Skip to main content
British Journal of Experimental Pathology logoLink to British Journal of Experimental Pathology
. 1970 Aug;51(4):361–371.

Production of Experimental Models of Foetal Growth Retardation by Inhibition of DNA or Protein Synthesis

B Klionsky, J S Wigglesworth
PMCID: PMC2072311  PMID: 5485759

Abstract

Foetal growth retardation was induced in the rat by administration of hydroxyurea, an inhibitor of DNA synthesis, or cycloheximide, an inhibitor of protein synthesis. Each drug was given at 2 stages of pregnancy, either at 15 or at 18 days. Body and organ weights were studied at term (21 days) and DNA, RNA and protein estimations performed on brain and liver, with additional measurements of carbohydrate in the liver.

Inhibition of DNA synthesis (hydroxyurea) caused reduction in organ cell population whether given early or late in pregnancy but the effect on the brain was more marked in early pregnancy. Haemopoietic cells in the liver were destroyed by repeated dosage on day 18.

Inhibition of protein synthesis (cycloheximide) caused reduction in mean cell weight, but little reduction in cell population whether given early or late. With both drugs the effects on cell population were more severe with administration early in pregnancy.

The results indicate that timing, mode of action and severity of stimulus are all important in determining the effect of any particular stress on foetal growth.

The implications for studies on human intra-uterine growth retardation are discussed.

Full text

PDF
361

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bitman J., Trezise L. A., Cecil H. C. Effect of cycloheximide (actidione) on the glycogen content of the rat uterus. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1966 Feb;113(2):414–420. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(66)90207-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chaube S., Murphy M. L. The effects of hydroxyurea and related compounds on the rat fetus. Cancer Res. 1966 Jul;26(7):1448–1457. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. WARKANY J., MONROE B. B., SUTHERLAND B. S. Intrauterine growth retardation. Am J Dis Child. 1961 Aug;102:249–279. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1961.02080010251018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Wannemacher R. W., Jr, Banks W. L., Jr, Wunner W. H. Use of a single tissue extract to determine cellular protein and nucleic acid concentrations and rate of amino acid incorporation. Anal Biochem. 1965 May;11(2):320–326. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(65)90020-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Winick M., Noble A. Cellular response in rats during malnutrition at various ages. J Nutr. 1966 Jul;89(3):300–306. doi: 10.1093/jn/89.3.300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Winick M., Noble A. Quantitative changes in DNA, RNA, and protein during prenatal and postnatal growth in the rat. Dev Biol. 1965 Dec;12(3):451–466. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(65)90009-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Winick M., Rosso P. Head circumference and cellular growth of the brain in normal and marasmic children. J Pediatr. 1969 May;74(5):774–778. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(69)80140-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Experimental Pathology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES