Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 Nov 7.
Published in final edited form as: Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2007 Aug 7;37(11):1222–1233. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2007.07.015

Alternative splicing generates multiple transcripts of the Inhibitor of Apoptosis Protein 1 in Aedes and Culex spp. mosquitoes

Eric T Beck 1, Carol D Blair 1, William C Black IV 1, Barry J Beaty 1,*, Bradley J Blitvich 2
PMCID: PMC2065863  NIHMSID: NIHMS32590  PMID: 17916508

Abstract

We determined the sequences of cDNA encoding Inhibitor of Apoptosis Protein 1 (IAP1) homologues from Aedes triseriatus, Ae. albopictus, Ae. aegypti, Culex pipiens and Cx. tarsalis. The cDNAs encode translation products that share ≥84% sequence similarity. The IAP1 mRNA of each mosquito species exists as 3 to 5 distinct variants due to the presence of heterogeneous sequences at the distal end of their 5'UTRs. Partial genomic sequencing upstream of the 5' end of the Ae. triseriatus IAP1 gene, and analysis of the Ae. aegypti genomic sequence, suggest that these mRNA variants are generated by alternative splicing. Each IAP1 mRNA variant from Ae. triseriatus and Cx. pipiens was detected by RT-PCR in all mosquito life-stages and adult tissues examined, and the relative concentration of each Ae. triseriatus IAP mRNA variant in various tissues was determined.

Keywords: Inhibitor of apoptosis, Alternative splicing, Aedes mosquitoes, Culex mosquitoes

INTRODUCTION

Apoptosis, or programmed cell death, is an evolutionarily conserved process that regulates the normal development and homeostasis of multicellular organisms by removing unwanted, damaged, mutated, or infected cells (Reed, 2000; Zimmerman et al., 2001; Twomey and McCarthy, 2005). Inhibitor of Apoptosis Proteins (IAPs) play a key role in this process (Deveraux and Reed, 1999; Salvesen and Duckett, 2002). IAPs were first identified in baculoviruses and have since been identified in other viruses, invertebrates and vertebrates (Crook et al., 1993; Deveraux and Reed, 1999; Salvesen and Duckett, 2002). IAPs bind to and inhibit the activity of caspases, a family of cysteine proteases that orchestrate rapid cellular destruction by cleaving various target proteins (Shi, 2002; Shi, 2004). The anti-apoptotic activities of IAPs are antagonized by IAP binding motif (IBM) proteins, a family of proapoptotic proteins that share an IAP-binding tetrapeptide motif (Bergmann et al., 2003; Vaux and Silke, 2003; Verhagen et al., 2006). Members of this family include Reaper, Hid, Grim, Sickle, and Jafrac2 in Drosophila, michelob_x in Anopheles gambiae, the michelob_x homolog in Aedes aegypti, and Smac/DIABLO, Omi/HtrA2 and GSPT1/eRF3 in mammals.

The defining characteristic of an IAP is the presence of at least one baculovirus IAP repeat (BIR) domain, with many IAPs also containing a C-terminal RING finger motif (Miller, 1999; Salvesen and Duckett, 2002). At least one BIR is required for anti-apoptotic activity, whereas the requirement for the RING motif depends upon the IAP and/or death-inducing stimuli. BIRs contain a highly conserved arrangement of cysteine and histidine residues that belong to a putative zinc-binding fold. BIRs mediate the interactions between IAPs and various other proteins, including caspases and IBM proteins (Roy et al., 1997; Vucic et al., 1997; Salvesen and Duckett, 2002). BIRs also mediate the formation of IAP homodimers, the apparent functional form of these proteins (Hozak et al., 2000). While BIRs are present in all IAP s, they are not exclusive to IAPs. In the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, the BIR-1 protein contains a BIR domain, but functions in regulating cytokinesis rather than the inhibition of apoptosis (Fraser et al., 1999). BIR containing proteins that function in cell division have also been described in yeast and mammals (Verhagen et al., 2001). RING motifs can function as E3 ligases by binding to E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes and recruiting E2s to target proteins (Huang et al., 2000; Yang et al., 2000; Olson et al., 2003). IAPs have been shown to catalyze the ubiquitination of caspases and various IBM proteins, targeting them for proteasomal degradation. The ring motifs of IAPs can also promote auto-ubiquitination and subsequent degradation, which presumably promotes apoptosis.

Only a few apoptosis-related genes from mosquitoes have been characterized, despite the central role that these vectors play in disease transmission (Blitvich et al., 2002; Zhou et al., 2005; Li et al., 2007). Studies on apoptosis regulation in insects have mostly focused on Drosophila (Kornbluth and White, 2005). However, the recent completion of the genome sequence of Anopheles gambiae, the principal malaria vector, has provided considerable insight into the genetic basis of apoptotic regulation in mosquitoes (Christophides et al., 2002). Interestingly, a larger number of apoptosis-related genes are encoded in the genome of An. gambiae than Drosophila, possibly due to the role that mosquitoes play in pathogen transmission. For example, 7 IAPs were identified in An. gambiae whereas only 4 IAPs (designated DIAP1, DIAP2, Deterin and Bruce) exist in Drosophila (Hay et al., 1995; Jones et al., 2000; Christophides et al., 2002; Vernooy et al., 2002). The recent availability of the Ae. aegypti genome sequence, the principal vector of both yellow fever and dengue viruses, should further increase our knowledge of mosquito apoptotic regulation (http://msc.tigr.org/aedes/aedes.shtml).

We recently identified and characterized a DIAP1 homologue from the La Crosse virus vector, Ae. triseriatus (Say) (designated AtIAP1) (Blitvich et al., 2002). The AtIAP1 translation product is a 403 amino acid protein that contains 2 BIRs and a RING finger motif. AtIAP1 mRNA was detectable by RT-PCR using primers that amplified a 1461 nt region (nt −252 to +1209) in all mosquito life-stages (embryos, first–fourth instar larvae, early and late pupae, adults) and adult tissues (midguts, ovaries, salivary glands) examined. In contrast, the AtIAP1 protein was detectable by western blot only in certain developmental stages (first instar larvae, early pupae, adults) and tissues (ovaries). Taken together, these data suggest that expression of AtIAP1 is post-transcriptionally regulated. More recently, an IAP1 from Ae. albopictus (designated AaIAP1) was characterized; this is the only other mosquito gene with significant homology to a known apoptotic suppressor to be studied in detail (Li et al., 2007). Expression of AaIAP1 protected lepidopteron cells from Hid-induced apoptosis, and vertebrate cells from bluetongue virus-induced apoptosis.

The 5' untranslated region (5'UTR) in the AtIAP1 mRNA is unusually long, and possesses significant secondary structure when analyzed using the MFOLD RNA folding server (http://bioweb.pasteur.fr/seqanal/interfaces/mfold-simple.html), suggesting that it has an important role in post-transcriptional regulation (Blitvich et al., 2002). Unusually long 5'UTRs are also present in the mRNAs of other IAPs, such as X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis (XIAP) and human inhibitor of apoptosis 2 (HIAP2) (1.6 kb and 1.2 kb, respectively), suggesting that this feature is common among IAPs. The 5'UTR of the XIAP1 mRNA contains an internal ribosomal entry site (IRES) that regulates translation in response to serum starvation and low dose gamma irradiation, but not etoposide-induced apoptosis, in human cell lines (Holcik et al., 1999; Holcik and Korneluk, 2000; Nevins et al., 2003). HIAP2 translation is regulated by an inducible IRES in response to endoplasmic reticulum stress (Warnakulasuriyarachchi et al., 2004). Translation of HIAP2 mRNA has also been shown to be regulated by a short 5'UTR open reading frame (μORF) located just 8 nt upstream of the HIAP2 initiation codon, suggesting that multiple post-transcriptional mechanisms can regulate IAP translation (Warnakulasuriyarachchi et al., 2003).

In our previous study, we identified heterogeneous sequences at the distal end of the 5'UTR in the AtIAP1 mRNA (Blitvich et al., 2002). Four cDNA clones were analyzed by 5' rapid amplification of cDNA ends (5' RACE) and automated sequencing. The 5'UTRs encoded by these cDNAs varied in length. The 401 nt immediately upstream of the open reading frame (ORF) were identical for each clone, but the distal nucleotide sequences possessed no significant similarity. At the time, it was not known whether this represented an artifact of our experimental approach, a splicing event, or unusual genomic organization. To investigate this phenomenon further, the AtIAP1 gene and additional AtIAP1 cDNA clones were sequenced, as were cDNAs encoding IAP1s from Ae. albopictus (Skuse), Ae. aegypti (Linnaeus), Culex pipiens Linnaeus and Cx. tarsalis Coquillett.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mosquitoes

Ae. triseriatus (Say) mosquitoes (originally collected as eggs in La Crosse, Wisconsin) were reared at 24°C and 75% relative humidity with a photocycle of 16:8 (L:D). Ae. albopictus (Skuse) mosquitoes (originally collected as eggs in San Juan, Puerto Rico) were reared at 27°C and 80% relative humidity with a photocycle of 12:12 (L:D). Ae. aegypti (Linnaeus) mosquitoes (also collected as eggs in Puerto Rico) were reared at 27°C and 80% relative humidity with a photocycle of 12:12 (L:D). Cx. pipiens Linnaeus mosquitoes (obtained from Iowa State University in 2002) were reared at 27°C and 80% relative humidity with a photocycle of 12:12 (L:D). Cx. tarsalis Coquillett mosquitoes (obtained from Bakersfield, California in 2004) were reared at 27°C and 80% relative humidity with a photocycle of 12:12 (L:D). Larvae and pupae were reared in 15 × 25 × 15 cm polypropylene plastic trays containing approximately 500 ml of tap water supplemented with 30 mg of pulverized tetramin fish food/mouse chow (1:1).

RNA isolation

Total RNA was extracted from whole adult mosquitoes (Ae. triseriatus, Ae. albopictus, Ae. aegypti, Cx. pipiens, Cx. tarsalis) and from various developmental stages (embryos, larvae, pupae) and organs (ovaries, midguts, salivary glands) of Ae. triseriatus and Cx. pipiens using Trizol Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Briefly, whole mosquitoes were homogenized in 2 ml of Trizol Reagent using a mortar and pestle on ice. Organs were dissected from adult female mosquitoes (n = 20) and homogenized in 200 μl of Trizol Reagent by vigorous pipetting and vortexing. Numbers of whole mosquitoes used in each reaction are as follows: embryos (5000), first instar larvae (500), second instar larvae (50), third instar larvae (40), fourth instar larvae (30), early pupae (20), late pupae (20) and adults (20). Following homogenization, total RNA was extracted following the manufacturer's instructions.

Reverse transcription

An aliquot of total RNA (1–2 μg) was mixed with 100 ng of poly(A) tail-specific primer (5′-GGC CAC GCG TCG ACT AGT ACT TTT TTT TTT TTT TTT T-3′) and heated at 70°C for 10 min. After briefly chilling on ice, the RNA was reverse transcribed at 42°C for 1 hour using 200 units of Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, Gaithersburg, MD) with each dNTP at 500 μM in 1x reaction buffer [20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.4), 50 mM KCl, 2.5 mM MgCl , 10 mM DTT]. Samples were heated at 70°C for 15 min and treated with 2 units of RNase H (Invitrogen, Gaithersburg, MD) at 37°C for 20 min.

Polymerase chain reaction

PCR amplifications were performed using 1 μl of cDNA template, 0.1 unit of Taq polymerase, 30 ng of each primer and each dNTP at 200 μM in 1x PCR buffer [20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.4), 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2]. Reactions were performed as follows: 94°C for 3 min, thirty cycles of 94°C for 45 sec, 50°C for 45 sec and 72°C for 2 min, followed by a final extension at 72°C for 7 min. PCR amplifications were first performed using degenerate primers designed from conserved regions in the AtIAP1 and DIAP1 cDNA sequences (forward: 5'-TGC TTC AGY TGC GGY GGY GGY CTC AWG GAT TGG-3'; reverse: 5'-GGT RAA SGG YTT CCG RCA SAG CGG ACA CTT-3'). The resulting PCR products were sequenced and used to design additional primers. The nucleotide sequence of the reverse primer used to amplify the extreme 3′ end of each IAP1 cDNA matched the 5′ half of the poly(A)-specific reverse transcription primer (5′-GGC CAC GCG TCG ACT AGT AC-3′). Control RTPCRs were performed using the Cx. pipiens actin-1 cDNA sequence (Genbank Accession DQ023309; forward primer: 5'-ATG TGG GAC GAA GAA GTT GCT GCT C-3', reverse primer: 5'-GCT CAA TGG GAT ACT TCA GCG TCA G-3').

5' RACE

The nucleotide sequences at the 5′ end of each IAP1 mRNA were determined by a series of 5′RACE (5′ rapid amplification of cDNA ends) reactions. Briefly, total RNA was reverse transcribed using an IAP1-specific primer. Complementary DNAs were purified using a QIAquick spin column (QIAGEN, Chatsworth, CA) and oligo(dC) tails were added to the 3′ ends using 15 units of terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (Invitrogen, Gaithersburg, MD) in 1x tailing buffer [10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.4), 25 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2 and 0.02 mM dCTP]. Tailing reactions were performed at 37°C for 30 min and then terminated by heat-inactivation (65°C for 10 min). Oligo dC-tailed cDNAs were purified by ethanol precipitation, then PCR amplified using a consensus forward primer specific to the C-tailed termini (5′-GAC ATC GAA AGG GGG GGG GGG-3′) and one of several reverse primers specific to the mosquito IAP1 cDNA sequence.

cDNA cloning and sequencing

PCR products were inserted into the pCR4-TOPO cloning vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and ligated plasmids were transformed into competent TOPO10 E. coli cells (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Cells were grown on LB agar containing ampicillin (50 μg/ml) and kanamycin (50 μg/ml), and colonies were screened for inserts by PCR amplification. An aliquot of each PCR product was examined by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis and several PCR products were purified using a QIAquick spin column (QIAGEN, Chatsworth, CA) and sequenced using an ABI 377 DNA sequencer at Colorado State University.

Quantitative Reverse Transcriptase PCR of AtIAP1 Variants

RNA was extracted from Ae. triseriatus life stages and tissue types according to the previously described methods; however, the number of individuals per sample was reduced to the following: embryos (100), first instar larvae (50), second instar larvae (25), third instar larvae (10), fourth instar larvae (5), pupae (5), adult males (5), non-blood-fed female adults (5), and 24 hours post blood-fed female adults (5). Larvae and pupae were collected less than 24 hours after molting. Ovarian, midgut, and salivary gland tissue extractions were performed on tissue dissected from five adult female mosquitoes. All groups were sampled in triplicate. After RNA extraction each sample was analyzed using the Qiagen Quantitect SYBR Green RT-PCR kit (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA) to determine the quantities of each mRNA splice variant and actin (primer sequences can be found in Table 1) on an Opticon 2 Real-Time Thermocycler (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Reactions were run in duplicate and amplified according to the manufacturer's protocols (using 20 μL reactions instead of 50 μL reactions). The fluorescence threshold was set at 0.014 using the logarithmic scale and the CT values for each sample were recorded and averaged among duplicates. The average CT value of each sample was then averaged among triplicate samples of a particular life stage or tissue type. For a given life stage or tissue type, the Δ CT for each AtIAP1 mRNA variant was calculated by subtracting the lowest AtIAP1 mRNA variant CT value for that stage or tissue from the remaining CT values for that stage or tissue. The Δ CT value was then used as an exponent for the number two to determine the fold difference between the most abundant mRNA variant (the lowest CT value) and the other AtIAP1 mRNA variants (in a perfect PCR reaction each amplification cycle theoretically represents a doubling of the amplicon or conversely a two-fold decrease in the amount of the original target RNA). The reciprocal of this value was calculated (this does not change the relative concentrations of each mRNA variant, but serves to make the graph more intuitive because larger bars represent a greater amount of transcript). The most abundant AtIAP1 mRNA variant was set at a relative frequency of 1. An example calculation for the quantification of mRNA variant 1 of the pupal life stage follows:

Average Sample AtIAP variant CT = (CT for pupae sample 1 replicate 1 AtIAP variant 1 + CT for pupae sample 1 replicate 2 AtIAP variant 1)/2

Life stage average AtIAP variant CT = (pupae sample 1 average sample AtIAP variant CT + pupae sample 2 average sample AtIAP variant CT + pupae sample 3 average sample AtIAP variant CT)/3

Δ CT for sample = Life stage average AtIAP variant CT – Lowest life stage Average AtIAP variant CT at the particular life stage

Variant Fold Difference compared to most abundant mRNA variant = 2Δ CT for life stage

Table 1.

Primers used for Q-RT-PCR of Ae. triseriatus AtIAP1 mRNA splice variants.

Primer Name Primer Sequence (5' – 3') mRNA Amplified
ActinF GAA CAC CCA GTG CTG TTG AC Ae. triseriatus Actin
ActinR GTA CGA CCG GAA GCG TAC AG Ae. triseriatus Actin
IAP1F TCC ATT CGT CTT TGC TTG TC Ae. triseriatus AtIAP1 variant #1
IAP1R GCA ATT GCA CTG CTC TCT CTC Ae. triseriatus AtIAP1 variant #1
IAP2F CGA AAA AGG ATT TGC TGC TG Ae. triseriatus AtIAP1 variant #2
IAP2R CTC TTG GTC CAG ATG GGA AA Ae. triseriatus AtIAP1 variant #2
IAP3F CAT TGT GTC TCG CAT CGT CT Ae. triseriatus AtIAP1 variant #3
IAP3R GCG CTC TCT TCT TCA ATG GT Ae. triseriatus AtIAP1 variant #3
IAP4F CCA TTG TAA CTG GTC CTG GTC Ae. triseriatus AtIAP1 variant #4
IAP4R CTC TTG GTC CAG ATG GGA AA Ae. triseriatus AtIAP1 variant #4
IAP5F TCG ATT TGT GAT GTT TGG TG Ae. triseriatus AtIAP1 variant #5
IAP5R GCA ATT GCA CTG CTC TCT CTC Ae. triseriatus AtIAP1 variant #5

Genomic sequencing of AtIAP1

Because of the lack of an Ae. triseriatus genome sequence database, the genomic sequence of AtIAP1 was determined using the Universal GenomeWalker Kit (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA). Ae. triseriatus DNA was extracted from colony mosquitoes and digested according to the manufacturer's specifications. Adaptors were then ligated to the digested DNA and PCR amplified using a gene specific primer in conjunction with an adaptor specific primer. Several walks were done to obtain as much sequence upstream of the AtIAP1 gene as possible.

Genomic sequence analysis of AeIAP1

The locations of the heterogeneous sequences of the Ae. aegypti inhibitor of apoptosis 5'UTR were determined by a BLAST search of the Ae. aegypti genome on the TIGR website (http://msc.tigr.org/aedes/aedes.shtml). This search revealed that the AeIAP1 gene is located on supercontig 1.368 of the genome (GenBank accession no. CH477553). Using this sequence, we were able to determine the location of the 5' heterogeneous UTR sequences in reference to the coding region of the AeIAP1 gene.

RESULTS

Comparison of the ORFs

Using a combination of RT-PCR and 5'-RACE, we identified homologues of the Drosophila IAP1 in Ae. triseriatus, Ae. albopictus, Ae. aegypti, Cx. pipiens and Cx. tarsalis mosquitoes (designated AtIAP1, AaIAP1, AeIAP1, CpIAP1 and CtIAP1, respectively). The IAP1 cDNAs encode predicted translation products of 401 (Ae. aegypti), 402 (Ae. albopictus), 403 (Ae. triseriatus), 409 (Cx. pipiens) and 410 (Cx. tarsalis) amino acids (Fig. 1). Alignment of the deduced amino acid sequences revealed that the IAP1s from Cx. pipiens and Cx. tarsalis shared the greatest similarity (96% similarity, 93% identity), and the IAP1s from Ae. albopictus and Cx. tarsalis were the most divergent (84% similarity, 80% identity). Each amino acid sequence contains two BIR domains (BIR1 and BIR2) and a C-terminal RING finger. Fifty-three of the 65 (82%) amino acids in the BIR1 are strictly conserved between all mosquito species examined. Species with the most similar BIR1s were Cx. pipiens and Cx. tarsalis (97% similar, 97% identical). Sixty-one of the 66 (92%) amino acids in the BIR2 are also strictly conserved between all species examined. Species with the most similar BIR2s were Cx. pipiens and Cx. tarsalis (98% similarity, 100% identity). The 36-amino acid RING finger of each mosquito IAP1 is identical.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Alignment of the deduced amino acid sequences of the mosquito IAP1s. The first, second and third underlined regions denote the BIR1, BIR2 and RING domains, respectively. The IAP1s from Ae. triseriatus, Ae. albopictus, Ae. aegypti, Cx. pipiens and Cx. tarsalis are denoted as AtIAP1, AaIAP1, AeIAP1, CpIAP1 and CtIAP1, respectively.

The predicted AaIAP1 translation product consists of 402 amino acids, assuming that the first ATG of the cDNA sequence serves as the initiation codon. The context of this codon (gatATGG) conforms to the consensus sequence (a/gccATGG) required for optimal translation initiation at the critical −3 and +4 positions (Kozak, 1986). Three other in-frame ATG codons are located shortly downstream, including one at position +13 to +15 which aligns with the predicted initiation codons for AtIAP1, CpIAP1 and CtIAP1 (Fig. 1). However, this ATG was not selected as the AaIAP1 initiation, codon because it is not in the context required for optimal translation initiation. The first in-frame ATG of the AeIAP1 cDNA sequence was also selected as the initiation codon. This context of this codon (ataATGG) conforms to the consensus sequence required for optimal translation initiation at the critical −3 and +4 positions. Two other in-frame ATG codons are located shortly downstream, including one that aligns with the predicted initiation codons for the AtIAP1, CpIAP1 and CtIAP1 but does not conform to the context required for optimal translation initiation. While the ATG surrounded by the optimal translation initiation sequence is the most likely translation initiation codon in both AaIAP1 and AeIAP1, the possibility that one of suboptimal ATG codons is the actual translation start site or an additional translation initiation site involved in increased translation efficiency cannot be ruled out (Kochetov, 2005).

Identification of multiple IAP1 mRNA variants

Multiple IAP1 mRNA variants were identified in each mosquito spp. (Table 2). Three IAP1 mRNA variants were detected in Ae. aegypti and Cx. pipiens, four were detected in Ae. albopictus and Cx. tarsalis, and five were detected in Ae. triseriatus. These variants contain different sequences at the distal ends of their 5'UTRs, as well as a long homogeneous 5'UTR region ranging from 305 nt (Cx. tarsalis) to 401 nt (Ae. triseriatus). Alignments of the heterogeneous 5' UTR sequences can be found in the supplemental information (Supplemental Figs. 1A-1E). RNA folding predictions of each 5' UTR sequence can also be found in the supplemental information (Supplemental Figs 2A-2E). Secondary structure predictions differ between mRNA variants within each species, with the most noticeable differences occurring in the variable portion of the 5' UTR.

Table 2.

Overview of the IAP1 mRNA variants of each mosquito species.

Species Number of IAP1
mRNA variants
identified
Length (nt) of
each 5'UTR
Length (nt) of
homogeneous
5'UTR
Number of IAP1
cDNA clones
sequenced
Ae. triseriatusa 5 450, 550, 604, 642, 725 401 30
Ae. albopictus 4 592, 606, 739, 915 389 40
Ae. aegypti 3 619, 659, 749 393 29
Cx. pipiens 3 431, 537, 677 352 12
Cx. tarsalis 4 348, 349, 382, 484 305 19
a

The 5 different AtIAP1 transcripts are denoted as mRNA variant 1 to 5, with variant 1 being the shortest transcript, and variant 5 being the longest. A similar nomenclature has been used for the other species. GenBank accession nos. are as follows: AtIAP1 mRNA variants 1 to 5: EF043244, EF043245, EF043246, EF043247, and EF043248, respectively; AaIAP1 mRNA variants 1 to 4: EF043240, EF043241, EF043242, and EF043243, respectively; AeIAP1 mRNA variants 1 to 3: EF043237, EF043238 and EF043239, respectively; CpIAP1 mRNA variants 1 to 3: EF043249, EF043250, and EF043251, respectively and CtIAP1 mRNA variants 1 to 4: EF043252, EF043253, EF043254, and EF043255, respectively.

The 5 IAP1 mRNA variants from Ae. triseriatus were identified by analyzing 30 cDNA clones by 5'RACE and automated sequencing (Table 2). The 5'UTRs of these clones are 450 nt (n = 1), 550 nt (n = 1), 604 nt (n = 9), 642 nt (n = 7) and 725 (n = 12) in length. The 401 nt immediately upstream of the ORF are identical for each clone. The 5 transcripts are denoted as AtIAP1 mRNA variants 1 to 5; variant 1 is the shortest transcript, and variant 5 is the longest. A similar nomenclature has been used for the IAP1s of the other mosquito species.

Forty IAP1 cDNA clones from Ae. albopictus were examined (Table 2). The 5'UTRs of these clones are 592 nt (n = 4), 606 nt (n = 3), 739 (n = 25) and 915 nt (n = 1) in length. The 389 nt immediately upstream of the ORF are identical for each clone. The 7 other AaIAP1 cDNA clones contain a truncated 5'UTR consisting of only the 193 nt immediately upstream of the ORF. Truncated 5'UTRs were also observed for the IAP1 mRNA of Ae. aegypti. Briefly, 29 AeIAP1 cDNA clones were examined. The 5'UTRs of these clones are 619 nt (n = 5), 659 nt (n = 1) and 749 nt (n = 6) in length. The 393 nt immediately upstream of the ORF are identical for each clone. The 17 other cDNA clones contained only the 179 nt immediately upstream of the ORF. Two other Ae. aegypti IAP1 sequences are available in the public domain. One sequence was submitted to Genbank in February 2004 (GenBank accession no. AAS66751), and the second was determined by the Ae. aegypti Genomic Sequencing Consortium; both IAP1 sequences contain relatively short 5'UTRs (182 and 185 nt, respectively) similar to the length of the truncated 5'UTRs reported here.

Twelve and nineteen IAP1 cDNA clones were sequenced from Cx. pipiens and Cx. tarsalis, respectively (Table 2). The 5'UTRs of the CpIAP1 cDNA clones are 431 nt (n = 6), 537 nt (n = 2) and 677 (n = 4) in length. The 352 nt immediately upstream of the ORF are identical for each clone. The 5'UTRs of the CtIAP1 cDNA clones are 348 nt (n = 1), 349 nt (n = 1), 382 (n = 4) and 484 (n = 5) in length. The 305 nt immediately upstream of the ORF are identical for each clone. The 8 other CtIAP1 cDNA clones contain only the 124 nt (n = 6) or 128 nt (n = 2) immediately upstream of the 5'UTR.

Partial sequencing of the Ae. triseriatus IAP1 gene

Using genome walking, approximately 6 kb of new sequence data were generated and three of the five heterogeneous 5'UTR sequences in the Ae. triseriatus genome were identified (GenBank accession no. EF059537, Fig. 2). The heterogeneous sequence from AtIAP1 mRNA variant 1 was located immediately upstream of the homogeneous 5'UTR sequence, while the heterogeneous sequence from AtIAP1 mRNA variant 4 was 2,110 base pairs upstream of the homogeneous 5'UTR sequence. The heterogeneous 5'UTR sequence from AtIAP1 mRNA variant 3 was also found, but the reverse primer bound incorrectly, prohibiting determination of the exact genomic position of the sequence. The heterogeneous sequences at the distal ends of AtIAP1 mRNA variants 2 and 5 were not amplified from the Ae. triseriatus genome. Because two of the five heterogeneous 5' UTR sequences, variants 1 and 4, were found upstream of the AtIAP1 ORF, alternative splicing is a more likely explanation for mRNA variants than multiple gene copies.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Genomic schematics of DIAP1, AeIAP1, and AtIAP1 genes. The schematics are drawn to scale (the full length DIAP1 gene represents roughly 13 kb) with the exception of the dotted line in the AeIAP1 figure (this line represents roughly 115 kb of DNA) and dotted and dashed line in the AtIAP1 figure (this line represents an unknown genomic distance). Red boxes indicate untranslated regions, grey indicates the protein coding sequence, and blue indicates 5' UTR variable regions. Uppercase letters represent nucleotides located in the exon while lowercase letters represent nucleotides found in the intron. Bold letters indicate nucleotides matching the consensus sequences of D. melanogaster 5' splice site (sequences indicated by an *), 3' branch site (sequences indicated by a #), and 3' splice site (sequences indicated by a ∼) intron motifs.

Genomic location of Ae. aegypti 5' heterogeneous UTR sequences

Two of the three heterogeneous 5'UTR sequences of AeIAP1 were located in the known genome sequence of Ae.aegypti (Fig. 2). The heterogeneous sequence of AeIAP1 mRNA variant 2 begins 470 base pairs upstream of the genomic sequence of the 5' homogeneous UTR sequence. The heterogeneous sequence of AeIAP1 mRNA variant 1 begins 119.78 kb upstream of the genomic sequence for the 5' homogeneous UTR sequence. Both of these sequences are nearly identical between the cDNA sequence from our lab strain (Rexville D) and the genomic sequence of Ae. aegypti Liverpool strain found in Genbank. The heterogeneous sequence of AeIAP1 mRNA variant 3 was not found in the Ae. aegypti genome when a Blast search was performed. The Ae. aegypti IAP1 gene (and the Ae. triseriatus IAP1 gene) contains sequence motifs that are similar to the splice site motifs found in D. melanogaster introns (Fig. 2) (Lim and Burge, 2001). These sequences are found directly following the 5' UTR heterogeneous sequences (the 5' intron splice site motif), preceding the 5' UTR homogeneous sequences (the 3' intron splice site motif), and 70 – 135 base pairs before the beginning of the 5' UTR homogeneous sequences (the 3' intron branch site motif). A similar pattern is seen in the genomic arrangement of DIAP1 (Fig. 2), which is predicted to generate multiple mRNA variants through alternative splicing (Adams et al., 2000).

Life-stage specific expression of the AtIAP1 mRNA variants

We examined the life-stage and tissue-specific expression of each IAP1 mRNA variant from Ae. triseriatus using quantitative reverse-transcriptase PCR (Figs. 3A and 3B). Total RNA was extracted from 9 Ae. triseriatus life-stages, namely embryos (8 days old), larvae (first, second, third, and fourth instars within 24 hours after molting), pupae (within 24 hours of pupation) and adults (pre-bloodfed females, post-bloodfed females, and males), as well as three tissue types: salivary glands, ovaries, and midguts from pre-bloodfed (4 days post-eclosion) and 24 hours post blood-fed (fed at 4 days post-eclosion) females. All five mRNA variants were detected in all life-stages and tissue types albeit in varying concentrations (Figs. 3A and 3B). mRNA variant 2 had the lowest expression level in all tissues and was generally followed by variant 1 (with exceptions being seen in ovarian tissue and pupae). Variant 3 was the most abundant transcript in all Ae. triseriatus life stages except L2 and L3 larvae, where variant 4 was the most abundant. There were obvious differences in adult female tissue expression patterns of AtIAP1 mRNA variants: in salivary glands and midguts variant 4 predominated, whereas in ovarian tissue variant 3 was the most abundant.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Figure 3

Developmental- and tissue-specific expression of each IAP1 mRNA variant from Ae. triseriatus, showing the relative amount of each AtIAP1 mRNA variant found in each life stage or tissue type. The most abundant mRNA variant for each stage or tissue was recorded as a relative frequency of one and the remaining AtIAP1 mRNA variants were recorded as a percentage of the most abundant variant based on their expression levels. Variant 1 is on the left of each group and proceeds to variant 5 on the right. (A) Quantitative RT-PCR amplifications were performed using mRNA variant-specific primers and total RNA extracted from various life stages, namely: embryos, first instar larvae, second instar larvae, third instar larvae, fourth instar larvae, pupae (< 24 hrs after pupation), pre-bloodfed adult females, 24 hour post-bloodfed females, and adult males. (B) Quantitative RT-PCR amplifications were performed using mRNA variant-specific primers and total RNA extracted from various adult tissues, namely pre-bloodfed and 24 hour post-bloodfed female salivary glands, midguts, and ovaries.

Life-stage specific expression of the CpIAP1 mRNA variants

We also examined the life-stage and tissue-specific expression of each IAP1 mRNA variant of Cx. pipiens (Fig. 4). Total RNA was extracted from 7 Cx. pipiens life-stages, namely embryos (24 hr), larvae (first/second, third, and fourth instars), pupae (early and late) and adults. Total RNA was also extracted from midguts, ovaries and salivary glands from adult female mosquitoes. RT-PCRs were performed using variant-specific primers that amplified regions of ∼200 nt. In this species, the mRNA variants were ubiquitously expressed in all life-stages (Fig. 4A) and tissues examined (Fig. 4B). Control RT-PCR reactions for Cx. pipiens actin mRNA were used to assure equal loading in each lane.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Figure 4

Developmental- and tissue-specific expression of each IAP1 mRNA variant from Cx. pipiens. (A) RT-PCR amplifications were performed using mRNA variant-specific primers and total RNA extracted from various life stages, namely: 24-h-old embryos (lane 1), first/second instar larvae (lane 2), third instar larvae (lane 3), fourth instar larvae (lane 4), early pupae (lane 5), late pupae (lane 6) and adults (lane 7). (B) RT-PCR amplifications were performed using mRNA variant-specific primers and total RNA extracted from various adult female tissues, namely midguts (lane 1) ovaries (lane 2) and salivary glands (lane 3). Control reactions were performed using primers specific to the Cx. pipiens actin cDNA sequence

DISCUSSION

A recent study provided evidence that AaIAP1 functions as an inhibitor of apoptosis (Li et al., 2007). Although a similar function has not been reported for AtIAP1, AeIAP1, CpIAP1 or CtIAP1, it seems plausible that these BIR-containing proteins do indeed function as apoptosis inhibitors based on their sequence homology to AaIAP1. We have shown that these putative IAP1s from Aedes and Culex spp. mosquitoes exist as distinct mRNA variants due to the presence of heterogeneous sequences at the distal ends of their 5'UTRs. Analysis of the AtIAP1 and AeIAP1 genome sequences indicated that these mRNA variants are created through alternative splicing from a single gene rather than the transcription of separate genes. This represents an interesting finding, as alternative splicing has been reported infrequently in mosquitoes (Kokoza and Raikhel, 1997; Ranson et al., 1998; Seo et al., 2003). However, alternative splicing has been reported frequently in other organisms. An estimated 35-60% of all human genes are alternatively spliced (Mironov et al., 1999; Stamm et al., 2005).

Many other apoptosis-regulatory genes are expressed as distinct mRNA variants or protein isoforms as a result of alternative splicing, which demonstrates that this mode of gene regulation plays a major role in the control of apoptosis (Wu et al., 2003; Schwerk and SchulzeOsthoff, 2005). Alternative splicing of transcripts from a single gene appears to generate multiple DIAP1 mRNA variants (Adams et al., 2000). Three DIAP1 mRNA variants were predicted during the computational analysis of the Drosophila genome. Each transcript shares the same ORF and 78 nt region of the 5'UTR, but the distal ends of their 5'UTRs contain heterogeneous sequences of 352, 197 or 158 nt (GenBank accession nos. NM_079377, NM_168644, NM_168645; isoforms A, B and C, respectively). Alternative splicing from a single gene also was predicted to generate two DIAP2 mRNA variants with heterogeneous sequences at the distal ends of their 5'UTRs (GenBank accession nos. NM_057779 and NM_176182; isoforms A and B, respectively). The biological significance of these DIAP1 and DIAP2 mRNA variants is not known. Most members of the Bcl-2 family are alternatively spliced (Akgul et al., 2004). For example, transcripts of the Bcl-2 gene, the prototype member of this family, generate 2 discrete mRNA isoforms with different subcellular locations and biological functions (Tsujimoto and Croce, 1986; Tanaka et al., 1993).

While there is no information available on the developmental or tissue-specific distribution of the mRNA variants of DIAP1 or DIAP2, the expression profiles of several mammalian IAPs that exist as alternative splice variants have been determined. The tissue-specific expression of 3 survivin mRNA variants was assessed by RT-PCR in adult mice, with survivin121 detectable in all 10 tissues examined, survivin140 detectable only in the thymus and testis, and survivin40 not detectable in any of the tissues examined (Conway et al., 2000). Differential expression patterns were also reported for the two Livin splice variants (Ashhab et al., 2001). Livin α mRNA was not detectable by RT-PCR in any of the 8 human fetal tissues examined, whereas Livin β mRNA was detectable only in fetal kidney, heart and spleen.

The number of IAP1 mRNA variants identified in each mosquito species varied from three to five. However, these findings may be a consequence of our experimental approach, and not represent a true difference in the number of IAP1 mRNA variants between species. Longer 5'UTR sequences may not have been identified because they are less likely to be RT-PCR amplified or cloned into the TOPO vectors than shorter sequences. Furthermore, some 5'UTRs may not have been RT-PCR amplified due to the presence of unusually stable secondary structures that were not heat-denatured during the reverse transcription. Interestingly, several AaIAP1, AeIAP1 and CtIAP1 cDNA clones encoded truncated 5'UTRs. It is unclear whether this represents a splicing event or an artifact of our RT-PCR or 5' RACE procedures. However, it is important to note that the Ae. aegypti Genomic Sequencing Consortium (http://msc.tigr.org/aedes/aedes.shtml) employed a different sequencing strategy from that used here and reported that the 5'UTR of the Ae. aegypti IAP1 consists of 185 nt. This corresponds closely to the size (179 nt) of the truncated 5'UTR region identified in several AeIAP1 cDNA clones.

We searched the available Ae. aegypti genome sequence for the 3 heterogeneous sequences that we identified at the distal end of the AeIAP1 mRNA. Two of these heterogeneous sequences were found. The heterogeneous sequence from AeIAP1 mRNA variant 2 was located 470 bp upstream of the homogeneous 5'UTR sequence whereas the heterogeneous sequence from AeIAP1 mRNA variant 1 was approximately 120 kb upstream of the homogeneous 5'UTR sequence. The AeIAP1 genomic sequence is located on supercontig 1.368, which is made up of many smaller contig sequences. There are still gaps between some of the sequences that make up this supercontig, which may be why we did not find the heterogeneous sequence from AeIAP1 mRNA variant 3.

Using genomic walking, we sequenced approximately 6 kb of the Ae. triseriatus genome. This region contains 3 of the 5 heterogeneous sequences at the distal end of the AtIAP1 mRNA. The two other heterogeneous sequences were not identified. The heterogeneous sequences may be located too far upstream to be detected using our PCR-based approach. Indeed, as already noted, one of the heterogeneous sequences in the AeIAP1 mRNA was located 120 kb upstream of the homogeneous 5'UTR sequence.

Approximately 95% of intron boundaries in Drosophila melanogaster can be predicted exactly using computer programs. Lim and Burge have studied the sequence of several genomes, including D. melanogaster, and have determined the most frequently occurring sequences found at the 5' splice site, the 3' splice site, and the branch site of introns (Lim and Burge, 2001). These predictions were made using computer programs and revealed that the most common splice signals are quite similar to sequences found in both Ae. triseriatus and Ae. aegypti genomes. Computer analysis shows that the sequence “AAGGTAAGTTT” is the most common splice site for the 5' end of an intron in D. melanogaster. With the exception of the underlined base pairs in this sequence, there is some variability found at each site, particularly the first and last two bases of the sequence (Lim and Burge, 2001). Similar sequences were found directly following all of the variable 5'UTR sequences in the D. melanogaster, Ae. aegypti and Ae. triseriatus genomes (Fig. 2). Similarly, “TACTAAT” make up the most common nucleotides in the branch site generally located near the 3' end of the intron. Again, there is some variability, most of which is seen in the first two and the last base of the sequence (Lim and Burge, 2001). Sequences similar to this one were found 70 - 135 base pairs upstream from the homogeneous region of the 5'UTR in the D. melanogaster, Ae. aegypti, and Ae. triseriatus genomes (Fig. 2). Finally, the 3' splice site sequence of D. melanogaster is generally “CAGAT” preceded by approximately 17 thymidines (Lim and Burge, 2001). This “CAGAT” sequence is found at the beginning of the homogeneous 5'UTR sequence (i.e. the 3' end of the intron separating the heterogeneous and homogeneous 5'UTR sequences) in the genomes of D. melanogaster, Ae. aegypti, and Ae. triseriatus (Fig. 2). The D. melanogaster genome also has several thymidines preceding the 3' splice sequence. While the Ae. aegypti and Ae. triseriatus sequences are not directly preceded by a string of thymidines, they are in a fairly thymidine-rich area of the genome. These sequence motifs indicate that AeIAP1 and AtIAP1 genes undergo alternative splicing to create mRNA variants.

We previously examined the life-stage and tissue-specific expression of AtIAP1 mRNA by RT-PCR using primers specific to a homogeneous region of the cDNA sequence (Blitvich et al., 2002). AtIAP1 mRNA was detected in all developmental stages (embryos, first-fourth instar larvae, early and late pupae, adults) and adult tissues (midguts, ovaries, salivary glands) examined. Here, we have extended our earlier observations and shown that each mRNA variant of AtIAP1 is also detectable, although at different concentrations, by quantitative RT-PCR in all of these life-stages and tissues. All three mRNA variants of CpIAP1 also were detectable by variant-specific RT-PCR in all developmental stages and adult tissues examined. Taken together, these data suggest that constitutive expression of each IAP1 mRNA variant is common to Culicine mosquitoes.

It is likely that translational control of the mosquito IAP1 mRNA is dependent upon the heterogeneous region of the 5'UTR. Each mRNA variant may be translated in response to a particular apoptosis-inducing stimulus or in a certain life-stage or tissue. For example, our previous studies showed that AtIAP1 protein is found only in the ovaries (Blitvich et al., 2002), while current studies show that the ovaries have a very different AtIAP1 mRNA expression profile from the midguts and salivary glands (Fig. 3B). It is possible that in adult female ovaries only AtIAP1 mRNA variant 3 is translated to make protein. It is also interesting to note that mRNA variants 3 and 5 are the two most prominent variants in the life stages where the mosquitoes are transitioning to the next stage of development (i.e. embryos, L4 larvae, and early pupae) (Fig. 3A). These variants could play a role in creating AtIAP1 protein that is used for structural metamorphosis.

Differential translation of each mosquito IAP1 mRNA variant could be achieved if the heterogeneous region of each 5'UTR forms distinct secondary structures recognized by different translational activators and repressors. Analysis of the 5'UTR sequence of all culicine IAP1 mRNA variants by the method of Markham and Zuker (2005), using the DINAMelt web server, revealed that each 5'UTR differed considerably in respect to predicted secondary structure, particularly in the heterogeneous region of the UTR (Supplemental Figs. 2A-2E). The different structures observed could condition translation efficiency in different tissues or life stages. Differential translational regulation has been reported for other mRNA variants that contain distinct 5'UTRs; examples include human surfactant protein A, estrogen receptor-α and insulin (Kos et al., 2002; Shalev et al., 2002; Wang et al., 2005).

Our current study shows that mosquito IAP RNAs contain variations in the 5'UTR that are produced through alternative splicing, but this does not affect protein sequence. Constitutive expression of all mRNA variants can be seen in all life stages and tissue types of Cx. pipiens and Ae. triseriatus. However, it is likely that different IAP mRNA variants are predominantly translated following different apoptosis-inducing stimuli or in different mosquito life-stages or tissue types.

Supplementary Material

01

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank Cynthia Meredith for her help in raising and caring for the mosquitoes and Ma. Isabel Salazar-Sanchez and Janice Gonzalez for mosquito tissue dissections. This study was supported by grant AI 32543 from the National Institutes of Health. Eric Beck was supported by the FTP training grant CCT 822307 from the Centers for Disease Control.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

REFERENCES CITED

  • 1.Adams MD, Celniker SE, Holt RA, Evans CA, Gocayne JD, Amanatides PG, Scherer SE, Li PW, Hoskins RA, Galle RF, George RA, Lewis SE, Richards S, Ashburner M, Henderson SN, Sutton GG, Wortman JR, Yandell MD, Zhang Q, Chen LX, Brandon RC, Rogers YH, Blazej RG, Champe M, Pfeiffer BD, Wan KH, Doyle C, Baxter EG, Helt G, Nelson CR, Gabor GL, Abril JF, Agbayani A, An HJ, Andrews-Pfannkoch C, Baldwin D, Ballew RM, Basu A, Baxendale J, Bayraktaroglu L, Beasley EM, Beeson KY, Benos PV, Berman BP, Bhandari D, Bolshakov S, Borkova D, Botchan MR, Bouck J, Brokstein P, Brottier P, Burtis KC, Busam DA, Butler H, Cadieu E, Center A, Chandra I, Cherry JM, Cawley S, Dahlke C, Davenport LB, Davies P, de Pablos B, Delcher A, Deng Z, Mays AD, Dew I, Dietz SM, Dodson K, Doup LE, Downes M, Dugan-Rocha S, Dunkov BC, Dunn P, Durbin KJ, Evangelista CC, Ferraz C, Ferriera S, Fleischmann W, Fosler C, Gabrielian AE, Garg NS, Gelbart WM, Glasser K, Glodek A, Gong F, Gorrell JH, Gu Z, Guan P, Harris M, Harris NL, Harvey D, Heiman TJ, Hernandez JR, Houck J, Hostin D, Houston KA, Howland TJ, Wei MH, Ibegwam C, et al. The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. Science. 2000;287:2185–95. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5461.2185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Akgul C, Moulding DA, Edwards SW. Alternative splicing of Bcl-2-related genes: functional consequences and potential therapeutic applications. Cell. Mol. Life. Sci. 2004;61:2189–99. doi: 10.1007/s00018-004-4001-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bergmann A, Yang AY, Srivastava M. Regulators of IAP function: coming to grips with the grim reaper. Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol. 2003;15:717–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2003.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Blitvich BJ, Blair CD, Kempf BJ, Hughes MT, Black WC, Mackie RS, Meredith CT, Beaty BJ, Rayms-Keller A. Developmental- and tissue-specific expression of an inhibitor of apoptosis protein 1 homologue from Aedes triseriatus mosquitoes. Insect Mol, Biol, 2002;11:431–42. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2583.2002.00352.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Christophides GK, Zdobnov E, Barillas-Mury C, Birney E, Blandin S, Blass C, Brey PT, Collins FH, Danielli A, Dimopoulos G, Hetru C, Hoa NT, Hoffmann JA, Kanzok SM, Letunic I, Levashina EA, Loukeris TG, Lycett G, Meister S, Michel K, Moita LF, Muller HM, Osta MA, Paskewitz SM, Reichhart JM, Rzhetsky A, Troxler L, Vernick KD, Vlachou D, Volz J, von Mering C, Xu J, Zheng L, Bork P, Kafatos FC. Immunity-related genes and gene families in Anopheles gambiae. Science. 2002;298:159–65. doi: 10.1126/science.1077136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Conway EM, Pollefeyt S, Cornelissen J, DeBaere I, Steiner-Mosonyi M, Ong K, Baens M, Collen D, Schuh AC. Three differentially expressed survivin cDNA variants encode proteins with distinct antiapoptotic functions. Blood. 2000;95:1435–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Crook NE, Clem RJ, Miller LK. An apoptosis-inhibiting baculovirus gene with a zinc finger-like motif. J, Virol. 1993;67:2168–74. doi: 10.1128/jvi.67.4.2168-2174.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Deveraux QL, Reed JC. IAP family proteins--suppressors of apoptosis. Genes Dev. 1999;13:239–52. doi: 10.1101/gad.13.3.239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Fraser AG, James C, Evan GI, Hengartner MO. Caenorhabditis elegans inhibitor of apoptosis protein (IAP) homologue BIR-1 plays a conserved role in cytokinesis. Curr. Biol. 1999;9(6):292–301. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(99)80137-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hay BA, Wassarman DA, Rubin GM. Drosophila homologs of baculovirus inhibitor of apoptosis proteins function to block cell death. Cell. 1995;83:1253–62. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90150-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Holcik M, Korneluk RG. Functional characterization of the X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis (XIAP) internal ribosome entry site element: role of La autoantigen in XIAP translation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000;20:4648–57. doi: 10.1128/mcb.20.13.4648-4657.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Holcik M, Lefebvre C, Yeh C, Chow T, Korneluk RG. A new internal-ribosome-entry-site motif potentiates XIAP-mediated cytoprotection. Nat. Cell. Biol. 1999;1:190–2. doi: 10.1038/11109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hozak RR, Manji GA, Friesen PD. The BIR motifs mediate dominant interference and oligomerization of inhibitor of apoptosis Op-IAP. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000;20:1877–85. doi: 10.1128/mcb.20.5.1877-1885.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Huang H, Joazeiro CA, Bonfoco E, Kamada S, Leverson JD, Hunter T. The inhibitor of apoptosis, cIAP2, functions as a ubiquitin-protein ligase and promotes in vitro monoubiquitination of caspases 3 and 7. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:26661–4. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C000199200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jones G, Jones D, Zhou L, Steller H, Chu Y. Deterin, a new inhibitor of apoptosis from Drosophila melanogaster. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:22157–65. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M000369200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kokoza VA, Raikhel AS. Ovarian- and somatic-specific transcripts of the mosquito clathrin heavy chain gene generated by alternative 5′-exon splicing and polyadenylation. J. Biol. Chem. 1997;272:1164–70. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.2.1164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kornbluth S, White K. Apoptosis in Drosophila: neither fish nor fowl (nor man, nor worm) J. Cell. Sci. 2005;118:1779–87. doi: 10.1242/jcs.02377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kos M, Denger S, Reid G, Gannon F. Upstream open reading frames regulate the translation of the multiple mRNA variants of the estrogen receptor alpha. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:37131–8. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M206325200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kozak M. Point mutations define a sequence flanking the AUG initiator codon that modulates translation by eukaryotic ribosomes. Cell. 1986;44:283–92. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90762-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Li Q, Li H, Blitvich BJ, Zhang J. The Aedes albopictus Inhibitor of Apoptosis 1 gene protects vertebrate cells from bluetongue virus-induced apoptosis. Insect Mol. Biol. 2007;16(1):93–105. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2007.00705.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lim LP, Burge CB. A computational analysis of sequence features involved in recognition of short introns. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2001;98:11193–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.201407298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Markham NR, Zuker M. DINAMelt web server for nucleic acid melting prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:W577–W581. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Miller LK. An exegesis of IAPs: salvation and surprises from BIR motifs. Trends Cell. Biol. 1999;9:323–8. doi: 10.1016/s0962-8924(99)01609-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mironov AA, Fickett JW, Gelfand MS. Frequent alternative splicing of human genes. Genome Res. 1999;9:1288–93. doi: 10.1101/gr.9.12.1288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Nevins TA, Harder ZM, Korneluk RG, Holcik M. Distinct regulation of internal ribosome entry site-mediated translation following cellular stress is mediated by apoptotic fragments of eIF4G translation initiation factor family members eIF4GI and p97/DAP5/NAT1. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:3572–9. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M206781200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Olson MR, Holley CL, Yoo SJ, Huh JR, Hay BA, Kornbluth S. Reaper is regulated by IAP-mediated ubiquitination. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:4028–34. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M209734200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ranson H, Collins F, Hemingway J. The role of alternative mRNA splicing in generating heterogeneity within the Anopheles gambiae class I glutathione S-transferase family. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1998;95:14284–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.24.14284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Reed JC. Mechanisms of apoptosis. Am. J. Pathol. 2000;157:1415–30. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64779-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Roy N, Deveraux QL, Takahashi R, Salvesen GS, Reed JC. The c-IAP-1 and c-IAP-2 proteins are direct inhibitors of specific caspases. Embo J. 1997;16:6914–25. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.23.6914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Salvesen GS, Duckett CS. IAP proteins: blocking the road to death's door. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2002;3:401–10. doi: 10.1038/nrm830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Schwerk C, Schulze-Osthoff K. Regulation of apoptosis by alternative pre-mRNA splicing. Mol. Cell. 2005;19:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.05.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Seo SJ, Cheon HM, Sun J, Sappington TW, Raikhel AS. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:41954–62. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M308200200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Shalev A, Blair PJ, Hoffmann SC, Hirshberg B, Peculis BA, Harlan DM. A proinsulin gene splice variant with increased translation efficiency is expressed in human pancreatic islets. Endocrinology. 2002;143:2541–7. doi: 10.1210/endo.143.7.8920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Shi Y. Caspase activation, inhibition, and reactivation: a mechanistic view. Protein Sci. 2004;13:1979–87. doi: 10.1110/ps.04789804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Shi Y. Mechanisms of caspase activation and inhibition during apoptosis. Mol. Cell. 2002;9:459–70. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(02)00482-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Stamm S, Ben-Ari S, Rafalska I, Tang Y, Zhang Z, Toiber D, Thanaraj TA, Soreq H. Function of alternative splicing. Gene. 2005;344:1–20. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2004.10.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Tanaka S, Saito K, Reed JC. Structure-function analysis of the Bcl-2 oncoprotein. Addition of a heterologous transmembrane domain to portions of the Bcl-2 beta protein restores function as a regulator of cell survival. J. Biol. Chem. 1993;268:10920–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Tsujimoto Y, Croce CM. Analysis of the structure, transcripts, and protein products of bcl-2, the gene involved in human follicular lymphoma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1986;83:5214–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.14.5214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Twomey C, McCarthy JV. Pathways of apoptosis and importance in development. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2005;9:345–59. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2005.tb00360.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Vaux DL, Silke J. Mammalian mitochondrial IAP binding proteins. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2003;304:499–504. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(03)00622-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Verhagen AM, Coulson EJ, Vaux DL. Inhibitor of apoptosis proteins and their relatives: IAPs and other BIRPs. Genome Biol. 2001;2(7) doi: 10.1186/gb-2001-2-7-reviews3009. e-publication. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Verhagen AM, Kratina TK, Hawkins CJ, Silke J, Ekert PG, Vaux DL. Identification of mammalian mitochondrial proteins that interact with IAPs via N-terminal IAP binding motifs. Cell. Death Differ. 2006 doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4402001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Vernooy SY, Chow V, Su J, Verbrugghe K, Yang J, Cole S, Olson MR, Hay BA. Drosophila Bruce can potently suppress Rpr- and Grim-dependent but not Hid-dependent cell death. Curr. Biol. 2002;12:1164–8. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)00935-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Vucic D, Kaiser WJ, Harvey AJ, Miller LK. Inhibition of reaper-induced apoptosis by interaction with inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (IAPs) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1997;94:10183–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.19.10183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wang G, Guo X, Floros J. Differences in the translation efficiency and mRNA stability mediated by 5′-UTR splice variants of human SP-A1 and SP-A2 genes. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2005;289:L497–508. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00100.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Warnakulasuriyarachchi D, Cerquozzi S, Cheung HH, Holcik M. Translational induction of the inhibitor of apoptosis protein HIAP2 during endoplasmic reticulum stress attenuates cell death and is mediated via an inducible internal ribosome entry site element. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:17148–57. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M308737200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Warnakulasuriyarachchi D, Ungureanu NH, Holcik M. The translation of an antiapoptotic protein HIAP2 is regulated by an upstream open reading frame. Cell. Death Differ. 2003;10:899–904. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Wu JY, Tang H, Havlioglu N. Alternative pre-mRNA splicing and regulation of programmed cell death. Prog. Mol. Subcell. Biol. 2003;31:153–85. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-09728-1_6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Yang Y, Fang S, Jensen JP, Weissman AM, Ashwell JD. Ubiquitin protein ligase activity of IAPs and their degradation in proteasomes in response to apoptotic stimuli. Science. 2000;288:874–7. doi: 10.1126/science.288.5467.874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Zhou L, Jiang G, Chan G, Santos CP, Severson DW, Xiao L. Michelob_x is the missing inhibitor of apoptosis protein antagonist in mosquito genomes. EMBO Rep. 2005;6:769–74. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Zimmermann KC, Bonzon C, Green DR. The machinery of programmed cell death. Pharmacol. Ther. 2001;92:57–70. doi: 10.1016/s0163-7258(01)00159-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

01

RESOURCES