Skip to main content
The American Journal of Pathology logoLink to The American Journal of Pathology
. 1979 Mar;94(3):569–584.

Immunogenetic aspects of intracerebral skin transplantation in inbred rats.

S J Geyer, T J Gill 3rd
PMCID: PMC2042272  PMID: 371412

Abstract

This study was undertaken to evaluate the ability of intracerebral skin grafts transplanted across different genetic disparities in the major histocompatibility complex (RT1) to elicit an immune response in inbred rats, as determined by histologic examination and by the ability of the grafts to sensitize the recipients to subsequent orthotopic skin grafts. The ability of intracerebral skin allografts to sensitize rats to transplantation antigens is related to the specific genetic disparity between the graft and the host: sensitization appears to occur more consistently across an A region barrier than across a B region barrier. Histologic changes of intracerebral graft rejection are more severe in rats with two intracerebral grafts than in those with one. The degree of histologic change attributable to intracerebral allograft rejection correlates with the ability of these grafts to sensitize the recipient. In certain strains intracerebral sensitization is accomplished with two grafts but not with one, indicating an antigenic dose requirement for intracerebral sensitization.

Full text

PDF
569

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Albright A. L., Gill T. J., 3rd, Geyer S. J. Immunogenetic control of brain tumor growth in rats. Cancer Res. 1977 Aug;37(8 Pt 1):2512–2521. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BILLINGHAM R. E., SILVERS W. K. STUDIES ON HOMOGRAFTS OF FOETAL AND INFANT SKIN AND FURTHER OBSERVATIONS ON THE ANOMALOUS PROPERTIES OF POUCH SKIN GRAFTS IN HAMSTERS. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1964 Dec 15;161:168–190. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1964.0087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barker C. F., Billingham R. E. Histocompatibility requirements of heart and skin grafts in rats. Transplant Proc. 1971 Mar;3(1):172–175. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barker C. F., Billingham R. E. Immunologically privileged sites. Adv Immunol. 1977;25:1–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Barker C. F., Billingham R. E. The lymphatic status of hamster cheek pouch tissue in relation to its properties as a graft and as a graft site. J Exp Med. 1971 Mar 1;133(3):620–639. doi: 10.1084/jem.133.3.620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Barker C. F., Billingham R. E. The role of afferent lymphatics in the rejection of skin homografts. J Exp Med. 1968 Jul 1;128(1):197–221. doi: 10.1084/jem.128.1.197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Block M. A., Tworek E. J., Miller J. M. Parathyroid homografts in brain tissue. Experimental studies. Arch Surg. 1966 May;92(5):778–784. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1966.01320230126023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Calne R. Y., Sells R. A., Pena J. R., Davis D. R., Millard P. R., Herbertson B. M., Binns R. M., Davies D. A. Induction of immunological tolerance by porcine liver allografts. Nature. 1969 Aug 2;223(5205):472–476. doi: 10.1038/223472a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Eichwald E. J., Wetzel B., Lustgraaf E. C. Genetic aspects of second-set skin grafts in mice. Transplantation. 1966 May;4(3):260–273. doi: 10.1097/00007890-196605000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. GREENE H. S. N. A conception of tumor autonomy based on transplantation studies: a review. Cancer Res. 1951 Dec;11(12):899–903. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. GREENE H. S. N. The transplantation of tumors to the brains of heterologous species. Cancer Res. 1951 Jul;11(7):529–534. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. GREENE H. S. Heterotransplantation of tumors. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1957 Dec 16;69(4):818–829. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1957.tb49720.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. GREENE H. S. The transplantation of human brain tumors to the brains of laboratory animals. Cancer Res. 1953 Jun;13(6):422–426. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gibson T., Medawar P. B. The fate of skin homografts in man. J Anat. 1943 Jul;77(Pt 4):299–310.4. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hasek M., Chutna J., Sládecek M., Lodin Z. Immunological tolerance and tumor allografts in the brain. Nature. 1977 Jul 7;268(5615):68–69. doi: 10.1038/268068a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. LAMBERT P. B., FRANK H. A. BELLMAN S, FARNSWORTH D: THE ROLE OF THE LYMPH TRUNKS IN THE RESPONSE TO ALLOGENEIC SKIN TRANSPLANTS. Transplantation. 1965 Jan;3:62–73. doi: 10.1097/00007890-196501000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lance E. M. A functional and morphologic study of intracranial thyroid allografts in the dog. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1967 Sep;125(3):529–539. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. MITCHISON N. A. Passive transfer of transplantation immunity. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1954 Feb 18;142(906):72–87. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1954.0007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. MITCHISON N. A. Studies on the immunological response to foreign tumor transplants in the mouse. I. The role of lymph node cells in conferring immunity by adoptive transfer. J Exp Med. 1955 Aug 1;102(2):157–177. doi: 10.1084/jem.102.2.157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Pedersen N. C., Morris B. The role of the lymphatic system in the rejection of homografts: a study of lymph from renal transplants. J Exp Med. 1970 May 1;131(5):936–969. doi: 10.1084/jem.131.5.936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Raju S., Grogan J. B. Immunologic study of the brain as a privileged site. Transplant Proc. 1977 Mar;9(1):1187–1191. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ridley A., Cavanagh J. B. The cellular reactions to heterologous, homologous and autologous skin implanted into brain. J Pathol. 1969 Nov;99(3):193–203. doi: 10.1002/path.1710990303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. SCHEINBERG L. C., EDELMAN F. L., LEVY W. A. IS THE BRAIN "AN IMMUNOLOGICALLY PRIVILEGED SITE"?I. STUDIES BASED ON INTRACEREBRAL TUMOR HOMOTRANSPLANTATION AND ISOTRANSPLANTATION TO SENSITIZED HOSTS. Arch Neurol. 1964 Sep;11:248–264. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1964.00460210026003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. STROBER S., GOWANS J. L. THE ROLE OF LYMPHOCYTES IN THE SENSITIZATION OF RATS TO RENAL HOMOGRAFTS. J Exp Med. 1965 Aug 1;122:347–360. doi: 10.1084/jem.122.2.347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Scheinberg L. C., Kotsilimbas D. G., Karpf R., Mayer N. Is the brain "an immunologically privileged site"? 3. Studies based on homologous skin grafts to the brain and subcutaneous tissues. Arch Neurol. 1966 Jul;15(1):62–67. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1966.00470130066006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Stark O., Kunz H. W., Gill T. J., 3rd Comparison of the haplotypes of the major histocompatibility complex in the rat. III. Two difficult haplotypes: H-1h (Ag-B12) in the HW strain and Ag-B13 (H-1m) in the MNR/N strain. J Immunogenet. 1978 Aug;5(4):261–273. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-313x.1978.tb00654.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Stuart F. P., Saitoh T., Fitch F. W. Rejection of renal allografts: specific immunologic suppression. Science. 1968 Jun 28;160(3835):1463–1465. doi: 10.1126/science.160.3835.1463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Tilney N. L., Gowans J. L. The sensitization of rats by allografts transplanted to alymphatic pedicles of skin. J Exp Med. 1971 May 1;133(5):951–962. doi: 10.1084/jem.133.5.951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. VOISIN G. A., MAUER P. Studies on the role of antibodies in the failure of homografts. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1957 Mar 22;64(5):1053-70; discussion, 1070-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1957.tb52496.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. White E., Hildemann W. H. Allografts in genetically defined rats: difference in survival between kidney and skin. Science. 1968 Dec 13;162(3859):1293–1295. doi: 10.1126/science.162.3859.1293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The American Journal of Pathology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Investigative Pathology

RESOURCES