Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Jun 25.
Published in final edited form as: Tetrahedron. 2007 Jun 25;63(26):5768–5796. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2007.02.058

Table 3. Spectroscopic comparison of natural and synthetic amphidinolide E (1) 1H NMR Data.

graphic file with name nihms25213f26.jpg

Proton Natural (Kobayashi, 600 MHz) Synthetic (Roush, 400 MHz)
2 3.26 (1H, dq, J = 10.0, 6.8 Hz) 3.26 (1H, m)
3 5.59 (1H, dd, J = 14.0, 10.0) 5.59 (1H, m) H3, H10 & H23 overlap
4 6.20 (1H, dd, J = 14.0, 10.6) 6.20 (1H, m) H4 and H5 overlap
5 6.16 (1H, dd, J = 14.5, 10.6) 6.16 (1H, m) H4 and H5 overlap
6 5.53 (1H, dd, J = 14.5, 8.5) 5.53 (1H, dd, J = 14.8, 8.8)
7 3.88 (1H, t, J = 8.5) 3.89 (1H, t, J = 8.8)
8 3.95 (1H, t, J = 8.5) 3.95 (1H, t, J = 8.4)
9 5.27 (1H, dd, J = 15.6, 8.5) 5.27 (1H, dd, J = 14.4, 7.6)
10 5.64 (1H, m) 5.64 (1H, m) H3, H10 & H23 overlap
11a 2.23 (1H, m) 2.23 (1H, m)
11b 1.82 (1H, m) 1.82 (1H, m)
12a 1.76 (1H, m) 1.76 (1H, m)
12b 1.48 (1H, m) 1.48 (1H, m)
13 3.41 (1H, m) 3.40 (1H, m)
14a 1.40 (1H, m) 1.40 (1H, m)
14b 1.25 (1H, m) 1.25 (1H, m)
15a 1.58 (1H, m) 1.58 (1H, m) overlapping w/water
15b 1.33 (1H, m) 1.33 (1H, m)
16 3.56 (1H, dt, J = 7.5, 7.1) 3.56 (1H, m)
17 3.72 (1H, dt, J = 7.5, 4.5) 3.72 (1H, m)
18 4.66 (1H, d, J = 8.3) 4.66 (1H, d, J = 9.2)
19 2.25 (1H, m) 2.25 (1H, m)
20a 2.40 (1H, d, J = 13.4) 2.40 (1H, d, J = 14.0)
20b 1.79 (1H, m) 1.79 (1H, m)
22 6.05 (1H, d, J = 15.9) 6.05 (1H, d, J = 15.2)
23 5.71 (1H, dt, J = 15.9, 6.8) 5.71 (1H, m) H3, H10 & H23 overlap
24 2.78 (2H, br d, J = 6.8) 2.78 (2H, m)
26a 4.75 (1H, s) 4.75 (1H, s)
26b 4.71 (1H, s) 4.71 (1H, s)
27 1.72 (3H, s) 1.72 (3H, s)
28a 4.98 (1H, s) 4.98 (1H, s)
28b 4.87 (1H, s) 4.87 (1H, s)
29 0.92 (3H, d, J = 6.6) 0.92 (3H, d, J = 6.8)
30 1.25 (3H, d, J = 6.8) 1.25 (3H, d, J = 6.8)