Abstract
Photosynthetic organisms can store nitrogen by synthesizing arginine, and, therefore, feedback inhibition of arginine synthesis must be relieved in these organisms when nitrogen is abundant. This relief is accomplished by the binding of the PII signal transduction protein to acetylglutamate kinase (NAGK), the controlling enzyme of arginine synthesis. Here, we describe the crystal structure of the complex between NAGK and PII of Synechococcus elongatus, at 2.75-Å resolution. We prove the physiological relevance of the observed interactions by site-directed mutagenesis and functional studies. The complex consists of two polar PII trimers sandwiching one ring-like hexameric NAGK (a trimer of dimers) with the threefold axes of these molecules aligned. The binding of PII favors a narrow ring conformation of the NAGK hexamer that is associated with arginine sites having low affinity for this inhibitor. Each PII subunit contacts one NAGK subunit only. The contacts map in the inner circumference of the NAGK ring and involve two surfaces of the PII subunit. One surface is on the PII body and interacts with the C-domain of the NAGK subunit, helping widen the arginine site found on the other side of this domain. The other surface is at the distal region of a protruding large loop (T-loop) that presents a novel compact shape. This loop is inserted in the interdomain crevice of the NAGK subunit, contacting mainly the N-domain, and playing key roles in anchoring PII on NAGK, in activating NAGK, and in complex formation regulation by MgATP, ADP, 2-oxoglutarate, and by phosphorylation of serine-49.
Keywords: arginine synthesis, regulation, x-ray structure, signaling, cyanobacteria
In photosynthetic organisms nitrogen can be stored by synthesizing arginine (1, 2) and, therefore, feedback inhibition of arginine synthesis must be relieved when nitrogen is abundant. The enzyme of arginine biosynthesis that is the target of arginine inhibition, N-acetyl-l-glutamate (NAG) kinase (NAGK) (1, 3–5), was found in cyanobacteria and plants (2, 4–8) to be a target of the carbon/nitrogen PII signaling protein (9, 10), forming with it a complex in which arginine inhibition is alleviated (6, 7).
PII signaling proteins are homotrimers of a 12- to 13-kDa subunit that interact with enzymes, transcription factors, and ammonia channels, regulating their activity (9, 10) and carbon/nitrogen homeostasis. Numerous structures of PII proteins, including those for cyanobacteria and plants (9–12), are known, but it was unclear how PII proteins carry out their functions. The body of the PII trimer is roughly hemispheric. Its subunits have βαββαβ topology, with α helices looking outward and the β sheet inward and providing the intersubunit interactions. Each subunit has three loops: the B- and C-loops and the larger flexible T-loop. The T-loop residues Y51 and S49 are, respectively, the sites of the regulatory uridylylation and phosphorylation in enterobacterial and cyanobacterial PII proteins (9, 10), with S49 phosphorylation abolishing interaction with NAGK (4, 6). ADP, MgATP, and 2-oxoglutarate (2OG) bind at the T-loop (13) and modulate the binding of PII to its targets (6, 9, 10). The recently determined structure of the inhibitory complex of GlnK (a PII protein) with the ammonia channel AmtB of Escherichia coli (14, 15) showed that the extended T-loop blocks the cytoplasmic opening of the ammonia channel, explaining channel function inhibition. This structure sheds no light on the PII–NAGK complex because PII activates NAGK (6, 7) and because ADP was found in the GlnK–AmtB complex (15), whereas ADP prevents PII–NAGK complex formation (6).
We determine here the crystal structure of the PII–NAGK complex of the cyanobacterium Synechococcus elongatus strain PCC7942. We previously determined the structures of arginine-insensitive (16) and arginine-sensitive NAGKs (17). The latter are hexameric ring-like trimers of dimers with a central hole of 25–30 Å, in which the dimers resemble the homodimeric arginine-insensitive enzyme (16). The NAGK subunit is an open α3β8α4 sandwich that can be divided into a N-domain and a C-domain. The N- and C-domains host, respectively, the NAG and ATP sites, on the C-edge of the central β-sheet. Arginine-sensitive NAGKs (17) have a N-terminal mobile kinked α-helix (called the N-helix) that, by interlacing with another dimer N-helix, links the dimers into the hexamer. The dimers are tilted relative to the ring plane, and the upper and lower ring surfaces are serrated, with three peaks, one per subunit. Arginine binds on each subunit next to the interdimeric junctions near the N-helices, widening the ring, decreasing the tilt of the dimers and reorienting the N-helices (17). In the present complex, the NAGK closely resembles other arginine-sensitive NAGKs. In contrast, the T-loop of PII adopts a novel compact shape that is specifically adapted to this interaction. We use site-directed mutagenesis, functional assays, and binding studies to confirm the in vivo relevance of this complex. The structure clarifies regulation of PII binding to NAGK and PII activation of NAGK. Sequence signatures identified here for PII signaling through NAGK account for the restriction of this signaling to photosynthetic organisms.
Results
Crystallization and Overall Structure of the Complex.
Crystal forms (Table 1) I and II, diffracted to 2.75- and 3.46-Å resolution, respectively. Phases were obtained for crystal II with molecular replacement using models of Thermotoga maritima NAGK (17) and of uncomplexed S. elongatus PII (11), yielding a solution consisting of three subunits of each protein in the asymmetric unit. In turn, the partially refined structure of crystal II was used for molecular replacement in crystal I, yielding one NAGK hexamer and two PII trimers in the asymmetric unit, forming the complex. All six subunits of each protein in the asymmetric unit have virtually identical structure.
Table 1.
Data collection and refinement statistics
| Parameter | Crystal I | Crystal II |
|---|---|---|
| Space group | P21 | C2221 |
| Unit cell (a, b, c), Å | 90.4, 161.0, 91.6 β = 106.5° | 106.9, 149.5, 162.2 |
| Resolution, Å* | 87.71–2.75 (2.90–2.75) | 54.07–3.46 (3.65–3.46) |
| Completeness, %* | 100 (100) | 100 (100) |
| Multiplicity* | 5.1 (5.2) | 4.1 (4.1) |
| I/σ* | 6.9 (2.0) | 6.3 (1.9) |
| Rsym, %* | 8.5 (36.7) | 9.9 (39.1) |
| Reflections, total/unique | 334,220/65,178 | 70,396/17,338 |
| Rcryst/Rfree, % | 20.0/23.6 | 23.3/29.4 |
| rmsd bond length, Å | 0.011 | 0.010 |
| rmsd bond angles, ° | 1.37 | 1.13 |
| No. of atoms/average | ||
| B-factors, Å2 | ||
| Protein atoms | 17,902/38.3 | 8,531/73.4 |
| NAG | 6/45.7 | 2/73.2 |
| Water | 187/31.8 | |
| Ramachandran plot, % | ||
| Favored | 92.0 | 89.2 |
| Allowed | 7.8 | 10.2 |
| Generous | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Disallowed | 0 | 0.2 |
*Values in parentheses are data for the highest-resolution shell.
The complex (Fig. 1) has 32 point group symmetry. Two PII trimers sandwich one NAGK trimer of dimers, with their threefold axes aligned. The same complex was generated in crystal II after application of a crystal symmetry, but we will refer to the higher resolution (2.75 Å) crystal I structure. The complex approximates a sphere of radius ≈53 Å. The PII trimers are at the poles and contact the NAGK hexamer inner circumference. PII is not packed tightly on NAGK. Each PII subunit interacts with one NAGK subunit, contacting the α4 region of NAGK toward its connection with the central sheet N-edge (Fig. 2). Two surfaces of each PII subunit mediate the contacts: the B-loop and the β1–α1 connection are exposed in the PII trimer flat side and contact the NAGK subunit C-domain; and the T-loop is inserted in the interdomain crevice, making extensive contacts with the NAGK N-domain.
Fig. 1.
PII–NAGK complex. NAGK, PII, and NAG are shown as surface, ribbons, and spheres, respectively. NAGK dimers and PII subunits are colored independently. Views are along the threefold axis (A) or the twofold axis (B).
Fig. 2.
PII subunit–NAGK subunit contacts. PII, NAGK, and NAG are shown as strings, ribbons, and spheres, respectively. The contacting parts of the T-loop, B-loop, and β1–α1 connection, including some interacting side chains (in sticks), are blue, red, and green, respectively. The surfaces provided by these elements form meshworks of the same colors. The NAGK central β-sheet is green, and other β-strands and the α-helices are brownish and grayish for N- and C-domains, respectively. Some NAGK elements and PII residues are labeled. (Inset) Structure of bound NAG, encased within its electron density omit map contoured at 2.5σ.
NAGK and Its Arginine Site.
The ring-like hexameric NAGK contains one normally bound NAG molecule in each subunit (Fig. 2) and closely resembles other arginine-inhibitable NAGKs (17) [Figs. 1 and 2, and supporting information (SI) Fig. 5]. Superimposition of the dimers with those of T. maritima NAGK reveals (Fig. 3A) a rigid body displacement of 1.9 Å of the C-domains toward the contacting PII molecules. The hexamer is less wide, and its dimers are more tilted than in the arginine-bound NAGK of T. maritima (SI Fig. 5). The orientation of the N-helices, identical in all of the subunits, represents an approximate average of the closely related orientations of these helices in the arginine-free NAGK of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (17) (Fig. 3B).
Fig. 3.
Changes in the NAGK dimer, the N-helix, and the arginine site. (A) Stereoview of backbone superimposition of NAGK dimers of S. elongatus (green) and T. maritima (red). Two PII subunits (blue; labeled PII) are bound to S. elongatus NAGK. The twofold axis (black ellipse) is perpendicular to the paper. For clarity, not all elements are shown in NAGK. Note the displacement toward PII of the C-domain and the opposite displacement of the N-helix, of S. elongatus NAGK. (B) N-helix orientation in the NAGKs of S. elongatus (green), T. maritima (red), and in two NAGK subunits of P. aeruginosa (cyan and yellow). (C) Arginine site surface in T. maritima NAGK (Upper) with bound arginine (in sticks) and in S. elongatus NAGK (Lower). (D) Stereoview of the superimposed arginine sites of T. maritima (black; bound arginine in yellow) and S. elongatus (green) NAGKs. The next subunit N-helix portion (in fainter color) runs parallel to the αH–β16 loop. Red broken lines are polar contacts with arginine, and the black broken line is one hydrogen bond between the αH–β16 loop and the adjacent subunit N-helix.
Each NAGK subunit exhibits one arginine site at its expected location (Fig. 3 C and D). This site is widened relative to the high affinity site of T. maritima NAGK (Fig. 3 C and D) because of movements of the elements forming the site. The N-helix C-terminal portion is positioned as in the empty site of P. aeruginosa NAGK, with the phenolic ring of Y23, which should accommodate the Cα of arginine (17), dislodged from the site. Strand β16 is moved toward the PII molecule that binds to its C-end, and the side chain of M287, which would stack the chain of bound arginine, is displaced away ≈1 Å. The αH–β16 connecting loop, which would bind through its main-chain O atoms the guanidinium and α-NH3+ groups of arginine, is overexpanded, possibly because of pulling by the N-helix of the other subunit that runs parallel to it (Fig. 3D). These arginine site changes justify the ≈15-fold increase in the half-inhibitory concentration of arginine (I0.5Arg) triggered by PII (Table 2 and SI Fig. 6).
Table 2.
Influence of mutations of PII or of NAGK on the arginine concentration causing 50% inhibition of NAGK (I0.5Arg) in the presence of PII and on surface plasmon resonance assay of PII–NAGK complex formation
| PII form | NAGK form | I0.5Arg, μ M* | Plasmon resonance signal, % |
|---|---|---|---|
| None | Wild type | 39 | 0 |
| Wild type | Wild type | 572 | 100 |
| F11A | Wild type | 46 | 0 |
| F11Q | Wild type | 52 | Not assayed |
| R45A | Wild type | 41 | 0 |
| Y46A | Wild type | 376 | 43 |
| R47A | Wild type | 380 | 16 |
| S49D | Wild type | 52 | 0 |
| E85A | Wild type | 91 | 4 |
| Wild type | R139A | 33 ± 12 | 10 |
| Wild type | I229A | 10 ± 9 | Not assayed |
| Wild type | I229N | 100 | Not assayed |
| Wild type | R233A | 65 ± 4 | 0 |
| Wild type | D250A | 466 | 100 |
| Wild type | R254A | 128 | 12 |
| Wild type | L256A | 517 | 100 |
| Wild type | Q258A | No activity | 0 |
The I0.5Arg value was determined from plots of NAGK activity vs. arginine concentration, in assays containing 6 μg/ml NAGK (29 nM hexamer) and 2.4 μg/ml PII (65 nM trimer). The NAGK mutations did not alter substantially the I0.5Arg in the absence of PII, except for mutation L256A (I0.5Arg in the absence of PII, 115 ± 13 μM). For Biacore surface plasmon resonance, His6-tagged NAGK proteins were immobilized on Ni2+-nitrilotriacetic acid sensor chips, and PII proteins (87.5 μg/ml, 2.37 μM trimer) were the analytes.
*Unless indicated, standard errors did not exceed 5% of the mean values given.
PII Exhibits a Compact T-Loop.
S. elongatus PII resembles closely the structure of free PII (11) (Fig. 4 A–D), except for the T-loop (residues 37–54), which, instead of being extended, is in all of the subunits in an identical compact conformation resembling a flexed leg having the proximal segment packed against the PII body and the distal segment (residues 41–52) packed against the proximal segment through a cushion of hydrophobic side chains (Y46, L56, and Y51) (Fig. 4E). Both segments are also linked by a salt bridge (E44–K58). In the distal segment, residues 44–51 form an imperfect β-hairpin that is centrally involved in the interactions with NAGK and that includes and exposes S49, the residue that when phosphorylated prevents complex formation (4, 6). A similarly shaped T-loop was observed very recently in GlnK1 of Methanococcus jannaschii bound to MgATP (13). Because the present complex has no nucleotides, each T-loop must be stabilized in the compact conformation by its contacts with NAGK. This compact conformation requires that a salt bridge between R47 and E85 (a B-loop residue) found in free PII (11) be broken, and, indeed, in the complex the partner of E85 in this bond is R233 of NAGK (Fig. 4E). Hydrogen bonds that link the main chain N atoms of R47 and G48 to the εO atom of Q258 from NAGK (Fig. 4E) should stabilize this T-loop compact conformation. Contacts between the T- and B-loops (Q42 and E44 with I86) or even with helix 1 of the adjacent PII subunit also stabilize this compact conformation.
Fig. 4.
The PII trimer and the T-loop. (A–D) Ribbon representations of the trimer, with independent coloring of each subunit, except the T-loop, B-loop, and β1–α1 junction, colored blue, red, and green, respectively. The PII conformation in the present complex (A and B) and in free S. elongatus PII (C and D), are compared. Views are along the threefold axis from the side that contacts NAGK (A and C) or perpendicularly to the vertical threefold axis, with the face that interacts with NAGK looking down (B and D). (E) T-loop (in blue) contacts with NAGK subunit (yellow semitransparent surface) showing interacting residues. Parts of the B-loop (in red) and of another PII subunit (green) that interact with the T-loop are also represented. (F) Ion-pair network (red broken lines) centered in the T-loop (blue), involving NAGK subunit N-domain (yellow) and C-domain (grayish) elements. The β6–β7 hairpin and the neighboring β3–β4 hairpin forming the NAG site lid (with bound NAG as spheres) are in string representation and are compared with the corresponding hairpins of T. maritima NAGK (in green). Residue side chains are shown as sticks and hydrogen bonds as black broken lines.
Interaction of PII with NAGK.
The contacts with the C-domain of NAGK mediated by the flat side of the PII trimer, bury ≈304 Å2 per PII subunit (determined with a probe of radius 1.4 Å) and involve the B-loop and the β1–α1 junction (and adjacent residues) of PII and the N-end of helix F and the C-ends of helix G and of β16 (Fig. 2) of NAGK. These contacts include hydrophobic interactions (F11 and T83 of PII and I229, I253, and A257 of NAGK), hydrogen bonds, and the already mentioned bond between E85 of PII and R233 of NAGK. These interactions pull the C-domain and β16 toward PII, contributing to the widening of the arginine site (see above) on the other side of the domain.
The other contact surface, provided by the T-loop terminal β-hairpin, buries 393 Å2 per PII subunit. This hairpin is inserted at the NAGK interdomain crevice, being surrounded by and making contacts with the last turns of helix G, from the C-domain, and of helix E from the N-domain, as well as with the β7 strand of the β6–β7 hairpin at the N-domain surface (Figs. 2 and 4F). This last hairpin and the T-loop terminal hairpin form a hybrid imperfect four-stranded β-sheet involving five hydrogen bonds, of which two are provided by the OH group of S49. An ion-pair network (Fig. 4F) centered in the T-loop residues R45 and E50 (themselves connected by a salt bridge) radiates to the surrounding elements of NAGK, involving R139, D142, E151, E194, and R254, and possibly mediating the decrease in the KmNAG induced by PII in the absence of arginine (see Discussion).
Overall, the PII–NAGK interface is remarkably open, being composed of six small contact surfaces for each PII trimer, totaling 2,094 Å2 buried area, or, for the NAGK hexamer, 1,826 Å2 buried area per PII trimer. These buried surfaces only represent 14.3% of the exposed surface of PII and, for both PII trimers, only 5.8% of the exposed surface of the NAGK hexamer, accounting for the transient nature of the interactions between NAGK and PII.
Signature Sequences for PII–NAGK Signaling.
The restriction to photosynthetic organisms of PII–NAGK signaling reflects sequence and structural specializations. The T-loop residues R45 and S49 and the B-loop residue E85 have paramount roles in complex formation (Fig. 4 E and F) and are conserved in photosynthetic organisms but not in other organisms. The same applies to the NAGK residues E194, R233, R254, and Q258 of NAGK, all involved in the interactions (Figs. 4 E and F), and to A257, which centers the hydrophobic patch linking both proteins. The simultaneous presence of these residues in either PII or NAGK is a signature for the involvement of these proteins in PII–NAGK signaling: these residues did not concur in any of 214 or 183 available PII or NAGK sequences from nonphotosynthetic organisms, but they were present in 46 of 48 and in 41 of 43 available PII and NAGK sequences of photosynthetic organisms (Swiss-Prot database; www.expasy.org). The two red algae without the NAGK signature, Gracilaria tenuistipitata and Cyanidioschyzon merolae (Swiss-Prot files Q6B8Z0 and Q85FW5, respectively) have no PII gene in their chloroplast genomes (National Center for Biotechnology Information genomes database files NC_006137 and NC_004779; www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez) and may not use PII signaling.
Functional Relevance of the Complex Revealed by Site-Directed Mutagenesis and Binding Studies.
Using the yeast two-hybrid system that revealed the PII–NAGK interaction (5), we detected no interaction between wild-type NAGK and the PII mutants F11A, R45A, Y46A, R47A, S49A, S49D, S49E, and E85A, or between wild-type PII and the NAGK mutants R139A, I229A, R233A, R254A, L256A, and Q258A (SI Fig. 7), whereas interaction between PII subunits or between NAGK subunits were not hampered by these mutations. All of these residues (except Y46 and L256, which are indirectly involved) are directly involved in PII–NAGK contacts. In contrast, mutations to alanine of 7 PII residues and 15 NAGK residues mapping at points of the molecular surfaces not directly involved in PII–NAGK interactions did not prevent complex formation (SI Fig. 7, in blue). Thus, residues involved in the contacts in the crystalline complex are important residues for complex formation in vivo.
NAGK activity assays (Table 2) revealed that the PII mutations F11A, F11Q, R45A, S49D, or E85A, or the NAGK mutations R139A, I229A, I229N, R233A, or R254A abolished or greatly reduced the increase in the I0.5Arg triggered by PII when using the wild-type proteins (Table 2). For most of these mutants, including the inactive (although soluble and hexameric) Q258A NAGK mutant, surface plasmon resonance assays showed abolished or decreased PII–NAGK binding (Table 2). Because these mutations affect residues in which the side chains are directly involved in the PII–NAGK contacts, the complex reflects the genuine interactions between NAGK and PII. R47 of PII only contacts NAGK through its main-chain atoms, and Y46 of PII and L256 of NAGK are not directly involved in the contacts, and thus, the mutations at these residues had less important (R47 and Y46) or no (L256A) effect. As expected, the NAGK mutant D250A, used as an internal negative control, behaved just as did wild-type NAGK. Overall, the three assays agree and leave little doubt that the present complex reflects the physiological interactions between PII and NAGK. Further, the 2:1 PII trimer:NAGK hexamer stoichiometry of the complex is the same in the crystal and in solution, as shown in binding studies in which we used ultrafiltration to separate free PII from NAGK-complexed PII, carried out with accurately quantitated protein solutions (see SI Experimental Procedures). The linear Scatchard plots (SI Fig. 8) revealed a single type of site occurring in a number of ≈2 per NAGK hexamer.
Discussion
This work reveals how PII and NAGK interact while also describing the structure of S. elongatus NAGK and a novel conformation of the PII protein from this organism. The NAGK closely resembles other arginine-sensitive NAGKs (17) and appears representative of plant NAGKs, which are hexameric and similar in subunit mass (7, 18) and sequence (≈60% identity). Because plants and cyanobacteria have highly similar PII proteins (11, 12) and conserve key interacting residues, the present structure should also represent the complex in plants.
The importance of the compact T-loop conformation for complex formation is highlighted by the involvement of three of the eight residues of the PII–NAGK signaling signature (E85 of PII and R233 and Q258 of NAGK) in triggering or in stabilizing the compact T-loop shape. By similarity with M. jannaschii GlnK1, MgATP, and ADP binding to PII should trigger, respectively, the compact and highly extended T-loop conformations (13, 15), explaining the dissociation of the PII–NAGK complex by ADP but not by MgATP (6). These MgATP and ADP effects on the T-loop fit the proposed PII role in energy signaling in cyanobacteria (10).
Nitrogen abundance is signaled by PII through the inversely related 2OG levels (10), but there is conflict on the 2OG effects on NAGK-mediated signaling: 2OG hampered PII–NAGK complex formation in plasmon resonance assays (6) but not in pulldown or gel filtration assays (4), and it slightly increased instead of decreasing NAGK activity in the presence of PII (4). With Arabidopsis thaliana proteins (7), 2OG did not prevent PII-triggered increase in I0.5Arg. Because the structure of M. jannaschii GlnK1 (13) suggested that 2OG binding may stabilize the compact T-loop conformation triggered by MgATP (13), 2OG may not abolish PII–NAGK interaction. However, the increased negative potential caused by 2OG binding (13) may hamper complex formation by electrostatic repulsion, given the negative potential of the NAGK ring faces (data not shown). This electrostatic effect should be strongly influenced by the ionic strength, possibly accounting for the variable 2OG effects in different assays (4, 6).
In S. elongatus, the phosphorylation of S49 of PII is stimulated by 2OG and prevents PII binding to NAGK (10). The present structure clarifies this effect of S49 phosphorylation. One donor hydrogen bond formed with NAGK by the S49 OH group is lost upon phosphorylation. More importantly, steric and electrostatic clash with NAGK binding should be triggered by the bulkiness and negative charge of the phosphate, given the involvement of S49 in the contacts with NAGK and the negative potential of the NAGK surface (data not shown).
Protein–protein complex formation involves an initial encounter complex in which one or few side chains of one protein act as anchors (19). The only residue in the complex that meets all of the characteristics of an anchor is the T-loop residue R45 (19): it belongs to the smaller protein, and it is exposed in the unbound form; it binds a preformed groove in the receptor, burying a positively charged (and thus polar) group and >100 Å2 (115 Å2 in the case of R45) of solvent-accessible surface. R45 is a key element of the ion-pair network linking the T-loop and NAGK. This network may mediate the decrease in the KmNAG triggered by PII on S. elongatus NAGK in the absence of arginine. The network involves D142, which stems from a loop that is glued to the mobile lid of the NAG site (Fig. 4F). The pull on D142 toward PII upon network completion may drag the lid toward its lowered position (16, 17) found in the high-affinity form of the NAG site. This action explains why the lid is lowered in an empty NAG site of crystal II (data not shown), and the lack of effect of PII on the KmNAG in the absence of arginine in the NAGK of A. thaliana (7), which has D142 replaced by Asn.
The present structure clarifies how PII binding renders NAGK less sensitive to arginine. Given the low activity and high apparent affinity for arginine of S. elongatus NAGK in the absence of PII and its increased activity and decreased affinity for arginine in the complex with PII (4, 6), the binding of PII must stabilize an active NAGK form having low affinity for arginine. Previous work (17) with other NAGKs equated this form with a narrow-ring conformation of the NAGK hexamer presenting highly tilted dimers and an orientation of the interlaced N-helices that is restricted within narrow spatial margins. The NAGK in the present complex conforms with these requirements for narrowness, high dimer tilt (SI Fig. 5), and N-helices orientation (Fig. 3B). Through their linkage to PII, the NAGK subunits should be pulled toward both poles of the complex, favoring the high tilt of the NAGK dimers and the concomitant narrowing of the NAGK ring, and indirectly forcing the N-helices that interconnect the dimers into the observed orientation, associated with a low-affinity form of the arginine site. In addition, the interactions of the PII body with the C-domains of NAGK pull from β16, contributing to arginine site widening. In any case, the effects of PII on NAGK functionality are long-distance effects because they do not involve PII participation in substrate sites or PII occlusion of the arginine site. This fact fits the observation that the increase in I0.5Arg is saturated with increasing PII concentrations (SI Fig. 6): there should not be such saturation for physical competition between PII and arginine for the arginine site.
The binding of two PII trimers per NAGK hexamer revealed by the present structure and binding studies fits prior determinations with S. elongatus NAGK and PII (6), provided that these earlier data are corrected for apparent NAGK overestimation by a factor of 1.73 (caused by the use in ref. 6 of a too small ε280 for NAGK). A stoichiometry of 1:1 PII trimer:NAGK hexamer reported (7) for the complex of A. thaliana may need revision because molar concentrations of the proteins may not have been accurate and because the assays involved potentially damaging long incubations at 25°C. Clearly, our crystallographic evidence and binding assays strongly indicate that each NAGK molecule has two apparently identical sites for PII. Considering the abundance of PII in S. elongatus (K.F., unpublished data), NAGK should mainly exist in complex with two PII trimers when nitrogen is abundant.
The indirect effects of PII on NAGK functionality contrast with the direct role of GlnK in blocking the ammonia channel AmtB (14, 15). In the latter case, the tip of the ADP-binding and more extended T-loop, including nonuridylylated Y51, blocks the cytoplasmic opening of the channel. As in the complex with NAGK, the flat side of the GlnK trimer looks toward the target, but nearly all of the contacts are mediated by the T-loop, the anchor residue appears to be R47, and the T-loop conformation resembles one conformation of the ADP-bound loop of M. jannaschii GlnK1 (13). More examples of structures of PII complexed to other targets will have to be characterized to ascertain whether the present structure and that of the GlnK–AmtB complex are paradigms for the interaction of PII with its targets, or whether PII is a highly plastic protein that is able to adapt its T-loop in diverse ways for interaction with different targets.
Experimental Procedures
Full protocols are available in SI Experimental Procedures.
Preparation of PII and NAGK.
The argB and glnB genes of S. elongatus strain PCC7942, encoding NAGK and PII, were PCR-cloned from plasmids pUAGC62 and pUAGC12 (5), respectively, in the NdeI and XhoI or NdeI and HindIII sites of pET-15b or pET-22b plasmids, being separately expressed in E. coli BL21 cells. Purification of N-terminally His-tagged NAGK (N-terminal sequence MGSSH6SSGLVPRGSHM, ending in M1 of wild-type NAGK) and of PII were described previously (6, 11).
Crystallization of the Complex.
A mixture of 0.5 mg/ml NAGK and 0.1 mg/ml PII, in a solution containing 20 mM Hepes (pH 7.5), 1 mM DTT, 40 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, and 20 mM NAG, incubated for 10 min at 23°C, was concentrated to 5 mg/ml by ultrafiltration. The complex was crystallized in two forms (Table 1) at 21°C in hanging drops made of 1 μl each of protein and precipitant solution [crystal I: 0.1 M Tris·HCl, pH 8.5/0.15 M sodium acetate/20% (wt/vol) polyethylene glycol 4000; crystal II: 0.1 M sodium cacodylate, pH 6.5/0.25 M magnesium acetate/10% (wt/vol) polyethylene glycol 8000].
Data Collection and Structure Determination.
For details, see Table 1 and SI Experimental Procedures.
Other Methods.
Site-directed mutagenesis of yeast two-hybrid plasmids (5) was carried out by using the QuikChange II system from Stratagene (La Jolla, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Yeast two-hybrid analysis of NAGK and PII mutants was carried out as described previously (5). For activity and plasmon resonance assays (4, 6), the argB and glnB mutants were PCR-subcloned into, respectively, pET-22b and the Strep tag fusion vector pASK-IBA3 (IBA GmbH, Göttingen, Germany), and the mutant proteins were overexpressed and purified (4, 6). When comparing with these mutants, wild-type PII was also fused to the Strep tag II peptide (4). All of the purified mutants of PII and NAGK were soluble and formed the expected oligomer (checked by PAGE under nondenaturing conditions). The binding of PII to NAGK was quantitated by centrifugal ultrafiltration through a membrane cutoff of 100 kDa, monitoring the decrease in the amount of PII crossing the membrane when NAGK was added.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank I. Fuentes and M. Maheswaran for technical help. This work was supported by Spanish Ministry of Education and Science Grants BFU2004-05159, BFU2005-02231, and DFG Fo195/4. J.L.L. is a fellow of the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science. European Union and European Synchotron Radiation Facility (ESRF) Grenoble gave financial support for synchrotron use, and ESRF personnel provided expert help.
Abbreviations
- NAGK
N-acetyl-l-glutamate kinase
- NAG
N-acetyl-l-glutamate
- 2OG
2-oxoglutarate.
Footnotes
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
The atomic coordinates and structure factors have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank, www.pdb.org [PDB ID codes 2V5H (crystal I) and 2JJ4 (crystal II)].
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0705987104/DC1.
References
- 1.Slocum RD. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2005;43:729–745. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2005.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Maheswaran M, Ziegler K, Lockau W, Hagemann M, Forchhammer K. J Bacteriol. 2006;188:2730–2734. doi: 10.1128/JB.188.7.2730-2734.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Fernández-Murga ML, Gil-Ortiz F, Llácer JL, Rubio V. J Bacteriol. 2004;186:6142–6149. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.18.6142-6149.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Heinrich A, Maheswaran M, Ruppert U, Forchhammer K. Mol Microbiol. 2004;52:1303–1314. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04058.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Burillo S, Luque I, Fuentes I, Contreras A. J Bacteriol. 2004;186:3346–3354. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.11.3346-3354.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Maheswaran M, Urbanke C, Forchhammer K. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:55202–55210. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M410971200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chen YM, Ferrar TS, Lohmeier-Vogel EM, Morrice N, Mizuno Y, Berenger B, Ng KK, Muench DG, Moorhead GB. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:5726–5733. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M510945200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sugiyama K, Hayakawa T, Kudo T, Ito T, Yamaya T. Plant Cell Physiol. 2004;45:1768–1778. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pch199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Arcondeguy T, Jack R, Merrick M. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2001;65:80–105. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.65.1.80-105.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Forchhammer K. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2004;28:319–333. doi: 10.1016/j.femsre.2003.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Xu Y, Carr PD, Clancy P, Garcia-Dominguez M, Forchhammer K, Florencio F, Vasudevan SG, Tandeau De Marsac N, Ollis DL. Acta Crystallogr D. 2003;59:2183–2190. doi: 10.1107/s0907444903019589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mizuno Y, Berenger B, Moorhead GB, Ng KK. Biochemistry. 2007;46:1477–1483. doi: 10.1021/bi062149e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yildiz O, Kalthoff C, Raunser S, Kuhlbrandt W. EMBO J. 2007;26:589–599. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gruswitz F, O'Connell J, III, Stroud RM. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:42–47. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0609796104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Conroy MJ, Durand A, Lupo D, Li XD, Bullough PA, Winkler FK, Merrick M. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:1213–1218. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0610348104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ramon-Maiques S, Marina A, Gil-Ortiz F, Fita I, Rubio V. Structure (London) 2002;10:329–342. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(02)00721-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ramon-Maiques S, Fernandez-Murga ML, Gil-Ortiz F, Vagin A, Fita I, Rubio V. J Mol Biol. 2006;356:695–713. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.11.079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lohmeier-Vogel EM, Loukanina N, Ferrar TS, Moorhead GB, Thorpe TA. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2005;43:854–861. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2005.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rajamani D, Thiel S, Vajda S, Camacho CJ. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:11287–11292. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0401942101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.




