Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1987 May;53(5):958–965. doi: 10.1128/aem.53.5.958-965.1987

Use of Monodispersed, Fluorescently Labeled Bacteria to Estimate In Situ Protozoan Bacterivory

Barry F Sherr 1,*, Evelyn B Sherr 1, Robert D Fallon 1,
PMCID: PMC203794  PMID: 16347355

Abstract

We have developed a procedure for preparing monodispersed, fluorescently labeled bacteria (FLB), which may be used to measure virtually instantaneous rates of protozoan bacterivory in natural waters. FLB can be prepared both from natural bacterioplankton assemblages and from clonal isolates and can be stored in frozen suspension or freeze-dried without apparent loss of fluorescence intensity. They are not toxic to protozoa and can be metabolized to support bacterivorous protozoan growth rates equal to those on the same strain of unstained, viable bacteria. In experiments comparing uptake of FLB with uptake of fluorescent latex microspheres by protozoan assemblages in a salt marsh tidal creek, we found that both pelagic oligotrichous ciliates and phagotrophic flagellates ingested FLB with a frequency 4- to 10-fold greater than they ingested the microspheres. Consequently, it appears that the use of latex microspheres leads to underestimation of protozoan bacterivory and that the FLB technique is superior for estimating instantaneous rates of in situ protozoan grazing on bacterioplankton.

Full text

PDF
958

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bird D. F., Kalff J. Bacterial grazing by planktonic lake algae. Science. 1986 Jan 31;231(4737):493–495. doi: 10.1126/science.231.4737.493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bratbak G., Dundas I. Bacterial dry matter content and biomass estimations. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1984 Oct;48(4):755–757. doi: 10.1128/aem.48.4.755-757.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fuhrman J. A., McManus G. B. Do bacteria-sized marine eukaryotes consume significant bacterial production? Science. 1984 Jun 15;224(4654):1257–1260. doi: 10.1126/science.224.4654.1257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hobbie J. E., Daley R. J., Jasper S. Use of nuclepore filters for counting bacteria by fluorescence microscopy. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1977 May;33(5):1225–1228. doi: 10.1128/aem.33.5.1225-1228.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Sanders R. W., Porter K. G. Use of metabolic inhibitors to estimate protozooplankton grazing and bacterial production in a monomictic eutrophic lake with an anaerobic hypolimnion. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986 Jul;52(1):101–107. doi: 10.1128/aem.52.1.101-107.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Wikner J., Andersson A., Normark S., Hagström A. Use of genetically marked minicells as a probe in measurement of predation on bacteria in aquatic environments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986 Jul;52(1):4–8. doi: 10.1128/aem.52.1.4-8.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES