Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Cardiol. 2007 Aug 16;100(9):1397–1399. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.06.028

Simvastatin (40mg/day), Adiponectin Levels, and Insulin Sensitivity in Subjects with the Metabolic Syndrome

Sridevi Devaraj 1, David Siegel 1, Ishwarlal Jialal 1
PMCID: PMC2080663  NIHMSID: NIHMS33762  PMID: 17950796

Abstract

The metabolic syndrome (MS) is characterized by low grade inflammation, and confers an increased risk for diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease. Statins reduce cardiovascular events in MS patients and have pleiotropic effects in addition to low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) lowering. Since there is a paucity of data examining the effect of statins on adiponectin levels and insulin sensitivity in the MS, we tested the effect of simvastatin (40mg/day) compared to placebo on circulating adiponectin levels and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA) in MS subjects in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Simvastatin therapy failed to affect circulating adiponectin levels or insulin sensitivity compared to placebo over 8-weeks. In conclusion, although simvastatin is anti-inflammatory, it failed to affect adiponectin levels or improve insulin sensitivity in subjects with MS.

Keywords: statin, insulin resistance, adiponectin, pleiotropism

Introduction

One in 4 individuals in the US population has the metabolic syndrome (1). Subjects with the metabolic syndrome (MS) have a 5-fold increased risk of diabetes and 2-fold increased risk of cardiovascular disease (2). We have previously shown that simvastatin therapy in subjects with MS compared to placebo results in significantly reduced high sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, significantly decreased monocyte interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha levels, 2 cytokines which play a major role in insulin resistance (3). We also showed that simvastatin therapy significantly decreased monocytic nuclear factor kappa B (NFκB) and increased Akt and phosphatidyl inositol 3-kinase activity in MS subjects compared to placebo (4,5). Monocyte-macrophages have been shown to directly influence adipocyte biology and systemic insulin resistance in mice (4,5). Also, the percentage of macrophage infiltration in adipose tissue correlates with obesity and insulin resistance (6). Adiponectin is an important adipocytokine that is thought to couple regulation of insulin sensitivity with energy metabolism and serve to link obesity with insulin resistance (7,8). Plasma levels of adiponectin are decreased in obesity, in subjects with MS and in Type 2 diabetes mellitus and may play a key role in development of both insulin resistance and atherosclerosis (7,8). Also, lifestyle modification, thiazolidenediones, fenofibrate and the CB1 antagonist, rimonabant have been shown to significantly increase plasma adiponectin and insulin sensitivity (79). However, there is conflicting data with regards to the effect of statin monotherapy on plasma adiponectin levels and insulin sensitivity (1015). Since we have shown that simvastatin therapy decreases monocyte IL-6 and TNF and upregulates phosphatidyl inositol 3-kinase, a pivotal signaling pathway in insulin action and glucose transport, we tested the effect of simvastatin (40 mg/day) on adiponectin levels and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA), an index of insulin sensitivity in subjects with the metabolic syndrome, a population at high risk for diabetes, in whom the effect of statin monotherapy on adiponectin or HOMA has not been reported.

Methods

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at University of California Davis Medical Center and all subjects gave informed consent. This was a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study. For this study, subjects with the Metabolic Syndrome (n=50) as defined using the criteria of the National Cholesterol Education Panel-Adult Treatment Panel III were studied and other selection criteria have been reported previously (3).

At the baseline visit, subjects were randomized to receive either placebo or simvastatin (40 mg/day) for a period of 8 weeks. Fasting blood was obtained at baseline and at the end of an 8-week period in each group (placebo and 40 mg/d of simvastatin). Baseline chemistries were measured using standard laboratory techniques. Insulin and adiponectin levels were measured in plasma at baseline and following 8 weeks of simvastatin or placebo using immunoassay reagents from Linco, both of which had intra- and inter-assay coefficient of variation of <12%. HOMA was calculated as [fasting glucose in mg/dL*0.0555) * Immunoreactive Insulin (uIU/ml)]/22.5(13).

Data are expressed as mean +/− S.D for parametric data and as median (25th, 75th percentile) for non-parametric data. Statistical analysis was performed by the GCRC biostatistician using SAS software. Following repeated measures analysis of variance, baseline and post-treatment differences between groups was assessed using Mann Whitney (Monte Carlo 2-tailed estimate) tests. Percent change and delta differences between groups were compared using Wilcoxon signed rank tests. Spearman rank correlation coefficients were computed to assess associations between variables of interest.

Results

The male/female ratio, age and body mass index of the group was 14/36, 51 ± 12 years and 39± 7 kg/sqm respectively. As reported previously and in Table 1 (3), simvastatin therapy, resulted in a significant reduction in LDL cholesterol, hs-CRP and monocyte IL-6 and TNF compared to both baseline and placebo. \

Table 1.

Effect of Simvastatin Therapy on Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance and Adiponectin in Subjects with the Metabolic Syndrome

Variable Placebo Simvastatin
Baseline Week 8 Baseline Week 8
Insulin (uU/mL) 16.9 ± 8.9 17.2 ± 7.4 16.1 ± 8.7 17.1 ± 9.1
Glucose (mg/dL) 109 ± 35 100 ± 33 114 ± 55 104 ± 47
HOMA-IR 4.5 ± 0.8 4.4 ± 0.7 4.5 ± 1.1 4.2 ± 0.9
Adiponectin (ug/mL) 7.3±1.9 7.2 ± 1.4 7.7 ± 2.1 8.2 ± 1.8
Hs-CRP (mg/L) 5.3 (2.4,6.6) 5.2 (2.4,9.1) 3.6 (3,6.1) 2.3 (1.2,3.6)*

Data are mean ± S.D. for all variables except hs-CRP which is median (25th percentile, 75th percentile);

*

p<0.005 compared to baseline and placebo

As shown in Table 1, compared to placebo, simvastatin therapy failed to significantly alter glucose and insulin levels, leading to a null effect with regards to HOMA, an index of insulin sensitivity. In addition, there was no significant affect of simvastatin therapy on plasma adiponectin levels in subjects with MS compared to placebo (Table 1).

Discussion

The statin drugs effectively lower cholesterol levels in patients with and without coronary artery disease and are associated with a reduction in cardiovascular events in patients with and without MS. We recently demonstrated that simvastatin therapy significantly reduced hsCRP levels and monocyte biomediators (IL-6, TNF) and also showed significant downregulation of NFKb and upregulation of AKT and phosphatidyl inositol 3-kinase following simvastatin therapy in MS subjects (3). Owing to the central role played by phosphatidyl inositol 3 kinase in insulin action, we decided to examine the effects of simvastatin therapy on HOMA, an indicator of insulin sensitivity and circulating adiponectin levels in this placebo-controlled study in patients with MS since this has not been reported before. Since this was not a pre-specified outcome, we did not measure insulin sensitivity by the gold standard, euglycemic clamp technique, but used HOMA, an accepted index of insulin sensitivity.

So far, despite the multiple pleiotropic effects of statin therapy, there is little consensus about the effects of statin on insulin sensitivity and adiponectin levels. Previously, fluvastatin therapy failed to have any additional effect compared to therapeutic lifestyle changes on adiponectin levels and HOMA in patients with dyslipidemia (13). Koh et al also failed to show any significant effects of atorvastatin monotherapy on plasma adiponectin levels or insulin sensitivity in patients with combined hyperlipidemia, and in subsequent studies, with simvastatin (20 mg/day) in diabetics or hypertensive subjects(11,12,14). Atorvastatin therapy in 2 independent studies, also has not resulted in improvement in insulin sensitivity or adiponectin levels in subjects with impaired fasting glucose and diabetics (16,17). Sakamoto et al reported that pravastatin therapy increased adiponectin levels compared to baseline in Japanese patients with coronary artery disease, however this was not a placebo-controlled study (15). Furthermore, no studies have examined the effect of statin therapy in patients with MS, a high risk population for diabetes; this is the novel aspect of the present study.

Simvastatin therapy in MS subjects, fails to significantly affect insulin sensitivity or plasma adiponectin levels in this 8-week study. Future studies will test if long term statin therapy alone or in combination with other agents could improve insulin sensitivity or adiponectin levels. There is no question that statin therapy represents a quantum leap with regards to therapeutic intervention of patients at risk of cardiovascular disease (18,19). However, in the Heart Protection Study, simvastatin therapy did not affect rate of new onset diabetes. These results emphasize the importance of combination therapy for patients at risk of diabetes or diabetics such as addition of thiazolidenediones, metformin or cannabinoid receptor 1 blocker, in addition to therapeutic lifestyle changes, the primary choice of therapy in MS subjects, to improve insulin resistance and endothelial function as well as reduce inflammation and upregulate adiponectin levels, thus improving the overall cardiometabolic profile. However, much further research is needed with the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) gamma agonist or selective cannabinoid receptor 1 blocker, such as rimonabant.

Acknowledgments

NIH K24 AT00596 and HL 074360

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Ford ES, Giles WH, Dietz WH. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among US adults: findings from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. JAMA. 2002;287:356–359. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.3.356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Devaraj S, Rosenson RS, Jialal I. Metabolic syndrome: an appraisal of the pro-inflammatory and procoagulant status. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2004;33:431–453. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2004.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Devaraj S, Chan E, Jialal I. Direct demonstration of an antiinflammatory effect of simvastatin in subjects with the metabolic syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(11):4489–4496. doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-0299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Weisberg SP, McCann D, Desai M, Rosenbaum M, Leibel RL, Ferrante AW., Jr Obesity is associated with macrophage accumulation in adipose tissue. J Clin Invest. 2003;112:1796–1808. doi: 10.1172/JCI19246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Xu H, Barnes GT, Yang Q, Tan G, Yang D, Chou CJ, Sole J, Nichols A, Ross JS, Tartaglia LA, Chen H. Chronic inflammation in fat plays a crucial role in the development of obesity-related insulin resistance. J Clin Invest. 2003;112:1821–1830. doi: 10.1172/JCI19451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Permana PA, Menge C, Reaven PD. Macrophage-secreted factors induce adipocyte inflammation and insulin resistance. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006;341:507–514. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ouchi N, Walsh K. Adiponectin as an anti-inflammatory factor. Clin Chim Acta. 2007;380(1–2):24–30. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2007.01.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Han SH, Quon MJ, Kim JA, Koh KK. Adiponectin and cardiovascular disease: response to therapeutic interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49(5):531–538. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.08.061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kakafika AI, Mikhailidis DP, Karagiannis A, Athyros VG. The Role of Endocannabinoid System Blockade in the Treatment of the Metabolic Syndrome. J Clin Pharmacol. 2007 doi: 10.1177/0091270007299358. Epub ahead of print. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Forst T, Pfutzner A, Lubben G, Weber M, Marx N, Karagiannis E, Koehler C, Baurecht W, Hohberg C, Hanefeld M. Effect of simvastatin and/or pioglitazone on insulin resistance, insulin secretion, adiponectin, and proinsulin levels in nondiabetic patients at cardiovascular risk--the PIOSTAT Study. Metabolism. 2007;56(4):491–496. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2006.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Koh KK, Quon MJ, Han SH, Ahn JY, Jin DK, Kim HS, Kim DS, Shin EK. Vascular and metabolic effects of combined therapy with ramipril and simvastatin in patients with type 2 diabetes. Hypertension. 2005;45(6):1088–193. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000166722.91714.ba. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Koh KK, Quon MJ, Han SH, Chung WJ, Ahn JY, Seo YH, Kang MH, Ahn TH, Choi IS, Shin EK. Additive beneficial effects of losartan combined with simvastatin in the treatment of ypercholesterolemic, hypertensive patients. Circulation. 2004;110(24):3687–3692. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000143085.86697.13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sonmez A, Dogru T, Tasci I, Yilmaz MI, Pinar M, Naharci I, Bingol N, Kilic S, Demirtas A, Bingol S, Ozgurtas T, Erikci S. The effect of fluvastatin on plasma adiponectin levels in dyslipidaemia. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2006;64(5):567–572. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2006.02510.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Koh KK, Quon MJ, Han SH, Chung WJ, Ahn JY, Seo YH, Choi IS, Shin EK. Additive beneficial effects of fenofibrate combined with atorvastatin in the treatment of combined hyperlipidemia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45(10):1649–1653. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.02.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sakamoto K, Sakamoto T, Ogawa H Kumamoto Joint Research on Hypercholesterolemia Investigators. The effect of 6 months of treatment with pravastatin on serum adiponection concentrations in Japanese patients with coronary artery disease and hypercholesterolemia: a pilot study. Clin Ther. 2006;28(7):1012–1021. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Costa A, Casamitjana R, Casals E, Alvarez L, Morales J, Masramon X, Hernandez G, Gomis R, Conget I. Effects of atorvastatin on glucose homeostasis, postprandial triglyceride response and C-reactive protein in subjects with impaired fasting glucose. Diabet Med. 2003;20(9):743–745. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2003.00993.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Shetty GK, Economides PA, Horton ES, Mantzoros CS, Veves A. Circulating adiponectin and resistin levels in relation to metabolic factors, inflammatory markers, and vascular reactivity in diabetic patients and subjects at risk for diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(10):2450–2457. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.10.2450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Collins R, Armitage J, Parish S, Sleigh P, Peto R. Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group. MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol-lowering with simvastatin in 5963 people with diabetes: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2003;361:2005–2016. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)13636-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Colhoun HM, Betteridge DJ, Durrington PN, Hitman GA, Neil HA, Livingstone SJ, Thomason MJ, Fuller JH CARDS Investigators. Rapid emergence of effect of atorvastatin on cardiovascular outcomes in the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS) Diabetologia. 2005;48(12):2482–2485. doi: 10.1007/s00125-005-0029-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES