Skip to main content
PMC home page
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1988 Oct;54(10):2393–2397. doi: 10.1128/aem.54.10.2393-2397.1988

Product Inhibition of Butyrate Metabolism by Acetate and Hydrogen in a Thermophilic Coculture

Birgitte K Ahring 1,*, Peter Westermann 1
PMCID: PMC204269  PMID: 16347751

Abstract

Studies on product inhibition of a thermophilic butyrate-degrading bacterium in syntrophic association with Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum showed that a gas phase containing more than 2 × 10−2 atm (2.03 kPa) of hydrogen prevented growth and butyrate consumption, while a lower hydrogen partial pressure of 1 × 10−3 to 2 × 10−2 atm (0.1 to 2.03 kPa) gradually inhibited the butyrate consumption of the coculture. No inhibition of butyrate consumption was found on the addition of 0.75 × 10−3 atm (76 Pa) of hydrogen to the gas phase. A slight inhibition of butyrate consumption by the coculture occurred at an acetate concentration of 16.4 mM. Inhibition gradually increased with increasing acetate concentration up to 81.4 mM, when complete inhibition of butyrate consumption occurred. When the culture contained an acetate-utilizing methanogen in addition to M. thermoautotrophicum, the inhibition of the triculture by acetate was gradually reversed as the acetate concentration was lowered by the aceticlastic methanogen. The results show that optimal growth conditions for the thermophilic butyrate-degrading bacterium depend on both hydrogen and acetate removal.

Full text

PDF
2393

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ahring B. K., Westermann P. Kinetics of butyrate, acetate, and hydrogen metabolism in a thermophilic, anaerobic, butyrate-degrading triculture. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987 Feb;53(2):434–439. doi: 10.1128/aem.53.2.434-439.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahring B. K., Westermann P. Thermophilic anaerobic degradation of butyrate by a butyrate-utilizing bacterium in coculture and triculture with methanogenic bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987 Feb;53(2):429–433. doi: 10.1128/aem.53.2.429-433.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Balch W. E., Wolfe R. S. New approach to the cultivation of methanogenic bacteria: 2-mercaptoethanesulfonic acid (HS-CoM)-dependent growth of Methanobacterium ruminantium in a pressureized atmosphere. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1976 Dec;32(6):781–791. doi: 10.1128/aem.32.6.781-791.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Boone D. R., Bryant M. P. Propionate-Degrading Bacterium, Syntrophobacter wolinii sp. nov. gen. nov., from Methanogenic Ecosystems. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1980 Sep;40(3):626–632. doi: 10.1128/aem.40.3.626-632.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Boone D. R., Xun L. Effects of pH, Temperature, and Nutrients on Propionate Degradation by a Methanogenic Enrichment Culture. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987 Jul;53(7):1589–1592. doi: 10.1128/aem.53.7.1589-1592.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bryant M. P. Commentary on the Hungate technique for culture of anaerobic bacteria. Am J Clin Nutr. 1972 Dec;25(12):1324–1328. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/25.12.1324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. HUNGATE R. E. The anaerobic mesophilic cellulolytic bacteria. Bacteriol Rev. 1950 Mar;14(1):1–49. doi: 10.1128/br.14.1.1-49.1950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Henson J. M., Smith P. H. Isolation of a Butyrate-Utilizing Bacterium in Coculture with Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum from a Thermophilic Digester. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985 Jun;49(6):1461–1466. doi: 10.1128/aem.49.6.1461-1466.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kaspar H. F., Wuhrmann K. Kinetic parameters and relative turnovers of some important catabolic reactions in digesting sludge. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1978 Jul;36(1):1–7. doi: 10.1128/aem.36.1.1-7.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mackie R. I., Bryant M. P. Metabolic Activity of Fatty Acid-Oxidizing Bacteria and the Contribution of Acetate, Propionate, Butyrate, and CO(2) to Methanogenesis in Cattle Waste at 40 and 60 degrees C. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981 Jun;41(6):1363–1373. doi: 10.1128/aem.41.6.1363-1373.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. McInerney M. J., Bryant M. P., Hespell R. B., Costerton J. W. Syntrophomonas wolfei gen. nov. sp. nov., an Anaerobic, Syntrophic, Fatty Acid-Oxidizing Bacterium. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981 Apr;41(4):1029–1039. doi: 10.1128/aem.41.4.1029-1039.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Robinson J. A., Tiedje J. M. Kinetics of hydrogen consumption by rumen fluid, anaerobic digestor sludge, and sediment. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 Dec;44(6):1374–1384. doi: 10.1128/aem.44.6.1374-1384.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Thauer R. K., Jungermann K., Decker K. Energy conservation in chemotrophic anaerobic bacteria. Bacteriol Rev. 1977 Mar;41(1):100–180. doi: 10.1128/br.41.1.100-180.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Varel V. H., Isaacson H. R., Bryant M. P. Thermophilic methane production from cattle waste. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1977 Feb;33(2):298–307. doi: 10.1128/aem.33.2.298-307.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Zinder S. H., Cardwell S. C., Anguish T., Lee M., Koch M. Methanogenesis in a Thermophilic (58 degrees C) Anaerobic Digestor: Methanothrix sp. as an Important Aceticlastic Methanogen. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1984 Apr;47(4):796–807. doi: 10.1128/aem.47.4.796-807.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES