Abstract
In-use testing of disinfectants is necessary to ensure efficacy over time. The current official procedure for testing disinfectants, the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) use-dilution method, cannot be adapted to repeated sampling techniques of use-life testing. It is therefore necessary to use an alternative method when evaluating the activity of a disinfectant under actual use. The Clinical Research Associates (CRA) suspension method was developed to fill this need. It consists of adding 0.5 ml of a standard culture to 5.0 ml of test disinfectant and sampling the mixture after 10 min for surviving bacteria. When this test was compared with the AOAC use-dilution method under a simulated use situation, the two methods were generally equivalent in identifying disinfectant inactivation. In addition, the CRA method was less time consuming, easier to perform, and less variable than the AOAC method. Use of the CRA method in a clinical study demonstrated the need for reuse claims to be based on clinical use studies rather than on laboratory testing only.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Ascenzi J. M., Ezzell R. J., Wendt T. M. Evaluation of carriers used in the test methods of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986 Jan;51(1):91–94. doi: 10.1128/aem.51.1.91-94.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Christensen E. A., Jepsen O. B., Kristensen H., Steen G. In-use tests of disinfectants. Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand B. 1982 Apr;90(2):95–100. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1982.tb00088.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gorman S. P., Scott E. M., Russell A. D. Antimicrobial activity, uses and mechanism of action of glutaraldehyde. J Appl Bacteriol. 1980 Apr;48(2):161–190. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1980.tb01217.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gélinas P., Goulet J. Neutralization of the activity of eight disinfectants by organic matter. J Appl Bacteriol. 1983 Apr;54(2):243–247. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1983.tb02613.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- KELSEY J. C. A CAPACITY USE-DILUTION TEST FOR DISINFECTANTS. Mon Bull Minist Health Public Health Lab Serv. 1965 Jun;24:152–160. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kortenbout W. P. Some factors influencing the effective use of disinfectants and cleaning agents. Curationis. 1982 Jun;5(2):29–33. doi: 10.4102/curationis.v5i2.397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miner N. A., McDowell J. W., Willcockson G. W., Bruckner N. I., Stark R. L., Whitmore E. J. Antimicrobial and other properties of a new stabilized alkaline glutaraldehyde disinfectant/sterilizer. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1977 Apr;34(4):376–382. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reybrouck G. A comparison of the quantitative suspension tests for the assessment of disinfectants. Zentralbl Bakteriol B. 1980;170(5-6):449–456. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reybrouck G. A theoretical approach of disinfectant testing. Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig B. 1975 Jul;160(4-5):342–367. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reybrouck G., Borneff J., van de Voorde H., Werner H. P. A collaborative study on a new quantitative suspension test, the in vitro test, for the evaluation of the bactericidal activity of chemical disinfectants. Zentralbl Bakteriol B. 1979 Jun;168(5-6):463–479. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Russell A. D. Factors influencing the activity of antimicrobial agents: an appraisal. Microbios. 1974 Apr;10(38):151–174. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van Klingeren B., Leussink A. B., van Wijngaarden L. J. A collaborative study on the repeatability and the reproducibility of the Dutch standard-suspension-test for the evaluation of disinfectants. Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig B. 1977 Aug;164(5-6):521–548. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]