Abstract
We investigated the pharmacokinetic profile and the efficacy of ondansetron (day 1) given as 16 mg suppository once a day, as compared with ondansetron 8 mg tablets twice daily, in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. The study was primarily aimed at investigating the pharmacokinetics and was part of a large multinational, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy efficacy trial. Pharmacokinetic data were obtained in a total of 20 patients, 11 of whom had received a suppository containing ondansetron, and nine patients had received the oral formulation. The median area under the plasma concentration curve (AUC) obtained with the oral formulation was 226 ng ml-1h-1 (range 91-750), and the median maximum plasma level (Cmax) was 50.5 ng ml-1 (range 24.7-199.6) after a dose of 8 mg. For the ondansetron suppository the median AUC was 140 ng ml-1h-1 range (77-405) and the median Cmax was 17.1 ng ml-1 (range 13-48.3) after a dose of 16 mg. The systemic exposure after correction for the dose difference after the suppository was on average 70% lower than after the tablet. The median time to reach the maximum level (Tmax) was 60 min (range 28-120) with the oral formulation and 209 min (range 90-420) with the suppository. For both the tablet and suppository, there was no apparent relationship between either Cmax or AUC, and efficacy. Although the patient numbers were too small for a formal exposure-response relationship to be derived, the slightly poorer pharmacokinetic performance of the suppository did not appear to be associated with a lessening of control of emesis following chemotherapy. The study demonstrates that the pharmacokinetic analysis of a once-daily 16 mg ondansetron suppository results in appropriate plasma concentrations and AUC, and that this rectal formulation is effective in the protection against nausea and vomiting associated with cyclophosphamide chemotherapy. This formulation will provide a useful alternative to the currently available oral formulation.
Full text
PDF



Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bonneterre J., Chevallier B., Metz R., Fargeot P., Pujade-Lauraine E., Spielmann M., Tubiana-Hulin M., Paes D., Bons J. A randomized double-blind comparison of ondansetron and metoclopramide in the prophylaxis of emesis induced by cyclophosphamide, fluorouracil, and doxorubicin or epirubicin chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 1990 Jun;8(6):1063–1069. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1990.8.6.1063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Coates A., Abraham S., Kaye S. B., Sowerbutts T., Frewin C., Fox R. M., Tattersall M. H. On the receiving end--patient perception of the side-effects of cancer chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1983 Feb;19(2):203–208. doi: 10.1016/0277-5379(83)90418-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Colthup P. V., Felgate C. C., Palmer J. L., Scully N. L. Determination of ondansetron in plasma and its pharmacokinetics in the young and elderly. J Pharm Sci. 1991 Sep;80(9):868–871. doi: 10.1002/jps.2600800913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cupissol D., Bressolle F., Adenis L., Carmichael J., Bessell E., Allen A., Wargenau M., Romain D. Evaluation of the bioequivalence of tablet and capsule formulations of granisetron in patients undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy for malignant disease. J Pharm Sci. 1993 Dec;82(12):1281–1284. doi: 10.1002/jps.2600821221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hsyu P. H., Pritchard J. F., Bozigian H. P., Gooding A. E., Griffin R. H., Mitchell R., Bjurstrom T., Panella T. L., Huang A. T., Hansen L. A. Oral ondansetron pharmacokinetics: the effect of chemotherapy. J Clin Pharmacol. 1994 Jul;34(7):767–773. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1994.tb02038.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kaasa S., Kvaløy S., Dicato M. A., Ries F., Huys J. V., Royer E., Carruthers L. A comparison of ondansetron with metoclopramide in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a randomized, double-blind study. International Emesis Study Group. Eur J Cancer. 1990 Mar;26(3):311–314. doi: 10.1016/0277-5379(90)90227-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marschner N. W., Adler M., Nagel G. A., Christmann D., Fenzl E., Upadhyaya B. Double-blind randomised trial of the antiemetic efficacy and safety of ondansetron and metoclopramide in advanced breast cancer patients treated with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide. Eur J Cancer. 1991;27(9):1137–1140. doi: 10.1016/0277-5379(91)90311-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pritchard J. F. Ondansetron metabolism and pharmacokinetics. Semin Oncol. 1992 Aug;19(4 Suppl 10):9–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
