Skip to main content
British Journal of Experimental Pathology logoLink to British Journal of Experimental Pathology
. 1985 Feb;66(1):1–5.

The effect of adjuvant arthritis on the subsequent local inflammatory response in rats.

F R Mangan, J P Rager, M J Thomson
PMCID: PMC2041017  PMID: 3970825

Abstract

An assessment was made of the cellular inflammatory response to the subcutaneous implantation of sterile nitrocellulose discs and polyvinyl sponges in both normal rats and rats with adjuvant-induced arthritis. It was found that from 3 days after adjuvant injection the treated animals exhibited a reduced accumulation of inflammatory cells onto the nitrocellulose discs and that this impairment in response was not apparent until the discs had been retained for longer than 24 h. When discs were implanted after non-arthritogenic doses of adjuvant constituents or injection of brewer's yeast no effect was seen on the subsequent response. When polyvinyl sponges were used in adjuvant-treated animals a similar initial reduction in cellular accumulation was observed, which was later followed by increased cell numbers associated with enhanced granuloma formation. Differential cell counts revealed that both neutrophil and mononuclear cell types were affected. Some of the possible mechanisms involved in these observations are discussed.

Full text

PDF
1

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baumgartner W. A., Beck F. W., Lorber A., Pearson C. M., Whitehouse M. W. Adjuvant disease in rats: biochemical criteria for distinguishing several phases of inflammation and arthritis. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1974 Feb;145(2):625–630. doi: 10.3181/00379727-145-37863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Boyle E. A., Mangan F. R. The effect of a novel, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory compound, nabumetone (BRL 14777), on cellular infiltration into 24-hour polyvinyl sponge implants in the rat, compared with some steroidal and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1982 Sep;34(9):570–575. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1982.tb04795.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Glenn E. M., Gray J., Kooyers W. Chemical changes in adjuvant-induced polyarthritis of rats. Am J Vet Res. 1965 Sep;26(114):1195–1203. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Görög P., Kovács I. B. Experimental inflammation and tumor growth: chemical carcinogenesis in adjuvant arthritic rats. Inflammation. 1979 Sep;3(4):359–364. doi: 10.1007/BF00913494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Nakamura H., Shimizu M. Accelerated granuloma formation in adjuvant-induced arthritic rats and its modification by antirheumatic drugs. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1979 Oct;211(1):20–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Normann S. J., Schardt M. A macrophage inflammation test using subcutaneous nitrocellulose filters. J Reticuloendothel Soc. 1978 Feb;23(2):153–160. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Normann S. J., Schardt M., Sorkin E. Cancer progression and monocyte inflammatory dysfunction: relationship to tumour excision and metastasis. Int J Cancer. 1979 Jan 15;23(1):110–113. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910230119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Tannenbaum H., Poskitt K. The leukocyte adherence inhibition assay in adjuvant-induced disease in rats. J Rheumatol. 1980 May-Jun;7(3):293–300. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British journal of experimental pathology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES