Abstract
We set out to determine the extent to which two groups of patients reported having been informed about the adverse effects of NSAIDs. These consisted of 50 patients who had suffered an acute gastrointestinal bleed while taking a NSAID, and 100 age, sex and drug matched controls who had not. Eight (16%) of the index patients, and 41 (41%) of the control patients remembered having been informed of potential adverse effects, an odds ratio of 3.65 (95% CI 1.55–8.58, P<0.002). Two (4%) of the index patients recalled having been advised what to do should adverse symptoms develop, whereas 21 (21%) of the control patients did so, an odds ratio of 6.38 (95% CI 1.4–28.4, P<0.01). Eighteen (36%) of patients who bled had experienced gastrointestinal pain prior to the bleed, but of these only two (11%) admitted reduced compliance with NSAID therapy. In contrast, 10 (67%) of the 15 control patients who had suffered epigastric discomfort admitted reduced compliance, an odds ratio of 16.0 (95% CI 2.6–98.8, P<0.001). Our results suggest that patients who report not having been informed of adverse effects of NSAIDs are less likely to reduce intake in response to epigastric pain than patients who report having received such information. If the patients who bled had reduced their intake of NSAIDs to the same extent as apparently better informed control patients in response to epigastric pain, it is possible that some episodes of acute gastrointestinal bleeding would have been avoided.
Keywords: NSAIDs, GI bleeding, adverse effects, patient knowledge
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (150.6 KB).