Skip to main content
Archives of Disease in Childhood logoLink to Archives of Disease in Childhood
. 2007 May;92(5):466. doi: 10.1136/adc.2006.114876

Is hyperchloraemic acidosis a problem in children with gastroenteritis rehydrated with normal saline? Authors' reply

K Neville 1, C Verge 1, A Rosenberg 1, M O'Meara 1, J Walker 1
PMCID: PMC2083710  PMID: 17449531

The letter from Eisenhut1 questions the benefits of intravenous rehydration of children with gastroenteritis with normal saline (NS) because of the possibility of hyperchloraemic acidosis and suggests that Ringer's lactate or an equivalent solution might offer advantages over NS.

Our study of 102 children with gastroenteritis judged to need intravenous fluids, compared plasma and urinary electrolyte changes after randomisation to receive either 0.9% saline+2.5% dextrose (NS, n = 51) or 0.45% saline+2.5% dextrose (N/2, n = 51).2 The infusion rate was at the discretion of the treating physician according to either a rapid replacement protocol (RRP; 10 ml/kg/h for 4 h) or a standard replacement protocol (SRP; replacement of estimated percent dehydration over 24 h).

Data on acidosis and plasma concentrations of chloride were not presented in our original manuscript2 but are available in all children. At baseline, the children were normochloraemic (mean+SD chloride 100.4±3.4 mmol/l) with a raised anion gap. Mean bicarbonate (a surrogate for acidosis) was low (17.8±3.0 mmol/l). Ninety of 102 children had a bicarbonate value of <22 mmol/l associated with a mean anion gap of 21±3.5 mmol/l.

After 4 h (T4) the chloride concentration increased to 105±3.0 mmol/l in the NS group vs 102±2.7 mmol/l in the N/2 group (p<0.001). At the same time both groups experienced a similar improvement in their acid base status, with a rise in bicarbonate (mean±SD T4 bicarbonate NS vs N/2 19±3.2 mmol/l vs 19±2.6 mmol/l, respectively, p = 0.12) and fall in anion gap (mean T4 anion gap NS vs N/2 16±3.8 mmol/l vs 17±2.6 mmol/l, respectively, p = 0.2). Separate analysis of the approximately three quarters of children who completed 4 h of the RRP demonstrated almost identical chloride, bicarbonate and anion gap changes (data not shown). In the 16 children (NS n = 8, N/2 n = 8) who received intravenous fluids for 24 h, the chloride changes persisted (median (range) T24 chloride NS vs N/2 107 mmol/l (105–115) vs 105 mmol/l (100–110), respectively, p = 0.04) but with continued improvement in bicarbonate and anion gap in both groups (median (range) T24 bicarbonate NS vs N/2 19 mmol/l (15–20) vs 20 mmol/l (12–24), respectively, p = 0.4; median (range) T24 anion gap NS vs N/2 16 mmol/l (10–17) vs 16 mmol/l (13–20), respectively, p = 0.4).

Infusion of normal saline was associated with hyperchloraemia but not acidosis even after 24 h of intravenous fluids compared with a lower chloride solution. The near identical changes in bicarbonate and anion gap in these two groups could have one of two explanations. Firstly, the chloride load from normal saline in the volumes given does not cause acidosis. Alternatively, the chloride load may have some impact on acidosis that is offset by the superior ability of normal saline over a hypotonic saline solution to refill the intravascular space and improve tissue perfusion, important in dehydration.

Infusion of large volumes of normal saline including during resuscitation or surgery can result in hyperchloraemic acidosis.3,4,5,6,7,8,9 This has also been reported in response to Ringer's lactate or its equivalents, albeit to a lesser extent.3,6,9 Studies comparing the two fluids have usually shown no difference in clinical outcome,3,5,6,9,10 except in those at high risk, such as the elderly.7 There are no data in children apart from the report of Durward et al,11 who found that the development of hyperchloraemic acidosis in children after cardiac surgery receiving normal saline as their ”maintenance” fluid had no clinical sequelae. As far as we are aware, there are also no data comparing normal saline and Ringer's lactate in adults who are salt depleted, as is frequently the case with gastroenteritis.12

The improvement in plasma sodium in our study patients who received NS versus N/2, together with the similar improvements in bicarbonate and anion gap in the two groups, casts doubt on the clinical significance of the modest hyperchloraemia demonstrated. When infused in large volumes normal saline has been shown to maintain a normal plasma sodium compared to a drop with Ringer's lactate.5,8 In the setting of pre‐existing salt depletion and non‐osmotic antidiuretic hormone activity such as we have shown in gastroenteritis,13 this may be important.

Eisenhut also questions the safety of rapid intravenous fluid replacement in dehydrated children with gastroenteritis. It was not a primary aim of our study to identify clinical and biochemical differences between those who received RRP compared with SRP. However, in both this2 and an earlier observational study of children receiving only N/2,13 we found that the children receiving more prolonged fluids (either SRP alone or RRP followed by SRP) rather than those receiving RRP alone experienced potentially clinically significant dilutional hyponatraemia. Further, it has been well documented that rapid replacement of fluid deficit either orally or intravenously in childhood gastroenteritis is safe and well tolerated,14,15,16 has significant health economics benefits and is widely recommended.17,18,19

Footnotes

Competing interests: None declared.

References

  • 1.Eisenhut M. Adverse effects of rapid isotonic saline infusion. Arch Dis Child 200691(9)797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Neville K A, Verge C F, Rosenberg A R.et al Isotonic is better than hypotonic saline for intravenous rehydration of children with gastroenteritis: a prospective randomised study. Arch Dis Child 200691(3)226–232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Brill S A, Stewart T R, Brundage S I.et al Base deficit does not predict mortality when secondary to hyperchloremic acidosis. Shock 200217(6)459–462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Reid F, Lobo D N, Williams R N.et al (Ab)normal saline and physiological Hartmann's solution: a randomized double‐blind crossover study. Clin Sci 2003104(1)17–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Scheingraber S, Rehm M, Sehmisch C.et al Rapid saline infusion produces hyperchloremic acidosis in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery. Anesthesiology 199990(5)1265–1270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Waters J H, Gottlieb A, Schoenwald P.et al Normal saline versus lactated Ringer's solution for intraoperative fluid management in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: an outcome study. Anesth Analg 200193(4)817–822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wilkes N J, Woolf R, Mutch M.et al The effects of balanced versus saline‐based hetastarch and crystalloid solutions on acid‐base and electrolyte status and gastric mucosal perfusion in elderly surgical patients. Anesth Analg 200193(4)811–816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Williams E L, Hildebrand K L, McCormick S A.et al The effect of intravenous lactated Ringer's solution versus 0.9% sodium chloride solution on serum osmolality in human volunteers. Anesth Analg 199988(5)999–1003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kellum J A. Fluid resuscitation and hyperchloremic acidosis in experimental sepsis: improved short‐term survival and acid‐base balance with Hextend compared with saline. Crit Care Med 200230(2)300–305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lowery B D, Cloutier C T, Carey L C. Electrolyte solutions in resuscitation in human hemorrhagic shock. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1971133(2)273–284. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Durward A, Tibby S M, Skellett S.et al The strong ion gap predicts mortality in children following cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. Pediatr Crit Care Med 20056(3)281–285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hirschhorn N. The treatment of acute diarrhea in children. An historical and physiological perspective. Am J Clin Nutr 198033(3)637–663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Neville K A, Verge C F, O'Meara M W.et al High antidiuretic hormone levels and hyponatremia in children with gastroenteritis. Pediatrics 2005116(6)1401–1407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nager A L, Wang V J. Comparison of nasogastric and intravenous methods of rehydration in pediatric patients with acute dehydration. Pediatrics 2002109566–572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Phin S J, McCaskill M E, Browne G J.et al Clinical pathway using rapid rehydration for children with gastroenteritis. J Paediatr Child Health 200339(5)343–348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Reid S R, Bonadio W A. Outpatient rapid intravenous rehydration to correct dehydration and resolve vomiting in children with acute gastroenteritis. Ann Emerg Med 199628(3)318–323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.American Academy of Pediatrics, Provisional Committee on Quality Improvement, Subcommittee on Acute Gastroenteritis Practice parameter: the management of acute gastroenteritis in young children. Pediatrics 199697424–435. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Armon K, Stephenson T, MacFaul R.et al An evidence and consensus based guideline for acute diarrhoea management. Arch Dis Child 200185132–142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sandhu B K. European Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Working Group on Acute Diarrhoea. Practical guidelines for the management of gastroenteritis in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 200133(Suppl 2)S36–S39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Archives of Disease in Childhood are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES