Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1988 Sep;54(9):2174–2178. doi: 10.1128/aem.54.9.2174-2178.1988

Effect of Pentoses and Pentitols on Fermentation of Hay by Mixed Populations of Ruminal Microorganisms

Deborah J Gascoyne 1,†,*, Michael K Theodorou 1, Michael J Bazin 1
PMCID: PMC202832  PMID: 16347728

Abstract

Consecutive batch culture, a technique which involves sequential transfer of cultures to fresh medium at regular intervals, was used to establish mixed ruminal-microbial populations in an anaerobic medium containing highly digestible hay. Once volatile fatty acid production was stable, perturbations were imposed in consecutive cultures by the addition of one of each of the following pentoses or analogous pentitols: l-arabinose, d-lyxose, d-ribose, d-xylose, l-arabitol, d-arabitol (lyxitol), ribitol, and xylitol. With the exception of d-lyxose, the addition of pentoses caused marked increases in propionate and valerate production, and except for d-arabitol, pentitol addition caused increases in butyrate and valerate production. On transfer to and continued incubation in the control medium, volatile fatty acid production reverted to preperturbed levels. The presence of pentitols and pentoses significantly reduced the endpoint pH of cultures and the proportion of hay that was fermented. With all added substrates, the response to the perturbation was at its maximum within one incubation (i.e., within 48 h). Similarly, the variables being monitored all returned to control levels within one incubation. On the basis of these results, it is suggested that changes were related to the need to maintain a redox balance within anaerobic cultures rather than any significant changes in the microbial population that was present.

Full text

PDF
2174

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bryant M. P. Commentary on the Hungate technique for culture of anaerobic bacteria. Am J Clin Nutr. 1972 Dec;25(12):1324–1328. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/25.12.1324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Czerkawski J. W., Breckenridge G. Fermentation of various soluble carbohydrates by rumen micro-organisms with particular reference to methane production. Br J Nutr. 1969 Nov;23(4):925–937. doi: 10.1079/bjn19690104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. HUNGATE R. E. The anaerobic mesophilic cellulolytic bacteria. Bacteriol Rev. 1950 Mar;14(1):1–49. doi: 10.1128/br.14.1.1-49.1950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hagen The calcium orthophosphate solubilities as represented by a model in three dimensions. Acta Odontol Scand. 1975;33(2):67–83. doi: 10.3109/00016357509026346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hiltner P., Dehority B. A. Effect of soluble carbohydrates on digestion of cellulose by pure cultures of rumen bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983 Sep;46(3):642–648. doi: 10.1128/aem.46.3.642-648.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lister C. J., Smithard R. R. Effects of intraruminal administration of polyol to sheep. J Sci Food Agric. 1984 Jan;35(1):21–28. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2740350105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. McNAUGHT M. L. The utilization of non-protein nitrogen in the bovine rumen. 7. A qualitative and quantitative study of the breakdown of carbohydrate which accompanies protein formation in bovine rumen contains during in vitro incubation. Biochem J. 1951 Aug;49(3):325–332. doi: 10.1042/bj0490325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Miller T. L., Wolin M. J. A serum bottle modification of the Hungate technique for cultivating obligate anaerobes. Appl Microbiol. 1974 May;27(5):985–987. doi: 10.1128/am.27.5.985-987.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mountfort D. O., Asher R. A. Role of catabolite regulatory mechanisms in control of carbohydrate utilization by the rumen anaerobic fungus Neocallimastix frontalis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983 Dec;46(6):1331–1338. doi: 10.1128/aem.46.6.1331-1338.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Poutiainen E., Tuori M., Sirviö I. The fermentation of polyalcohols by rumen microbes in vitro [proceedings]. Proc Nutr Soc. 1976 Dec;35(3):140A–141A. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Scheinin A., Mäkinen K. K., Ylitalo K. Turku sugar studies. I. An intermediate report on the effect of sucrose, fructose and xylitol diets on the caries incidence in man. Acta Odontol Scand. 1974;32(6):383–412. doi: 10.3109/00016357409026549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sutton J. D. The fermentation of soluble carbohydrates in rumen contents of cows fed diets containing a large proportion of hay. Br J Nutr. 1968 Dec;22(4):689–712. doi: 10.1079/bjn19680080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Theodorou M. K., Gascoyne D. J., Akin D. E., Hartley R. D. Effect of phenolic acids and phenolics from plant cell walls on rumenlike fermentation in consecutive batch culture. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987 May;53(5):1046–1050. doi: 10.1128/aem.53.5.1046-1050.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wolin M. J. Metabolic interactions among intestinal microorganisms. Am J Clin Nutr. 1974 Nov;27(11):1320–1328. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/27.11.1320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES