Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 1992 Dec;174(23):7743–7749. doi: 10.1128/jb.174.23.7743-7749.1992

Escherichia coli is able to grow with negligible sodium ion extrusion activity at alkaline pH.

T Ohyama 1, R Imaizumi 1, K Igarashi 1, H Kobayashi 1
PMCID: PMC207488  PMID: 1332943

Abstract

The Escherichia coli mutant NM81, which is deficient in the nhaA gene for the sodium/proton antiporter, still has a sodium ion extrusion activity because of a second antiporter encoded by nhaB (E. Padan, N. Maisler, D. Taglicht, R. Karpel, and S. Schuldiner, J. Biol. Chem. 264:20297-20302, 1989). By chance, we have found that E. coli pop6810 already contains a mutation affecting the sodium ion circulation, probably in or near nhaB, and that its delta nhaA mutant, designated RS1, has no sodium ion extrusion activity at alkaline pH. The growth of RS1 was inhibited completely by 0.1 M sodium, whereas growth inhibition of NM81 was observed only at sodium concentrations greater than 0.2 M. RS1 grew at a normal rate in an alkaline medium containing a low sodium concentration. Furthermore, RS1 grew with a negligible proton motive force in the alkaline medium containing carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone. The transport activities for proline and serine were not impaired in RS1, suggesting that these transport systems could be driven by the proton motive force at alkaline pH. These findings led us to conclude that the operation of the sodium/proton antiporter is not essential for growth at alkaline pH but that the antiporter is required for maintaining a low internal sodium concentration when the growth medium contains a high concentration of these ions.

Full text

PDF
7743

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bassilana M., Damiano E., Leblanc G. Relationships between the Na+-H+ antiport activity and the components of the electrochemical proton gradient in Escherichia coli membrane vesicles. Biochemistry. 1984 Feb 28;23(5):1015–1022. doi: 10.1021/bi00300a033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beck J. C., Rosen B. P. Cation/proton antiport systems in escherichia coli: properties of the sodium/proton antiporter. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1979 Apr 15;194(1):208–214. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(79)90611-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Booth I. R. Regulation of cytoplasmic pH in bacteria. Microbiol Rev. 1985 Dec;49(4):359–378. doi: 10.1128/mr.49.4.359-378.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown I. I., Galperin MYu, Glagolev A. N., Skulachev V. P. Utilization of energy stored in the form of Na+ and K+ ion gradients by bacterial cells. Eur J Biochem. 1983 Aug 1;134(2):345–349. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1983.tb07573.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Castle A. M., Macnab R. M., Shulman R. G. Measurement of intracellular sodium concentration and sodium transport in Escherichia coli by 23Na nuclear magnetic resonance. J Biol Chem. 1986 Mar 5;261(7):3288–3294. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen C. C., Tsuchiya T., Yamane Y., Wood J. M., Wilson T. H. Na+ (Li+)-proline cotransport in Escherichia coli. J Membr Biol. 1985;84(2):157–164. doi: 10.1007/BF01872213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dibrov P. A. The role of sodium ion transport in Escherichia coli energetics. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1991 Feb 8;1056(3):209–224. doi: 10.1016/s0005-2728(05)80052-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fraimow H. S., Greenman J. B., Leviton I. M., Dougherty T. J., Miller M. H. Tobramycin uptake in Escherichia coli is driven by either electrical potential or ATP. J Bacteriol. 1991 May;173(9):2800–2808. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.9.2800-2808.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Goldberg E. B., Arbel T., Chen J., Karpel R., Mackie G. A., Schuldiner S., Padan E. Characterization of a Na+/H+ antiporter gene of Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 May;84(9):2615–2619. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.9.2615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hama H., Shimamoto T., Tsuda M., Tsuchiya T. Properties of a Na+-coupled serine-threonine transport system in Escherichia coli. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1987 Dec 11;905(2):231–239. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(87)90451-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hara Y., Nakao M. ATP-dependent proton uptake by proteoliposomes reconstituted with purified Na+,K+-ATPase. J Biol Chem. 1986 Sep 25;261(27):12655–12658. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Heefner D. L., Harold F. M. ATP-linked sodium transport in Streptococcus faecalis. I. The sodium circulation. J Biol Chem. 1980 Dec 10;255(23):11396–11402. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ishikawa T., Hama H., Tsuda M., Tsuchiya T. Isolation and properties of a mutant of Escherichia coli possessing defective Na+/H+ antiporter. J Biol Chem. 1987 Jun 5;262(16):7443–7446. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Karpel R., Olami Y., Taglicht D., Schuldiner S., Padan E. Sequencing of the gene ant which affects the Na+/H+ antiporter activity in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1988 Jul 25;263(21):10408–10414. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kinoshita N., Unemoto T., Kobayashi H. Proton motive force is not obligatory for growth of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1984 Dec;160(3):1074–1077. doi: 10.1128/jb.160.3.1074-1077.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. LENNOX E. S. Transduction of linked genetic characters of the host by bacteriophage P1. Virology. 1955 Jul;1(2):190–206. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(55)90016-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. LOWRY O. H., ROSEBROUGH N. J., FARR A. L., RANDALL R. J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951 Nov;193(1):265–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Laubinger W., Dimroth P. The sodium ion translocating adenosinetriphosphatase of Propionigenium modestum pumps protons at low sodium ion concentrations. Biochemistry. 1989 Sep 5;28(18):7194–7198. doi: 10.1021/bi00444a010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. McMorrow I., Shuman H. A., Sze D., Wilson D. M., Wilson T. H. Sodium/proton antiport is required for growth of Escherichia coli at alkaline pH. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1989 May 19;981(1):21–26. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(89)90077-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mogi T., Yamamoto H., Nakao T., Yamato I., Anraku Y. Genetic and physical characterization of putP, the proline carrier gene of Escherichia coli K12. Mol Gen Genet. 1986 Jan;202(1):35–41. doi: 10.1007/BF00330513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mugikura S., Nishikawa M., Igarashi K., Kobayashi H. Maintenance of a neutral cytoplasmic pH is not obligatory for growth of Escherichia coli and Streptococcus faecalis at an alkaline pH. J Biochem. 1990 Jul;108(1):86–91. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a123168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Padan E., Maisler N., Taglicht D., Karpel R., Schuldiner S. Deletion of ant in Escherichia coli reveals its function in adaptation to high salinity and an alternative Na+/H+ antiporter system(s). J Biol Chem. 1989 Dec 5;264(34):20297–20302. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Padan E., Schuldiner S. Intracellular pH regulation in bacterial cells. Methods Enzymol. 1986;125:337–352. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(86)25029-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Padan E., Zilberstein D., Schuldiner S. pH homeostasis in bacteria. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1981 Dec;650(2-3):151–166. doi: 10.1016/0304-4157(81)90004-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Pinner E., Padan E., Schuldiner S. Cloning, sequencing, and expression of the nhaB gene, encoding a Na+/H+ antiporter in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1992 Jun 5;267(16):11064–11068. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Polvani C., Blostein R. Protons as substitutes for sodium and potassium in the sodium pump reaction. J Biol Chem. 1988 Nov 15;263(32):16757–16763. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Polvani C., Sachs G., Blostein R. Sodium ions as substitutes for protons in the gastric H,K-ATPase. J Biol Chem. 1989 Oct 25;264(30):17854–17859. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Schuldiner S., Fishkes H. Sodium-proton antiport in isolated membrane vesicles of Escherichia coli. Biochemistry. 1978 Feb 21;17(4):706–711. doi: 10.1021/bi00597a023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Taglicht D., Padan E., Schuldiner S. Overproduction and purification of a functional Na+/H+ antiporter coded by nhaA (ant) from Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1991 Jun 15;266(17):11289–11294. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Thelen P., Tsuchiya T., Goldberg E. B. Characterization and mapping of a major Na+/H+ antiporter gene of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1991 Oct;173(20):6553–6557. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.20.6553-6557.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Tsuchiya T., Wilson T. H. Cation-sugar cotransport in the melibiose transport system of Escherichia coli. Membr Biochem. 1978;2(1):63–79. doi: 10.3109/09687687809063858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. West I. C., Mitchell P. Proton/sodium ion antiport in Escherichia coli. Biochem J. 1974 Oct;144(1):87–90. doi: 10.1042/bj1440087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Yamato I., Ohsawa M., Anraku Y. Defective cation-coupling mutants of Escherichia coli Na+/proline symport carrier. Characterization and localization of mutations. J Biol Chem. 1990 Feb 15;265(5):2450–2455. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Zilberstein D., Agmon V., Schuldiner S., Padan E. Escherichia coli intracellular pH, membrane potential, and cell growth. J Bacteriol. 1984 Apr;158(1):246–252. doi: 10.1128/jb.158.1.246-252.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Zilberstein D., Agmon V., Schuldiner S., Padan E. The sodium/proton antiporter is part of the pH homeostasis mechanism in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1982 Apr 10;257(7):3687–3691. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES