Skip to main content
British Journal of Cancer logoLink to British Journal of Cancer
. 1994 Oct;70(4):672–673. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1994.369

Intrauterine device use and risk of endometrial cancer.

F Parazzini 1, C La Vecchia 1, S Moroni 1
PMCID: PMC2033405  PMID: 7917915

Abstract

The relationship between intrauterine device (IUD) use and risk of endometrial cancer has been analysed in a case-control study conducted in Italy between 1983 and 1992, including 453 patients with histologically confirmed endometrial cancer and 1,451 controls admitted for acute, non-gynaecological, non-hormonal, non-neoplastic conditions to the same network of hospitals where cases had been identified. Two (0.4%) cases versus 36 (2.3%) controls reported ever using an IUD. The corresponding multivariate relative risk was 0.4 (95% CI 0.1-1.0). The results of this study and the few published available epidemiological data suggest a protective role of IUD use on endometrial carcinogenesis, but potential selective mechanisms for IUD utilisation (indication bias) should be carefully considered in the interpretation.

Full text

PDF
672

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Castellsagué X., Thompson W. D., Dubrow R. Intra-uterine contraception and the risk of endometrial cancer. Int J Cancer. 1993 Jul 30;54(6):911–916. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910540607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. El-Badrawi H. H., Hafez E. S., Barnhart M. I., Fayad M., Shafeek A. Ultrastructural changes in human endometrium with copper and nonmedicated IUDs in utero. Fertil Steril. 1981 Jul;36(1):41–49. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)45616-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. González-Angulo A., Aznar-Ramos R., Feria-Velasco A. Ultrastructural changes found in endometrium of women using Lippes intrauterine device. J Reprod Med. 1973 Feb;10(2):44–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. MANTEL N., HAENSZEL W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959 Apr;22(4):719–748. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Myatt L., Elder M. G., Lim L. Alterations in progesterone receptors in the rat uterus bearing an intra-uterine device during the oestrous cycle and early pregnancy. J Endocrinol. 1980 Dec;87(3):365–373. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.0870365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Parazzini F., La Vecchia C., Bocciolone L., Franceschi S. The epidemiology of endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 1991 Apr;41(1):1–16. doi: 10.1016/0090-8258(91)90246-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Parazzini F., La Vecchia C., Negri E., Fedele L., Balotta F. Reproductive factors and risk of endometrial cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Feb;164(2):522–527. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(11)80012-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sheppard B. L. Endometrial morphological changes in IUD users: a review. Contraception. 1987 Jul;36(1):1–10. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(87)90057-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Tamaya T., Nakata Y., Ohno Y., Nioka S., Furuta N. The mechanism of action of the copper intrauterine device. Fertil Steril. 1976 Jul;27(7):767–772. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK

RESOURCES