Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2007 Jun 18;51(9):3374–3377. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00275-07

Update to the Multiplex PCR Strategy for Assignment of mec Element Types in Staphylococcus aureus

Catarina Milheiriço 1, Duarte C Oliveira 1,*, Hermínia de Lencastre 1,2
PMCID: PMC2043198  PMID: 17576837

Abstract

Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) typing is important for the identification and definition of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clones, and for routine purposes, multiplex PCR assays are the most adequate for SCCmec typing. Here, we describe an update to the multiplex PCR strategy for SCCmec typing that we described in 2002 so that SCCmec types IV and V may be properly identified.


Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains are characterized by the presence of a large heterologous mobile genetic element called the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec), which includes the mecA gene, the central element of methicillin resistance (4). Besides the mec gene complex (which comprises the mecA gene and its regulators, mecI and mecR1), SCCmec contains the ccr gene complex, which encodes recombinases responsible for the mobility of SCCmec (7). Several SCCmec types have been defined by use of the combination of the class of the mec gene complex and the ccr allotype (1, 3-5, 9, 16). The remaining parts of SCCmec are called J regions (regions J1, J2, and J3), which constitute nonessential components of the cassette, although in some cases these regions carry additional antibiotic resistance determinants. J1 is the region between the chromosomal left junction and the ccr complex, J2 is the region between the ccr complex and the mec complex, and J3 is the region between the mec complex and the chromosomal right junction. Therefore, the structural organization of SCCmec may be summarized as J1-ccr-J2-mec-J3. Variations in the J regions within the same mec-ccr combination are used to define SCCmec subtypes.

In 2002, we described a multiplex PCR strategy for the rapid assignment of SCCmec types to MRSA strains. That strategy was able to properly identify SCCmec types I to III and some epidemiologically relevant variants (e.g., subtypes IA and IIIA) by probing eight loci scattered through the mec elements and generating specific amplification fragments of three to five bands (13). SCCmec type IV, which at that time was not yet recognized as an important structural type mainly due to its spread among community-acquired MRSA (CA-MRSA) strains, was not properly identified since it was positive only for the internal positive control and the dcs locus, which is also present in SCCmec types I and II. Here, we report an update to the previously described “SCCmec multiplex PCR strategy” in order to better characterize SCCmec type IV and also to include the detection of the recently described SCCmec type V.

Table 1 lists the characteristics of the primers used for the updated version of the SCCmec multiplex PCR. In order to minimize the complexity of the multiplex PCR, the detection of linearized plasmids pUB110 and pT181 was abandoned. These loci are not critical for SCCmec type assignment, and its utility was to discriminate subtypes IA (positive for pUB110) and IIIA (negative for pT181). Eight new primers were added for the detection of ccrB allotype 2 (specific for SCCmec types II and IV), ccrC (specific for SCCmec type V), the SCCmec type III J1 region, and the SCCmec type V J1 region.

TABLE 1.

Primers used in the updated version of SCCmec multiplex PCR

Primer name Primer sequence (5′→3′) Primer specificity (SCCmec type, region) Amplicon size (bp) Reference
CIF2 F2 TTCGAGTTGCTGATGAAGAAGG I, J1 region 495 13
CIF2 R2 ATTTACCACAAGGACTACCAGC 13
ccrC F2 GTACTCGTTACAATGTTTGG V, ccr complex 449 This study
ccrC R2 ATAATGGCTTCATGCTTACC This study
RIF5 F10 TTCTTAAGTACACGCTGAATCG III, J3 region 414 13
RIF5 R13 ATGGAGATGAATTACAAGGG 13
SCCmec V J1 F TTCTCCATTCTTGTTCATCC V, J1 region 377 This study
SCCmec V J1 R AGAGACTACTGACTTAAGTGG This study
dcs F2 CATCCTATGATAGCTTGGTC I, II, IV, and VI, J3 region 342 13
dcs R1 CTAAATCATAGCCATGACCG 13
ccrB2 F2 AGTTTCTCAGAATTCGAACG II and IV, ccr complex 311 This study
ccrB2 R2 CCGATATAGAAWGGGTTAGC This study
kdp F1 AATCATCTGCCATTGGTGATGC II, J1 region 284 13
kdp R1 CGAATGAAGTGAAAGAAAGTGG 13
SCCmec III J1 F CATTTGTGAAACACAGTACG III, J1 region 243 This study
SCCmec III J1 R GTTATTGAGACTCCTAAAGC This study
mecI P2 ATCAAGACTTGCATTCAGGC II and III, mec complex 209 13
mecI P3 GCGGTTTCAATTCACTTGTC 13
mecA P4 TCCAGATTACAACTTCACCAGG Internal positive control 162 13
mecA P7 CCACTTCATATCTTGTAACG 13

The conditions for the multiplex PCR assay were first optimized by using the following prototype strains: COL, SCCmec type I (16); N315, SCCmec type II (4); ANS46, SCCmec type III (16); MW2, SCCmec type IVa (1); 8/6-3P, SCCmec type IVb (9); Q2314, SCCmec type IVc (6); JCSC4469, SCCmec type IVd; AR43/3330.1, SCCmec type IVE (17); M03-68, SCCmec type IVg (8); HAR22, SCCmec type IVh (11); WIS, SCCmec type V (5); and HDE288, SCCmec type VI (15). For validation purposes, a diverse collection of 60 MRSA isolates previously characterized in terms of their genetic backgrounds and SCCmec types was tested by use of the updated SCCmec multiplex PCR assay (Table 2). All assays were performed in a T1 thermocycler (Biometra, Germany). The optimal cycling conditions were the following: 94°C for 4 min; 30 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 53°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 1 min; and a final extension at 72°C for 4 min. Each PCR mixture, in a final volume of 50 μl, contained 5 ng of chromosomal template; 1× PCR buffer with 1.5 mM MgCl2 (Applied Biosystems); 40 μM (each) deoxynucleoside triphosphate (MBI Fermentas, Hanover, MD); 0.2 μM primers kdp F1 and kdp R1; 0.4 μM primers CIF2 F2, CIF2 R2, RIF5 F10, RIF5 R13, SCCmec III J1F, SCCmec III J1R, SCCmec V J1 F, and SCCmec V J1 R; 0.8 μM primers mecI P2, mecI P3, dcs F2, dcs R1, mecA P4, mecA P7, ccrB2 F2, ccrB2 R2, ccrC F2, and ccrC R2; and 1.25 U of Amplitaq DNA polymerase (Applied Biosystems). The PCR products (10 μl) were resolved in a 3% Seakem LE (Cambrex, Rockland, ME) agarose gel in 0.5% Tris-borate-EDTA buffer (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) at 4 V/cm for 2.5 h and were visualized with ethidium bromide.

TABLE 2.

Prototype strains and representative collection used for validation of updated SCCmec multiplex PCR assay

Straina Origin Isolation date MLST (ST)b SCCmec type ccrAB type Multiplex PCR assignment Referencec
COL United Kingdom 1965 250 I 1 I 16
UK13136 United Kingdom 1960 250 I 1 I 16
BK793 Egypt 1961 250 I 1 I 16
E2125 Denmark 1964 247 I 1 I 16
PER34 Spain 1989 250 IA 1 I 16
HPV107 Portugal 1992 247 IA 1 I 16
BK1953 United States 1995 247 IA 1 I 16
PER184 Spain 1991 247 IA 1 I 16
PER88 Spain 1992 247 IA 1 I 16
HAR40 Belgium 1995 228 I 1 I 15
HAR21 Finland 2002 5 I 1 I 15
PL72 Poland 1991 5 I-VARd 1 VI 15
POL3 Poland 1992 5 I-VAR 1 VI 15
N315 Japan 1982 5 II 2 II 4
USA100 United States 1995-2003 5 II 2 II 10
BK2464 United States 1996 5 II 2 II 16
JP1 Japan 1987 5 II 2 II 16
JP205 Japan 1998 5 II 2 II 15
USA200 United States 1995-2003 36 II 2 II 10
HAR24 Finland 2002 36 II 2 II 15
USA600 United States 1995-2003 45 II 2 II 10
ANS46 Australia 1982 239 III 3 III 16
R35 United States 1987 239 III 3 III 16
HU25 Brazil 1993 239 III 3 III 16
HUSA304 Hungary 1993 239 III 3 III 16
HU106 Hungary 1996 239 III 3 III 16
LHH1 United States 1994 239 III 3 III 16
BK2421 United States 1996 239 III 3 III 16
HSJ216 Portugal 1997 239 IIIA 3 III 16
HDG2 Portugal 1993 239 IIIB 3 IIIB 16
MW2 United States 1998 1 IVa 2 IV 1
CA05 Chicago 1999 256 IVa 2 IV 9
8/6-3P Chicago 1996 770 IVb 2 IV 9
Q2314 Dallas, TX 1996 5 IVc 2 IV 6
JCSC4469 Japan 1982 5 IVd 2 IV AB097677
AR43/3330.1 Ireland 1988-2002 8 IVE 2 IV 17
M03-68 Korea 2003 5 IVg 2 IV 8
HAR22 Finland 2002 22 IVh 2 IV 11
USA400 United States 1995-2003 1 IV 2 IV 10
USA800 United States 1995-2003 5 IV 2 IV 10
BM18 United States 1989 5 IV 2 IV 16
COB3 Colombia 1996 5 IV 2 IV 16
FFP311 Portugal 1996 5 IV 2 IV 14
VNG17 Portugal 1992-1993 5 IV 2 IV 14
RJP17 Portugal 1992-1993 5 IV 2 IV 14
HSA49 Portugal 1993 5 IV 2 IV 15
HSA74 Portugal 1993 5 IV 2 IV 14
ARG9 Argentina 1996 5 IV 2 IV 14
USA300 United States 1995-2003 8 IV 2 IV 10
USA500 United States 1995-2003 8 IV 2 IV 10
BK2529 United States 1996 8 IV 2 IV 16
BargII17 United States 1996 8 IV 2 IV 16
GRE120 Greece 1993 8 IV 2 IV 15
HAR36e Greece 2002 254 IV-VAR 2 IV-VAR 15
HGSA146 Portugal 2003 22 IVh 2 IV 11
HGSA163 Portugal 2003 22 IVh 2 IV 11
DEN2946 Denmark 2001 30 IV 2 IV 15
DEN2294 Denmark 2001 30 IV 2 IV 15
HAR38 Belgium 1995 45 IV 2 IV 15
USA700 United States 1995-2003 72 IV 2 IV 10
GRE14 Greece 1998 80 IV 2 IV 15
DEN2949 Denmark 2001 80 IV 2 IV 15
DEN114 Denmark 2001 80 IV 2 IV 15
DEN1451 Denmark 2001 153 IV 2 IV 15
WIS Australia V ccrC V 5
HT0087 Australia 2005 377 V ccrC V 18
HT0184 Greece 2005 377 V ccrC V 18
HT0350 The Netherlands 2003 377 V ccrC V 18
HT0388 Switzerland 2003 377 V ccrC V 18
HT0826 France 2003 377 V ccrC V 18
HDE288 Portugal 1996 5 VI 4 VI 14
HUC136 Portugal 1995 5 VI 4 VI 14
IPO92 Portugal 2001 5 VI 4 VI 14
a

Strains in boldface are the prototype strains for SCCmec types and subtypes.

b

MLST, multilocus sequence type; ST, sequence type.

c

Reference for SCCmec type assignment and ccr type.

d

VAR, variant.

e

Strain HAR36 is characterized by SCCmec type IV and is also positive for the J3 locus specific for SCCmec type III.

Figure 1 illustrates the amplification patterns obtained for the prototype strains. SCCmec types I to III generate specific amplification patterns of three to five bands. SCCmec type IV generates an amplification pattern of three bands (mecA, ccrB2, and dcs) for subtypes a to d, g, and h; and subtypes IVE and IVF generate only two bands, since they are negative for the dcs locus. SCCmec type V also originates a pattern of three bands (mecA, ccrC, and J1). SCCmec type VI, which appears to be an “exotic” local variant (14), generates only two bands (mecA and dcs), and its assignment must be confirmed by ccrAB allotyping (ccrAB4). Note that SCCmec types IV and VI previously could not be discriminated since both were positive only for mecA and dcs.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Amplification patterns for the prototype strains obtained with the updated SCCmec multiplex PCR strategy. Lane 1, SCCmec type I (strain COL); lane 2, type II (N315); lane 3, type III (ANS46), lane 4, type IVa (MW2); lane 5, type IVb (8/6-3P); lane 6, type IVc (Q2314); lane 7, type IVd (JCSC4469); lane 8, type IVE (AR43/3330.1); lane 9, type IVg (M03-68); lane 10, type IVh (HAR22); lane 11, type V (WIS); lane 12, type VI (HDE288); lanes M, DNA molecular size marker (1-kb DNA Ladder Plus; Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA).

As illustrated in Table 2, the updated SCCmec multiplex PCR assay performed well in assigning SCCmec types to the 60 diverse MRSA isolates. As expected, subtypes IA and IIIA, defined by the presence of pUB110 and the absence of pT181, respectively, could not be detected, whereas the sporadically occurring subtype IIIB, defined as being negative for the J3 region specific locus, was still detected. Strains PL72 and POL3 were incorrectly assigned to SCCmec type VI. These sporadically occurring strains were first tentatively classified as SCCmec type IV (13) and after ccrB sequencing (14) were classified as new type I variants with a partial deletion within the J1 region, which includes the J1-specific locus of SCCmec type I included in the multiplex PCR assay. This unique example of an incorrect assignment reinforces the importance of confirming multiplex PCR results by ccr gene complex typing, either by conventional PCR allotyping (12) or by DNA sequencing (15), at least for a subset of strains belonging to the same clonal type or whenever a new clone is detected.

In short, the updated version of the previously described SCCmec multiplex PCR strategy enables the rapid presumptive assignment of all known SCCmec types to MRSA strains. Whereas the previous version enabled the prompt identification of only SCCmec types I to III, since SCCmec type IV was poorly identified and SCCmec type V was not detected, the means for the proper identification of SCCmec types IV and V was added to this updated version. The prompt detection of SCCmec types IV and V is particularly relevant for the characterization of the recent threat of CA-MRSA, mostly characterized by these two structural variants of the mec element. In practical terms, changes to the previous protocol were kept to a minimum, and so the implementation of this SCCmec typing strategy will be straightforward, particularly for those laboratories currently using the previously described SCCmec multiplex PCR strategy.

The importance of SCCmec typing is well illustrated by the fact that the proposal by Enright and colleagues (2) that MRSA clones be named according to their multilocus sequence types and SCCmec types (e.g., clone ST5-MRSA-II), which was agreed to by a subcommittee of the International Union of Microbiology Societies in Tokyo, Japan, in 2002, is currently consensual in the specialized literature. In this context, rapid and easy assays for the detection of SCCmec types, such as the multiplex PCR typing strategy described in this study, are critical tools for the proper characterization of MRSA clones. The SCCmec element, which carries the determinant for “broad-spectrum” beta-lactam resistance in staphylococci, is a critical epidemiological marker for MRSA clones. However, besides being an important tool for surveillance studies, SCCmec typing of large international collections of isolates has contributed dramatically to the elucidation of the origin(s) and evolutionary history of contemporary MRSA clones.

Acknowledgments

We thank T. Ito, D. C. Coleman, R. Daum, K. T. Park, W. B. Grubb, J. Etienne, and A. Tomasz for having kindly given some of the prototype and reference strains used in this study.

Partial support for this study was provided by projects POCI/BIA-MIC/58416/2004 from the Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT), Lisbon, Portugal, and FCG-55068 from the Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, Lisbon, Portugal, both awarded to H. de Lencastre. C. Milheiriço and D. C. Oliveira were supported by grants SFRH/BD/23010/2005 and SFRH/BPD/9374/2002, respectively, from FCT.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print on 18 June 2007.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Baba, T., F. Takeuchi, M. Kuroda, H. Yuzawa, K. Aoki, A. Oguchi, Y. Nagai, N. Iwama, K. Asano, T. Naimi, H. Kuroda, L. Cui, K. Yamamoto, and K. Hiramatsu. 2002. Genome and virulence determinants of high virulence community-acquired MRSA. Lancet 359:1819-1827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Enright, M. C., D. A. Robinson, G. Randle, E. J. Feil, H. Grundmann, and B. G. Spratt. 2002. The evolutionary history of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:7687-7692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ito, T., Y. Katayama, K. Asada, N. Mori, K. Tsutsumimoto, C. Tiensasitorn, and K. Hiramatsu. 2001. Structural comparison of three types of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec integrated in the chromosome in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:1323-1336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ito, T., Y. Katayama, and K. Hiramatsu. 1999. Cloning and nucleotide sequence determination of the entire mec DNA of pre-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus N315. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:1449-1458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ito, T., X. X. Ma, F. Takeuchi, K. Okuma, H. Yuzawa, and K. Hiramatsu. 2004. Novel type V staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec driven by a novel cassette chromosome recombinase, ccrC. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:2637-2651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ito, T., K. Okuma, X. X. Ma, H. Yuzawa, and K. Hiramatsu. 2003. Insights on antibiotic resistance of Staphylococcus aureus from its whole genome: genomic island SCC. Drug Resist. Update 6:41-52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Katayama, Y., T. Ito, and K. Hiramatsu. 2000. A new class of genetic element, staphylococcus cassette chromosome mec, encodes methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:1549-1555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kwon, N. H., K. T. Park, J. S. Moon, W. K. Jung, S. H. Kim, J. M. Kim, S. K. Hong, H. C. Koo, Y. S. Joo, and Y. H. Park. 2005. Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) characterization and molecular analysis for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and novel SCCmec subtype IVg isolated from bovine milk in Korea. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 56:624-632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ma, X. X., T. Ito, C. Tiensasitorn, M. Jamklang, P. Chongtrakool, S. Boyle-Vavra, R. S. Daum, and K. Hiramatsu. 2002. Novel type of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec identified in community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:1147-1152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.McDougal, L. K., C. D. Steward, G. E. Killgore, J. M. Chaitram, S. K. McAllister, and F. C. Tenover. 2003. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis typing of oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from the United States: establishing a national database. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:5113-5120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Milheirico, C., D. C. Oliveira, and H. de Lencastre. 2007. Multiplex PCR strategy for subtyping the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type IV in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: ‘SCCmec IV multiplex’. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 60:42-48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Okuma, K., K. Iwakawa, J. D. Turnidge, W. B. Grubb, J. M. Bell, F. G. O'Brien, G. W. Coombs, J. W. Pearman, F. C. Tenover, M. Kapi, C. Tiensasitorn, T. Ito, and K. Hiramatsu. 2002. Dissemination of new methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clones in the community. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:4289-4294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Oliveira, D. C., and H. de Lencastre. 2002. Multiplex PCR strategy for rapid identification of structural types and variants of the mec element in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:2155-2161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Oliveira, D. C., C. Milheirico, and H. De Lencastre. 2006. Redefining a structural variant of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec, SCCmec type VI. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:3457-3459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Oliveira, D. C., C. Milheirico, S. Vinga, and H. de Lencastre. 2006. Assessment of allelic variation in the ccrAB locus in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clones. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 58:23-30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Oliveira, D. C., A. Tomasz, and H. de Lencastre. 2001. The evolution of pandemic clones of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: identification of two ancestral genetic backgrounds and the associated mec elements. Microb. Drug Resist. 7:349-361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Shore, A., A. S. Rossney, C. T. Keane, M. C. Enright, and D. C. Coleman. 2005. Seven novel variants of the staphylococcal chromosomal cassette mec in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from Ireland. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49:2070-2083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tristan, A., M. Bes, H. Meugnier, G. Lina, B. Bozdogan, P. Courvalin, M. Reverdy, M. C. Enright, F. Vandenesch, and J. Etienne. 2007. Global distribution of Panton-Valentine leukocidin-positive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, 2006. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 13:594-600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES