Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1989 Jun;55(6):1512–1518. doi: 10.1128/aem.55.6.1512-1518.1989

Regulation of Bacterioplankton Production and Cell Volume in a Eutrophic Estuary

Peter Koefoed Bjørnsen 1,*, Bo Riemann 1, Jan Pock-Steen 1, Torkel Gissel Nielsen 1, Steen Jesper Horsted 1
PMCID: PMC202896  PMID: 16347945

Abstract

During three periods of 16 to 25 days, bacterioplankton production, bacterial cell volume, chlorophyll a, CO2 assimilation, and particulate organic carbon were measured in enclosures situated in the eutrophic estuary Roskilde Fjord, Denmark. The enclosures were manipulated with respect to sediment contact and contents of inorganic nutrients, planktivorous fish, and suspension-feeding bivalves. Nutrient enrichment, the presence of suspension feeders, and sediment contact induced pronounced changes in bacterial production, as well as minor changes in bacterial cell volume; however, these effects seemed to be indirect, transmitted via phytoplankton. Bacterial production, measured as [3H]thymidine incorporation, closely followed changes in phytoplankton biomass and production, with time lags of 5 to 10 days. Good correlations of mean bacterioplankton production to chlorophyll a concentration and CO2 assimilation suggested phytoplankton to be the dominating source of bacterial substrate, apparently independent of nutrient stress. Zooplankton >140 μm, bivalves, and sediment seemed to provide insignificant, if any, substrate for bacterioplankton, and benthic suspension feeders seemed not to act as direct competitors for dissolved organic carbon. The bacterioplankton mean cell volume, measured by image analysis, changed seasonally, with the smallest cells during the summer. Within each period, the bacterial cell volume correlated positively to growth rate and negatively to temperature.

Full text

PDF
1512

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bell R. T., Kuparinen J. Assessing phytoplankton and bacterioplankton production during early spring in lake erken, sweden. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1984 Dec;48(6):1221–1230. doi: 10.1128/aem.48.6.1221-1230.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bjørnsen P. K. Automatic determination of bacterioplankton biomass by image analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986 Jun;51(6):1199–1204. doi: 10.1128/aem.51.6.1199-1204.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ferguson R. L., Buckley E. N., Palumbo A. V. Response of marine bacterioplankton to differential filtration and confinement. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1984 Jan;47(1):49–55. doi: 10.1128/aem.47.1.49-55.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hagström A., Larsson U., Hörstedt P., Normark S. Frequency of dividing cells, a new approach to the determination of bacterial growth rates in aquatic environments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1979 May;37(5):805–812. doi: 10.1128/aem.37.5.805-812.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lovell C. R., Konopka A. Primary and bacterial production in two dimictic indiana lakes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985 Mar;49(3):485–491. doi: 10.1128/aem.49.3.485-491.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Manahan D. T., Wright S. H., Stephens G. C. Simultaneous determination of net uptake of 16 amino acids by a marine bivalve. Am J Physiol. 1983 Jun;244(6):R832–R838. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1983.244.6.R832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Newell S. Y., Christian R. R. Frequency of dividing cells as an estimator of bacterial productivity. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981 Jul;42(1):23–31. doi: 10.1128/aem.42.1.23-31.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sargent M. G. Control of cell length in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 1975 Jul;123(1):7–19. doi: 10.1128/jb.123.1.7-19.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Smits J. D., Riemann B. Calculation of cell production from [h]thymidine incorporation with freshwater bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988 Sep;54(9):2213–2219. doi: 10.1128/aem.54.9.2213-2219.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES