Abstract
In migrating eukaryotic cells, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), filamentous actin (F-actin), and monomeric Rho GTPases are key components of a complex positive-feedback system that maintains and amplifies a phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate signal at the leading edge of the cell. This lipid signal is required for cell polarization and movement. In leukocytes and Dictyostelium, activation or inhibition of any one of these components leads to the activation or inhibition, respectively, of the others via undefined feedback interactions. The role of Ca2+ signals in migrating leukocytes is controversial, and there has been no indication that Ca2+ participates in positive feedback. Here, we demonstrate that an extracellular Ca2+ influx is required for positive feedback at the leading edge of spontaneously polarized macrophages. Inhibition of extracellular Ca2+ influx leads to loss of leading-edge PI3K activity, disassembly of F-actin, cessation of ruffling, and decay of chemoattractant signals. Conversely, increasing cytosolic Ca2+ enhances membrane ruffling, PI3K activity, and F-actin accumulation. Overall, these findings demonstrate that an extracellular Ca2+ influx is an essential component, together with PI3K and F-actin, of the positive-feedback cycle that maintains leading-edge structure and ruffling activity and that supports the chemoattractant response. Strikingly, the Ca2+-sensitive enzyme protein kinase Cα (PKCα) is enriched at the leading edge, and its enrichment is sensitive to blockade of Ca2+ influx, to inhibition of PI3K activity, and to F-actin depolymerization. These findings support the working hypothesis that a local, leading-edge Ca2+ signal recruits PKCα as a central player in the positive-feedback loop.
Keywords: actin; calcium; chemotaxis; phosphoinositide 3-kinase; phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate
The importance of Ca2+ in directed cell migration has been long recognized (1–5) and controversial (6, 7). Leukocyte migration, for example, slows and stops when the Ca2+ is depleted from the extracellular medium or is chelated from the medium with EGTA or when the Ca2+ channel blocker La3+ is added to the extracellular medium (1–5, 8). Similarly, migration slows when the intracellular Ca2+ is buffered (9, 10). Furthermore, in many leukocytes, addition of exogenous phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate (PI(3,4,5)P3), the lipid product of PI3K, stimulates a Ca2+ influx, whereas PI3K inhibition blocks Ca2+ influx, implicating a link between PI3K and Ca2+ signaling (11–13). All of these observations suggest that Ca2+ plays an important, but undefined, role in cell polarization or migration. However, the function of Ca2+ in leukocyte migration has not yet been determined, and current models for leading-edge maintenance and signaling do not propose a role for Ca2+ (14–16).
The formation of an actively ruffling leading edge is a key cellular event that always precedes migration, and maintenance of a leading edge is required for persistent migration (14–16). The present study investigates the potential link between Ca2+ signaling and leading-edge maintenance by fluorescence imaging in live RAW264.7 mouse macrophages (hereafter referred to as RAW cells). Using fluorescent proteins to determine the cellular localizations of PI3K activity, actin, and PKCα, the study finds that an extracellular Ca2+ influx (i) participates in a positive-feedback cycle with PI3K and F-actin activities at the leading edge, (ii) contributes to the organization and maintenance of an actively ruffling leading edge, (iii) localizes PKCα to the ruffling leading edge, and (iv) supports prolonged stimulation of PI3K activity by chemoattractant.
Results
Characterization of Polarized RAW Cells as a Model System for the Macrophage Leading Edge.
To investigate the contribution of Ca2+ signaling to leading-edge structure and function, we used spontaneously polarized RAW cells as a macrophage model system. We have found that RAW cells display spontaneous polarization when plated on glass and exhibit active ruffling of the leading-edge membrane [Fig. 1A and supporting information (SI) Movie 1]. Because the trailing end of these cells adheres tightly to the glass, the cell becomes quite elongated and fails to crawl, yielding a spatially and kinetically stable leading edge. The resulting polarized cell is an ideal model system for quantitating the cellular processes essential for leading-edge maintenance and signaling.
Fig. 1.
Characterization of polarized RAW cells. (A) Wild-type, polarized RAW cells imaged at 5-s intervals as visualized by Nomarski optics, illustrating the pronounced, ruffling leading edge. (B and C) Time-lapse fluorescence images of spontaneously polarized RAW cells expressing GFP-Akt1PH (Upper) or GFP-actin (Lower) treated with 500 nM wortmannin (WORT) (B) or 10 μg ml−1 latrunculin B (LatB) (C). Images show the cell at the time indicated relative to drug addition, illustrating the redistribution of fluorescent protein from the leading-edge region to the cell body (defined as the regions to the left and right of the vertical bar, respectively) after treatment. For each time series, the intensity scaling was the same for all images. Images are representative of at least five experiments. (D) Plots show the integrated GFP-Akt1PH fluorescence versus time for the leading-edge and cell body regions before and after wortmannin (Left) or LatB (Right) addition, thereby quantitating the transfer of fluorescent protein from the leading edge to the cell body after treatment. See also SI Movies 1, 3, and 5–7 for A, B, and C.
The establishment of cell polarity required for spontaneous and chemotactic cell movement is believed to involve a positive-feedback loop that self-organizes the leading edge of migrating amoeboid cells ranging from Dictyostelium to leukocytes (15–19). The currently identified components of this feedback system are (i) activation of PI3K to produce the signaling lipids PI(3,4,5)P3 and PI(3,4)P2 (18, 20), (ii) polymerization of actin (19, 21), and (iii) activation of the monomeric GTPase Rac1 (22, 23). To assay for PI3K activity, we used GFP fused to the Akt1 pleckstrin homology (PH) domain (GFP-Akt1PH), which binds specifically to PI(3,4,5)P3 and PI(3,4)P2 and is widely used as a PI3K activity sensor (24). GFP-Akt1PH was observed to accumulate at the leading edge of ruffling RAW cells (Fig. 1 B–D and SI Fig. 5A), and its accumulation was stable for long periods (>15 min) (SI Fig. 5B and SI Movie 2). To visualize F-actin, we used both (i) GFP fused to β-actin (GFP-actin), which incorporates into F-actin filaments, and (ii) fluorescently labeled phalloidin, which preferentially stains F-actin. Both probes were found predominantly in leading-edge ruffles (Fig. 1 B–D and SI Fig. 5A). Finally, to observe Rac1, we stained cells with fluorescent anti-Rac1 antibody, which also localized predominantly to the leading edge (SI Fig. 5A). Thus, all three components of the established positive-feedback loop targeted preferentially to the leading-edge membrane and ruffles of polarized cells. These enrichments of Akt1, F-actin, and Rac1 at the leading edge arose from specific recruitment of these components and not simply from increased membrane density or cytoplasmic volume in the ruffling region (see multiple controls in SI Fig. 5 A–E).
To directly test whether spontaneously polarized RAW cells possess a PI3K/F-actin positive-feedback loop at their leading edge, we next investigated the consequence of inhibiting PI3K activity or F-actin treadmilling in ruffling cells expressing GFP-Akt1PH or GFP-actin. The PI3K inhibitor wortmannin decreases PI(3,4,5)P3 at the leading edge of cells by inhibiting its production, whereas phosphatases continue to hydrolyze it (25). Wortmannin treatment of cells caused rapid loss of GFP-Akt1PH from the leading edge and stopped ruffling (Fig. 1B Upper and SI Movie 3). Quantitative analysis of GFP-Akt1PH fluorescence shows that, upon wortmannin treatment, the leading-edge region experiences a large loss of fluorescence on the same time scale as a significant fluorescence increase is observed in the cell body (Fig. 1D, left plot and SI Fig. 6A). DMSO, the vehicle for wortmannin, affected neither ruffling nor the cellular distribution of GFP-Akt1PH (SI Fig. 6B and SI Movie 4). Treatment with wortmannin also caused loss of GFP-actin from the leading-edge ruffles (Fig. 1B Lower and SI Movie 5), as predicted by the positive-feedback hypothesis requiring an essential link between PI3K activity and F-actin polymerization.
Latrunculin B (LatB) sequesters monomeric actin and prevents F-actin polymerization, resulting in loss of lamellipodial structure (18). In polarized cells, GFP-actin at the leading edge was rapidly lost after LatB treatment (Fig. 1C Lower and SI Movie 6). Consistent with the positive-feedback hypothesis, LatB treatment also caused loss of GFP-Akt1PH from the leading edge (Fig. 1C Upper; Fig. 1D, right plot; and SI Movie 7). Interestingly, the mechanism of Akt1PH loss from the leading-edge membrane during LatB treatment appears qualitatively different from its loss in response to wortmannin (compare Fig. 1 B Upper and C Upper). In addition to simple dissociation from membrane, internalization of Akt1PH-bound plasma membrane is also observed (best seen in SI Movie 7). In sum, these observations demonstrate that a positive-feedback loop involving PI3K and F-actin regulates leading-edge ruffling in RAW cells, as in other leukocytes.
A Ca2+ Influx Maintains PI3K Activity, F-Actin Polymerization, and Ruffling in RAW Cells.
Because leukocyte migration both requires a functional positive-feedback loop at the leading edge (18, 26, 27) and is inhibited by blocking Ca2+ influx (1–5, 8), we next investigated whether blockade of Ca2+ influx disrupts the PI3K/F-actin positive-feedback loop. To test this possibility, we examined the effects of reagents that block extracellular Ca2+ influx [EGTA, La3+, and the organic Ca2+ channel inhibitor SKF 96365 (SKF)] on the distribution of GFP-Akt1PH and GFP-actin in polarized cells. We found that all three agents produced a loss of GFP-Akt1PH from the leading edge within 2–3 min, concomitant with a loss of membrane ruffling (Fig. 2A and SI Movies 8–10). Addition of imaging buffer (vehicle for EGTA and La3+) or DMSO (vehicle for SKF) had no effect on ruffling or on the distribution of GFP-Akt1PH (SI Fig. 6 B and C). Quantitation of GFP-Akt1PH fluorescence demonstrates that the intensity loss from the leading edge is simultaneous with the intensity increase in the cell body, indicating a dramatic loss of PI(3,4,5)P3/PI(3,4)P2 at the leading edge. In parallel experiments, we found no redistribution of fluorescence of the PI(4,5)P2 sensor GFP-PLCδ1PH in response to SKF, wortmannin, or LatB (SI Fig. 7A), suggesting that these agents affect the distribution of PI(3,4,5)P3/PI(3,4)P2 but not PI(4,5)P2. It follows that an extracellular Ca2+ influx is required for sustained PI3K activity during maintenance of an active leading edge.
Fig. 2.
Inhibition of extracellular Ca2+ influx results in loss of PI3K activity, F-actin, and ruffling from the leading edge. (A and B) Time-lapse fluorescence images of RAW cells expressing GFP-Akt1PH (A) or GFP-actin (B) treated with 3 mM EGTA (Top), 1 mM LaCl3 (Middle), or 20 μM SKF (Bottom). Indicated times are relative to drug addition. The images show the transfer of fluorescent protein from the leading-edge region to the cell body after drug addition, as do the accompanying plots of integrated GFP-Akt1PH fluorescence. (C) Nomarski images of wild-type cell treated with 3 mM EGTA at the indicated time, illustrating the loss of ruffling and retraction of the leading edge after treatment. For each time series, the intensity scaling was the same for all images. Images are representative of at least five experiments. See also SI Movies 8–12 for A, B, and C.
Similarly, we found that EGTA, La3+, and SKF addition caused rapid loss of leading-edge GFP-actin within 2 min of addition (Fig. 2B and SI Movie 11). Nomarski imaging of wild-type cells similarly showed a collapse of the leading edge and ruffles in response to EGTA or SKF treatment (Fig. 2C and SI Fig. 8, respectively, and SI Movies 12 and 13). Together, our results strongly suggest that Ca2+ influx participates in the established PI3K/F-actin positive-feedback loop, because both PI3K activity and F-actin-associated ruffling require influx of extracellular Ca2+.
Our hypothesis that Ca2+ influx is a required component of the positive-feedback loop predicts that a cytoplasmic Ca2+ increase will stimulate PI3K activity and F-actin turnover, yielding enhanced ruffling. To test this prediction, we next stimulated polarized, ruffling cells with ATP, which elicits global cytoplasmic Ca2+ signals in macrophages (28) and many other cell types (29). Ruffling cells expressing GFP-Akt1PH and, stimulated with ATP, exhibited a large, transient increase in GFP-Akt1PH fluorescence at the leading edge (SI Fig. 9A and SI Movie 14). In addition, large local increases were observed at ectopic ruffles outside the leading edge and at the tip of the uropod, and a small, transient fluorescence increase was observed along the plasma membrane of the cell body (SI Fig. 9A and SI Movie 14). The latter findings suggest that the positive-feedback loop is operating in all regions of the plasma membrane but is normally suppressed by lipid phosphatases and that such suppression can be overridden by a large Ca2+ signal. As expected from the observed increase in ruffling, ATP also transiently increased GFP-actin at the leading edge, at the ectopic ruffle sites, and at the tip of the uropod (SI Fig. 10A and SI Movie 15). In contrast, ATP caused no fluorescence increase for the PI(4,5)P2 sensor GFP-PLCδ1PH at the leading edge, ectopic ruffles, or the uropod (SI Fig. 7B), suggesting that ATP specifically increases the PI(3,4,5)P3/PI(3,4)P2 products of PI3K activity at these locations but not PI(4,5)P2.
We also examined the effects of ATP on nonruffling RAW cells presumed to have no preexisting, active positive-feedback loop. In these cells, global addition of ATP caused no change in the intracellular distribution of GFP-Akt1PH or GFP-actin (SI Figs. 9B and 10B, respectively) in contrast to global addition of chemotactic peptide C5a (24), which directly stimulated PI3K and elicited global translocation of GFP-Akt1PH to the plasma membrane in both ruffling and nonruffling cells (SI Fig. 9 C and D and SI Movie 16). Together, these results indicate that polarized cells possess an active positive-feedback loop driving a ruffling leading edge and that feedback-loop activity can be amplified by additional release of a Ca2+ into the cytoplasm, confirming our hypothesis that Ca2+ is an essential component of positive feedback at the leading edge.
Localized PKCα Recruitment at the Leading Edge Requires Ca2+ Influx, PI3K Activity, and F-Actin.
Plasma membrane targeting of PKCα to the plasma membranes of mammalian cells is driven by the binding of Ca2+, PI(4,5)P2, and phosphatidylserine to its C2 domain (30, 31). Once the C2 domain is docked to the membrane, diacylglycerol (DAG) can bind to the PKCα C1 domain (32–35). Because PI(4,5)P2 is distributed homogeneously throughout the inner plasma membrane leaflet of polarized RAW cells (SI Fig. 5C Lower and SI Movie 17), and because DAG binding can occur only when the protein is already docked to the membrane during a Ca2+ signal (32–35), a Ca2+ signal alone is necessary and sufficient to trigger recruitment of YFP-PKCα to plasma membrane, making PKCα useful as a Ca2+ sensor (36). Thus, addition of ATP, which elicits a global and transient Ca2+ signal, produced a global and transient recruitment of YFP-PKCα to plasma membrane in both ruffling and nonruffling cells (Fig. 3C and SI Fig. 11, respectively, and SI Movie 18).
Fig. 3.
Recruitment of PKCα to the leading edge is sensitive to extracellular Ca2+ influx, PI3K activity, and F-actin polymerization. (A) Time-lapse fluorescence images of polarized RAW cells expressing YFP-PKCα treated with 3 mM EGTA (Upper) or 1 mM LaCl3 (Lower). Plots show the integrated YFP-PKCα fluorescence versus time for the leading-edge and cell body regions before and after drug addition. Both the images and plots reveal a significant transfer of YFP-PKCα from the leading edge to the cell body after blockade of Ca2+ influx. (B) Time-lapse fluorescence images of polarized RAW cells expressing YFP-PKCα treated with 500 nM wortmannin (WORT) (Upper) or 10 μg ml−1 latrunculin B (LatB) (Lower). Plots show the integrated YFP-PKCα fluorescence versus time for the leading-edge and cell-body regions before and after drug addition. Both the images and plots illustrate the redistribution of YFP-PKCα from the leading edge to the cell body after treatment. (C) Time-lapse fluorescence images of a ruffling RAW cells expressing YFP-PKCα treated with global addition of 25 μM ATP, showing a large increase in fluorescence at the leading-edge plasma membrane as well as a global targeting to plasma membrane throughout the cell body. Indicated times are relative to addition of drug. For each time series, the intensity scaling was the same for all images. Images are representative of at least five experiments. See also SI Movies 18–22 for A, B, and C. Both wortmannin and LatB cause dissociation of YFP-PKCα from the leading edge; in addition, LatB causes loss of YFP-PKCα through internalization of plasma membrane, as best seen in SI Movie 21.
Strikingly, in unstimulated, ruffling cells, the YFP-PKCα Ca2+ sensor is stably enriched at the ruffling leading edge (Fig. 3 A–C and SI Fig. 5C Middle). This finding suggests that a local cytoplasmic Ca2+ signal similar to that reported at the leading edge of chemotaxing primary neutrophils (9) may exist in polarized RAW cells. Upon addition of a Ca2+ influx blocker, either EGTA or La3+, a rapid loss of YFP-PKCα was observed from the leading edge, and membrane ruffling ceased (Fig. 3A Upper and Lower, respectively, and SI Movies 19 and 20). Quantitative analysis of the fluorescence distribution clearly demonstrated that the blockade of Ca2+ influx caused a dramatic redistribution of YFP-PKCα from the leading edge to the cell body. Similarly, wortmannin and LatB also triggered rapid loss of YFP-PKCα from the leading edge of polarized, ruffling cells (Fig. 3B and SI Movies 21 and 22), although the response to LatB is qualitatively different from the response to wortmannin as noted above (Fig. 1 B and C). These results indicate that an influx of extracellular Ca2+ is essential for a local, leading-edge Ca2+ signal detected in the cytoplasm by YFP-PKCα and that this local Ca2+ signal can be inhibited either by blocking Ca2+ influx or by disruption of the positive-feedback loop.
A Ca2+ Influx Maintains PI3K Activity in Chemoattractant-Stimulated RAW Cells.
To ascertain whether the extracellular Ca2+ influx is essential for chemoattractant signaling, we next tested the effect of blocking Ca2+ influx on PI3K activity in RAW cells stimulated with chemoattractant lipopolysaccharide (LPS). RAW cells plated on a dense fibronectin substrate exhibited no polarization, PI3K activity, or ruffling and, thus, lacked a detectable positive-feedback loop. Nonpolarized cells expressing GFP-Akt1PH and stimulated with LPS exhibited a striking global translocation of GFP-Akt1PH to the plasma membrane as the result of LPS-generated PI3K activity, which persisted for several minutes and was accompanied by membrane outgrowth (Fig. 4A Top and SI Movie 23). However, addition of the extracellular Ca2+ influx blocker SKF 70 seconds after stimulation with LPS dramatically shortened the PI3K response to LPS (Fig. 4A Middle) in a fashion similar to the addition of the PI3K antagonist wortmannin (Fig. 4A Bottom). Fluorescence analysis confirmed the reversal of GFP-Akt1PH translocation, from the plasma membrane back to the cytosol, in response to both SKF and wortmannin treatment. Treatment of LPS-stimulated cells with LatB also displaced GFP-Akt1PH from the plasma membrane as well as triggering membrane internalization as previously seen in other chemoattractant-stimulated leukocytes (SI Fig. 12 and SI Movie 24) (18). Together, these findings indicate that extracellular Ca2+ influx plays an essential role in maintenance of PI3K activity and F-actin polymerization in cells stimulated with chemoattractant.
Fig. 4.
Inhibition of extracellular Ca2+ influx or PI3K reverses the accumulation of PI(3,4,5)P3 at the plasma membrane in LPS-treated cells. Time-lapse fluorescence images of nonpolarized RAW cells plated on fibronectin and expressing GFP-Akt1PH. Shown are cells before and after treatment with 10 μM LPS at 10 s, followed by treatment at 70 s with 0.1% DMSO (Top), 20 μM SKF (Middle), or 500 nM wortmannin (Bottom). Plots show average pixel intensity of Akt1PH fluorescence in the cytosol before and after drug additions. Indicated times are relative to drug addition. Both images and plots indicate that the carrier (DMSO) has no effect, whereas the Ca2+ channel blocker (SKF) and PI3K inhibitor [wortmannin (WORT)] both inhibit the PI3K activity in attractant-stimulated cells. For each time series, the intensity scaling was the same for all images. Vertical dotted lines indicate addition of LPS (Left) and either SKF, wortmannin, or DMSO (Right). Images are representative of at least three experiments. See also SI Movie 23.
Discussion
Together, the above evidence reveals that an extracellular Ca2+ influx is essential for the organization and maintenance of an active leading edge in RAW macrophages. Inhibitors of the Ca2+ influx cause the leading edge to collapse and disrupt both PI3K activity and F-actin, whereas an increase in cytoplasmic Ca2+ stimulates ruffling and enhances PI3K and F-actin. Moreover, inhibition of either PI3K activity or F-actin polymerization blocks the Ca2+ signal while disrupting the leading edge. As a result, the Ca2+ signal must now be considered a necessary component, along with PI3K and F-actin activity, of the positive-feedback loop that underlies leading-edge stability and activity. Although the spontaneously polarized RAW cells used in the present study were not chemotaxing, previous studies of chemotaxing neutrophils have shown that blockade of Ca2+ entry with extracellular EGTA or La3+ blunts Ca2+ signaling and directed cell migration (1–5), and the present study shows that Ca2+ influx in RAW cells is necessary for prolonged PI3K activity in response to chemoattractant. It follows that Ca2+ influx and the positive-feedback loop in which it participates are likely to play central roles in leukocyte polarization, leading-edge maintenance, and chemoattractant signaling.
We also present evidence that PKCα is specifically recruited to the leading edge of spontaneously polarized, actively ruffling RAW cells. The simplest explanation for this observation is that the essential Ca2+ influx involved in the positive-feedback loop triggers or maintains a localized, cytoplasmic Ca2+ signal at the leading edge. It is not yet clear whether this Ca2+ signal arises predominantly from the extracellular Ca2+ influx or, rather, from intracellular Ca2+ stores. In the latter case, the extracellular Ca2+ influx would be required to trigger release from intracellular stores, or replenish intracellular stores. In either case, the resulting localized Ca2+ signal activates the PKCα C2 domain, which recruits the protein to the plasma membrane. In an attempt to image Ca2+ at the leading edge, we loaded minimal quantities of the fluorescent Ca2+ indicators Fluo3-AM and FuraRed-AM into ruffling RAW cells. However, these small-molecule Ca2+ indicators eliminated ruffling and localization of the PI3K activity sensor GFP-Akt1PH at the leading edge (data not shown). Such leading-edge collapse presumably arose from the well documented Ca2+ buffering effects of these highly mobile, high-affinity Ca2+ chelators (37, 38), which would buffer low magnitude Ca2+ signals. Overall, the small-molecule Ca2+ indicator studies failed to provide additional information on the spatial extent of the Ca2+ signal, but they did provide further evidence highlighting the importance of Ca2+ signaling in leading-edge structure and activity.
The identity of the plasma membrane Ca2+ channel responsible for the required Ca2+ influx is unknown, but two plausible candidates exist. One is a subfamily of noncapacitative, PI(3,4,5)P3-gated Ca2+ influx channels of the transient receptor potential (TRP) class (39). Such TRP channels have been described in leukocytes (11, 12, 40) and in neuronal growth cones (41, 42). The other is a Ca2+ channel regulated by extracellular ATP, which could either directly gate the channel or activate a signaling pathway leading to channel gating. Recent evidence indicates that local secretion of ATP at the leading edge of chemotaxing neutrophils is essential for gradient sensing (43), which raises the possibility of a link between ATP secretion and Ca2+ influx.
Finally, several possibilities exist for the circuit connections between the leading-edge Ca2+ signal and the PI3K/F-actin positive-feedback loop. In other cells, Rac1 has been implicated in the PI3K/F-actin positive-feedback loop (17, 22), but we have not yet directly assessed the role of Rac1 activity in the RAW macrophage Ca2+/PI3K/F-actin feedback loop. Given that Rac1 may also participate, one intriguing possibility is the involvement of CAPRI, a Rac1 scaffold protein containing two C2 domains that promote Ca2+-dependent membrane translocation (44). CAPRI has been shown to be necessary for Rac1 translocation to macrophage phagosomes (45), which also exhibit a local Ca2+ signal during phagocytosis (9). Thus, a Ca2+/CAPRI-dependent mechanism for Rac1 targeting could serve to augment signaling from Rac1-sensitive PI3Kγ (46). An equally intriguing possibility is that the Ca2+-triggered recruitment of endogenous PKCα, which we have observed in the polarized RAW macrophages (data not shown), could be required for phosphorylation of MARCKS (47, 48), which is linked to PI(4,5)P2 sequestration and actin remodeling.
In closing, excessive macrophage migration plays an important role in inflammatory diseases such as asthma (49), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (50), and rheumatoid arthritis (51). Thus, targeting the channels or effectors responsible for the essential Ca2+ influx could represent a strategy in developing therapeutics for these diseases. More broadly, further studies are needed to determine the generality of the Ca2+ influx in other migrating cells and to elucidate its fundamental molecular mechanisms.
Materials and Methods
Materials.
RAW264.7 murine macrophage-like cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). Antibiotic G418, latrunculin B, LPS, wortmannin, SKF96365, ATP, fibronectin, and endotoxin-free BSA were from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). TRITC-conjugated anti-Rac1 was from BD Transduction Laboratories (Lexington, KY). Alexa Fluor 488-phalloidin and Lipofectamine 2000 were from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). pEGFP-Akt1PH was subcloned from IMAGE clone 4562823 (residues 1–120) into pEGFP(C1) (Invitrogen). Construction of pYFP-PKCα and pGFP-PLCδ1PH was described (30). EGFP-actin was a gift from N. Ahn (University of Colorado).
Cell Culture.
Cells were cultured and transfected as described (31), and stable cell lines were produced by using antibiotic G418. Before experiments, stably transfected cells were cultured on glass-bottomed 35-mm dishes (MatTek, Ashland, MA) in culture medium without antibiotics at 1 × 105 cells per plate for a minimum of 3–4 h to allow cells to establish a polarized morphology. For experiments in Fig. 4 and SI Fig. 12, cells were plated on dishes treated with human fibronectin.
Live-Cell Fluorescent Protein Imaging.
Live-cell imaging experiments were performed as described (31). Final images were produced by using Adobe Photoshop (Adobe Systems, Mountain View, CA) and ImageJ (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/). Videos were produced with ImageJ and QuickTime Pro.
Image Analysis.
Analysis of fluorescence distribution in cells in Figs. 1, 2, and 4 was performed by integrating the background- and bleach-corrected fluorescence from the leading-edge region (defined by ruffles) and cell body (see diagram in SI Fig. 6A). Fluorescence change with respect to time was normalized to the fluorescence values of the leading-edge region and cell body at t = 0 s. Analysis of fluorescence distribution in Fig. 4 was performed by determining the background- and bleach-corrected average pixel intensity from the cytosolic region of the cells.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant R01 GM063235 (to J.J.F.).
Abbreviation
- RAW cells
RAW264.7 mouse macrophages.
Footnotes
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0707719104/DC1.
References
- 1.Becker EL, Showell HJ. Z Immunitatsforsch Exp Klin Immunol. 1972;143:466–476. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gallin JI, Rosenthal AS. J Cell Biol. 1974;62:594–609. doi: 10.1083/jcb.62.3.594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wilkinson PC. Exp Cell Res. 1975;93:420–426. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(75)90468-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Estensen RD, Reusch ME, Epstein ML, Hill HR. Infect Immun. 1976;13:146–151. doi: 10.1128/iai.13.1.146-151.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Boucek MM, Snyderman R. Science. 1976;193:905–907. doi: 10.1126/science.948752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zigmond SH. J Cell Biol. 1977;75:606–616. doi: 10.1083/jcb.75.2.606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Marasco WA, Becker EL, Oliver JM. Am J Pathol. 1980;98:749–768. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mandeville JT, Ghosh RN, Maxfield FR. Biophys J. 1995;68:1207–1217. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80336-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sawyer DW, Sullivan JA, Mandell GL. Science. 1985;230:663–666. doi: 10.1126/science.4048951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Marks PW, Maxfield FR. J Cell Biol. 1990;110:43–52. doi: 10.1083/jcb.110.1.43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ching TT, Hsu AL, Johnson AJ, Chen CS. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:14814–14820. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M009851200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hsu AL, Ching TT, Sen G, Wang DS, Bondada S, Authi KS, Chen CS. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:16242–16250. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M002077200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Tian W, Laffafian I, Dewitt S, Hallett MB. EMBO Rep. 2003;4:982–988. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.embor947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Parent CA. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2004;16:4–13. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2003.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Franca-Koh J, Kamimura Y, Devreotes P. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2006;16:333–338. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2006.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Charest PG, Firtel RA. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2006;16:339–347. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2006.06.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Weiner OD, Neilsen PO, Prestwich GD, Kirschner MW, Cantley LC, Bourne HR. Nat Cell Biol. 2002;4:509–513. doi: 10.1038/ncb811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wang F, Herzmark P, Weiner OD, Srinivasan S, Servant G, Bourne HR. Nat Cell Biol. 2002;4:513–518. doi: 10.1038/ncb810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Xu J, Wang F, Van Keymeulen A, Herzmark P, Straight A, Kelly K, Takuwa Y, Sugimoto N, Mitchison T, Bourne HR. Cell. 2003;114:201–214. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00555-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Funamoto S, Milan K, Meili R, Firtel RA. J Cell Biol. 2001;153:795–810. doi: 10.1083/jcb.153.4.795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Weiner OD, Servant G, Welch MD, Mitchison TJ, Sedat JW, Bourne HR. Nat Cell Biol. 1999;1:75–81. doi: 10.1038/10042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Srinivasan S, Wang F, Glavas S, Ott A, Hofmann F, Aktories K, Kalman D, Bourne HR. J Cell Biol. 2003;160:375–385. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200208179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Park KC, Rivero F, Meili R, Lee S, Apone F, Firtel RA. EMBO J. 2004;23:4177–4189. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Servant G, Weiner OD, Herzmark P, Balla T, Sedat JW, Bourne HR. Science. 2000;287:1037–1040. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5455.1037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Funamoto S, Meili R, Lee S, Parry L, Firtel RA. Cell. 2002;109:611–623. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00755-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Watanabe N, Mitchison TJ. Science. 2002;295:1083–1086. doi: 10.1126/science.1067470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Arrieumerlou C, Meyer T. Dev Cell. 2005;8:215–227. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2004.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Qiu ZH, Gijon MA, de Carvalho MS, Spencer DM, Leslie CC. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:8203–8211. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.14.8203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Dubyak GR, el-Moatassim C. Am J Physiol. 1993;265:C577–606. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1993.265.3.C577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Evans JH, Murray D, Leslie CC, Falke JJ. Mol Biol Cell. 2006;17:56–66. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E05-06-0499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Corbin JA, Evans JH, Landgraf KE, Falke JJ. Biochemistry. 2007;46:4322–4336. doi: 10.1021/bi062140c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Raghunath A, Ling M, Larsson C. Biochem J. 2003;370:901–912. doi: 10.1042/BJ20021420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Oancea E, Meyer T. Cell. 1998;95:307–318. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81763-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Medkova M, Cho W. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:19852–19861. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.28.19852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lenz JC, Reusch HP, Albrecht N, Schultz G, Schaefer M. J Cell Biol. 2002;159:291–302. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200203048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Reither G, Schaefer M, Lipp P. J Cell Biol. 2006;174:521–533. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200604033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Neher E, Augustine GJ. J Physiol. 1992;450:273–301. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1992.sp019127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sala F, Hernandez-Cruz A. Biophys J. 1990;57:313–324. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(90)82533-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kwon Y, Hofmann T, Montell C. Mol Cell. 2007;25:491–503. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.01.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ramsey IS, Delling M, Clapham DE. Annu Rev Physiol. 2006;68:619–647. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.68.040204.100431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Wang GX, Poo MM. Nature. 2005;434:898–904. doi: 10.1038/nature03478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Li Y, Jia YC, Cui K, Li N, Zheng ZY, Wang YZ, Yuan XB. Nature. 2005;434:894–898. doi: 10.1038/nature03477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Chen Y, Corriden R, Inoue Y, Yip L, Hashiguchi N, Zinkernagel A, Nizet V, Insel PA, Junger WG. Science. 2006;314:1792–1795. doi: 10.1126/science.1132559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Lockyer PJ, Kupzig S, Cullen PJ. Curr Biol. 2001;11:981–986. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(01)00261-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Zhang J, Guo J, Dzhagalov I, He YW. Nat Immunol. 2005;6:911–919. doi: 10.1038/ni1232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Suire S, Hawkins P, Stephens L. Curr Biol. 2002;12:1068–1075. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)00933-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Hartwig JH, Thelen M, Rosen A, Janmey PA, Nairn AC, Aderem A. Nature. 1992;356:618–622. doi: 10.1038/356618a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Myat MM, Anderson S, Allen LA, Aderem A. Curr Biol. 1997;7:611–614. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(06)00262-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Peters-Golden M. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2004;31:3–7. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.f279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Barnes PJ. COPD. 2004;1:59–70. doi: 10.1081/COPD-120028701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Kinne RW, Brauer R, Stuhlmuller B, Palombo-Kinne E, Burmester GR. Arthritis Res. 2000;2:189–202. doi: 10.1186/ar86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.