Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 Nov 12.
Published in final edited form as: J Psychiatr Pract. 2004 Jul;10(4):239–248. doi: 10.1097/00131746-200407000-00005

The Role of Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors in Current Psychiatric Practice

Jess G Fiedorowicz 1, Karen L Swartz 1
PMCID: PMC2075358  NIHMSID: NIHMS31302  PMID: 15552546

Abstract

The use of monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) by psychiatrists has declined over the past several decades with the expansion of psychiatrists’ pharmacologic armamentarium. This trend has also been driven by concern about food and drug interactions and side effects, as well as waning physician experience with these medications. Many psychiatrists, in fact, never prescribe MAOIs. Recent research has liberalized the MAOI diet and identified symptom presentations more likely to respond to these medications. Thus, clinicians must continue to familiarize themselves with the properties of and indications for prescribing MAOIs.

Keywords: psychopharmacology, drug response, monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), phenelzine, isocarboxazid, tranylcypromine, moclobemide, selegiline, dosage, physician prescribing practices, major depression, bipolar depression, atypical depression, treatment-refractory depression

CURRENTLY AVAILABLE MONOAMINE OXIDASE INHIBITORS

The nonselective monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) currently available in the United States include phenelzine (Nardil), isocarboxazid (Marplan), and tranylcypromine (Parnate). These medications are irreversible inhibitors of the enzyme monoamine oxidase (MAO).

Selegeline is a selective inhibitor of type B MAO (MAOB) and is currently approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for parkinsonism. Current studies using selegeline for depression are discussed at the end of this article in the section on “Future Directions.”

Moclobemide is a reversible inhibitor of type A MAO (MAOA) and is consequently believed to require fewer dietary restrictions. Reversible inhibitors of MAO have been well studied in the treatment of depression, but are not currently available in the United States. Moclobemide is available in Australia, Europe, and Canada.1

CURRENT PRESCRIBING PRACTICES OF PHYSICIANS IN THE UNITED STATES

With the continuing increase in the number of available antidepressants, the use of MAOIs relative to other antidepressant medications has declined.26 Early reports of potentially fatal interactions tempered enthusiasm for MAOIs.7 Further decline in use was influenced by the 1965 release of the Medical Research Council trial, which demonstrated no difference from placebo in patients suitable for ECT.1,8 The Medical Research Council trial studied inpatients with severe endogenous depression, used a dose of phenelzine of 60 mg/day, and evaluated patients receiving treatment at 4 weeks.8,9 The trial has been criticized by some for using insufficient doses in high acuity patients.7

A 1999 survey of the Michigan Psychiatric Association found that 12% of practicing psychiatrists never prescribed an MAOI, while another 27% had not prescribed an MAOI in the prior 3 years. Only 2% of respondents reported frequent use of MAOIs compared with reports of approximately 25% a decade earlier.10,11 The most common reasons for not prescribing an MAOI included drug interactions, side effects, preference for other treatments, and dietary restrictions.3,10,12,13 Despite the availability of alternative antidepressants, some psychiatrists specializing in affective disorders maintain that MAOIs are underutilized.14 In fact, reports of efficacy in the management of treatment-resistant and bipolar depression, along with low rates of induction of mania, have led to increased use of these agents at some centers.3,1518

When they are prescribed, MAOIs are often given at inadequate doses.7,1922 Like most other antidepressants, the dose should be titrated upward for therapeutic response. The commonly cited maximum daily dose of isocarboxazid and tranylcypromine is 60 mg/day (six 10 mg tablets). The reported maximum daily dose of phenelzine is 90 mg/day (six 15 mg tablets). Generally, doses of 40–60 mg/day of isocarboxazid and tranylcypromine and 60–90 mg/day of phenelzine are most effective, when tolerated.7,17 Table 1 summarizes desirable target doses of the MAOIs that are available in the United States and approved for the treatment of depression.4,2325

Table 1.

MAOIs currently available in the United States

Generic name Trade name Tablet strength Target dosing range
Isocarboxazid Marplan 10 mg 40–60 mg/day (4–6 tabs)
Phenelzine Nardil 15 mg 60–90 mg/day (4–6 tabs)
Tranylcypromine Parnate 10 mg 40–60 mg/day (4–6 tabs)

GENERAL THEORY AND MECHANISM

The antidepressant effects of MAO inhibition were discovered serendipitously when patients with tuberculosis were treated with iproniazid.26,27 Following this discovery, scientists began to hypothesize that a deficiency in catecholamines, specifically norepinephrine and dopamine, and possibly the indolamine serotonin, may result in depression.28 This hypothesis was substantiated by correlations between MAOI inhibition and mood improvement in depressed patients.29 While this is surely an overly simplistic hypothesis, the monoamine hypothesis is supported by depletion studies of neurotransmitter precursors such as tryptophan and by the known mechanisms of antidepressant medications.3032

MAOs represent a family of enzymes that metabolize and subsequently inactivate monoamine and indolamine neurotransmitters, including dopamine, epinephrine, norepinephrine, serotonin, and tyramine.21,33 MAO is present in the nervous system, liver, gastrointestinal tract, mitochondrial membranes, and platelets, and it consists of two subtypes, MAOA and MAOB. Inhibition of MAOA, which most specifically catabolizes serotonin, norepinephrine, and tyramine, is thought to be most directly linked with the antidepressant activity of MAOIs.21 The mechanism of action of antidepressants such as the MAOIs was once thought to be the direct result of increased neurotransmitter amines at nerve terminals. However, such increases occur within days of initiation of treatment, while the treatment effects are not seen for weeks. More recent hypotheses have focused on receptor-mediated pre-synaptic and postsynaptic events.7,34

The MAOIs phenelzine, isocarboxazid, and tranylcypromine irreversibly inhibit the activity of MAO. This subsequently increases the neural concentration of amine neurotransmitters such as serotonin, norepinephrine, and dopamine. Because the enzyme is irreversibly inhibited, the body must regenerate MAO to resume previous levels of enzymatic activity. This process of regeneration can take weeks, so that the effects of the MAOI can persist long after the drug has been cleared from the body. Thus, plasma levels of MAOIs are not necessarily correlated with the degree of MAO inhibition.35 It has been suggested that platelet MAO enzyme inhibition may be measured as a surrogate for central nervous system MAO inhibition, with at least 85% (80%–90%) platelet inhibition believed to be required for antidepressant efficacy.9,3638

SAFETY AND TOLERABILITY

Side-Effect Profile

The most common early side effects of MAOIs include orthostatic hypotension, dizziness, drowsiness, insomnia, and nausea.3943 Orthostatic hypotension can typically be managed with slow titration of the drug, divided dosing, or increased fluid intake. Insomnia associated with the MAOI must be differentiated from that resulting from the depression itself. Adjustments in time of dosing often prove beneficial in relieving insomnia. Patients may be more likely to experience sedation with phenelzine than with the other MAOIs, and the dosing schedule may need to be adjusted accordingly.

Late side effects of weight gain, edema, muscle pains, myoclonus, paresthesias, and sexual dysfunction have also been reported with MAOIs.42,44 Although generally found with all MAOIs, weight gain may be worse with phenelzine.45 Paresthesias are thought to be the result of pyridoxine deficiency and are amenable to pyridoxine supplementation.42 In addition, hepatotoxicity is rarely observed with MAOIs.33,46,47

There have been several reports of transient increases in blood pressure shortly (30 minutes to 2 hours) after ingestion of MAOIs.48,49 These reactions may vary from transient, asymptomatic increases in blood pressure to frank hypertensive crisis.50 These reactions do not appear to be related to dietary or drug interactions and have been documented in both inpatient and outpatient settings. Such reactions can be clinically significant, resulting in up to a doubling of average blood pressure.48 These transient elevations in blood pressure appear to be rare events; typically they are self-limited and without serious consequences.50

Cases of serotonin syndrome, which are discussed in more detail in the following section on drug interactions, have been reported on MAOI monotherapy.51 However, serotonin syndrome has been more frequently reported as a result of interactions with serotonergic agents.5153 Overdoses of MAOIs may result in severe CNS excitation and increased sympathetic outflow, which can be manifested by neuromuscular irritability, hyperthermia, hypertension or hypotension, and arrhythmias. Overdose is potentially fatal and requires close observation and supportive care.54

Drug Interactions

Despite decades of use, the pharmacokinetic interactions of MAOIs are still not well understood.35,55 It is known that phenothiazine antipsychotics, such as fluphenazine, may increase concentrations of tranylcypromine. Tranylcypromine is also an inhibitor of CYP2C19, which metabolizes proton pump inhibitors such as omeprazole.55,56 Cimetidine has been shown to diminish the clearance of moclobemide and it is therefore recommended that doses of moclobemide be cut in half when using this combination.55

The irreversible MAOIs are rapidly absorbed and generally quickly eliminated, with plasma elimination half-lives of 1.5–4 hours.35,43 However, because of their irreversible inhibition of MAO, the physiological effects of phenelzine, isocarboxazid, and tranylcypromine persist for up to 2–3 weeks.13 Thus, their pharmacodynamic half-life is greater than the pharmacokinetic half-life alone would suggest. A 14-day washout period before beginning another antidepressant is therefore recommended to prevent potentially serious pharmacodynamic interactions.55,57 While it is generally safe to begin a different antidepressant after a 14-day washout, patients should be monitored closely after the washout period since there have been case reports of interactions, including serotonin syndrome, following 14-day washout periods.58 Similar caution should be exercised when switching from one MAOI to another, although more rapid switches (1–8 days) have been safely performed.57,59 A washout period of five half-lives for an antidepressant and its active metabolites should be provided before initiating an MAOI.57 This would require approximately a 4–5 week washout period for fluoxetine.

Combining serotonergic antidepressants and other serotonergic medications with MAOIs involves the risk of serotonin syndrome. The syndrome typically presents as mental status changes, restlessness, myoclonus, hyperreflexia, diaphoresis, and/or evidence of autonomic overactivity.52,60,61 These symptoms can be generally divided into three categories: mental status changes, motor symptoms, and autonomic instability.60 This potentially fatal syndrome is thought to represent a toxic state and is treated with supportive care such as intravenous hydration and removal of the offending agent or agents.52

Because of the risk of serotonin syndrome, serotonergic antidepressants and other serotonergic medications should be avoided in patients taking MAOIs. Narcotic medications at anesthetic doses and meperidine at any dose may exert serotonergic effects and could potentially result in the serotonin syndrome when combined with MAOIs. Volatile anesthetics are preferred for elective surgery in patients on MAOIs. However, certain surgeries, such as those involving cardiopulmonary bypass, may demand narcotic adjunct and thus entail increased risk.62 Patients on MAOIs should be specifically instructed to inform all clinicians that they are taking an MAOI and to advertise this fact in some way (e.g., through use of a medic alert bracelet) should emergent surgery be required when they are unable to verbally communicate their MAOI status. Interactions have been reported when combining pharmacologic doses (1–6 gm) of l-tryptophan with tranylcypromine.52,63 There is no evidence, however, that dietary tryptophan is unsafe. The common over-the-counter medication dextromethorphan has also been associated with the serotonin syndrome in patients taking MAOIs.52 Pseudoephedrine, an over-the-counter decongestant and sympathomimetic amine, has been associated with hypertensive crises in patients on MAOIs.64 Other sympathomimetic and stimulant drugs are also contraindicated including ephedrine, phenylephedrine, amphetamines, and cocaine.33 The antibiotic linezolid has been shown to display some monoamine inhibition, although, to date, there have been no reports of serotonin syndrome or other interactions with this medication.65

The MAOI Diet

Many of the traditional MAOI diets, which remain standard at numerous hospitals, are unnecessarily restrictive.66 Reports of food interactions with MAOIs published in the early 1960s led to the development of stringent dietary restrictions.67,68 Consumption of numerous foods, principally cheese, by patients on MAOIs was associated with potentially fatal hypertensive crises. The clinical syndrome associated with the hypertensive crisis has been described as a sudden onset of a severe, pulsating headache, palpitations, diaphoresis, stiff neck, and nausea.68 The crisis may culminate in stroke.68 These potentially fatal hypertensive crises on MAOIs were eventually linked to a specific interaction with tyramine.

However, many of the foods once thought to be dangerous for patients on MAOIs are now considered to be safe. Although the cautious clinician’s initial temptation may be to choose the more conservative diet, an excessively stringent diet may actually be detrimental, since clinicians and patients may be deterred from considering a potentially effective treatment. In addition, patients may become dangerously lax with their diet after accidentally discovering that certain diet items are actually not harmful.69,70

Numerous studies, most notably those conducted by Shulman’s group at the University of Toronto, have attempted to quantify the tyramine content of food.69,7174 A tyramine content of less than 6 mg per serving is generally considered safe.69,72,75 Gardner et al. have identified the following foods as “absolutely restricted:” aged cheeses and meats, banana peels, broad bean (such as fava) pods, spoiled meats, Marmite, sauerkraut, soybean products such as soy sauce, and tap beer.69 Tap beers may contain variable levels of tyramine, which can become dangerously high; thus tap beer should be universally avoided by patients taking MAOIs.69,73 Wines and bottled/canned beer should be used in moderation, not to exceed two drinks/day.69

Foods considered to have been unnecessarily restricted include “avocados; bananas; beef/chicken bouillon; chocolate; fresh and mild cheeses, e.g., ricotta, cottage, cream cheese, processed slices; fresh meat, poultry, or fish; gravy (fresh); monosodium glutamate; peanuts; properly stored pickled or smoked fish, e.g., herring; raspberries…yeast extracts (except Marmite).”69 Parmesan cheese is estimated to have a safe tyramine content of 0.2 mg/serving.76 Although technically an aged cheese, mozzarella has relatively low levels of tyramine.72,76 Pizzas with other aged cheeses should be avoided. Several pizzas from large chain outlets (e.g., Pizza Hut, Domino’s) have been analyzed and deemed “safe for consumption” by patients taking MAOIs.72

Previous MAOI diets were overinclusive due to a healthy concern for patient safety. Many of the earlier restrictions had been based on unsubstantiated case reports and limited scientific understanding of the mechanism underlying the interaction.77 With the development of evidence-based dietary restrictions, the MAOI diet has become less burdensome. Table 2 details the most recent revision of the MAOI diet at Sunnybrook & Women’s College Health Sciences Centre, a University of Toronto affiliate that has been at the forefront of such research. This revised diet should serve to improve patient compliance and quality of life. However, dietary compliance should continue to be routinely assessed with patients, since they may tend to follow the diet less carefully over time.78,79 Clinicians should conduct an ongoing diet survey and provide targeted dietary recommendations for patients taking MAOIs.79

Table 2.

MAOI diet

Food type Foods to be avoided Foods allowed
Cheese All matured or aged cheese Fresh cottage cheese, cream cheese, ricotta cheese, and processed cheese slices
  Casseroles made with these cheeses (e.g., lasagna). Fresh milk products. (e.g., sour cream, yogurt, ice cream)
  (Cheese should be considered aged unless known safe)  
Meat Fermented/dry sausage (e.g., pepperoni, salami, mortadella, summer sausage) All fresh packaged or processed meat such as hot dogs, fish, or poultry: store in refrigerator immediately and eat as soon as possible.
  Improperly stored meat, fish, or poultry  
  Improperly stored pickled herring  
Fruits & vegetables Fava or broad bean pods (not beans) Banana pulp
  Banana peels All other fruits and vegetables
Beverages All tap (draft) beer Alcohol: no more than two bottled or canned beers or two 4-ounce glasses of wine per day
Miscellaneous Marmite concentrated yeast extract Other yeast extract (e.g., Brewer's yeast)
  Sauerkraut Pizzas without aged cheeses
  Soy sauce or other soy bean condiments Soy milk, tofu

Adapted from the Sunnybrook & Women’s College Health Sciences Centre MAOI Diet, courtesy of Dr. Kenneth I. Shulman and Dr. Thomas W. Paton.

ROLE OF MAOIs IN THE CLINICIAN’S ARMAMENTARIUM

Atypical Depression

There have been several proposals to subtype clinical depression. Of the more recent proposals, the concept of atypical depression has been somewhat enduring in the literature and is currently included in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision(DSM-IV-TR).80 The term atypical depression has evolved from depressions resembling “anxiety hysteria” to its current DSM-IV-TR definition.27 The DSM-IV-TR operationally defines atypical features as consisting of mood reactivity and two of the following: weight gain or increased appetite, hypersomnia, leaden paralysis, and an enduring pattern of sensitivity to perceived interpersonal rejection.80,81 This definition was largely modeled after the Columbia Criteria developed based on years of research by a group at Columbia University that included Liebowitz, Quitkin, and others.82,83

There is controversy as to whether or not such a subtype suggests a different pathophysiology and thus represents a valid clinical entity.84,85 The atypical depression subtype has been criticized for characterizing any symptoms that are not classic, “typical” symptoms of a melancholic or endogenous depression as a distinct subtype. Atypical depression therefore becomes a disjunctive category. For instance, premorbid personality characteristics or “atypical” presenting symptoms may lead to a diagnosis of atypical depression. Additional criticism comes from the lack of internal consistency among the defining criteria for this subtype.84 Observations of individuals who progress from typical to atypical features within a single depressive episode or from one episode to another also challenge the validity of this subtype as a distinct illness.

Regardless of whether depression with atypical features represents a distinct and valid subtype, a number of studies suggest that certain symptom presentations may be more likely to respond to MAOIs.82 These studies have examined a number of patient features suggesting atypical presentation, including a histrionic need for attention, interpersonal sensitivity, vulnerability to rejection, early onset of chronic dysphoria, association with panic attacks, association with anxiety, increased appetite, weight gain, hypersomnia or initial insomnia, and increased libido.81,83,8694 In other trials, patients with atypical or nonendogenous features did not show a preferential response to an MAOI over a tricyclic antidepressant (TCA), although in a study by Paykel et al. those with additional anxiety did show a better response to the MAOI.95 In a 4-week study comparing patients with nonendogenous depression who received tranylcypromine (27 patients, dose of 30–60 mg/day), nortriptyline (34 patients, dose of 75–150 mg/day), or placebo (37 patients), White et al. did not demonstrate significant differences between the MAOI and TCA.96 While many studies of depressed patients with atypical features have demonstrated greater response to MAOIs than TCAs, evidence that MAOIs are superior to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in this population is lacking.82,97

It has also been suggested that the preferential response to MAOIs seen in depressed patients with anxiety or panic symptoms may simply be a reflection of the demonstrated efficacy of MAOIs in patients with anxiety and panic.84 In any case, MAOIs should remain at least a second or third-line treatment option in depressed patients with anxiety or panic as well as in patients who present with atypical features.

Bipolar Depression

MAOIs have not been as extensively studied in bipolar depression as in unipolar depression with or without atypical features. This likely reflects a general tendency of investigators to exclude patients with bipolar depression from clinical trials.98 However, there is some evidence from controlled trials that MAOIs may be more effective than TCAs in the treatment of anergic bipolar depression, which has been defined as fatigue, psychomotor retardation, and at least one reversed neurovegetative symptom in patients with bipolar disorder meeting criteria for a major depressive episode.16,99 Furthermore, there is some suggestion from chart reviews that MAOIs may induce milder manic states than other antidepressants.100 Based on this limited experience, some clinicians have become more likely to prescribe MAOIs for patients with bipolar depression.15

Treatment-Refractory Depression

Many psychiatrists are reluctant to prescribe MAOIs for treatment-refractory depression because of concern about having to use a washout period or an unfounded perception that MAOIs possess weaker antidepressant properties than newer agents.4,14 MAOIs certainly have demonstrated efficacy in the routine treatment of depression.17,39,40,86,96,101104 Their efficacy and safety has also been demonstrated in elderly populations, although more study in this population is needed.61,105

While comparative studies of treatment options for treatment-refractory depression are limited, switching to an MAOI remains an evidence-based and often overlooked option.14,17,19 A number of studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of MAOIs in treatment-refractory, particularly tricyclic-refractory, depression.17,90,99,106109

Concern about the need to use a washout period is certainly reasonable, and this requirement can be especially burdensome when switching from a serotonergic medication with a long half-life such as fluoxetine. In other situations, however, a washout period can have certain clinical advantages. Clinicians can use this period as an opportunity to “clear the slate,” particularly for patients who are on complex psychopharmacologic regimens. In certain situations, a washout period may not even be warranted. With appropriate precautions, MAOIs have safely been initiated in patients who have discontinued TCAs less than 4 days earlier.57,110

With the expansion of the antidepressant repertoire available to clinicians, MAOIs have understandably become a less popular choice for patients who fail a full trial of an antidepressant medication. However, while newer agents undoubtedly have more attractive risk profiles, MAOIs should not be ruled out as a therapeutic option and should continue to play a role in the management of patients with treatment-refractory depression.2,12,21 Patients with treatment-refractory depression require long-term antidepressant treatment, and, although there are limited long-term studies, MAOIs do appear to have long-term efficacy.1

FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Newer reversible and selective inhibitors of MAO have been developed and purport to improve the safety and acceptability of MAOIs.47 As previously mentioned, these agents are not yet available in the United States. Reversible inhibitors of MAO (RIMAs) such as moclobemide require fewer dietary restriction. Nonetheless, the level of dietary restriction required with RIMAs remains a question and a prudent level of caution is advised.33 RIMAs have also been safely and effectively combined with SSRIs, suggesting that they have a lower potential for drug interactions than traditional MAOIs.111 A meta-analysis of RIMA studies suggests that they may be slightly less effective than the traditional MAOIs phenelzine and tranylcypromine.112 Furthermore, they have not yet been demonstrated to be more effective than other types of antidepressants for atypical depression.112

A transdermal selegiline system is under study. This method of drug delivery limits enterohepatic MAO inhibition, presumably eliminating the need for dietary tyramine restriction.113,114 Because the transdermal delivery system essentially bypasses the MAOA rich intestinal mucosa, intestinal MAO is not significantly inhibited, so that orally ingested tyramines can be metabolized.47 The selegiline transdermal system also does not appear to interact with over-the-counter decongestants.47 Furthermore, the overall side-effect profile is believed to be more favorable than that of traditional MAOIs.114 The clinical effect demonstrated in these studies remains modest, although the potential for targeted MAO inhibition is encouraging.

High-dose selegiline (60 mg/day) has been shown to be safe and effective in a small group of elderly patients with treatment-resistant depression (i.e., who have failed to respond to at least two trials of antidepressants).115 At this dose, selegiline may not be as MAOB selective, although it does appear to have a better side-effect profile than nonselective MAOIs. Previous studies of high-dose selegiline have also had promising results.116,117 Subjects in these high-dose selegiline trials were maintained on low tyramine or strict MAOI diets.115117

Case reports and studies have also described the use of MAOIs in combination with other antidepressants, including bupropion with tranylcypromine, RIMAs with SSRIs, and irreversible MAOIs with TCAs.118120 The current safety data concerning such combinations are limited and clinicians must exercise appropriate caution.

CONCLUSIONS

Over the decades since their introduction, MAOIs have lost favor among clinicians. This was initially driven by concerns over side effects, effectiveness, and drug and diet interactions. More recently, the increasing number of available antidepressants has limited the use of MAOIs. In fact, MAOIs are so seldom used than many clinicians have little or no experience with them and are thus unlikely to use them even when indicated. Nevertheless, research suggests that MAOIs may be particularly effective in the treatment of depressions with atypical features such as those with anxious or nonendogenous presentations. MAOIs have also been well established as an effective option for patients with treatment-resistant depression.

While the risk of serotonin syndrome due to drug interactions remains a serious concern, dietary restrictions should be less of a concern than previously believed. More detailed study of the tyramine content of foods and an enhanced understanding of the mechanism of food interactions have lessened the burden of dietary restriction. Unfortunately, many currently used formulations of the MAOI diet have not yet been updated.

Given the lack of a rational method for choosing antidepressants, it is important to maximize treatment options available for patients with depression, particularly treatment-refractory depression. The MAOIs, a distinct class of antidepressant medications with a distinct mechanism of action, represent a treatment option that is often overlooked and arguably underutilized. In addition, when they are used, MAOIs are often prescribed at insufficient doses. MAOIs should be considered for patients with atypical depression, bipolar depression, and treatment-refractory depression. Psychiatrists must familiarize themselves with this important class of anti-depressants, because MAOIs should and likely will continue to play a part in the management of depression in select patients.

Footnotes

Additional Source Kennedy SH, McKenna KF, Baker GB. Monoamine oxidase inhibitors. In: Sadock BJ, Sadock VA, eds. Kaplan & Sadock’s comprehensive textbook of psychiatry, 7th ed. Vol 2. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000: 2397–2407.

References

  • 1.Kennedy SH. Continuation and maintenance treatments in major depression: The neglected role of monoamine oxidase inhibitors. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 1997;22:127–131. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Fava M. New approaches to the treatment of refractory depression. J Clin Psychiatry. 2000;61:26–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nutt D, Glue P. Monoamine oxidase inhibitors: Rehabilitation from recent research? Br J Psychiatry. 1989;154:287–291. doi: 10.1192/bjp.154.3.287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Petersen T, Dording C, Neault NB, et al. A survey of prescribing practices in the treatment of depression. Prog Neuro-psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2002;26:177–187. doi: 10.1016/s0278-5846(01)00250-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Olfson M, Klerman GL. Trends in the prescription of antidepressants by office-based psychiatrists. Am J Psychiatry. 1993;150:571–577. doi: 10.1176/ajp.150.4.571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Olfson M, Marcus SC, Pincus HA, et al. Antidepressant prescribing practices of outpatient psychiatrists. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998;55:310–316. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.55.4.310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pare CMB. The present status of monoamine oxidase inhibitors. Br J Psychiatry. 1985;146:576–584. doi: 10.1192/bjp.146.6.576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Medical Research Council. Clinical trial of the treatment of depressive illness. Br J Psychiatry. 1965;1:881–886. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5439.881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Robinson DS, Nies A, Ravaris L, et al. Clinical pharmacology of phenelzine. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1978;35:629–635. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1978.01770290111010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Balon R, Mufti R, Arfken CL. A survey of prescribing practices for monoamine oxidase inhibitors. Psychiatr Serv. 1999;50:945–947. doi: 10.1176/ps.50.7.945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Clary C, Mandos LA, Schweizer E. Results of a brief survey of the prescribing practices for monoamine oxidase inhibitor antidepressants. J Clin Psychiatry. 1990;51:226–231. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fava M. Management of nonresponse and intolerance: Switching strategies. J Clin Psychiatry. 2000;61:10–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cooper AJ. Tyramine and irreversible monoamine oxidase inhibitors in clinical practice. Br J Psychiatry. 1989;155:38–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nierenberg AA. Treatment choice after one antidepressant fails: A survey of northeastern psychiatrists. J Clin Psychiatry. 2003;52:383–385. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zarate CA, Tohen M, Baraibar G, et al. Prescribing trends in antidepressants in bipolar depression. J Clin Psychiatry. 1995;56:260–264. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Himmelhoch JM, Thase ME, Mallinger AG, et al. Tranylcypromine versus imipramine in anergic bipolar depression. Am J Psychiatry. 1991;148:910–916. doi: 10.1176/ajp.148.7.910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Thase ME, Trivedi MH, Rush AJ. MAOIs in the contemporary treatment of depression. Neuropsychopharmacology. 1995;12:185–219. doi: 10.1016/0893-133X(94)00058-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kukopulos A, Caliari B, Tundo A, et al. Rapid cyclers, temperament, and antidepressants. Compr Psychiatry. 1983;24:249–258. doi: 10.1016/0010-440x(83)90076-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Amsterdam JD, Hornig-Rohan M. Treatment algorithms in treatment-resistant depression. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 1996;19:371–385. doi: 10.1016/s0193-953x(05)70293-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Keller MB, Klerman GL, Lavori PW, et al. Treatment received by depressed patients. JAMA. 1982;248:1848–1855. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Amsterdam JD, Chopra M. Monoamine oxidase inhibitors revisited. Psychiatric Annals. 2001;31:361–370. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Guze BH, Baxter LR, Rego J. Refractory depression treated with high doses of a monoamine oxidase inhibitor. J Clin Psychiatry. 1987;48:31–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Davidson J, Miller R, Turnbill CD, et al. An evaluation of two doses of isocarboxazid in depression. J Affect Disord. 1984;6:201–207. doi: 10.1016/0165-0327(84)90025-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ravaris CL, Nies A, Robinson DS, et al. A multiple-dose, controlled study of phenelzine in depression-anxiety states. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1976;33:347–350. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1976.01770030057008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tyrer P, Gardner M, Lambourn J, et al. Clinical and pharmacokinetic factors affecting response to phenelzine. Br J Psychiatry. 1980;136:359–365. doi: 10.1192/bjp.136.4.359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Crane GE. Iproniazid (Marsilid) phosphate, a therapeutic agent for mental disorders and debilitating diseases. Psychiatric Research Reports. 1957;8:142–152. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.West ED, Dally PJ. Effects of iproniazid in depressive syndromes. BMJ. 1959;1:1491–1494. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5136.1491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Schildkraut JJ. The catecholamines hypothesis of affective disorders: A review of current evidence. Am J Psychiatry. 1964;122:509–522. doi: 10.1176/ajp.122.5.509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Dunlop E, DeFelice EA, Bergen JR, et al. The relationship between MAO inhibition and improvement of depression: Preliminary results with intravenous modaline sulfate (W3207B) Psychosomatics. 1965;VI:1–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bymaster FP, McNamara RK, Tran PV. New approaches to developing antidepressants by enhancing monoaminergic neurotransmission. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2003;12:531–543. doi: 10.1517/13543784.12.4.531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Moreno FA, Heninger GR, McGahuey CA, et al. Tryptophan depletion and risk of depression relapse: A prospective study of tryptophan depletion as a potential predictor of depressive episodes. Biol Psychiatry. 2000;48:327–329. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(00)00893-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Delgado PL, Charney DS, Price LH, et al. Serotonin function and the mechanism of antidepressant action: Reversal of antidepressant-induced remission by rapid depletion of plasma tryptophan. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1990;47:411–418. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1990.01810170011002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Livingston MG, Livingston HM. Monoamine oxidase inhibitors: An update on drug interactions. Drug Saf. 1996;14:218–227. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199614040-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Baker GB, Coutts RT, McKenna KF, et al. Insights into the mechanisms of action of the MAO inhibitors phenelzine and tranylcypromine: A review. J Psychiatr Neurosci. 1992;17:206–214. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mallinger AG, Smith E. Pharmacokinetics of monoamine oxidase inhibitors. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1991;27:493–502. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Davidson J, McLeod MN, White HL, et al. Inhibition of platelet monoamine oxidase in depressed subjects treated with phenelzine. Am J Psychiatry. 1978;135:470–472. doi: 10.1176/ajp.135.4.470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Breshnahan DB, Pandey GN, Janicak PG, et al. MAO inhibition and clinical response in depressed patients treated with phenelzine. J Clin Psychiatry. 1990;51:47–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Raft D, Davidson J, Wasik J, et al. Relationship between response to phenelzine and MAO inhibition in a clinical trial of phenelzine, amitriptyline, and placebo. Neuropsychobiology. 1981;7:122–126. doi: 10.1159/000117841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bartholomew AA. An evaluation of tranylcypromine (“Parnate”) in the treatment of depression. Med J Aust. 1962;49:655–662. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1962.tb27021.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Davidson J, Turnbill C. Isocarboxazid: Efficacy and tolerance. J Affect Disord. 1983;5:183–189. doi: 10.1016/0165-0327(83)90012-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Escobar JI, Schiele BC, Zimmerman R. The tranylcypromine isomers: A controlled clinical trial. Am J Psychiatry. 1974;131:1025–1026. doi: 10.1176/ajp.131.9.1025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Evans DL, Davidson J, Raft T. Early and late side-effects of phenelzine. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1982;2:208–210. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Fulton B, Benfield P. Moclobemide: An update of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use. Drugs. 1996;52:450–474. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199652030-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Fava M. Weight gain and antidepressants. J Clin Psychiatry. 2000;61:37–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Rabkin J, Quitkin F, Harrison W, et al. Adverse reactions to monoamine oxidase inhibitors. Part I. A comparative study. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1984;4:270–278. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Gomez-Gil E, Salmeron JM, Mas A. Phenelzine-induced fulminant hepatic failure. Ann Intern Med. 1996;124:692–693. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-124-7-199604010-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Robinson DS. Monoamine oxidase inhibitors: A new generation. Psychopharmacol Bull. 2002;36:124–138. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Falon B, Foote B, Walsh T, et al. “Spontaneous” hypertensive episodes with monoamine oxidase inhibitors. J Clin Psychiatry. 1988;49:163–165. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Linet LS. Mysterious MAOI hypertensive episodes. J Clin Psychiatry. 1986;47:563–565. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Lavin MR, Mendelwitz A, Kronig MH. Spontaneous hypertensive reactions with monoamine oxidase inhibitors. Biol Psychiatry. 1993;34:146–151. doi: 10.1016/0006-3223(93)90384-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Fischer P. Serotonin syndrome in the elderly after antidepressive monotherapy. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1995;15:440–442. doi: 10.1097/00004714-199512000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sternbach H. The serotonin syndrome. Am J Psychiatry. 1991;148:705–713. doi: 10.1176/ajp.148.6.705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Neuvonen PJ, Pohjola-Sintonen S, Tacke U, et al. Five fatal cases of serotonin syndrome after moclobemide-citalopram or moclobemide-clomipramine overdoses. Lancet. 1993;342:1419. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92774-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Linden CH, Rumack BH, Strehlke C. Monoamine oxidase inhibitor overdose. Ann Emerg Med. 1984;13:1137–1144. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(84)80339-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Baker GB, Urichuk LJ, McKenna KF, et al. Metabolism of monoamine oxidase inhibitors. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 1999;19:411–426. doi: 10.1023/A:1006901900106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Kita T, Sakaeda T, Baba T, et al. Different contribution of CYP2C19 in the in vitro metabolism of three proton pump inhibitors. Biol Pharm Bull. 2003;26:386–390. doi: 10.1248/bpb.26.386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Marangell LB. Switching antidepressants for treatment-resistant disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2001;62:12–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Gitlin MJ. Venlafaxine, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, and the serotonin syndrome. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1997;17:66–67. doi: 10.1097/00004714-199702000-00022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Szuba MP, Hornig-Rohan M, Amsterdam JD. Rapid conversion from one monoamine oxidase inhibitor to another. J Clin Psychiatry. 1997;58:307–310. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Bodner RA, Lynch T, Lewis L, et al. Serotonin syndrome. Neurology. 1995;45:219–223. doi: 10.1212/wnl.45.2.219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Volz H-P, Gleiter CH. Monoamine oxidase inhibitors: A perspective on their use in the elderly. Drugs Aging. 1998;13:341–355. doi: 10.2165/00002512-199813050-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Noorily S, Hantler CB. Monoamine oxidase inhibitors and cardiac anesthesia revisited. South Med J. 1997;90:836–838. doi: 10.1097/00007611-199708000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Pope HG, Jonas JM, Hudson JI, et al. Toxic reactions to the combination of monoamine oxidase inhibitors and tryptophan. Am J Psychiatry. 1985;142:491–492. doi: 10.1176/ajp.142.4.491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Livingston MG. Interactions with selective MAOIs. Lancet. 1995;345:533–534. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90460-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Hammerness P, Parada H, Abrams A. Linezolid: MAOI activity and potential drug interactions. Psychosomatics. 2002;43:248–249. doi: 10.1176/appi.psy.43.3.248-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Sullivan EA, Shulman KI. Diet and monoamine oxidase inhibitors: A re-examination. Can J Psychiatry. 1984;29:707–711. doi: 10.1177/070674378402900814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Blackwell B. Hypertensive crisis due to monoamine-oxidase inhibitors. Lancet. 1963;II:849–851. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(63)92743-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Blackwell B, Marley E, Price J, et al. Hypertensive interactions between monoamine oxidase inhibitors and foodstuffs. Br J Psychiatry. 1967;113:349–365. doi: 10.1192/bjp.113.497.349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Gardner DM, Shulman KI, Walker SE, et al. The making of a user friendly MAOI diet. J Clin Psychiatry. 1996;57:99–104. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.McCabe B, Tsuang MT. Dietary consideration in MAO inhibitor regimens. J Clin Psychiatry. 1982;43:178–181. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Shulman KI, Walker SE, MacKenzie S, et al. Dietary restriction, tyramine, and the use of monoamine oxidase inhibitors. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1989;9:397–402. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Shulman KI, Walker SE. Refining the MAOI diet: Tyramine content of pizzas and soy products. J Clin Psychiatry. 1999;60:191–193. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Shulman KI, Tailor SAN, Walker SE, et al. Tap (draft) beer and monoamine oxidase inhibitor dietary restrictions. Can J Psychiatry. 1997;42:310–312. doi: 10.1177/070674379704200311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Walker SE, Shulman KI, Tailor SAN, et al. Tyramine content of previously restricted foods in monoamine oxidase inhibitor diets. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1996;16:383–388. doi: 10.1097/00004714-199610000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Bieck PR, Antonin KH. Oral tyramine pressor test and the safety of monoamine oxidase inhibitor drugs: Comparison of brofaromine and tranylcypromine in healthy subjects. J Clin Psychiatry. 1988;8:237–245. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Feinberg S, Holzer B. Clarifying the safety of the MAOI diet and pizza. J Clin Psychiatry. 2000;61:145. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Folks DG. Monoamine oxidase inhibitors: Reappraisal of dietary consideration. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1983;3:249–252. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Neil JF, Licata SM, May SJ, et al. Dietary noncompliance during treatment with tranylcypromine. J Clin Psychiatry. 1979;40:33–37. [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Sweet RA, Brown EJ, Heimberg RG, et al. Monoamine oxidase inhibitor dietary restrictions: What are we asking patients to give up? J Clin Psychiatry. 1995;56:196–201. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. fourth edition, text revision. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000. Mood disorders; pp. 325–428. [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Clayton P. Depression subtyping: Treatment implications. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59:5–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Nierenberg AA, Alpert JE, Pava J, et al. Course and treatment of atypical depression. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59:5–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Liebowitz MR. Depression with anxiety and atypical depression. J Clin Psychiatry. 1993;52:10–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Parker G, Roy K, Mitchell P, et al. Atypical depression: A reappraisal. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159:1470–1479. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.9.1470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Lam RW, Stewart JN. The validity of atypical depression in DSM-IV. Compr Psychiatry. 1996;37:375–383. doi: 10.1016/s0010-440x(96)90020-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Davidson J, Raft D, Pelton S. An outpatient evaluation of phenelzine and imipramine. J Clin Psychiatry. 1987;48:143–146. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Davidson J, Pelton S. Forms of atypical depression and their response to antidepressant drugs. Psychiatry Res. 1986;17:87–95. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(86)90063-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Liebowitz MR, Quitkin FM, Stewart JW, et al. Antidepressant specificity in atypical depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1988;45:129–137. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1988.01800260037004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Liebowitz MR, Quitkin FM, Stewart JW, et al. Phenelzine v imipramine in atypical depression: A preliminary report. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1984;41:669–677. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1984.01790180039005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.McGrath PJ, Stewart JW, Nunes EV, et al. A double-blind crossover trial of imipramine and phenelzine for outpatients with treatment-refractory depression. Am J Psychiatry. 1993;150:118–123. doi: 10.1176/ajp.150.1.118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Quitkin FM, Stewart JW, McGrath PJ, et al. Columbia atypical depression: A subgroup of depressives with better response to MAOI than to tricyclic antidepressants or placebo. Br J Psychiatry. 1993;163:30–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Stewart JW, McGrath PJ, Quitkin FM. Do age of onset and course of illness predict different treatment outcome among DSM IV depressive disorders with atypical features? Neuropsychopharmacology. 2002;26:237–245. doi: 10.1016/S0893-133X(01)00313-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Thase ME, Carpenter L, Kupfer DJ, et al. Atypical depression: Diagnostic and pharmacologic controversies. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1991;27:17–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Davidson JRT, Miller RD, Turnbill CD, et al. Atypical depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1982;39:527–534. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1982.04290050015005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Paykel ES, Rowan PR, Parker RR, et al. Responses to phenelzine and amitriptyline in subtypes of outpatient depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1982;39:1041–1049. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1982.04290090035008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.White K, Razini J, Cadow B, et al. Tranylcypromine vs nortriptyline vs placebo in depressed outpatients: A controlled trial. Psychopharmacology. 1984;82:258–262. doi: 10.1007/BF00427786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Pande AC, Birkett M, Fechner-Bates S, et al. Fluoxetine versus phenelzine in atypical depression. Biol Psychiatry. 1996;40:1017–1020. doi: 10.1016/0006-3223(95)00628-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Goodwin FK, Jamison KR. Manic-depressive illness. New York: Oxford University Press; 1990. Medical treatment of acute bipolar depression; pp. 630–664. [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Thase ME, Mallinger AG, McKnight D, et al. Treatment of imipramine-resistant recurrent depression, IV: A double-blind crossover study of tranylcypromine for anergic bipolar depression. Am J Psychiatry. 1992;149:195–198. doi: 10.1176/ajp.149.2.195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Stoll AL, Mayer PV, Kolbrener M, et al. Antidepressant-associated mania: A controlled comparison with spontaneous mania. Am J Psychiatry. 1994;151:1642–1645. doi: 10.1176/ajp.151.11.1642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Davidson JRT, Giller EL, Zisook S, et al. An efficacy study of isocarboxazid and placebo in depression, and its relationship to depressive nosology. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1988;45:120–127. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1988.01800260024003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Kay DWK, Garside RF, Fahy TJ. A double-blind trial of phenelzine and amitriptyline in depressed outpatients: A possible differential effect of the drugs on symptoms. Br J Psychiatry. 1973;123:63–67. doi: 10.1192/bjp.123.1.63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Reynaert C, Parent M, Mirel J, et al. Moclobemide versus fluoxetine for a major depressive episode. Psychopharmacology. 1995;118:183–187. doi: 10.1007/BF02245838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Georgotas A, McCue RE, Friedman E, et al. Response rate of depressive symptoms to nortriptyline, phenelzine, and placebo. Br J Psychiatry. 1987;151:102–106. doi: 10.1192/bjp.151.1.102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Georgotas A, McCue RE, Hapworth W, et al. Comparative efficacy and safety of MAOIs versus TCAs in treating depression in the elderly. Biol Psychiatry. 1986;21:1155–1166. doi: 10.1016/0006-3223(86)90222-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.McGrath PJ, Stewart JW, Harrison W, et al. Treatment of tricyclic refractory depression with a monoamine oxidase inhibitor antidepressant. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1987;23:169–172. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Himmelhoch JM, Detre T, Kupfer DJ, et al. Treatment of previously intractable depressions with tranylcypromine and lithium. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1972;155:216–220. doi: 10.1097/00005053-197209000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Thase ME, Frank E, Mallinger AG, et al. Treatment of imipramine-resistant recurrent depression, III: Efficacy of monoamine oxidase inhibitors. J Clin Psychiatry. 1992;53:5–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Nolen WA, van de Putte JJ, Dijken WA, et al. Treatment strategy in depression: MAO inhibitors in depression resistant to cyclic antidepressants: Two controlled crossover studies with tranylcypromine versus L-5-hydroxytryptophan and nomifensine. Acta Psychiatr. 1988;78:676–683. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1988.tb06403.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Kahn D, Silver JM, Opler LA. The safety of switching rapidly from tricyclic antidepressants to monoamine oxidase inhibitors. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1989;9:198–202. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Ebert D, Albert R, May A, et al. Combined SSRI-RIMA treatment in refractory depression: Safety data and efficacy. Psychopharmacology. 1995;119:342–344. doi: 10.1007/BF02246301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Lotufo-Neto F, Trivedi M, Thase ME. Meta-analysis of the reversible inhibitors of monoamine oxidase type A moclobemide and brofaromine for the treatment of depression. Neuropsychopharmacology. 1999;20:226–247. doi: 10.1016/S0893-133X(98)00075-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Amsterdam JD. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the safety and efficacy of selegiline transdermal system without dietary restrictions in patients with major depressive disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2003;64:208–214. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v64n0216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Bodkin JA, Amsterdam JD. Transdermal selegiline in major depression: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study in outpatients. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159:1869–1875. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.11.1869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Sunderland T, Cohen RM, Molchan S, et al. High-dose selegiline in treatment-resistant older depressive patients. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1994;51:607–615. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1994.03950080019003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Mann JJ, Aarons SF, Wilner PJ, et al. A controlled study of the antidepressant efficacy and side effects of (−)-deprenyl: A selective monoamine oxidase inhibitor. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1989;46:45–50. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1989.01810010047007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.McGrath PJ, Stewart JW, Harrison W, et al. A placebo-controlled trial of L-deprenyl in atypical depression. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1989;25:63–67. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Pierre JM, Gitlin MJ. Buproprion-tranycypromine combination for treatment-refractory depression. J Clin Psychiatry. 2000;61:450–451. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v61n0610h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Davidson J. Adding a tricyclic antidepressant to a monoamine oxidase inhibitor. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1982;2:216. doi: 10.1097/00004714-198206000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Nierenberg AA, Amsterdam JD. Treatment-resistant depression: Definition and treatment approaches. J Clin Psychiatry. 1990;51:39–47. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES