Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1987 Apr;53(4):832–838. doi: 10.1128/aem.53.4.832-838.1987

Isolation of Cellulolytic Anaerobic Extreme Thermophiles from New Zealand Thermal Sites

Christopher H Sissons 1,†,*, Keith R Sharrock 1,‡, Roy M Daniel 1, Hugh W Morgan 1
PMCID: PMC203765  PMID: 16347327

Abstract

Avicel enrichment cultures from 47 thermal-pool sites in the New Zealand Rotorua-Taupo region were screened for growth and carboxymethyl cellulase activity at 75°C. Eight anaerobic cellulolytic cultures were obtained. The effect of temperature on carboxymethyl cellulase activity was measured, and bacteria were isolated from the five best cultures. Bacteria from two sources designated TP8 and TP10 grew at 75°C, accumulated reducing sugar in the growth medium and gave free cellulases with avicelase activity. Bacteria from sources designated Tok4, Tok8, and Wai21 grew at 75°C, accumulated no free sugars in the medium, and gave free carboxymethyl cellulases with virtually no avicelase activity. All were obligate anaerobic nonsporeforming rods which stained gram negative, grew on pentoses as well as hexoses, and gave ethanol and acetate as major fermentation end products. The isolated strain which produced the most active and stable cellulases (trivially designated TP8.T) had lower rates of free endocellulase accumulation at 75°C than did Clostridium thermocellum at 60°C, but its cellulase activity against avicel and filter paper in culture supernatants was comparable. Tested at 85°C, TP8.T carboxymethyl cellulases included components which were very stable, whereas C. thermocellum carboxymethyl cellulases were all rapidly inactivated. The TP8.T avicelase activity was relatively unaffected by Triton X-100, EDTA, and dithiothreitol. Evidence was obtained for the existence of unisolated, cellulolytic extreme thermophiles producing cellulases which were more stable and active than those from TP8.T.

Full text

PDF
832

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bayer E. A., Kenig R., Lamed R. Adherence of Clostridium thermocellum to cellulose. J Bacteriol. 1983 Nov;156(2):818–827. doi: 10.1128/jb.156.2.818-827.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brock T. D., Od'ea K. Amorphous ferrous sulfide as a reducing agent for culture of anaerobes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1977 Feb;33(2):254–256. doi: 10.1128/aem.33.2.254-256.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bryant M. P. Commentary on the Hungate technique for culture of anaerobic bacteria. Am J Clin Nutr. 1972 Dec;25(12):1324–1328. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/25.12.1324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cowan D. A., Daniel R. M. Purification and some properties of an extracellular protease (caldolysin) from an extreme thermophile. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1982 Aug 10;705(3):293–305. doi: 10.1016/0167-4838(82)90251-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Daniel R. M., Cowan D. A., Morgan H. W., Curran M. P. A correlation between protein thermostability and resistance to proteolysis. Biochem J. 1982 Dec 1;207(3):641–644. doi: 10.1042/bj2070641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. HUNGATE R. E. The anaerobic mesophilic cellulolytic bacteria. Bacteriol Rev. 1950 Mar;14(1):1–49. doi: 10.1128/br.14.1.1-49.1950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Johnson E. A., Sakajoh M., Halliwell G., Madia A., Demain A. L. Saccharification of Complex Cellulosic Substrates by the Cellulase System from Clostridium thermocellum. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 May;43(5):1125–1132. doi: 10.1128/aem.43.5.1125-1132.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lamed R., Setter E., Bayer E. A. Characterization of a cellulose-binding, cellulase-containing complex in Clostridium thermocellum. J Bacteriol. 1983 Nov;156(2):828–836. doi: 10.1128/jb.156.2.828-836.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lee B. H., Blackburn T. H. Cellulase production by a thermophilic clostridium species. Appl Microbiol. 1975 Sep;30(3):346–353. doi: 10.1128/am.30.3.346-353.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ljungdahl L. G., Bryant F., Carreira L., Saiki T., Wiegel J. Some aspects of thermophilic and extreme thermophilic anaerobic microorganisms. Basic Life Sci. 1981;18:397–419. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4684-3980-9_23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mandels M., Andreotti R., Roche C. Measurement of saccharifying cellulase. Biotechnol Bioeng Symp. 1976;(6):21–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ng T. K., Ben-Bassat A., Zeikus J. G. Ethanol Production by Thermophilic Bacteria: Fermentation of Cellulosic Substrates by Cocultures of Clostridium thermocellum and Clostridium thermohydrosulfuricum. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981 Jun;41(6):1337–1343. doi: 10.1128/aem.41.6.1337-1343.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ng T. K., Weimer T. K., Zeikus J. G. Cellulolytic and physiological properties of Clostridium thermocellum. Arch Microbiol. 1977 Jul 26;114(1):1–7. doi: 10.1007/BF00429622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ng T. K., Zeikus J. G. Comparison of Extracellular Cellulase Activities of Clostridium thermocellum LQRI and Trichoderma reesei QM9414. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981 Aug;42(2):231–240. doi: 10.1128/aem.42.2.231-240.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ng T. K., Zeikus J. G. Purification and characterization of an endoglucanase (1,4-beta-D-glucan glucanohydrolase) from Clostridium thermocellum. Biochem J. 1981 Nov 1;199(2):341–350. doi: 10.1042/bj1990341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Peterson G. L. A simplification of the protein assay method of Lowry et al. which is more generally applicable. Anal Biochem. 1977 Dec;83(2):346–356. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(77)90043-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Reynolds P. H., Sissons C. H., Daniel R. M., Morgan H. W. Comparison of Cellulolytic Activities in Clostridium thermocellum and Three Thermophilic, Cellulolytic Anaerobes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986 Jan;51(1):12–17. doi: 10.1128/aem.51.1.12-17.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Saddler J. N. Factors limiting the efficiency of cellulase enzymes. Microbiol Sci. 1986 Mar;3(3):84–87. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Weimer P. J., Zeikus J. G. Fermentation of cellulose and cellobiose by Clostridium thermocellum in the absence of Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1977 Feb;33(2):289–297. doi: 10.1128/aem.33.2.289-297.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wood T. M., Wilson C. A., Stewart C. S. Preparation of the cellulase from the cellulolytic anaerobic rumen bacterium Ruminococcus albus and its release from the bacterial cell wall. Biochem J. 1982 Jul 1;205(1):129–137. doi: 10.1042/bj2050129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES