Skip to main content
British Journal of Experimental Pathology logoLink to British Journal of Experimental Pathology
. 1981 Feb;62(1):74–78.

Thymus-dependent and thymus-independent antibody responses: contrasting patterns of immunosuppression.

I E Addison, J W Babbage
PMCID: PMC2041648  PMID: 6971650

Abstract

The effects of mitoclomine, an anti-tumour agent, and of cortisone acetate on the antibody response of mice to thymus-dependent and thymus-independent antigens were compared. Both agents yielded patterns of immunosuppression which differed from that seen after X-rays, an agent which is likely to be active equally against T and B cells. Mitoclomine, at low doses, depressed thymus-independent responses the most; this effect can be explained if the drug is more active against B than T cells. Cortisone acetate at low doses, while depressing thymus-dependent responses, increased thymus-independent responses; this can be explained if the drug is more active against T than B cells. Thus three different patterns of immunosuppression (for X-rays, mitoclomine and cortisone acetate) can be interpreted in terms of effects simply on T or B cells.

Full text

PDF
74

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Addison I. E. A comparison of thymus dependent and thymus independent antibody responses made by different numbers and populations of immunocompetent cells. Br J Exp Pathol. 1974 Apr;55(2):177–186. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Addison I. E. The effect of x-rays on thymus dependent and thymus independent antibody formation. Br J Exp Pathol. 1974 Oct;55(5):487–491. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berenbaum M. C., Brent L., Kilshaw P. J. The therapeutic significance of the dose response curve for antilymphocytic serum. Transplantation. 1971 Jul;12(1):18–27. doi: 10.1097/00007890-197107000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ford W. L., Simmonds S. J. The tempo of lymphocyte recirculation from blood to lymph in the rat. Cell Tissue Kinet. 1972 Mar;5(2):175–189. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2184.1972.tb01014.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Playfair J. H., Purves E. C. Separate thymus dependent and thymus independent antibody forming cell precursors. Nat New Biol. 1971 Jun 2;231(22):149–151. doi: 10.1038/newbio231149a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Vos O. Radiation sensitivity and post-irradiation repair of mouse lymphatic cells in vivo and in vitro. A study with the parent to F1 hydrid graft-versus-host reaction. Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med. 1967;13(4):317–333. doi: 10.1080/09553006814550291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British journal of experimental pathology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES