Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1987 Jan;53(1):27–32. doi: 10.1128/aem.53.1.27-32.1987

Biofilm Dynamics and Kinetics during High-Rate Sulfate Reduction under Anaerobic Conditions

Per Halkjaer Nielsen 1
PMCID: PMC203596  PMID: 16347263

Abstract

The sulfate kinetics in an anaerobic, sulfate-reducing biofilm were investigated with an annular biofilm reactor. Biofilm growth, sulfide production, and kinetic constants (Km and Vmax) for the bacterial sulfate uptake within the biofilm were determined. These parameters were used to model the biofilm kinetics, and the experimental results were in good agreement with the model predictions. Typical zero-order volume rate constants for sulfate reduction in a biofilm without substrate limitation ranged from 56 to 93 μmol of SO24-cm−3 h−1 at 20°C. The temperature dependence (Q10) of sulfate reduction was equivalent to 3.4 at between 9 and 20°C. The measured rates of sulfate reduction could explain the relatively high sulfide levels found in sewers and wastewater treatment systems. Furthermore, it has been shown that sulfate reduction in biofilms just a few hundred micrometers thick is limited by sulfate diffusion into biofilm at concentrations below 0.5 mM. This observation might, in some cases, be an explanation for the relatively poor capacity of the sulfate-reducing bacteria to compete with the methanogenic bacteria in anaerobic wastewater treatment in submerged filters.

Full text

PDF
27

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Hamilton W. A. Sulphate-reducing bacteria and anaerobic corrosion. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1985;39:195–217. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.39.100185.001211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hoehn R. C., Ray A. D. Effects of thickness on bacterial film. J Water Pollut Control Fed. 1973 Nov;45(11):2302–2320. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ingvorsen K., Zehnder A. J., Jørgensen B. B. Kinetics of Sulfate and Acetate Uptake by Desulfobacter postgatei. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1984 Feb;47(2):403–408. doi: 10.1128/aem.47.2.403-408.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ingvorsen K., Zeikus J. G., Brock T. D. Dynamics of bacterial sulfate reduction in a eutrophic lake. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981 Dec;42(6):1029–1036. doi: 10.1128/aem.42.6.1029-1036.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Isa Z., Grusenmeyer S., Verstraete W. Sulfate reduction relative to methane production in high-rate anaerobic digestion: microbiological aspects. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986 Mar;51(3):580–587. doi: 10.1128/aem.51.3.580-587.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Isa Z., Grusenmeyer S., Verstraete W. Sulfate reduction relative to methane production in high-rate anaerobic digestion: technical aspects. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986 Mar;51(3):572–579. doi: 10.1128/aem.51.3.572-579.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lovley D. R., Klug M. J. Sulfate reducers can outcompete methanogens at freshwater sulfate concentrations. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983 Jan;45(1):187–192. doi: 10.1128/aem.45.1.187-192.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Widdel F., Pfennig N. Studies on dissimilatory sulfate-reducing bacteria that decompose fatty acids. I. Isolation of new sulfate-reducing bacteria enriched with acetate from saline environments. Description of Desulfobacter postgatei gen. nov., sp. nov. Arch Microbiol. 1981 Jul;129(5):395–400. doi: 10.1007/BF00406470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Williamson K., McCarty P. L. A model of substrate utilization by bacterial films. J Water Pollut Control Fed. 1976 Jan;48(1):9–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES