Skip to main content
NCBI home page
British Journal of Pharmacology logoLink to British Journal of Pharmacology
. 1982 Oct;77(2):255–265. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1982.tb09294.x

Electrophysiological effects of piperazine and diethylcarbamazine on Ascaris suum somatic muscle.

R J Martin
PMCID: PMC2044588  PMID: 7139188

Abstract

1 Electrophysiological recordings were made from the bag region of Ascaris suum muscle. Membrane potential and input conductance or membrane current under voltage clamp were measured. 2 In high-Cl- Ringer, bath-applied piperazine, at concentrations greater than 10(-4)M, produced a dose-dependent and reversible increase in input conductance associated with a hyperpolarizing potential. The increase in input conductance was reduced when the preparations were bathed in low-Cl- Ringer. Gamma-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) and piperazine reversal potentials were measured with a voltage clamp on the same cells using iontophoretic application of the agonists. The reversal potentials were the same and close to the predicted Nernst Cl- potential (-65 mV). When GABA and piperazine were applied simultaneously piperazine reversibly reduced the amplitude of the control outward GABA current response. It was concluded that piperazine acts as a GABA agonist of low potency on the extra-synaptic GABA receptors of the bag, mediating an increase in Cl- conductance. 3 Acetylcholine was applied iontophoretically within 100 micron of the bag region while the preparation was bathed in a low-Ca2+, low-Cl- Ringer. The response under voltage clamp was a dose-dependent inward current associated with an increase in input conductance. This response was reversibly antagonized by 3 X 10(-5)M tubocurarine, high concentrations of diethylcarbamazine (10(-3) to 10(-2)M) but not high concentrations of piperazine (10(-3) to 10(-2)M). It was concluded that there are extra-synaptic acetylcholine receptors on the bag region of Ascaris muscle and that diethylcarbamazine but not piperazine acts as an antagonist. 4 Bath-applied diethylcarbamazine (10(-4) to 2 X 10(-3)M) produced a reversible dose-dependent depolarization of the membrane potential which was associated with an increase in the amplitude and frequency of spontaneous depolarizing potentials in active preparations at 32 degrees C to 35 degrees C in high-Cl- Ringer. The excitatory action of diethylcarbamazine was not blocked by 3 X 10(-5)M tubocurarine. Diethylcarbamazine (10(-4) to 10(-3)M) had no effect on the outward current response to GABA iontophoresis. Diethylcarbamazine (10(-4) to 10(-2)M) reversibly antagonized in a dose-dependent manner the delayed rectification of the bag membrane. In a low-Ca2+, low-Cl- Ringer, diethylcarbamazine (10(-4) to 2 X 10(-3)M) reversibly antagonized the voltage-sensitive outward current of the bag. This effect was mimicked by high-K+ Ringer or perfusion with 4-aminopyridine (10(-3) to 2 X 10(-3)M). It was concluded that diethylcarbamazine did not react with the GABA receptor but antagonized a voltage-sensitive K+ conductance.

Full text

PDF
255

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abaitey A. K., Parratt J. R. The effects of diethylcarbamazine citrate on smooth muscle. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1977 Jul;29(7):428–432. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1977.tb11358.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aubry M. L., Cowell P., Davey M. J., Shevde S. Aspects of the pharmacology of a new anthelmintic: pyrantel. Br J Pharmacol. 1970 Feb;38(2):332–344. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1970.tb08521.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brading A. F., Caldwell P. C. The resting membrane potential of the somatic muscle cells of Ascaris lumbricoides. J Physiol. 1971 Sep;217(3):605–624. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Connor J. D., Constanti A., Dunn P. M., Forward A., Nistri A. The effects of piperazine on rat sympathetic neurones. Br J Pharmacol. 1981 Oct;74(2):445–454. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1981.tb09990.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Constanti A., Nistri A. A comparative study of the action of gamma-aminobutyric acid and piperazine on the lobster muscle fibre and the frog spinal cord. Br J Pharmacol. 1976 Jul;57(3):347–358. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1976.tb07673.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. DELCASTILLO J., DEMELLO W. C., MORALES T. MECHANISM OF THE PARALYSING ACTION OF PIPERAZINE ON ASCARIS MUSCLE. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1964 Jun;22:463–477. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1964.tb01701.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gysels H. Immunoelectrophoresis of avian lens proteins. Experientia. 1964 Mar 15;20(3):145–146. doi: 10.1007/BF02150703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. HODGKIN A. L., HUXLEY A. F. Currents carried by sodium and potassium ions through the membrane of the giant axon of Loligo. J Physiol. 1952 Apr;116(4):449–472. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1952.sp004717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hawking F. Diethylcarbamazine and new compounds for the treatment of filariasis. Adv Pharmacol Chemother. 1979;16:129–194. doi: 10.1016/s1054-3589(08)60244-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Iravani J. Wechselbeziehung von Barbituraten und Piperazin mit GABA an der Membran des Krebsmuskels. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Exp Pathol Pharmakol. 1965 Jul 26;251(3):265–274. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Martin R. J. The effect of gamma-aminobutyric acid on the input conductance and membrane potential of Ascaris muscle. Br J Pharmacol. 1980;71(1):99–106. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1980.tb10914.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. NORTON S., DE BEER E. J. Investigations on the action of piperazine on Ascaris lumbricoides. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1957 Sep;6(5):898–905. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1957.6.898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nistri A., Constanti A. Pharmacological characterization of different types of GABA and glutamate receptors in vertebrates and invertebrates. Prog Neurobiol. 1979;13(2):117–235. doi: 10.1016/0301-0082(79)90016-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Perkins M. N., Stone T. W. Comparison of the effects of ethylenediamine analogues and gamma-aminobutyric acid on cortical and pallidal neurones. Br J Pharmacol. 1982 Jan;75(1):93–99. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1982.tb08761.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Phillips J. L., Sturman G., West G. B. The interaction between anthelmintic drugs and histamine in Ascaris suum. Br J Pharmacol. 1976 Jul;57(3):417–420. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1976.tb07683.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sheth U. K. Mechanisms of anthelmintic action. Prog Drug Res. 1975;19:147–157. doi: 10.1007/978-3-0348-7090-0_19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Standen O. D. Chemotherapy of intestinal helminthiasis. Prog Drug Res. 1975;19:158–165. doi: 10.1007/978-3-0348-7090-0_20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Pharmacology are provided here courtesy of The British Pharmacological Society

RESOURCES