colilert test for detection and enumeration of total coliforms. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989 Oct;55(10):2443–2447. doi: 10.1128/aem.55.10.2443-2447.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dufour A. P., Strickland E. R., Cabelli V. J. Membrane filter method for enumerating Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981 May;41(5):1152–1158. doi: 10.1128/aem.41.5.1152-1158.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Edberg S. C., Allen M. J., Smith D. B. National field evaluation of a defined substrate method for the simultaneous detection of total coliforms and Escherichia coli from drinking water: comparison with presence-absence techniques. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989 Apr;55(4):1003–1008. doi: 10.1128/aem.55.4.1003-1008.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Edberg S. C., Edberg M. M. A defined substrate technology for the enumeration of microbial indicators of environmental pollution. Yale J Biol Med. 1988 Sep-Oct;61(5):389–399. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Feng P. C., Hartman P. A. Fluorogenic assays for immediate confirmation of Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 Jun;43(6):1320–1329. doi: 10.1128/aem.43.6.1320-1329.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jacobs N. J., Zeigler W. L., Reed F. C., Stukel T. A., Rice E. W. Comparison of membrane filter, multiple-fermentation-tube, and presence-absence techniques for detecting total coliforms in small community water systems. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986 May;51(5):1007–1012. doi: 10.1128/aem.51.5.1007-1012.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lewis C. M., Mak J. L. Comparison of membrane filtration and Autoanalysis Colilert presence-absence techniques for analysis of total coliforms and Escherichia coli in drinking water samples. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989 Dec;55(12):3091–3094. doi: 10.1128/aem.55.12.3091-3094.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Olson B. H., Clark D. L., Milner B. B., Stewart M. H., Wolfe R. L. Total coliform detection in drinking water: comparison of membrane filtration with Colilert and Coliquik. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991 May;57(5):1535–1539. doi: 10.1128/aem.57.5.1535-1539.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Pipes W. O., Minnigh H. A., Moyer B., Troy M. A. Comparison of Clark's presence-absence test and the membrane filter method for coliform detection in potable water samples. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986 Sep;52(3):439–443. doi: 10.1128/aem.52.3.439-443.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rice E. W., Geldreich E. E., Read E. J. The presence-absence coliform test for monitoring drinking water quality. Public Health Rep. 1989 Jan-Feb;104(1):54–58. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES