Skip to main content
British Journal of Pharmacology logoLink to British Journal of Pharmacology
. 1980 Jul;69(3):513–518. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1980.tb07042.x

Subsensitivity to cholinoceptor stimulation of the human iris sphincter in situ following acute and chronic administration of cholinomimetic miotic drugs.

S A Smith, S E Smith
PMCID: PMC2044267  PMID: 6105002

Abstract

1 Maximal pupillary miosis was obtained with single topical applications of 4 cholinomimetic drugs in therapeutic concentrations to normal human subjects. 2 When the pupil had recovered from the miosis, there remained a reduced light reflex response of 22.7% at 24 h after aceclidine, 18.0% at 31 h after pilocarpine, 10.3% at 48 h after physostigmine and 4.9% at 7 h after arecoline. 3 This reduced sensitivity to light was accompanied by an overshoot of the resting pupil diameter and, after aceclidine miosis, a reduced response to a second application of miotic. 4 Similar findings were observed in glaucoma patients following withdrawal of chronic pilocarpine therapy. 5 It is suggested that the slowly reversible after-effects of acute and chronic administration of cholinomimetic miotics can be explained by desensitization of iris sphincter cholinoceptors.

Full text

PDF
513

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Kaufman P. L. Anticholinesterase-induced cholinergic subsensitivity in primate accommodative mechanism. Am J Ophthalmol. 1978 May;85(5 Pt 1):622–631. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)77094-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Kaufman P. L., Bárány E. H. Recent observations concerning the effects of cholinergic drugs on outflow facility in monkeys. Exp Eye Res. 1977;25 (Suppl):415–418. doi: 10.1016/s0014-4835(77)80038-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Smith S. A., Ellis C. J., Smith S. E. Inequality of the direct and consensual light reflexes in normal subjects. Br J Ophthalmol. 1979 Jul;63(7):523–527. doi: 10.1136/bjo.63.7.523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Smith S. A., Smith S. E. Factors determining the potency of cholinomimetic miotic drugs and their effect upon the light reflex in man. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1978 Aug;6(2):149–153. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1978.tb00840.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Smith S. A., Smith S. E., Lazare R. An increased effect of pilocarpine on the pupil by application of the drug in oil. Br J Ophthalmol. 1978 May;62(5):314–317. doi: 10.1136/bjo.62.5.314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Pharmacology are provided here courtesy of The British Pharmacological Society

RESOURCES