Skip to main content
British Journal of Cancer logoLink to British Journal of Cancer
. 1976 Jan;33(1):79–90. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1976.8

Characterization of tumour cell aggregation promoting factor from rat ascites hepatoma cells: Separation of two factors with different antigenic property.

K Kudo, Y Hanaoka, H Hayashi
PMCID: PMC2024908  PMID: 56193

Abstract

The previously described glycoprotein that promotes tumour cell aggregation, derived from rat ascites hepatoma cells and capable of partial purification by chromatography, was found to be a mixture of 2 factors with different antigenic property. One was not absorbed by immunoadsorbent chromatography with anti-rat serum antibody and the other was. The action of the unabsorbed factor was clearly more potent than that of the absorbed factor. Both the factors were found in the serum of tumour bearing rats and the action of the unabsorbed factor was also more potent than that of the absorbed factor; its amount increased with time after i.p. inoculation of the cells. The serum of healthy rats contained the absorbed factor but not the unabsorbed factor. It was thus assumed that the unabsorbed factor was associated with the hepatoma cell surface itself and released into the serum, while the absorbed factor was associated with serum protein coating the cell.

Full text

PDF
79

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ishimaru Y., Ishihara H., Hayashi H. An electron microscopic study of tumour cell adhesiveness induced by aggregation promoting factor from rat ascites hepatoma cells. Br J Cancer. 1975 Feb;31(2):207–217. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1975.27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Kudo K., Tasaki I., Hanaoka Y., Hayashi H. A tumour cell aggregation promoting substance from rat ascites hepatoma cells. Br J Cancer. 1974 Dec;30(6):549–559. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1974.234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. LOWRY O. H., ROSEBROUGH N. J., FARR A. L., RANDALL R. J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951 Nov;193(1):265–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. ODASHIMA S. Comparative studies on the transplantability of liver cancers induced in rats fed with 3'-methyl-4-dimethylaminoazobenzene for 3-6 months. Gan. 1962 Dec;53:325–348. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. ODASHIMA S. ESTABLISHMENT OF ASCITES HEPATOMAS IN THE RAT, 1951-1962. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1964 Dec;16:51–93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. OUCHTERLONY O. Diffusion-in-gel methods for immunological analysis. Prog Allergy. 1958;5:1–78. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Oppenheimer S. B., Humphreys T. Isolation of specific macromolecules required for adhesion of mouse tumour cells. Nature. 1971 Jul 9;232(5306):125–127. doi: 10.1038/232125a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Porath J., Axen R., Ernback S. Chemical coupling of proteins to agarose. Nature. 1967 Sep 30;215(5109):1491–1492. doi: 10.1038/2151491a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. TAL C., DISHON T., GROSS J. THE AGGLUTINATION OF TUMOUR CELLS IN VITRO BY SERA FROM TUMOUR PATIENTS AND PREGNANT WOMEN. Br J Cancer. 1964 Mar;18:111–119. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1964.11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. WEISS L. Studies on cellular adhesion in tissue culture. I. The effect of serum. Exp Cell Res. 1959 Jun;17(3):499–507. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(59)90070-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. WEISS L. Studies on cellular adhesion in tissue culture. II. The adhesion of cells to gel surfaces. Exp Cell Res. 1959 Jun;17(3):508–515. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(59)90071-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK

RESOURCES