Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1987 Jun;53(6):1327–1332. doi: 10.1128/aem.53.6.1327-1332.1987

Application of Most-Probable-Number Statistics to Direct Enumeration of Microorganisms

D J Roser 1, H J Bavor 1,*, S A McKersie 1
PMCID: PMC203864  PMID: 16347364

Abstract

A novel method for rapid determination of total microbial cell numbers was investigated. The method involves the application of most-probable-number estimation statistics to direct microscopic counting of microbial cells by using a particle sizing graticule. Its accuracy and reliability were tested with computer simulations of bacterial cell distributions encountered in ecological studies. Good estimates of cell numbers were obtained when the cell density varied from 3 to 6,000 cells per field, i.e., over 3 orders of magnitude. Low levels of contagion did not markedly influence cell estimates, although high levels, corresponding to discrete scattered microcolonies, did. However, these could be recognized visually. Estimates of cell numbers in Breed smears confirmed its speed and good correlation with the standard quadrat counting technique under real experimental conditions.

Full text

PDF
1327

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ARMITAGE P. An examination of some experimental cancer data in the light of the one-hit theory of infectivity titrations. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959 Dec;23:1313–1330. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bjørnsen P. K. Automatic determination of bacterioplankton biomass by image analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986 Jun;51(6):1199–1204. doi: 10.1128/aem.51.6.1199-1204.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bott T. L., Kaplan L. A. Bacterial biomass, metabolic state, and activity in stream sediments: relation to environmental variables and multiple assay comparisons. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985 Aug;50(2):508–522. doi: 10.1128/aem.50.2.508-522.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Eisenhart C., Wilson P. W. STATISTICAL METHODS AND CONTROL IN BACTERIOLOGY. Bacteriol Rev. 1943 Jun;7(2):57–137. doi: 10.1128/br.7.2.57-137.1943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. MORAN P. A. Another test for heterogeneity of host resistance in dilution assays. J Hyg (Lond) 1958 Sep;56(3):319–322. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400037815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. MORAN P. A. The dilution assay of viruses. II. J Hyg (Lond) 1954 Dec;52(4):444–446. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400036913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. MORAN P. A. The dilution assay of viruses. J Hyg (Lond) 1954 Jun;52(2):189–193. doi: 10.1017/s002217240002739x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Pettipher G. L., Rodrigues U. M. Semi-automated counting of bacteria and somatic cells in milk using epifluorescence microscopy and television image analysis. J Appl Bacteriol. 1982 Dec;53(3):323–329. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1982.tb01278.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Roser D., Nedwell D. B., Gordon A. A note on 'plotless' methods for estimating bacterial cell densities. J Appl Bacteriol. 1984 Apr;56(2):343–347. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1984.tb01358.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Sieracki M. E., Johnson P. W., Sieburth J. M. Detection, enumeration, and sizing of planktonic bacteria by image-analyzed epifluorescence microscopy. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985 Apr;49(4):799–810. doi: 10.1128/aem.49.4.799-810.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES