Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2007 Jul 25;45(9):3095–3097. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00643-07

Characterization of Tunisian Mycobacterium tuberculosis Rifampin-Resistant Clinical Isolates

Alya Soudani 1,*, Sondess Hadjfredj 2, Mériem Zribi 1, Afef Masmoudi 1, Taieb Messaoud 2, Hanéne Tiouri 3, Chedlia Fendri 1
PMCID: PMC2045245  PMID: 17652484

Abstract

Analysis of the gene encoding the β-subunit of Mycobacterium tuberculosis RNA polymerase (rpoB) has demonstrated a small region that harbors the mutations most frequently associated with rifampin resistance. In this study, we determined the occurrence of rifampin resistance in 544 Tunisian clinical M. tuberculosis strains isolated in a university hospital between 2004 and 2006 by using the standard-proportion agar method, the INNO-LiPA Rif.TB assay, and DNA sequencing.


One of the most alarming trends concerning tuberculosis (TB) is the emergence of drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains, which has become a worldwide health care problem (15). The early detection of resistance to primary anti-TB agents is essential for the efficient treatment and control of multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains. Rifampin (RMP) is one of the most potent anti-TB drugs; therefore, resistance to RMP often results in high clinical relapse rates, particularly if RMP resistance is associated with resistance to other anti-TB drugs (8).

It has been established that RMP resistance in M. tuberculosis is mainly due to a group of mutations within a limited region of the rpoB gene that encodes the β-subunit of the RNA polymerase (28). These mutations can be characterized by PCR single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis (1, 23), heteroduplexing (21), dideoxy fingerprinting (6), the line probe assay (4, 7, 19), and automated DNA sequencing analysis (9, 24). However, few of these findings are associated with isolates from Tunisia, where the global incidence of TB infection was about 23.54 per 100,000 inhabitants (12). Therefore, the aim of our study was to determine the molecular basis of resistance in M. tuberculosis RMP-resistant strains by using the INNO-LiPA Rif.TB assay (Innogenetics, Ghent, Belgium) and DNA sequencing and to correlate these results with clinical and antibiotic sensitivity data.

A total of 544 clinical M. tuberculosis strains from 475 patients were isolated in a university hospital in an urban setting, the Rabta center, Tunis, Tunisia, during a 2-year period (2004 to 2006). The culturing of mycobacterial isolates was performed on solid Löwenstein-Jensen (LJ) medium. All M. tuberculosis cultures were biochemically characterized and confirmed by the AccuProbe method (Gen-Probe Inc., San Diego, CA).

Susceptibility testing for isoniazid (INH), RMP, ethambutol (EMB), streptomycin (SM), and ciprofloxacin (CIP) was carried out on LJ medium according to the standard procedure (2, 3). The critical concentrations of RMP, INH, EMB, SM, and CIP were 40, 0.2, 1, 10, and 10 μg/ml, respectively. Resistance to RMP was defined as ≥1% growth on RMP-containing medium compared to the rate of growth on control medium. On final analysis of the 544 isolates, 10 (1.83%) were RMP-resistant and 534 were characterized as fully susceptible to RMP. These 10 clinical isolates recovered from six different patients were classified as MDR strains since they were also resistant to INH. Complete medical records were available for all of the six patients, and these revealed negative human immunodeficiency virus status with previous anti-TB treatment histories, including RMP, INH, pyrazinamide, and SM during 3- to 6-month periods.

Susceptibility results for the other antituberculosis drugs tested showed 21 (3.8%) strains with a high level of resistance to INH, 99 (18.2%) resistant to EMB, 82 (15.07%) resistant to SM, and 5 (0.9%) resistant to CIP.

The template DNA for the molecular sequencing method was prepared by heat killing of mycobacteria at 95°C for 30 min, then sonication at room temperature for 25 min, and centrifugation at 14,000 × g for 5 min. Supernatant was kept at −20°C until needed. The commercial PCR-based reverse-hybridization line probe assay (INNO-LiPA Rif.TB test; Innogenetics, Ghent, Belgium) using biotinylated primers (IP1 and IP2) was performed manually according to the manufacturer's instructions. The line probe assay consists of specific oligonucleotides immobilized at known locations on membrane strips and hybridized under strictly controlled conditions with the biotin-labeled PCR product. The LiPA results were evaluated as described elsewhere (5).

DNA sequencing of both strands was performed with an ABI PRISM Dye terminator cycle sequencing ready reaction kit (Applied Biosystems) and the reactions were analyzed on an ABI PRISM 310. The BLAST 2 SEQUENCES computer program was used for DNA sequence comparisons (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST).

The presence of the M. tuberculosis complex was confirmed by a positive reaction with an oligonucleotide-specific probe for this complex. The results of the INNO-LiPA assay showed three different patterns with mutations in codon 526 or 531 leading to an amino acid change (Table 1). In all cases, we observed a single nucleotide mutation in codon 531, with substitutions of serine to tryptophan (TCG to TGG), serine to leucine (TCG to TTG) and serine to alanine (TCG to GCG). Three M. tuberculosis strains showed triple point mutations in two different codons (codon 526, His CAC to Cys TGC, and codon 531, Ser TCG to Ala GCG), which has not been previously reported. The compilation of data available from many studies indicated that RMP resistance in M. tuberculosis is mainly due to distinct mutations located within an 81-bp RMP resistance-determining region of the rpoB gene (8, 10, 11, 14, 16, 20, 26, 29). However, it is speculated that additional mechanisms, including a permeability barrier or membrane proteins acting as drug efflux pumps, may also be involved in conferring the resistance phenotype (7, 14, 17).

TABLE 1.

Resistance patterns of RMP-resistant M. tuberculosis isolates by proportion method, LiPA, and DNA sequencing

Patient Strain Isolation date (day/mo/yr) Drug resistance shown by proportion method Mutation shown by:
LiPA Sequencinga
1 10603 21/12/2004 INH, RMP, SM ΔS5 S531W
5585 12/05/2005 INH, RMP, SM, EMB ΔS5 S531W
4522 12/07/2006 INH, RMP, SM, EMB ΔS5 S531W
2 15 03/01/2006 INH, RMP R5b S531L
3267 28/04/2006 INH, RMP R5 S531L
3 9796 25/11/2005 INH, RMP, EMB, SM ΔS4/ΔS5 H526C/S531A
1409 28/02/2006 INH, RMP, EMB, SM ΔS4/ΔS5 H526C/S531A
4 2603 03/03/2006 INH, RMP R5 S531L
5 9742 23/11/2005 INH, RMP, SM, CIP ΔS4/ΔS5 H526C/S531A
6 4164 29/05/2006 INH, RMP, EMB ΔS5 S531W
a

Sequencing mutation descriptions are as follows: first, the amino acid residue in the wild-type sequence, then the codon position, and finally the amino acid residue in the mutated sequence. The numbering system is based on the Escherichia coli β-subunit of RNA polymerase (25).

b

R5, S531L.

Worldwide, the most frequent mutations are S531L, H526Y, and H526D, and all three can be reliably detected and differentiated by the INNO-LiPA Rif.TB test (19). Significantly, the frequency of mutations was higher at codon 531 and lower at codon 526 in the Tunisian isolates in our study than in those described previously. Moreover, the M. tuberculosis RMP-resistant strains that we investigated showed no mutations in codon 516. Also, a lot of novel mutations involving changes in one or two codons were identified in different geographic areas (22, 27), and it remains to be seen if the new mutation identified in our study can also be found in other parts of Tunisia, based on an epidemiologically independent group of isolates.

In Tunisia, as is the case worldwide, the vast majority of M. tuberculosis RMP-resistant strains are also INH-resistant, and although monoresistance to INH is common (18), monoresistance to RMP is rare (13). Thus, RMP resistance can be used for the identification of MDR tuberculosis infections. Spontaneous mutations that lead to drug resistance occur rarely in M. tuberculosis, and multidrug regimens can prevent the emergence of clinical drug resistance (25). The ability to rapidly identify an MDR-TB infection affords an effective management tool by reducing the frequency of noncompliance, since patients that do not have MDR-TB can be treated less aggressively, and this ability therefore contributes to the control of TB.

Despite the small number of strains investigated, the concordance between phenotypic RMP resistance susceptibility testing results and molecular sequencing results was 100%, indicating that the INNO-LiPA Rif.TB PCR-based hybridization assay is highly reliable when run in parallel with conventional laboratory TB diagnostics. The LiPA assay, though relatively expensive in low-resource countries, is simple and convenient. However, DNA sequencing is the “gold standard” for mutation detection, because it provides a definitive identification of any mutation present.

Nucleotide sequence accession number.

The sequence with novel mutations found in this study has been deposited in GenBank under accession number EF064790.

Acknowledgments

We thank Rebecca Millecamps, customer support product specialist, LiPA Infectious-INNOGENETICS NV, for her technical support and precious advice.

The work was performed in the Bacteriology Laboratory, Rabta University Hospital, and the Biochemistry and Molecular Laboratory, Children's Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print on 25 July 2007.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Bobadilla-del-Valle, M., A. Ponce-de-Leon, C. Arenas-Huertero, G. Vargas-Alarcon, M. Kato-Maeda, P. M. Small, P. Couary, G. M. Ruiz-Palacios, and J. Sifuentes-Osornio. 2001. rpoB gene mutations in rifampin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis identified by PCR single-stranded conformation polymorphism. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 7:1010-1013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Canetti, G., F. Froman, and J. Grosset. 1963. Mycobacteria: laboratory methods for testing drug sensitivity and resistance. Bull. W. H. O. 29:565-578. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Canetti, G., W. Fox, and A. Khomenko. 1969. Advances in techniques of testing mycobacterial drug sensitivity, and the use of sensitivity tests in tuberculosis control programs. Bull. W. H. O. 41:21-43. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cooksey, R. C., G. P. Morlock, S. Glickman, and J. T. Crawford. 1997. Evaluation of a line probe assay kit for characterization of rpoB mutations in rifampin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from New York City. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:1281-1283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.De Beenhouwer, H., Z. Lhiang, G. Jannes, W. Mijs, L. Machtelinckx, R. Rossau, H. Traore, and F. Portaels. 1995. Rapid detection of rifampin resistance in sputum and biopsy specimens from tuberculosis patients by PCR and line probe assay. Tuber. Lung Dis. 76:425-430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Felmlee, T. A., Q. Liu, C. Whelen, D. Williams, S. S. Sommer, and D. H. Persing. 1995. Genotypic detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis rifampin resistance: comparison of single-strand conformation polymorphism and dideoxy fingerprinting. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:1617-1623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hirano, K., C. Abe, and M. Takahashi. 1999. Mutations in the rpoB gene of rifampin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains isolated mostly in Asian countries and their rapid detection by line probe assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:2663-2666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hwang, H. Y., C. Y. Chang, L. L. Chang, S. F. Chang, Y. H. Chang, and Y. J. Chen. 2003. Characterization of rifampin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Taiwan. J. Med. Microbiol. 52:239-245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kapur, V., L. L. Li, S. Iordanescu, M. Hamrick, A. Wanger, B. N. Kreiswirth, and J. M. Musser. 1994. Characterization by automated sequencing of mutations in the gene (rpoB) encoding the RNA polymerase β subunit in rifampin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains from New York City and Texas. J. Clin. Microbiol. 32:1095-1098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mani, C., N. Selvakumar, S. Narayanan, and P. R. Narayanan. 2001. Mutations in the rpoB gene of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates from India. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:2987-2990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Matsiota-Bernard, P., G. Vrioni, and E. Marinis. 1998. Characterization of rpoB mutations in rifampin-resistant clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from Greece. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:20-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ministry of Public Health. 2004. Direction des soins de santé de base: programme national de lutte antituberculeuse. Edition 2004. Ministry of Public Health, Tunis, Tunisia.
  • 13.Mitchison, D. A. 1998. How drug resistance emerges as a result of poor compliance during short course chemotherapy for tuberculosis. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 2:10-15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ohno, H., H. Koga, S. Kohono, T. Tashiro, and K. Hara. 1996. Relationship between rifampin MICs for and rpoB mutations of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains isolated in Japan. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:1053-1056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pablos-Mendez, A., M. C. Raviglione, A. Laszlo, N. Binkin, H. L. Rieder, F. Bustreo, D. L. Cohn, C. S. Lambregts-van Weezenbeek, S. J. Kim, P. Chaulet, and P. Nunn. 1998. Global surveillance for antituberculosis-drug resistance, 1994-1997. World Health Organization-International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease Working Group on Anti-Tuberculosis Drug Resistance Surveillance. N. Engl. J. Med. 338:1641-1649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ramaswamy, S., S. J. Dou, A. Rendon, Z. Yang, M. D. Cave, and E. A. Graviss. 2004. Genotypic analysis of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from Monterrey, Mexico. J. Med. Microbiol. 53:107-113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rattan, A., A. Kalia, and N. Ahmad. 1998. Multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis: molecular perspectives. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 4:195-209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ridzon, R., C. G. Whitney, M. T. McKenna, J. P. Taylor, S. H. Ashkar, A. T. Nitta, S. M. Harvey, S. Valway, C. Woodley, R. Cooksey, and I. M. Onorato. 1998. Risk factors for rifampin mono-resistant tuberculosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 157:1881-1884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rosseau, R., H. Traore, H. Beenhouwer, W. Mijs, G. Jannes, P. De Rijk, and F. Portaels. 1997. Evaluation of the INNO-LiPA Rif.TB assay, a reverse hybridization assay for the simultaneous detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex and its resistance to rifampin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:2093-2098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sajduda, A., A. Brzostek, M. Poplawska, E. Augustynowicz-Kopec, Z. Zwolska, S. Niemann, J. Dziadek, and D. Hillemann. 2004. Molecular characterization of rifampin- and isoniazid-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains isolated in Poland. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:2425-2431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Saribas, Z., T. Kocagöz, A. Alp, and A. Günalp. 2003. Rapid detection of rifampin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates by heteroduplex analysis and determination of rifamycin cross-resistance in rifampin-resistant isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:816-818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Siddiqi, N., M. Shamim, S. Hussain, K. R. Choudhary, N. Ahmed, et al. 2002. Molecular characterization of multidrug-resistant isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from patients in North India. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:443-450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Telenti, A., P. Imboden, F. Marchesi, T. Schmidhein, and T. Bodmer. 1993. Direct, automated detection of rifampin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis by PCR and single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 37:2054-2058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Telenti, A., P. Imboden, F. Marchesi, D. Lowrie, S. Cole, M. J. Colston, L. Matter, K. Schopfer, and T. Bodmer. 1993. Detection of rifampin-resistance mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Lancet 341:647-650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Toungoussova, O. S., N. I. Nizovtseva, A. O. Mariandyshev, D. A. Caugant, P. Sandven, and G. Bjune. 2004. Impact of drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis on treatment outcome of culture-positive cases of tuberculosis in the Archnagel Oblast, Russia, in 1999. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 23:174-179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tracevska, T., I. Jansone, L. Broka, O. Marga, and V. Baumanis. 2002. Mutations in the rpoB and katG genes leading to drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Latvia. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:3789-3792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Traore, H., K. Fissette, I. Bastian, M. Devleeschouwer, and F. Portaels. 2000. Detection of rifampin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from diverse countries by a commercial line probe assay as an initial indicator of multidrug resistance. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung. Dis. 4:481-484. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Williams, D. L., C. Waguespack, K. Eisenach, J. T. Crawford, F. Portaels, M. Salfinger, M. C. Nolan, C. Abe, V. Sticht-Groh, and T. P. Gillis. 1994. Characterization of rifampin resistance in pathogenic mycobacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 38:2380-2386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yue, J., W. Shi, J. Xie, Y. Li, E. Zeng, and H. Wang. 2003. Mutations in the rpoB gene of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from China. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:2209-2212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES