Skip to main content
British Journal of Pharmacology logoLink to British Journal of Pharmacology
. 1980 Nov;70(3):367–373. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1980.tb08712.x

The integrity of the social hierarchy in mice following administration of psychotropic drugs.

V P Poshivalov
PMCID: PMC2044342  PMID: 7192165

Abstract

1 Mice in small groups develop a despotic type of social hierarchy, a feature of which is to resist alteration through the medium of psychotropic drugs. This makes a rapid pharmacologically induced change in the social hierarchy impossible. 2 Patrolling the territory and a certain level of social interaction are both critical factors in maintaining the phenomenon of inertia in the social hierarchy. Psychotropic drugs (diazepam, droperidol and mescaline) altered both these factors to a varying degree and also displayed a differing ability to maintain the inertia of the social hierarchy. 3 A drug-induced alteration in the level of aggression in a subordinate mouse in a group of three does not cause an alteration in its social position. 4 Chronic administration of diazepam, droperidol or mescaline, all of which alter the level of aggression in different ways, can result in an inversion of the social hierarchy where a competitive rival is present in the group of mice. The rate of inversion of the social hierarchy depends on the type of pre-existing social hierarchy. 5 It is suggested that the ability of psychotropic drugs to maintain the inertia of the hierarchy be used as an index of their effect upon certain types of species-specific behaviour; in particular aggression.

Full text

PDF
367

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Apfelbach R., Delgado J. M. Social hierarchy in monkeys (Macaca mulatta) modified by chlordiazepoxide hydrochloride. Neuropharmacology. 1974 Jan;13(1):11–20. doi: 10.1016/0028-3908(74)90003-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cutler M. G., Mackintosh J. H., Chance M. R. Effects of the environment on the behavioural response of mice to non-ataxic doses of ethyl alcohol. Neuropharmacology. 1975 Nov;14(11):841–846. doi: 10.1016/0028-3908(75)90112-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ely D. L., Henry J. P., Jarosz C. J. Effects of marihuana (delta9-THC) on behavior patterns and social roles in colonies of CBA mice. Behav Biol. 1975 Mar;13(3):263–276. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6773(75)91290-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Poole T. B., Morgan H. D. Differences in aggressive behaviour between male mice (Mus musculus L.) in colonies of different sizes. Anim Behav. 1973 Nov;21(4):788–795. doi: 10.1016/s0003-3472(73)80105-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. SILVERMAN A. P. ETHOLOGICAL AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF DRUG EFFECTS ON THE SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR OF LABORATORY RATS. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1965 Apr;24:579–590. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1965.tb01749.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Silverman A. P. The social behaviour of laboratory rats and the action of chlorpromazine and other drugs. Behaviour. 1966;27(1):1–38. doi: 10.1163/156853966x00083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Pharmacology are provided here courtesy of The British Pharmacological Society

RESOURCES