Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Aug 13.
Published in final edited form as: Tetrahedron. 2007 Aug 13;63(33):7926–7934. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2007.05.074

Constituents of the Leaves and Stem Bark of Aglaia foveolata

Angela A Salim a, Hee-Byung Chai a, Ismail Rachman b, Soedarsono Riswan b, Leonardus B S Kardono c, Norman R Farnsworth d, Esperanza J Carcache-Blanco a,e, A Douglas Kinghorn a,*
PMCID: PMC2034361  NIHMSID: NIHMS27288  PMID: 18698338

Abstract

The previously known potent cytotoxic agent silvestrol (1) (0.002% w/w yield) and five new flavagline derivatives (2-6) were isolated from the leaves of Aglaia foveolata collected in Indonesia. The new compound 5 has an unprecedented cyclic amide moiety in its cyclopenta[b]benzopyran skeleton, while compound 6 is a novel benzo[b]oxepine derivative in which the oxepine ring is cleaved. Pyramidatine (7), a biogenetic precursor of the new flavaglines 2-6, was isolated from the leaf extract investigated. Silvestrol was also isolated from the stem bark of A. foveolata (yield of 0.02% w/w) along with a new baccharane-type triterpenoid (8). The structures of the new compounds were elucidated on the basis of their NMR and mass spectrometric data. All new compounds isolated were tested against a panel of cancer cell lines, but only compound 2 was cytotoxic (IC50 range = 1.4-1.8 μM), and is the first member of the cyclopenta[b]benzopyran class found to exhibit this type of activity. Compound 2 also showed significant NF-κB inhibitory activity in an Elisa assay (IC50 = 0.37 μM).

Keywords: Aglaia foveolata, Meliaceae, Flavaglines, Cyclopenta[b]benzofuran, Cyclopenta[b]benzopyrans, Benzo[b]oxepine, Bisamide, Cytotoxicity, NF-κB inhibitory activity

INTRODUCTION

The genus Aglaia (Meliaceae) is distributed mainly in the tropical rain forests of Southeast Asia,1 and is characterized by the presence of unique secondary metabolites called “flavaglines”.2 Flavaglines are a group of compounds representative of the cyclopenta[b]benzofuran-, cyclopenta[b]benzopyran-, and benzo[b]oxepine-type skeletons, all of which are biogenetically derived from flavonoid and cinnamic amide moieties.2-4 To date, about 60 naturally occurring cyclopenta[b]benzofuran-type compounds, many of which exhibit insecticidal and antiproliferative activities, have been isolated from over 30 Aglaia species. The structural variation and biological properties of the flavaglines have been reviewed recently.5,6

There have been only two previous studies on Aglaia foveolata Pannell, which was studied initially by a collaborative French and Malaysian research group, and afforded two new dammarane-type triterpenes, foveolins A and B.7 In a later study, silvestrol and its isomer, episilvestrol, were identified as constituents of A. foveolata during a screening program for new antitumor agents from plants,8 as part of a multidisciplinary, collaborative natural products drug discovery project.9 Silvestrol is a highly potent cytotoxic agent for cancer cells, and possesses an unusual 1,4-dioxanyloxy moiety at position C-6 of the cyclopenta[b]benzofuran skeleton.8 Silvestrol was active in an in vivo murine hollow fiber test and also in the in vivo P388 murine leukemia model with a T/C value of 150% at 2.5 mg/kg/injection.8 Studies on its cellular mechanism of action in LNCaP (human hormone-dependent prostate cancer) cells showed that it induced apoptosis in a manner independent of p53 activity.10,11 Silvestrol has also shown selective and potent Bcl-2- and p53- independent antitumor activity against chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells obtained from patients, relative to normal peripheral blood mononuclear cells.12 Although the total synthesis of silvestrol has not been reported, the 1,4-dioxanyloxy moiety has been synthesized recently.13 Silvestrol has also been isolated from the bark of A. leptantha Miq. collected in Malaysia, and was found to inhibit the growth of PC3 (human prostate tumor) cells in a murine in vivo xenograft study.14

In our previous study, silvestrol was obtained from fruits and twigs of A. foveolata with yields of 0.01% and 0.0085% w/w, respectively. In the present investigation, the leaves and stem bark of recollected samples of A. foveolata were examined for the presence of silvestrol (1) and potentially new analogs of this compound.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Following bioassay-guided fractionation, silvestrol (1) was isolated from the CHCl3-soluble partitions of the MeOH extracts of the leaves and stem bark of A. foveolata, in yields of 0.002% and 0.02% w/w, respectively. From the leaf extract, five new flavaglines (2-6) and a known bisamide, pyramidatine (7),15 were obtained. In addition, a new baccharene-type triterpene (8), and a known triterpene, 17,24-epoxy-25- hydroxy-3-oxobaccharan-21-oic acid,8 were also isolated from the stem bark. The structures of all compounds were elucidated on the basis of their NMR and MS data, and, in the case of the known compounds, by comparison with literature spectroscopic data.

The new compound, 2, [α]20D -30.0 (c 0.16, CHCl3), was obtained as a white amorphous powder. In the HRESIMS, a sodiated molecular ion peak at m/z 675.2682 was consistent with a molecular formula of C38H40N2O8 (calcd for C38H40N2O8Na, 675.2682). The presence of twelve quaternary carbons, including two amide carbons (δC 167.5 and 170.0), nineteen methines, four methylenes, and three methyl carbons were established from the 13C and DEPT NMR spectra (Table 1). In the 1H NMR spectrum, characteristic benzene-ring signals (two monosubstituted, one p-disubstituted, and one 1,2,3,5- tetrasubstituted) and resonances for three methoxy groups were observed (Table 2). Furthermore, three methines at δH 3.22 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, H-3), 4.00 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, H-4), and 4.91 (s, H-10) were typical of a cyclopenta[b]benzopyran skeleton.5,16 The remaining methylenes and two amide protons at δH 5.49 (br t, J = 5.5 Hz, NH-12) and 6.46 (br t, J = 5.5 Hz, NH-17) showed correlations in the DQF-COSY spectrum, suggesting the presence of a 1,4-butanediamide chain. In the HMBC spectrum, a cross peak was observed between signals at δC 167.5 (C-18) and δH 7.82 (2H, d, J = 8.0 Hz, H-20,24), and indicated that one of the monosubstituted benzene rings is connected to this butanediamide chain. Further HMBC correlations from H-3 to C-2, C-10, C-11, and C-1′, and from H-4 to C-5, C-5a, C-11, C-1?, and C-2?,6?, established the connectivity of the 1,4-butanediamide moiety and the second monosubstituted benzene ring to C-3 and C-4, respectively. The relative configuration of compound 2 was determined from the analysis of 3J coupling constants and 2D NOESY correlations. The vicinal coupling constant value between H-3 and H-4 was 9.0 Hz, which was compatible with a H-3α and H-4β configuration.17 This configuration was further supported by the upfield 1H NMR signal of OMe-6 (δH 3.11), which was placed within the shielding zone of the phenyl ring at C-4α. In the NOESY spectrum, cross peaks between H-10/H-2′,6′, H-4/H-10, H-4/H-2?,6?, H-3/H-2?,6?, and H-3/NH-12 established an endo relationship between H-4 and H-10, and further confirm the H-3α, H-4β relative configuration. The new compound 2 has been named foveoglin A, and was assigned structurally as shown. To the best of our knowledge, there is only one previous report of the isolation of two other cyclopenta[b]benzopyran-type compounds possessing a benzoyl-1,4-butanediamide moiety, which were obtained from the leaves of A. andamanica Hiern collected in Thailand.18 The structures of these known compounds, pyramidaglains A and B, are similar to foveoglin A (2), except for the absence of a 10-acetoxy group in the latter compound and differences in the substituents affixed to positions 3 and 4.

Table 1.

13C NMR spectroscopic data for compounds 2 - 6 acquired in CDCl3a,b

Position 2 3 4 5 6
2 85.6 s 86.8 s 89.9 s 86.3 s 196.9 s
3 59.0 d 61.6 d 56.0 d 47.8 d 53.8 d
4 57.1 d 61.6 d 65.6 d 56.3 d 63.6 d
5 81.8 s 83.3 s 79.6 s 83.7 s 198.5 s
5a 104.2 s 106.0 s 110.4 s 104.4 s 105.8 s
6 160.3 s 158.8 s 156.3 s 158.3 s 162.0 s
7 93.0 d 92.7 d 92.5 d 92.7 d 91.7 d
8 160.8 s 160.9 s 160.9 s 161.3 s 166.4 s
9 93.9 d 93.7 d 93.8 d 93.4 d 94.3 d
9a 152.8 s 152.8 s 153.8 s 154.0 s 168.1 s
10 73.5 d 78.7 d 82.6 d 90.6 s -
11 170.0 s 173.4 s 173.8 s 174.0 s 168.1 s
13 39.0 t 39.0 t 39.3 t 38.6 t 38.9 t
14 26.2 t 26.0 t 26.2 t 25.6 t 26.3 t
15 26.3 t 26.5 t 26.9 t 27.0 t 26.9 t
16 39.4 t 39.5 t 39.7 t 39.7 t 39.3 t
18 167.5 s 167.6 s 167.8 s 167.7 s 167.4 s
19 134.5 s 134.5 s 134.4 s 134.7 s 134.5 s
20, 24 127.0 d 126.9 d 126.9 d 127.0 d 126.9 d
21, 23 128.6 d 128.6 d 128.6 d 128.4 d 128.6 d
22 131.5 d 131.5 d 131.5 d 131.2 d 131.4 d
1′ 129.2 s 130.2 s 129.8 s 128.6 s 129.0 s
2′, 6′ 128.0 d 129.3 d 128.6 d 128.7 d 131.3 d
3′, 5′ 113.6 d 113.7 d 113.1 d 113.7 d 113.7 d
4′ 159.3 s 159.5 s 158.9 s 159.9 s 163.4 s
1″ 136.8 s 136.7 s 137.4 s 135.3 s 136.9 s
2″, 6″ 128.6 d 128.5 d 129.2 d 127.1 d 128.9 d
3″, 5″ 127.7 d 127.7 d 128.0 d 127.1 d 129.1 d
4″ 127.0 d 127.0 d 126.8 d 125.8 d 127.6 d
OMe-6 55.5 q 55.7 q 56.2 q 56.1 q 56.0 q
OMe-8 55.4 q 55.3 q 55.2 q 55.3 q 55.6 q
OMe-4′ 55.4 q 55.4 q 55.4 q 55.4 q 55.4 q
a

Spectra were acquired at 100 MHz, TMS was used as internal standard .

b

Multiplicity was obtained from DEPT spectra.

Table 2.

1H NMR spectroscopic data for compounds 2 - 6 acquired in CDCl3a,b

2 3 4 5 6
3 3.22 d (9.0) 3.92 d (8.7) 4.67 d (5.8) 4.04 s 5.63 d (10.9)
4 4.00 d (9.0) 4.12 d (8.7) 3.44 d (5.8) 3.77 s 5.30 d (10.9)
7 5.86 d (2.2) 5.77 d (2.2) 6.12 d (2.1) 6.00 d (2.2) 5.95 d (2.4)
9 6.26 d (2.2) 6.04 d (2.2) 6.01 d (2.1) 5.47 d (2.2) 6.05 d (2.4)
10 4.91 s 4.89 s 4.28 d (9.6) -
13 2.93 m (6.5) 2.97 dd (13.3, 6.1) 3.47 m 3.30 m 3.02 dd (12.1, 6.0)
2.61 m (6.5) 2.88 dd (13.3, 6.1) 2.32 td (14.3, 7.0)
14 0.98 m 1.13 m 1.26 m 1.64 m 1.31-1.21 m
1.51 m
15 1.56 p (7.7) 1.20 m 1.26 m 1.80 m 1.31-1.21 m
1.63 m
16 3.29 m (6.5) 3.22 dq (6.4, 2.2) 3.47 m 3.51 m 3.30 p (6.1)
3.16 m (6.5) 3.31 m 3.30 m
20,24 7.82 d (8.0) 7.78 d (7.0) 7.77 d (7.5) 7.77 d (7.3) 7.77 d (7.0)
21, 23 7.47 t (7.7) 7.45 t (7.3) 7.42 d (7.2) 7.38 d (7.5) 7.44 t (7.0)
22 7.53 t (7.2) 7.51 t (7.3) 7.49 t (7.5) 7.46 t (7.2) 7.51 t (7.2)
2′, 6′ 7.62 d (8.9) 7.74 d (8.7) 7.64 d (8.9) 7.62 d (8.7) 7.97 d (8.9)
3′, 5′ 6.89 d (8.7) 6.89 d (8.7) 6.86 d (9.0) 6.99 d (8.7) 6.84 d (8.9)
2″, 6″ 6.93 m 6.98 m 6.89 m 6.70 m 7.36 d (7.3)
3″, 5″ 7.16 m 7.15 m 7.10 m 6.93 m 7.24 d (7.5)
4″ 7.16 m 7.15 m 7.10 m 6.93 m 7.16 t (7.3)
OMe-6 3.11 s 3.07 s 3.86 s 3.88 s 3.91 s
OMe-8 3.79 s 3.71 s 3.77 s 3.51 s 3.78 s
OMe-4′ 3.77 s 3.76 s 3.79 s 3.87 s 3.81 s
NH-12 5.49 br t (5.5) 6.89 m 6.56 br t (5.5) - 5.55 br t (5.8)
NH-17 6.46 br t (5.5) 6.37 br t (5.5) 6.61 br t (5.5) 6.61 br t (5.0) 6.34 br t (5.6)
OH-5 5.44 s 5.80 s 5.50 s
OH-10 6.03 d (9.6)
a

Spectra were acquired at 400 MHz, TMS was used as internal standard .

b

Coupling constants were measured in Hz.

The HRESIMS of compound 3 [white amorphous powder, [a]22D +170 (c 0.20, CHCl3)] was used to establish a molecular formula of C38H40N2O8, the same as that obtained for compound 2. The 1H and 13C NMR spectra of compounds 2 and 3 were comparable, suggesting that compound 3 also possesses a cyclopenta[b]benzopyran skeleton with a benzoyl-1,4-butanediamide moiety. In the HMBC spectrum, the same correlations were also observed for both compounds, indicating in 3 the same connectivity of the diamide moiety and the unsubstituted phenyl ring, as determined for compound 2. NOESY correlations and the 3J(H-3,H-4) coupling constant (8.7 Hz) of 3 revealed that these two compounds also have the same relative configuration at positions C-3 and C-4. However, the lack of any NOE interaction between H-4 and H-10 in compound 3 (foveoglin B) suggested that this compound is the C-10 epimer of compound 2. Due to the availability of foveoglin B, its monoacetate (3a) was also prepared in order to investigate the effect of a different substituent at position C-10 on its cytotoxicity. The structure of 3a was confirmed from its NMR and MS data. In the 1H NMR spectrum of 3a, proton H-10 was shifted downfield to δH 5.96 ppm due to the adjacent OAc group in position C-10.

Compound 4, obtained as amorphous white powder with an [a]22D value of +10 (c 0.30, CHCl3), also gave the same molecular formula as compounds 2 and 3, as determined by HRESIMS. Both the 1H and 13C NMR spectra of compound 4 were similar to those of 3, suggesting that they have the same gross structures. However, HMBC correlations from both δH 4.67 (H-3) and δH 3.44 (H-4) to δC 137.4 (C-1?) and 173.8 (C-11); from H-3 to δC 89.9 (C-2), 129.8 (C-1′), and 129.2 (C-2?,6?); and from H-4 to δC 79.6 (C-5) and 110.4 (C-5a), clearly indicated that the substituents at C-3 and C-4 were mutually exchanged in these compounds. In the 1H NMR spectrum of 4, the OMe-6 resonance was observed at δH 3.86, which confirmed that this methoxy group was no longer in the shielding region of the aromatic ring. The configurations at positions C-3 and C-4 were determined as H-3β and H-4α, respectively, based on the vicinal coupling constant (J = 5.8 Hz),17 and was confirmed by NOESY correlations between H-3/H-2′,6′, H-3/H2?,6?, H-4/H-2?,6?, and H-4/NH-12. A NOE cross peak was also observed between OH-10 (δH 6.03, d, J = 9.6 Hz) and H-3 (δH 4.67, d, J = 5.8 Hz), which confirmed the endo relationship between this hydroxyl group and H-3 proton. Therefore, the new compound 4 (isofoveoglin) was proposed as shown. As for compound 3, a monoacetate derivative (4a) was prepared, and its structure was confirmed by NMR and mass spectrometry data. The presence of an acetyl at position C-10 caused the downfield shift of proton H-10 to δH 6.10 ppm. In addition, H-4 was also shifted to δH 5.20 ppm, which confirmed the endo relationship between this proton with the acetyl group at position C-10 in 4a.

The fourth new compound isolated from A. foveolata leaves, 5, [α]20D -51.7 (c 0.41, CHCl3), displayed a sodiated molecular ion peak in the HRESIMS at m/z 673.2528, corresponding to a molecular formula of C38H38N2O8 (calcd for C38H38N2O8Na, 673.2526). Characteristic signals in the 1H and 13C NMR spectra confirmed the presence of a cyclopenta[b]benzopyran skeleton and a benzoyl-1,4-butanediamide moiety. The 1H NMR spectrum of 5 was similar to that of compound 4, except for the absence of signals belonging to H-10 and one amide proton. The molecular formula also confirmed that compound 5 has two less hydrogens than compound 4. As evident from the 13C and DEPT spectra, the signal for a hydroxymethine carbon at position C-10 was replaced by a quaternary carbon at δC 90.6. In the HMBC spectrum, cross peaks between this quaternary carbon with H-4 and H-13 were observed, indicating that N-12 formed a bond with C-10 to create a five-membered cyclic amide, an unprecedented moiety among the Aglaia cyclopenta[b]benzopyran derivatives5,6 (Figure 1). Key HMBC correlations from H-3 to C-1′, C-1?, and C-2?,6? confirmed the position of the unsubstituted phenyl group at C-3. Both protons H-3 (δH 4.04) and H-4 (δH 3.77) appeared as singlets in the 1H NMR spectrum, which would only be possible if their dihedral angle was close to 90°. Insight II molecular modeling was used to generate the 3D structure of compound 5, and the optimized model showed a H-3 and H-4 dihedral angle of 87.5° (Figure 2). Furthermore, NOESY correlations between H-3/H-4, H-3/H-2′,6′, H-3/H-2?,6?, H-4/H-2?,6?, H-13/H-2′,6′, and H-2′,6′/H-2?,6? are also compatible with this model. Thus, the new compound 5 (cyclofoveoglin) was assigned as indicated.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Selected HMBC correlations for compound 5.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Preferred configuration and selected NOE interactions for compound 5

Compound 6, [α]20D -16.1 (c 0.18, CHCl3), was obtained as a white amorphous solid with a molecular formula of C37H38N2O8, as determined from the sodiated molecular ion peak at m/z 661.2529 observed in the HRESIMS (calcd for C37H38N2O8Na, 661.2526). The presence of three aromatic rings and a benzoyl-1,4-butanediamide moiety, as in the previous four compounds (2 - 5), was evident from the characteristic signals in the 1H and 13C NMR spectra of 6. However, relative to these earlier described compounds, the proton signals of H-3 and H-4 were shifted downfield in 6 by more than 1 ppm, and appeared at δH 5.63 and 5.30, respectively. In addition, the 13C NMR spectrum also showed the presence of two conjugated keto groups at δC 198.5 and 196.9. The carbon resonances of 6 were similar to those of known benzo[b]oxepine-type compounds,5,16,19 except for the presence of an extra conjugated keto signal, and the absence of three resonances, one belonging to a quaternary carbon at position C-2 and two representative of the COOMe moiety at position C-10. In the HMBC spectrum, correlations were observed from the signals at δH 5.63 (d, J = 10.9 Hz, H-3) to C-2, C-1′, C-1?, and C-2?,6?; from δH 5.30 (d, J = 10.9 Hz, H-4) to C-5 and C-11; and from δH 7.97 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, H-2′,6′) to C-2, establishing the structure proposed for 6 (Figure 3). The relative configurations at positions C-3 and C-4 were determined from the H-3 and H-4 vicinal coupling constant, 2D NOESY data, and molecular modeling. The two possible relative configurations at stereocenters C-3 and C-4, 3R*,4R* and 3R*,4S*, were modeled using Insight II. The 3R*,4S* model (Figure 4) showed all the observed NOESY correlations and was consistent with the observed 3J(H-3,H-4) coupling constant (10.9 Hz). This result is also in agreement with previous studies on other Aglaia benzo[b]oxepine derivatives, in which only the 3R*,4S* and 3S*,4R* isomers have been isolated so far.4,16,19,20 Compound 6, which was named secofoveoglin, is a novel benzo[b]oxepine derivative of a type unprecedented in nature, in which the oxepine ring is cleaved.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Selected HMBC correlations for compound 6

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Preferred configuration and selected NOE interactions for compound 6

A known bisamide, pyramidatine (7), was isolated as the major constituent from the leaf extract. Pyramidatine has been isolated previously from Aglaia andamanica,18 and Aglaia pyramidata Hance [syn. A. silvestris (M. Roemer) Merrill].15 The isolation of pyramidatine from A. foveolata leaves further supports the proposed biogenetic origin of the flavaglines.3,4 The benzoyl-1,4-butanediamide part of pyramidatine constitutes the bisamide side chain of flavaglines isolated in the present study, while the second aromatic ring can be found as the unsubstituted aryl ring of the flavaglines.

Compound 8 was obtained as white amorphous powder, [α]20D +33.2 (c 0.46, CHCl3), and showed a sodiated molecular ion peak at m/z 559.3606 [M + Na]+ in the HRESIMS, supporting a molecular formula of C31H52O7 (calcd for C31H52O7Na, 559.3611). The 1H NMR spectrum of 8 exhibited signals from seven tertiary methyl groups at δH 0.93 (s), 0.99 (s), 1.00 (s), 1.17 (s), 1.23 (s), 1.24 (s), and 1.29 (s), two characteristic oxymethine groups at δH 3.54 (t, J = 5.7 Hz, H-24) and 3.66 (d, J = 11.0 Hz, H-17), and one methoxy group at δH 3.72 (s). The 13C and DEPT NMR spectra exhibited the presence of 31 signals (eight CH3, ten CH2, five CH, and eight C), including two carbonyls (δC 175.6, C-21 and 178.9, C-3), two oxygenated quaternary carbons (δC 75.0, C-25 and 76.4, C-4), and two oxygenated methines (δC 75.7, C-17 and 77.8, C-24). The characteristic signals in the 1H and 13C NMR spectra of 1 were comparable to those of 17,24-epoxy-25-hydroxy-3-oxobaccharan-21-oic acid, a baccharane-type triterpene previously isolated in our earlier work on A. foveolata.8 The main differences observed in the 13C NMR spectrum of these two compounds were the absence of a saturated ketone resonance at position C-3, which was replaced by a carbonyl signal in 8, and the presence of an oxygenated quaternary carbon instead of a non-oxygen-bearing carbon at position 4. In addition, an extra methoxy signal at δH 3.72 was observed for compound 8, which showed a HMBC correlation to C-21 (δC 175.6), and in turn exhibited HMBC cross peaks with H-16, H-17, and H-22. In the HMBC spectrum of 8, correlations were observed between the carbonyl at δC 178.9 (C-3) and H-2 (δH 2.21, m, and 2.49, m) and between the oxygenated quaternary carbon at δC 76.4 (C-4) and δH 1.23 (s, H3-29), 1.29 (s, H3-28), and 1.37 (m, H-5), confirming that the A ring of this new compound has been cleaved between positions C-3 and C-4. The relative stereochemistry of compound 8 was determined using a 2D NOESY experiment. The observed NOE correlations between H-17/CH3-26, H-17/CH3-27, H-17/CH3-30, and CH3-30/H-9 established the α- and β-orientations of H-17 and H-24, respectively. In addition, significant NOE enhancements were also observed between CH3-19/CH3-29 and CH3-18/H-13, and were consistent with the relative stereochemistry of other known baccharane-type triterpenes isolated previously.8 The new compound 8 was elucidated as 17,24-epoxy-25-hydroxy-21- methoxy-3,4-seco-baccharane.

All of the compounds isolated were tested in a small panel of cancer cell lines, and only silvestrol (1) and foveoglin A (2) were cytotoxic for the cell lines tested (Table 3). Isofoveogline (4) and cyclofoveoglin (5) showed weak cytotoxicity, while the remaining compounds were inactive. Interestingly, foveoglin B (3), the C-10 epimer of foveoglin A (2), did not exhibit any cytototoxic activity, which suggests that an endo orientation between H-10 and H-4 is necessary for cytotoxicity. Structural modification at position C-10, from a hydroxyl to an acetoxyl, caused the loss of activity in compound 4. The cyclization of the amide groups as in compound 5 did not affect the cytotoxicity of these compounds. Previously, only a few of cyclopenta[b]benzopyran-type flavaglines have been tested for cancer cell cytotoxicity, and none were shown to exhibit cytotoxic activity.16,20-23 It was thought previously that the cyclopenta[b]benzopyran-type compounds are inactive, with only the cyclopenta[b]benzofuran representatives of the flavaglines exerting this type of biological activity. However, this present investigation has shown that some cyclopenta[b]benzopyran derivatives may be cytotoxic, depending on the type of the amide moiety, the positions of substituents at C-3 and C-4, and the orientation of the OH-10. Pyramidatine (7), the precursor of compounds 2 - 6, was not cytotoxic in the cell lines tested. Pyramidatine has been tested previously in a different panel of cancer cell lines, and was found to be inactive.15

Table 3.

Cytotoxic Activity of Compounds 1, 2, 4, and 5a

Cell lineb
Compound Lu1 LNCaP MCF-7
1c 0.0012 0.0015 0.0015
2 1.8 1.4 1.8
4 17.5 21.0 16.1
5 18.1 16.0 13.5
Paclitaxeld 0.0023 0.0047 0.0007
a

Compounds 3, 3a, 4a, 6 - 8 were considered to be inactive, since their ED50 values were >20 μM against the tested cell lines. Results are expressed as ED50 values (μM)

b

Key to cell lines used: Lu1 = human lung cancer; LNCaP = hormone-dependent human prostate cancer; MCF-7 = human breast cancer.

c

Data obtained from ref. 8.

d

Used as a positive control.

All new compounds were also tested for NF-κB inhibitory activity in an enzyme- based Elisa assay. It was found that only foveoglin A (2) was active, with an IC50 value of 0.37 μM. All other compounds exhibited IC50 >5 μM, and were considered inactive. Previously, only a limited number of cyclopenta[b]benzopyran-type has been tested for the NF-κB inhibitory activity,23,24 and only one showed potent NF-κB inhibitory activity.23

The isolation of silvestrol (1) in this investigation is significant, since the leaves of A. foveolata potentially could be used as a renewable resource for the future supply of this promising antileukemic agent, in the event of its further development.

graphic file with name nihms-27288-f0001.jpg

EXPERIMENTAL

General

Optical rotations were measured using a Perkin-Elmer 241 automatic polarimeter (Waltham, MA). UV spectra were obtained with a Spectramax plus 384 spectrometer (Molecular Devices Corporation, Sunnyvale, CA). IR spectra were run on a Nicolet Protégé 460 FTIR spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA). NMR spectroscopic data were recorded in CD3OD at room temperature using a Bruker DRX-400 spectrometer. Electrospray ionization (ESI) mass spectrometric analyses were performed with a 3-tesla Finnigan FTMS-2000 Fourier transform mass spectrometer. HPLC were run on a SunFire Semiprep (5 μm, 150 × 10 mm i.d.) or SunFire Preparative (5 μm, 150 × 19 mm i.d.) C18 OBD column (Waters, Milford, MA). All solvents used from chromatographic separations were purchased from Fisher Scientific (Fair Lawn, NJ). Molecular modeling was performed using the InsightII program (Accelrys Software, Inc., Burlington, MA) with Discover® minimization energy.

Plant material

The leaves and stem bark of Aglaia foveolata Pannell were collected at Timpah village, Kapuas Regency, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia, in July 2006. The plant was identified by S. R. and I. R. Voucher specimens (collection number SR-IS.2) have been deposited at the Herbarium Bogoriense, Bogor, Indonesia. A. foveolata is a small tree ca. 9 m height and ca. 14 cm diameter breast height, with free branches at ca. 7 m height.

Extraction and Isolation of the Leaves

The dried and milled leaves (1.5 kg) of A. foveolata were extracted with MeOH (3 × 2.0 L) at room temperature for two days each. The combined MeOH extracts were concentrated in vacuo (300 mL) and water was added (300 mL) to give an aqueous MeOH solution. This aqueous extract was partitioned in turn with hexane (3 × 400 mL) and CHCl3 (3 × 400 mL), to afford dried hexane- (greenish gum, 40 g) and CHCl3-soluble (dark greenish gum, 70 g) residues. The CHCl3 soluble extract was subjected to a silica gel column chromatography (11×31 cm, 70-230 mesh) eluted with CHCl2-MeOH (100:1? 1:1) to give eight fractions (F1 - F8). Fraction F3 (MCF-7 cell line, ED50 = 2.2 μg/mL, 40 g) was further subjected to another silica gel column (7×33 cm, 230-400 mesh) eluted with hexane-EtOAc-MeOH (1:1:0? 0:1:1) to furnish nine sub-fractions (F301-309). Pyramidatine15 (7) precipitated from sub-fraction F306 (hexane-EtOAc-MeOH 10:10:1.5→10:10:2) as a white amorphous powder (1.0 g), and was filtered off. The filtrate of F306 (MCF-7 cells, ED50 <0.16 μg/mL, 2.1 g) was chromatographed on Diaion HP-20 gel (eluted with 90% MeOH) to remove the chlorophylls, followed by reversed-phase HPLC using semipreparative C18 column (CH3CN-H2O, 45? 52% in 30 min, 3 mL/min), to afford foveoglin B (3) (6 mg, tR 19.1 min), cyclofoveoglin (5) (4 mg, tR 24.5 min), isofoveoglin (2) (4 mg, tR 26.2 min), and secofoveoglin (6) (2 mg, tR 28.0 min). Sub-fraction F308 (ED50 < 0.16 μg/mL, 2.3 g) was chromatographed on Diaion HP-20 gel (eluted with 90% MeOH), followed by Sephadex LH-20 gel (2.5 × 75 cm, in 100% MeOH), and was finally separated by RP-HPLC (CH3CN-H2O, 45? 50% in 20 min, then 50? 60% in 10 min, 3 mL/min) to furnish silvestrol8 (1, 11 mg, tR 11.8 min), foveoglin A (3) (3.0 mg, tR 15.9 min), and additional quantity of foveoglin B (2) (6.5 mg, tR 29.4 min).

Extraction and Isolation of the Stem Bark

The dried and milled stem bark (1.5 kg) of A. foveolata was extracted with MeOH (4 × 3.0 L) at room temperature for up to three days each. The combined extracts were concentrated in vacuo, and water was added to make a 90% aqueous MeOH solution (400 mL). The aqueous solution was partitioned in turn with hexane (3 × 400 mL) and CHCl3 (3 × 400 mL) to give a light greenish gum (40 g) and a dark greenish gum (70 g), respectively. The CHCl3-soluble extract was partitioned on a silica gel column (7.4×32 cm, 70-230 mesh) eluted with CHCl2-MeOH (100:1? 1:1) to give ten fractions (F01 - F010). Fraction F04 (MCF-7 cells, ED50 = 0.8 μg/mL, 20 g) was chromatographed on silica gel (5×36 cm, 230-400 mesh) eluted with hexane-EtOAc-MeOH (1:1:0? 0:1:1) to furnish nine subfractions (F0401 - F0409). An amorphous white powder precipitated from subfraction F0403 (hexane-EtOAc-MeOH 1:1:0.02), which was identified as 17,24-epoxy-25-hydroxy-3-oxobaccharan-21-oic acid8 (3.0 g). Subfraction F0409 (1.0 g) were purified on a Sephadex LH-20 column (2.5×68 cm) eluted with MeOH to give the new compound 8 (80 mg) and impure silvestrol (300 mg). Compound 8 was further purified on a reversed-phase HPLC using preparative C18 column (CH3CN-H2O 1:1, 7 mL/min, UV detector at 210 nm, tR 14.7 min). Fraction F05 (MCF-7 cells, ED50 = <0.16 μg/mL, 4.35 g) was purified in the same manner as fraction F04 to give an additional quantity of impure silvestrol (150 mg). Silvestrol obtained from both fractions was combined and was finally purified on a C18 reverse-phase column (2.5×17 cm) to afford pure silvestrol (1) (300 mg).

Foveoglin A (2)

white amorphous powder; [α]20D -30.0 (c 0.16, CHCl3); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 203 (4.64), 213 (4.57) (br shoulder) nm; IR (film) νmax 3330, 2946, 1641, 1618, 1516, 1494, 1456, 1305, 1254, 1216, 1147, 1099, 931 cm-1; 1H NMR data, see Table 2; 13C NMR data, see Table 1; HRESIMS m/z 675.2682 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C38H40N2O8Na, 675.2682).

Foveoglin B (3)

white amorphous powder; [α]20D +170 (c 0.20, CHCl3); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 203 (4.76), 214 (4.71) (br shoulder) nm; IR (film) νmax 3316, 2936, 1637, 1620, 1587, 1520, 1456, 1305, 1254, 1214, 1149 cm-1; 1H NMR data, see Table 2; 13C NMR data, see Table 1; HRESIMS m/z 675.2673 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C38H40N2O8Na, 675.2682).

Isofoveoglin (4)

white amorphous powder; [α]20D +10 (c 0.30, CHCl3); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 203 (4.72), 214 (4.63) (br shoulder) nm; IR (film) νmax 3263, 1618, 1596, 1518, 1439, 1305, 1254, 1151, 1099, 931 cm-1; 1H NMR data, see Table 2; 13C NMR data, see Table 1; HRESIMS m/z 675.2683 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C38H40N2O8Na, 675.2682).

Cyclofoveoglin (5)

light yellow amorphous powder; [α]20D -51.7 (c 0.41, CHCl3); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 203 (4.74), 214 (4.64) (br shoulder) nm; IR (film) νmax 3332, 2936, 1694, 1622, 1515, 1456, 1257, 1150, 1101, 866 cm-1; 1H NMR data, see Table 2; 13C NMR data, see Table 1; HRESIMS m/z 673.2528 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C38H38N2O8Na, 673.2526).

Secofoveogline (6)

white amorphous powder; [α]20D -16.1 (c 0.18, CHCl3); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 203 (4.80), 215 (4.65) (br shoulder), 294 (4.55) nm; IR (film) νmax 3332, 2936, 2854, 1644, 1621, 1600, 1512, 1491, 1455, 1418, 1292, 1219, 1162 cm-1; 1H NMR data, see Table 2; 13C NMR data, see Table 1; HRESIMS m/z 661.2529 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C37H38N2O8Na, 661.2526).

Compound 8

white amorphous powder; [α]20D +33.2 (c 0.46, CHCl3); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 205 (3.50) nm; IR (film) νmax 3454, 2956, 1717, 1457, 1387, 919 cm-1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 3.72 (3H, s, COOCH3), 3.66 (1H, d, J = 11.0 Hz, H-17), 3.54 (1H, d, J = 5.7 Hz, H-24), 2.49 (1H, m, H-2a), 2.43 (1H, m, H-1a), 2.40 (1H, m, H-13), 2.21 (1H, m, H-2b), 2.12 (1H, m, H-22a), 2.06 (1H, m, H-12a), 1.89 (1H, m, H-16a), 1.85 (1H, m, H-23a), 1.79 (1H, m, H-1b), 1.69 (2H, m, H-22b and H-23b), 1.56 (2H, m, H2-6), 1.50 (1H, m, H-9), 1.48 (1H, m, H-15a), 1.44 (2H, m, H2-11), 1.37 (2H, m, H-5 and H-16b), 1.29 (5H, m, H2-7 and H3-28), 1.23 (3H, s, H3-29), 1.24 (3H, s, H3- 26), 1.17 (3H, s, H3-27), 1.09 (1H, m, H-12b), 1.05 (1H, m, H-15b), 1.00 (3H, s, H3-19), 0.99 (3H, s, H3-18), 0.93 (3H, s, H3-30); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 178.9 (s, C-3), 175.6 (s, C-21), 77.8 (d, C-24), 76.4 (s, C-4), 75.7 (d, C-17), 75.0 (s, C-25), 51.6 (q, COOCH3), 51.4 (d, C-5), 47.3 (s, C-20), 42.6 (s, C-14), 42.3 (d, C-9), 41.3 (s, C-10), 40.5 (s, C-8), 38.1 (d, C-13), 34.3 (q, C-28), 34.1 (t, C-1), 32.9 (t, C-7), 32.4 (t, C-22), 32.3 (t, C-16), 29.1 (t, C-2), 28.0 (t, C-15), 27.3 (q, C-29), 27.1 (q, C-27), 26.9 (q, C-26), 24.1 (t, C-12), 22.4 (t, C-11), 20.7 (t, C-23), 20.6 (q, C-19), 20.3 (t, C-6), 15.7 (q, C-18), 15.1 (q, C-30); HRESIMS m/z 559.3606 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C31H52 O7Na, 559.3611).

Preparation of foveoglin B-10-O-acetate (3a)

Foveoglin B (3) (2 mg) was acetylated with acetic anhydride (0.5 mL) and pyridine (0.5 mL) at room temperature for 24 h. The reaction product was purified by preparative TLC developed using hexane-EtOAc-MeOH (1:1:0.2) to give compound 3a (1.5 mg) (75% yield).

Compound 3a

white amorphous powder; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.77 (2H, td, J = 7.0, 1.5 Hz, H-20 and H-24), 7.56 (2H, td, J = 8.9, 2.0 Hz, H-2′ and H-6′), 7.52 (1H, tt, J = 7.2, 2.2 Hz, H-22), 7.45 (2H, tt, J = 7.0, 1.5 Hz, H-21 and H-23), 7.16 (3H, m, H-3″ - H- 5″), 6.99 (2H, m, H-2″ and H-6″), 6.89 (2H, td, J = 8.9, 2.0 Hz, H-3′ and H-5′), 6.25 (1H, br t, J = 5.3 Hz, NH-17), 6.15 (1H, d, J = 2.2 Hz, H-9), 5.96 (1H, s, H-10), 5.82 (1H, d, J = 2.2 Hz, H-7), 5.66 (1H, br t, J = 5.6 Hz, NH-12), 5.27 (1H, s, OH), 4.35 (1H, d, J = 10.2 Hz, H-4), 3.77 (3H, s, OCH3-8), 3.76 (3H, s, OCH3-4′), 3.75 (1H, m, H-3, partly overlapped with OCH3-4′), 3.21 (2H, br q, J = 6.3 Hz, H2-16), 3.08 (3H, s, OCH3-6), 2.99 (1H, dd, J = 13.1, 6.3 Hz, H-13a), 2.91 (1H, dd, J = 13.1, 6.3, H-13b), 2.28 (3H, s, COCH3), 1.13 (4H, m, H2-14 and H2-15); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 170.4 (C-11), 169.3 (OCOCH3), 167.4 (C-18), 161.1 (C-8), 159.6 (C-4′), 158.8 (C-6), 152.3 (C-9a), 136.1 (C-1″), 134.5 (C-19), 131.4 (C-22), 128.7 (C-1′), 128.6 (2C, C-2′ and C-6′), 128.5 (2C, C-21 and C-23), 128.3 (2C, C-2″ and C-6″), 127.8 (2C, C-3′ and C-5′), 127.2 (C-4″), 126.9 (2C, C-20 and C-24), 113.7 (2C, C-3′ and C-5′), 106.2 (C-5a), 94.0 (C-9), 92.8 (C-7), 86.1 (C-2), 81.6 (C-5), 79.6 (C-10), 60.4 (C-3), 60.1 (C-4), 55.5 (OCH3-4′), 55.2 (2C, OCH3-6 and OCH3-8), 39.5 (C-16), 39.2 (C-13), 26.5 (C-15), 26.3 (C-14), 21.4 (OCOCH3); HRESIMS m/z 717.2789 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C40H42N2O9Na, 717, 2788).

Preparation of isofoveoglin-10-O-acetate (4a)

Isofoveoglin (4) (2 mg) was acetylated following the above procedure to give compound 4a (1.4 mg) (70% yield).

Compound 4a

white amorphous powder; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.82 (2H, td, J = 7.2, 1.4 Hz, H-20 and H-24), 7.61 (2H, td, J = 9.0, 2.0 Hz, H-2′ and H-6′), 7.48 (1H, tt, J = 7.3, 1.9 Hz, H-22), 7.39 (2H, br t, J = 7.3 Hz, H-21 and H-23), 7.06 (3H, m, H-3″ - H- 5″), 6.86 (4H, d, J = 8.5 Hz, H-3′, H-5′ and H-2″, H-6″), 6.67 (1H, br t, J = 5.5 Hz, NH), 6.17 (1H, d, J = 2.2 Hz, H-7), 6.10 (1H, s, H-10), 6.02 (1H, d, J = 2.2 Hz, H-9), 5.53 (1H, s, OH), 5.20 (1H, d, J = 5.3 Hz, H-3), 3.94 (3H, s, OCH3-6), 3.81 (3H, s, OCH3-4′), 3.74 (3H, s, OCH3-8), 3.53 (2H, p, J = 5.5 Hz, H2-16), 3.44 (1H, d, J = 5.3 Hz, H-4), 3.41 (2H, m, H2-13, partly overlapped with H-3), 1.95 (3H, s, COCH3), 1.70 (4H, m, H2-14 and H2-15); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 171.9 (C-11), 169.2 (OCOCH3), 167.5 (C-18), 161.2 (C-8), 159.2 (C-4′), 156.5 (C-6), 153.7 (C-9a), 137.9 (C-1″), 134.6 (C-19), 131.3 (C-22), 128.9 (C-1′), 128.8 (2C, C-2″ and C-6″), 128.5 (2C, C-2′ and C-6′), 128.3 (2C, C-21 and C-23), 127.8 (2C, C-3′ and C-5′), 127.0 (2C, C-20 and C-24), 126.5 (C-4″), 113.3 (2C, C-3′ and C-5′), 109.1 (C-5a), 93.9 (C-9), 92.8 (C-7), 87.1 (C-2), 81.8 (C-5), 79.2 (C-10), 59.4 (C-4), 56.2 (C-3), 55.5 (OCH3-6), 55.2 (OCH3-8), 53.3 (OCH3-4′), 39.5 (C-16), 39.1 (C-13), 27.4 (C-15), 26.7 (C-14), 20.8 (OCOCH3); HRESIMS m/z 717.2785 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C40H42N2O9Na, 717, 2788).

Cytotoxicity evaluation

Compounds isolated from the leaves and stem bark of A. foveolata were tested against the Lu1 (human lung carcinoma), LNCaP (hormone-dependent human prostate carcinoma), and MCF-7 (human breast carcinoma), according to an established protocol.25

NF-κB Elisa assay

The NF-κB inhibitory assay was carried out according to the published protocol.23 Rocaglamide was used as a positive control, and exhibited IC50 values of 2.0 μM in this assay.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported, in part, by grant U19 CA52956 funded by the National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD. We are grateful for the College of Pharmacy, the Ohio State University, for the provision of the NMR spectroscopic equipment used in this investigation. We also thank Mr. P. Eichenseer, Campus Chemical Instrument Center, The Ohio State University, for the mass spectrometric data.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

REFERENCES AND NOTES

  • 1.Pannell CM.A Taxonomic Monograph of the Genus Aglaia Lour. (Meliaceae) Kew Bulletin Additional Series XVI 1992HMSO, Kew, Richmond, Surrey; UK [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Brader G, Vajrodaya S, Greger H, Bacher M, Kalchhauser H, Hofer O. J. Nat. Prod. 1998;61:1482. doi: 10.1021/np9801965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nugroho BW, Edrada RA, Wray V, Witte L, Bringmann G, Gehling M, Proksch P. Phytochemistry. 1999;51:367. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bacher M, Hofer O, Brader G, Vajrodaya S, Greger H. Phytochemistry. 1999;52:253. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Proksch P, Edrada R, Ebel R, Bohnenstengel FI, Nugroho BW. Curr. Org. Chem. 2001;5:923. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kim S, Salim AA, Swanson SM, Kinghorn AD. Anticancer Agents Med. Chem. 2006;6:319. doi: 10.2174/187152006777698123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Roux D, Martin M-T, Adeline M-T, Sevenet T, Hadi AHA, Pais M. Phytochemistry. 1998;49:1745. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9422(98)00305-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hwang BY, Su B-N, Chai H, Mi Q, Kardono LBS, Afriastini JJ, Riswan S, Santarsiero BD, Mesecar AD, Wild R, Fairchild CR, Vite GD, Rose WC, Farnsworth NR, Cordell GA, Pezzuto JM, Swanson SM, Kinghorn AD.J. Org. Chem 2004693350 ibid, J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 6156 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kinghorn AD, Farnsworth NR, Soejarto DD, Cordell GA, Swanson SM, Pezzuto JM, Wani MC, Wall ME, Oberlies NH, Kroll DJ, Kramer RA, Rose WC, Vite GD, Fairchild CR, Peterson RW, Wild R. Pharm. Biol. 2003;41(Suppl):53–67. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kim S, Hwang BY, Su B-N, Chai H, Mi Q, Kinghorn AD, Swanson SM. Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2004;45:132. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mi Q, Kim S, Hwang BY, Su B-N, Chai H, Arbieva ZH, Kinghorn AD, Swanson SM. Anticancer Res. 2006;26:3349. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Edwards RB, Lucas DM, Lozanski G, Johnson AJ, Su B-N, Lin TS, Byrd JC, Kinghorn AD, Grever MR. Abstracts of Papers; 48th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Hematology; Orlando, FL. December 9-12, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.El Sous M, Rizzacasa MA. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005;46:293. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Meurer-Grimes B, Yu J, Vairo GL. United States Patent US 6,710175 B2 23March2004
  • 15.Saifah E, Puripattanavong J, Likhitwitayawuid K, Cordell GA, Chai H, Pezzuto JM. J. Nat. Prod. 1993;56:473. doi: 10.1021/np50094a004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dumontet V, Thoison O, Omobuwajo OR, Martin MT, Perromat G, Chiaroni A, Riche C, Pais M, Sevenet T. Tetrahedron. 1996;52:6931. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Previous studies on other cyclopenta[bc]benzopyran-type compounds have shown that 3J(H-3,H-4) of 5-6 Hz is compatible with the H-3β,H-4α configuration, while the vicinal coupling constant of 9-10 Hz is compatible with the H-3α,H-4β configuration.5,6
  • 18.Puripattanavong J, Weber S, Brecht V, Frahm AW. Planta Med. 2000;66:740. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-9901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kim S, Su B-N, Riswan S, Kardono LBS, Afriastini JJ, Gallucci JC, Chai H, Farnsworth NR, Cordell GA, Swanson SM, Kinghorn AD. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005;46:9021. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kim S, Chin Y-W, Su B-N, Riswan S, Kardono LBS, Afriastini JJ, Chai H, Farnsworth NR, Cordell GA, Swanson SM, Kinghorn AD.J. Nat. Prod 2006691769 ibid, J. Nat. Prod. 2007, 70, 714 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bohnenstengel FI, Steube KG, Meyer C, Nugroho BW, Hung PD, Kiet LC, Proksch PZ. Naturforsch. 1999;54c:55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bohnenstengel FI, Steube KG, Meyer C, Quentmeier H, Nugroho BW, Proksch PZ. Naturforsch. 1999;54c:1075. doi: 10.1515/znc-1999-1212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Salim AA, Pawlus AD, Chai H-B, Farnsworth NR, Kinghorn AD, Carcache-Blanco EJ. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007;17:109. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2006.09.084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Baumann B, Bohnenstengel F, Siegmund D, Wajant H, Weber C, Herr I, Debatin KM, Proksch P, Wirth T. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:44791. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M208003200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Seo E-K, Kim N-C, Mi Q, Chai H, Wall ME, Wani MC, Navarro HA, Burgess JP, Graham JG, Cabieses F, Tan GT, Farnsworth NR, Pezzuto JM, Kinghorn AD. J. Nat. Prod. 2001;64:1483. doi: 10.1021/np0103158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES