Skip to main content
Croatian Medical Journal logoLink to Croatian Medical Journal
. 2006 Dec;47(6):882–887.

Retention of Basic Sciences Knowledge at Clinical Years of Medical Curriculum

Elvira Lazić 1, Josip Dujmović 1, Darko Hren 1
PMCID: PMC2080481  PMID: 17167861

Abstract

Aim

To explore the association between the knowledge of basic (physiology and biochemistry) and clinical sciences (internal medicine) among medical students, and determine the level of retained basic science knowledge at the fifth year of medical studies.

Methods

Medical students attending the second (n = 145, response rate 60%) or the fifth year (n = 176, response rate 73%) of medical studies at the Zagreb University School of Medicine in Croatia were given an anonymous knowledge test with 15 pairs of questions developed specifically for this purpose. Each pair consisted of a basic and clinical question, with the correct answer to the basic question explaining the physiological or biochemical background of the clinical question. Three pairs of questions were excluded from the analysis due to poor psychometric characteristics.

Results

We found statistically significant correlation between basic and clinical tests scores for both groups of students (r = 0.47, P<0.001 for the second year and r = 0.45, P<0.001 for the fifth year). 2 × 2 within-between measures ANOVA revealed a significant interaction effect for knowledge test and study year (Wilks λ = 0.55, F1, 319 = 262.7, P<0.001; effect size = 0.45), showing that fifth year students scored lower on the basic test than second year students but obtained higher scores on the clinical test.

Conclusion

The core basic science knowledge is lost during the clinical years of medical studies. Although remembering and understanding basic science concepts as a background of clinical statements at the clinical years does not directly affect clinical knowledge, there is a positive correlation between retained basic science concepts and clinical knowledge.


Plato (1) wrote, “Right opinion, being incapable of giving a reason, is not knowledge (for how can knowledge be devoid of reason? nor again, ignorance, for neither can ignorance attain the truth), but is clearly something which is a mean between ignorance and wisdom.”

Medical students build their clinical knowledge on the ground of previously obtained basic knowledge. Nevertheless, many senior undergraduate students indicate informally that they do not remember much from their basic science medical courses and that the content of those courses does not seem relevant to their later clinical work or studies (2).

The portion of knowledge retained by the students seems to be the central question for medical education (3). If students are unable to use the knowledge they had once been taught, if that knowledge becomes inert and inaccessible, then teaching such knowledge becomes questionable (4-6).

A loss of knowledge among senior medical students was confirmed by all the studies conducted. Watt (7) found a 21.5% decline in pre-clinical knowledge of oral biology when the same test was administered 20 months later to dental students. Krebs (8) discovered that medical students retained only 65% of the simple basic science knowledge. D’Eon (2) found a considerable knowledge loss among medical students in the three basic science courses tested and this loss was not uniform across courses (relative knowledge loss over the ten months was 18% of immunology, 52% of neuroanatomy, and 19% of physiology). Knowledge loss does not seem to be related to the marks on the final examination or the assessment of course quality by the students (2).

However, longitudinal data from five medical schools across the USA confirm the strong associations between levels of performance in medical school and clinical competence in residency (9). Failure rates on certifying examinations and board certification status were significantly associated with the assessment of basic sciences knowledge during medical school education. These findings strongly refute the pessimistic view which claims that what is learned in medical school is irrelevant to the practice of medicine (9).

The aim of the study was to explore the level of basic knowledge of physiology and biochemistry and how it influenced the knowledge of clinical medicine among second and fifth year medical students. Tested clinical concepts were supposed to be known to second year students as well, since they were taught as examples of applied basic science in medicine in the second year courses. Comparison of basic medical knowledge between second and fifth year medical students can illustrate whether basic science concepts are retained at the fifth year of medical studies and ascertain if senior students accept clinical knowledge with sufficient insight into causality of the processes learned.

Participants and Methods

Participants

The study sample included medical students from the second and fifth year of Zagreb University School of Medicine. All students filled out a brief demographic questionnaire before answering the knowledge test (Table 1).

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics of students involved in the study at the Zagreb University School of Medicine.

No. (%) of students in the year
Characteristic second fifth
Total 145 (100) 176 (100)
Male 54 (37) 65 (37)
GPA*:
  ≥4.1 56 (41) 37 (22)
  3.6-4.0 50 (36) 50 (29)
  ≤3.5 32 (23) 84 (49)

*Grade point average (GPA). Grades at the medical school range from 2 – satisfactory to 5 – outstanding. Since not all the students filled in their GPA in the questionnaire, the GPA groups were designed from n = 138 for the second year and n = 171 for the fifth year. GPA results refer to the year of 2005, when the students filled out the test.

Of all the second year students, 145 (60%) filled out the test at the end of June and at the beginning of July 2005, after they had completed their physiology and biochemistry courses. Of all the fifth year students, 176 (73%) filled out the test before their introductory lessons from the fifth year in October 2005. Passing the examination from internal medicine was a requirement for enrolling into the fifth year of study.

Full data for analysis were available for 321 students. The proportion of male students was similar for both years (37%). There was no difference in either basic or clinical knowledge between male and female students.

Knowledge test

We developed two sets of 15 open-ended questions. The first part of the test consisted of questions on basic sciences, and the second examined related clinical facts (see web Appendix). The order of questions was random, so that it would not be obvious that they form 15 pairs. We created the questions according to standard textbooks of physiology, biochemistry, and internal medicine used at the Zagreb University School of Medicine. A test of 30 questions was formed because it covered enough knowledge for analysis. The time to answer the whole test was 20 minutes. Each question pair represented a single topic. The basic questions were formed in such a way that the correct answer explained the physiological or biochemical background of the clinical question. One question pair was later omitted from the analysis because the connection between the basic and clinical question was too obvious. In the final analysis, there were 7 physiology and 7 biochemistry question pairs. Clinical questions were formed in a way that both second and fifth year students were equally familiarized with them. This was possible because the clinical concepts involved were covered by the biochemistry and physiology textbooks for the second study year, and second year students have just completed their physiology and biochemistry courses.

For each set of questions, we examined inter-item and item-total correlations for items in each set, separately for each year. We excluded two items from the test (question pairs 11 and 13) because their item-total correlation was close to zero, which indicated that the item did not belong into the test. The Cronbach α coefficient for 12 basic questions was 0.60 for second and 0.65 for fifth year students. For 12 clinical questions it was 0.54 for second, and 0.57 for fifth year students.

Statistical analysis

We used Kolmogorov-Smirnov test to investigate the normality of distribution of scores on the two sets of questions. Since the distribution was normal, we calculated Pearson r coefficient of correlation between the scores on the basic and clinical sets of questions, for each group separately. We used mixed between-within subjects ANOVA to investigate the effect of the test and the study year, as well as their interaction. Assumptions for this procedure (homogeneity of variance, independence of measurement, normality of distribution) were met. Level of statistical significance was set at P<0.05. All statistical procedures were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 13.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

For the second year, the mean number of correct answers out of 12 questions was 7.9 ± 2.3 for basic and 8.6 ± 1.9 for clinical questions. For fifth year students, the score was 5.5 ± 2.6 for basic and 10.3 ± 1.7 for clinical questions. We found statistically significant correlation between basic and clinical tests scores for both groups of students (r = 0.47, P<0.001 for the second year and r = 0.45, P<0.001 for the fifth year) (Figure 1). However, the correlation for all students taken together, although statistically significant, was lower (r = 0.17, P = 0.002).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Correlation between the basic and clinical test scores for students attending the second A, and fifth B, study year. Lines represent estimated regression line with 95% confidence intervals.

Next we performed 2 × 2 between-within subjects ANOVA to compare students’ results on the two sets of questions, as well as to determine the interaction between the study year and score on the test. We found statistically significant effect for the test score indicating that both second and fifth year students scored better on the clinical test (Wilks λ = 0.41, F1, 319 = 467.9, P<0.001; effect size = 0.60). There was no significant overall effect of the study year (F1, 319 = 2.81, P = 0.094). However, we found a significant interaction effect (Wilks λ = 0.55, F1, 319 = 262.7, P<0.001; effect size = 0.45), which showed that fifth year students scored lower on basic questions than second year students, but obtained higher scores on clinical questions (Figure 2). It indicates that clinical knowledge is not based on the knowledge of basic processes.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Test scores (mean ±95%confidence interval) of second and fifth year students for basic (open columns) and clinical (closed columns) questions.

Discussion

Our study showed a significant correlation between the knowledge of the basic and clinical medical facts by students of preclinical and clinical years of medical studies. However, this may only be due just to the fact that better students answered both sets of questions more successfully in general and not to the causative relationship between basic and clinical knowledge. This is supported by our finding that fifth year students scored higher on clinical questions, but lower on basic questions than second year students. This finding challenges the idea that basic knowledge has a direct influence on the successful answering to clinical questions because, if this causative relationship existed, we would necessarily obtain higher level of basic knowledge in fifth year students.

These results imply that clinical knowledge can be learned without complete understanding of its basic science background.

These results also imply that, while acquiring knowledge on a medical topic, clinical fact is not always memorized together with its basic background, but rather that the two types of knowledge are learned and memorized independently. For example, a student may know that oliguria causes an increase in blood pressure, without necessarily remembering the basic hemodynamic equation which explains that blood pressure is increased because of the increase in heart minute volume.

Although some studies of clinical reasoning showed little evidence that clinicians used basic science in routine diagnosis (10), it was also shown that knowledge of basic science may have value in clinical diagnosis by helping students recall or reconstruct the relationship between features and diagnosis (11). Because of its conceptual coherence, basic science was more memorable and helped students to reconstruct the features of individual disease categories after the initial symptom lists had been forgotten (11).

The field of hypertension management is a good example of the importance of the relationship between basic knowledge and clinical practice. In that field, progressive knowledge of physiology of the sympathetic nervous system, the kidney, and the renin-angiotensin system led to the progressive understanding of the mechanisms of elevated blood pressure and to the development of an array of effective blood pressure lowering drugs, thanks to which hypertension is now a controllable disease (12).

The reason for lower basic knowledge in fifth year students may be due to the fact that clinical textbooks do not provide a detailed coverage of basic science background and basic concepts are generally not required in the exams, so they are gradually forgotten. On the other hand, students of the fifth year are overwhelmed by the numerous clinical facts that need to be memorized and slowly lose their insight into basic science. For example, only 53% of participants in our study still remembered that oxygen was the terminal acceptor of electrons in the process of food oxygenation. It is important to point out that strong long-term memory, as previous research noted, is directly associated with over-learning in the initial phase and the proper distributing and renewal of study matter over longer intervals of time (13). Previous research also found that the focus on meaning and understanding rather than memorization, adequate time to learn, especially of complex material, and deliberate effective engagement with the task (practice) are course elements that promote initial learning (14).

The differences between second and fifth year students may also be partially related to the importance attributed to basic science facts by the two student populations. It was shown that senior students, as opposed to junior students, validated the learning objectives of basic sciences as less relevant to clinical practice, while biochemistry basic items were considered to be the most irrelevant (15). Also, fewer basic science than clinical items were regarded as core knowledge (16).

A limitation of this study is the fact that 12 question pairs which qualified for the statistical analysis covered a rather narrow range of medical topics and knowledge. Also, a logical connection between questions in a pair was only assumed. This was a cross-sectional study and we need longitudinal studies to provide a more comprehensive insight into the issue, by measuring the performance of students in preclinical and clinical years of medical studies, during the residency year, and later in their medical practice. A finding that clinical knowledge is not necessarily rooted in understanding basic processes calls for future research efforts which should aim to explore the elements necessary for successful performing of the medical tasks (9), as well as the factors that influence the connection between preclinical and clinical knowledge, such as different types of medical school curricula, methods of teaching and study materials, and students’ awareness of the importance of basic sciences. The objective should be a collaboratively and interdepartmentally developed basic science medical curriculum, created by both science and clinical faculty members, which would integrate more clinical knowledge into preclinical years (17).

Medical schools must show that they have a system to evaluate the extent to which their educational objectives are achieved, especially if the ultimate criterion of educational effectiveness in medicine is the quality of care rendered to patients. Medical schools undertaking innovative educational programs will particularly need a method of evaluating the results, beyond just mastering individual courses (9).

We believe that this study illustrates an informally accepted attitude among students that basic medical subjects are just peripherally associated with the profession they had chosen. It could also be used as a basis for discussion about the methods and programs of learning medicine, since scientific study is not just the introduction to clinical learning, as it is seen in many preclinical courses, but rather a foundation and bedrock for life (18).

Acknowledgments

We thank Ivan Balog for the assistance in the statistical analysis. We also thank Dario Sambunjak and all the professors who helped carry out this survey, as well as the students who participated in the study.

Appendix

Fourteen pairs of questions asked in the test; one pair of questions is related to one topic, where the correct answer to the basic questions (B) explains physiological or biochemical background of the clinical question (C)

Pair of questions* Correct answer
1 B
Nernst potential of which ion is closest to the membrane potential of the cell?
potassium
1 C
Serum concentration variances of which ion are most life threatening?
potassium
Lethality in hypo- or hyperkalemia is due to major contribution of Nernst potential of potassium in the cell membrane potential.
2 B
Arterial pressure is proportional to the product of _______ and peripheral resistance.
heart minute volume
2 C
Oliguria causes ________ in the level of arterial blood pressure.
increase
Hypertension in oliguria is caused by the increase in heart minute volume, referring to the basic equation of hemodynamics asked in the basic question.
3 B
Which molecule is the terminal acceptor of electrons and hydrogen in the process of complete oxygenation of food?
oxygen
3 C
Which basic disorder of the acid-base balance of the blood is caused by chronic hypoxia?
metabolic acidosis
Chronic lack of oxygen in the tissues causes metabolic acidosis due to accumulation of the products of incomplete oxygenation of food. Oxygen is the terminal acceptor of electrons in the process of food oxygenation.
4 B
Osmotic pressure on the capillary membrane results from ________ dissolved in the plasma.
proteins
4 C
Peripheral edema in the liver cirrhosis arises from the decrease in the ________ pressure of the plasma.
colloid- osmotic
Hypoproteinemia causes edema because proteins constitute the osmotic pressure on the capillary vessels’ membrane.
5 B
Nutritive deficit of which mineral can cause goiter?
iodine
5 C
Endemic goiter results from the accumulation of molecules of _______ in the follicles of the thyroid gland.
thyreo-globulin
The reason for the expansion of thyroid gland in hypothyroidism caused by the iodine deficit is accumulation of the protein thyroglobulin.
6 B
Peptide _______ contracts efferent arteriole of glomeruli increasing the resorption of sodium and water into the peritubular capillaries.
angio-tensin II
6 C
Renal artery stenosis causes an increase in releasing hormone _______ from the juxtaglomerular cells.
renin
Understanding the renovascular hypertension pathophysiology background is based on understanding the angiotensin’s function in the glomeruli.
7 B
What is activated in the external or internal pathway of blood coagulation?
prothrombin
7 C
Which vitamin is necessary for the synthesis of coagulation factors?
vitamin K
Vitamin K is necessary for the synthesis of the first coagulation factor and the purpose of the whole coagulation cascade is the activation of that same coagulation factor.
8 B
How many grams of sodium chloride need to be dissolved in the 100 mL of solution to prepare physiological solution?
0.9
8 C
Physiological solution is ______ % solution of sodium chloride.
0.9
“Percent solution” stands for the mass concentration and therefore students should be able to calculate grams of NaCl necessary to prepare 100 mL of 0.9% saline.
9 B
In the deficiency of carbohydrates (diabetes, starvation), acetyl-CoA resulting from the oxygenation of fat acids cannot accede the first reaction of the citrate cycle, which is to react with _______.
oxaloacetate
9 C
Acidosis in diabetes or during starvation arises from accumulation of _______.
ketones
Since the Krebs cycle is the central crossroad of metabolism, we asked students about the first reaction of the cycle. Acetyl-CoA molecules interact with each other and form ketones because they cannot interact with oxalacetate. This is due to the fact that, when the cell lacks glucose (diabetes, starving), all of the remaining oxalacetate is converted into glucose instead of entering the Krebs cycle
10 B
Which enzyme hydrolyses the esteric bond between fat acid and glycerol in the molecule of phospholipids in the cell membrane?
phospholipase
10 C
Which enzyme is inhibited by acetylsalicylic acid?
cyclo oxygenase
Phospholipase produces arachidonic acid, which is the substrate for cyclooxygenase to produce prostaglandins. Cyclooxygenase is the target enzyme of acetylsalicylic acid therapy effect.
11 B
Which hormone is the most potent stimulator of gluconeogenesis?
cortisol
11 C
In adrenal (Addisonian) crises blood concentration of glucose is _______.
decreased
Insufficiency in gluconeogenesis stimulation, one of the hyperglycemic effects of cortisol, results in hypoglycemia in Addisonian crises.
12 B
Which component of triglyceride can be used as a substrate in the process of gluconeogenesis?
glycerol
12 C
Glucose excess in the liver that surpasses the energetic needs is converted into acetyl-CoA for the synthesis of _______.
fat acids
It is important to remember that in human metabolism it is only possible for carbohydrates to convert into fat, while fat acid conversion to carbohydrates is impossible. Glucose cannot be produced from fat acids.
13 B
Which organ(s), in anaerobic condition, produce(s) the main raw for the process of gluconeogenesis?
muscles
13 C
Which acid causes acidosis during excessive activity of muscles?
lactic acid
Lactate produced during excessive muscle activity is used in the liver to produce the necessary glucose for the muscle work. Lactic acid accumulation is also the reason for metabolic acidosis.
14 B
Which dinucleotide – derivate of vitamin niacin, after reduction in the citrate cycle, transmits its electrons to the cytochroms of the respiratory chain?
NADH
14 C
Niacin (vitamin B3) deficit causes so-called 3 D syndrome or ______.
pellagra
Consequences of the vitamin niacin deficiency in human organism are the symptoms of pellagra. Niacin’s derivate nicotinamide-dinucleotide has an important role as a transmitter of electrons to the cytochroms of the respiratory chain, after the reduction of NAD to NADH in the citrate cycle.

*Question pairs 1-7 tested basic science knowledge of physiology, while question pairs 8-14 tested the knowledge of biochemistry.

References

  • 1.Plato. Symposium. Available from: http://classics.mit.edu/Plato/symposium.html, Accessed: November 20, 2006.
  • 2.D’Eon MF. Knowledge loss of medical students on first year basic science courses at the University of Saskatchewan. BMC Med Educ. 2006;6:5. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-6-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.ten Cate O, Snell L, Mann K, Vermunt J. Orienting teaching toward the learning process. Acad Med. 2004;79:219–28. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200403000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ellis JA, Semb GB, Cole B. Very long-term memory for information taught in school. Contemp Educ Psychol. 1998;23:419–33. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1997.0976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Harden RM. Approaches to curriculum planning. Med Educ. 1986;20:458–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1986.tb01193.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sanson-Fisher R, Rolfe I. The content of undergraduate health professional courses: a topic largely ignored? Med Teach. 2000;22:564–7. doi: 10.1080/01421590050175532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Watt ME. Retention of preclinical knowledge by clinical students. Med Educ. 1987;21:119–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1987.tb00677.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Krebs R, Hofer R, Bloch R, Guibert J-J. Conversation and forgetting of the biological knowledge at the propedeutic exam. MEDUCS Bulletin de l'Association Suisse d'Education Medicale. 1994;4:10–5. [in French]. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gonnella JS, Hojat M, Erdmann JB, Veloski JJ. Assessment measures in medical school, residency, and practice: the connections. New York: Springer; 1993. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Patel VL, Groen GJ, Scott HM. Biomedical knowledge in explanations of clinical problems by medical students. Med Educ. 1988;22:398–406. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1988.tb00774.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Woods NN, Brooks LR, Norman GR. The value of basic science in clinical diagnosis: creating coherence among signs and symptoms. Med Educ. 2005;39:107–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02036.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zanchetti A. The basic importance of the physiological approach in clinical medicine: the experience in the area of hypertension. Arch Ital Biol. 2005;143:97–102. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Halpern DF. Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bransford JD, Brown AL, Cocking RR, editors. How people learn: brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rudland JR, Rennie SC. The determination of the relevance of basic sciences learning objectives to clinical practice using a questionnaire survey. Med Educ. 2003;37:962–5. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01671.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Koens F, Rademakers JJ, Ten Cate OT. Validation of core medical knowledge by postgraduates and specialists. Med Educ. 2005;39:911–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02246.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.O'Brien K, Crespo L, Wallach P, Elnicki M. Internal Medicine Clerkship Directors' opinion regarding clinical input in the preclinical years: the 2002 CDIM basic science survey results. Teach Learn Med. 2006;18:105–9. doi: 10.1207/s15328015tlm1802_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bligh J. Learning about science is still important. Med Educ. 2003;37:944–5. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01703.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Croatian medical journal are provided here courtesy of Medicinska Naklada

RESOURCES