Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1989 Oct;55(10):2443–2447. doi: 10.1128/aem.55.10.2443-2447.1989

Evaluation of the Autoanalysis Colilert test for detection and enumeration of total coliforms.

T C Covert 1, L C Shadix 1, E W Rice 1, J R Haines 1, R W Freyberg 1
PMCID: PMC203102  PMID: 2513773

Abstract

The Autoanalysis Colilert (AC) test was compared with the membrane filter (MF), 10-tube multiple-tube fermentation (MTF) technique, and the presence-absence test as described in Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater for the detection and enumeration of total coliforms in water. The methods were evaluated with 31 samples from seven different sources. Each sample was analyzed by each of the techniques, using replicate 100-ml sample volumes. A total of 582 confirmed tubes were positive by the MTF test, and 533 tubes were positive by the AC test. Statistical analysis of the most-probable-number comparability data showed a statistically significant difference in the number of positive tubes, with the MTF test resulting in more positive tubes. There were no statistically significant differences in precision between the two methods. All the methods were comparable in detection of total coliforms. Levels of heterotrophic bacteria generally encountered in drinking water did not interfere with detection or enumeration of coliforms by the AC test.

Full text

PDF
2443

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Edberg S. C., Allen M. J., Smith D. B. National field evaluation of a defined substrate method for the simultaneous enumeration of total coliforms and Escherichia coli from drinking water: comparison with the standard multiple tube fermentation method. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988 Jun;54(6):1595–1601. doi: 10.1128/aem.54.6.1595-1601.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Edberg S. C., Atkinson B., Chambers C., Moore M. H., Palumbo L., Zorzon C. F., Singer J. M. Clinical evaluation of the MICRO-ID, API 20E, and conventional media systems for identification of Enterobacteriacea. J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Aug;10(2):161–167. doi: 10.1128/jcm.10.2.161-167.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Evans T. M., LeChevallier M. W., Waarvick C. E., Seidler R. J. Coliform species recovered from untreated surface water and drinking water by the membrane filter, standard, and modified most-probable-number techniques. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981 Mar;41(3):657–663. doi: 10.1128/aem.41.3.657-663.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Havelaar A. H., During M., Versteegh J. F. Ampicillin-dextrin agar medium for the enumeration of Aeromonas species in water by membrane filtration. J Appl Bacteriol. 1987 Mar;62(3):279–287. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1987.tb02410.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. KABLER P. W., CLARK H. F., GELDREICH E. E. SANITARY SIGNIFICANCE OF COLIFORM AND FECAL COLIFORM ORGANISMS IN SURFACE WATER. Public Health Rep. 1964 Jan;79:58–60. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Petzel J. P., Hartman P. A. A note on starch hydrolysis and beta-glucuronidase activity among flavobacteria. J Appl Bacteriol. 1986 Nov;61(5):421–426. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1986.tb04306.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES