Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 Nov 21.
Published in final edited form as: Semin Spine Surg. 2007 Jun;19(2):65–71. doi: 10.1053/j.semss.2007.04.009

Advances in Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the assessment of degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine

Chenyang Wang *, Joshua D Auerbach +, Walter RT Witschey #, Richard A Balderston §, Ravinder Reddy ^, Arijit Borthakur $
PMCID: PMC2084362  NIHMSID: NIHMS26006  PMID: 18037984

Abstract

The intervertebral disc is characterized by a tension-resisting annulus fibrosus, and a compression-resisting nucleus pulposus composed largely of proteoglycan. Both the annulus and the nucleus function in concert to provide the disc with mechanical stability. Early disc degeneration begins in the nucleus with proteoglycan depletion. Quantitative MRI techniques have been developed to non-invasively quantify the earliest degenerative changes that occur within the disc. Our ability to identify and quantify these early biochemical changes will provide a better understanding of the pathophysiology of disc degeneration and facilitate the study of interventions that aim to halt or reverse the degenerative process.

Keywords: quantitative MRI, intervertebral disc, annulus fibrosus, nucleus pulposus, proteoglycan, disc degeneration

INTRODUCTION

Degenerative disc disease (DDD) of the intervertebral disc (IVD) is the most common cause of back-related disability among North American adults [1]. This sometimes debilitating condition affects nearly 12 million people in the United States, and may generate direct and indirect costs exceeding 50 billion dollars annually in health-related expenditures. The radiographic evaluation of patients with DDD often begins with plain film radiography and a standard T1- and T2-weighted MRI to assess for structural changes within the nucleus and annulus indicative of disc degeneration including a loss of T2-weighted MRI signal, loss of disc height, disc bulge or herniation, posterior element arthrosis, stenosis, and potential vertebral body compromise. While standard MRI is able to detect these later stage developments, it is not able to provide a quantitative measure of the early changes that characterize early DDD. This limitation has led to the search for quantitative, non-invasive measures to evaluate the earliest changes involved in the initiation of the degenerative cascade. Such an imaging tool will be important for the evaluation of the patients with early DDD, and also in the assessment of disc regenerative or restorative technologies that aim to halt or reverse the degenerative process.

BACKGROUND

The IVD has 3 sub-structures: the annulus fibrosus (AF), which envelops the gel-like nucleus pulposus (NP), and the endplates. The proteoglycan (PG) rich NP is comprised of a network of randomly distributed collagen fibrils in a hydrated extra-fibrillar matrix. In contrast, the AF is highly organized. It has 15–40 lamellae (layers) enveloping the NP. In each lamella, collagen fibers are positioned at a 30° angle to the axial axis of the spine [2, 3]. 70–80% of the NP and about 65% of the AF consist of water [4]. After water is removed, an IVD is composed of collagens (50–70%), proteoglycans (10–50%), and other non-collagenous proteins (up to 25%) [4, 5]. Collagen in the AF gives the IVD its tensile strength. The glycosaminoglycan (GAG) branches of the PG are negatively charged, and they bind water. This water-binding property of GAG gives an IVD its hydrostatic pressure, which resists loading.

The initial stage of DDD is marked by PG degradation and subsequently a reduced capacity of the NP to bind water [6, 7]. In later stages of the disease, morphological changes such as a loss of disc height, annular tears and rim lesions, and osteophyte formation materialize [8]. Previous studies have implicated DDD with low back pain [911]. During the intial PG degradation, the PGs of NP breakdown to clusters of short aggregated and non-aggregated molecules, the GAG content decreases, and the NP’s capacity to bind water reduces [12, 13]. The increased modulus and decreased hydrostatic pressure triggers the NP to undergo a phase change, from a fluid-like material to a more solid-like material [1416]. Mechanical function of degenerated motion segments is compromised in all loading conditions [17, 18]. The current standard surgical treatment for lower back pain with advanced IVD degeneration is lumbar spinal fusion. However, if DDD can be detected at an earlier stage, the condition may benefit from emerging alternative treatments (e.g., nucleus replacement, total disc arthroplasty, cell therapy, growth factor therapy) [1921]. Evaluation of the viability of potential DDD therapies and longitudinal monitoring of DDD progression demands an objective and quantitative imaging strategy, one that is sensitive to the biochemical changes in the early stages of DDD. In this section, we will begin with a brief overview of conventional diagnostic quantitative MRI strategies (T1 and T2 relaxation mapping, dGEMRIC), followed by emerging novel quantitative MRI techniques (sodium, magic echo, and T 1?) that show promise as noninvasive, accurate diagnostic imaging tools for the quantitative assessment of early stage DDD.

T1 AND T2 RELAXATION MAPPING

In MRI, variable parameters such as repetition time (TR), echo time (TE), and spin-lock time (TSL) can be varied to achieve T 1, T2, and T 1? weighting effects of the images. Different tissues such as the AF and NP have unique T1, T2, and T 1? relaxation time constants. These relaxation time constants determine the exponential decay curve for the MR signal (Equation 1). If a series of images are collected with varying TR, TE, or TSL values, one can apply an exponential fit on a pixel-to-pixel basis across all images (Figure 1), and determine the corresponding T1, T2, or T1? relaxation time constants. This process is called relaxation time mapping, and it yields a map of relaxation time constants, which are related to the biochemical environment of water in the tissue. Hence, MRI relaxation time mapping is a noninvasive method to probe the tissue characteristics and quality. Earlier work by Chatani et al. has shown that AP and NP have different T 1 and T2 relaxation time constants [22]. A study by Chiu et al. revealed that T2 relaxation time constant has an inverse relationship with Thompson grade [23].

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The pixel-to-pixel mapping process for T2. The pixel intensities of the same pixel from all four images are fitted onto an exponential curve.

T1weighted:S=So(1eTR/T1)T2weighted:S=SoeTE/T2T1ρweighted:S=SoeTSL/T1ρ Equation 1

DELAYED GADOLINIUM-ENHANCED MAGENTIC RESONANCE IMAGING CONTRAST

The IVD is an avascular structure. Nutrients such as oxygen and glucose are delivered to IVD via diffusion. Previous study by Antoniou et al. has established a direct correlation between diffusion rate and glycoaminoglycan content in the NP [24]. In recent study by Niinimaki et al., delayed gadolinium(Gd)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging contrast (dGEMRIC) has been applied to study the diffusion characteristic of the IVD in vivo [25]. Gd is a T 1 shortening agent. Its presence in tissue speeds up tissue T1 relaxation process. In a T1-weighted image, tissue experiencing Gd uptake would show up brighter. In the study by Niinimaki et al., a T1 map was collected before and after intravenous injection of 0.2 mM/kg Gd-based contrast agent. The percentage decrease in T1 after Gd injection correlates with grading of disc degeneration [25]. However, recent research has linked the usage of Gd-based MR contrast agent with a rare but severe medical condition know as nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) [26]. In response, the FDA announced a recommendation to limit Gd-based contrast agents unless it is deemed absolutely necessary.

SODIUM MRI

A novel method for MRI of IVD is Sodium MRI. Although conventional MRI relies on imaging proton nuclei in water, MRI can also be performed on more physiologically relevant nuclei such as sodium (23Na) and Phosphorus (31P) among others. Sodium MRI is a highly accurate and specific technique for assessing various pathologies, and it has been applied to in vivo applications to image heart infarction, brain, and spine [2729]. Sodium MRI has been validated as a tool for quantitative measurement of the proteoglycan content via a measurement of tissue fixed charge density (FCD) which correlates to the amount of proteoglycan present [30, 31]. In sodium MRI, the FCD is directly calculated form [Na] measurements in a method developed by Lesperance et al. [32]. We recently demonstrated the feasibility of performing sodium MRI on ex vivo IVD specimens for the first time (Figure 2). In this image, a single high cervical IVD segment was imaged with a home-built MRI coil on a 3 Tesla Siemens Trio MRI scanner. A tube containing 300mM sodium concentration of saline was placed to the left of the disc to serve as a signal reference for quantifying the absolute concentration of sodium in the disc. Note the low signal from the vertebral bones due to the lower concentration of sodium (~50mM) of blood. It may soon be possible to determine IVD tissue quality (via a measurement of proteoglycan content) non-destructively and non-invasively on any clinical MRI scanner.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

A sodium MR image of cadaver cervical IVD with a 300mM sodium phantom.

The sodium MRI signal is significantly lower than that of conventional proton MRI. One of the major factors contributing to the decreased signal is the lower natural abundance of 23Na compared to proton. In the human body, typical proton concentration is around 110 M while typical sodium concentration in healthy IVD is only around 300 mM. In order to compensate for the loss of measurable signal, sodium MRI typically employs fast MRI pulse sequences with a lot of signal averaging and hence long MRI scan times. However, recent advances in the gradient technology may enable one to achieve ultra-short TE (<200μs) that can significantly improve resolution and SNR. Radiofrequency coil technology (multiple channel capability) and parallel imaging approaches and tuned pre-amplifiers would further contribute to high SNR. These advances may potentially make the clinical sodium MRI feasible at 3T scanners. Further, the recent proliferation of 7T whole-body MRI scanners in clinical research centers could have a significant impact on sodium MRI and its potential for clinical use.

MAGIC ECHO MRI

One novel MRI pulse sequence that may be used to study biochemical changes in the intervertebral disc during degenerative disc disease is the “magic-echo” pulse sequence currently under development in our lab. This relaxation mapping technique uses a series of RF pulses to generate a ‘magic echo’ [33] as shown in Figure 3. While the spin echo relaxation time T2 is insensitive to the loss of magnetization because of magnetic field inhomogeneities (T2* effects), the magic echo relaxation time T2ME is insensitive to the loss of transverse magnetization because of the static and magnetic dipole-dipole interaction between 1H nuclei on water molecules.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The magic echo pulse sequence

Magic echo imaging has previously been used to acquire images of samples with short T2 relaxation times. The groups of Kimmich, et al. and Briguet, et al. have shown signal enhancement in plastic plugs [34, 35] and bovine Achilles tendon [33], respectively, using magic echo imaging. This technique is poised to become a useful probe of the intervertebral disc. In a magic echo relaxation map, the voxel intensity is proportional to the relaxation time rather than the signal. Magic echo relaxation maps provide spatial information about the magic echo relaxation time T2ME throughout the tissue. By incrementing TE, the magic echo signal decays approximately like a single exponential function (Equation 2).

S(TE)=S0eTE/T2ME Equation 2

Preliminary studies were performed on 4 cadaveric spines and imaged using both standard spin echo and magic echo pulse sequences. Proton density, T2 and T2ME relaxation maps are shown from a representative spine from a 42 year old human male in Figure 4. The proton density weighted (TE/TR = 15/3000 ms) magic echo image is shown on the left and serves as reference for T2 (middle) and magic echo T2ME (right) relaxation maps. The discs shown are L4/L5 through T12/L1. T2 and magic echo T2ME maps were obtained using five identical echo times (15, 30, 45, 60 and 75 ms) as measured from the center of the slice selective sinc pulse to the echo time.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Cadaveric lower lumbar spine T2 and magic echo relaxation maps from a 42 year old human male.

Observed T2ME times in the IVD are significantly increased [(T2ME – T2) / T2 ~ 35%] over spin echo T2 relaxation times. Furthermore, Figure 5 shows ?T2MEs between the nucleus pulposus and adjacent endplate for two separate L4/L5 discs of 92.0 ± 7.8 ms and 93.7 ± 1.0 ms compared to ?T2s of 65.2 ± 5.3 ms and 71.5 ± 0.9 ms, respectively. The signal enhancement was also observed in two additional cadaveric spines. In addition, T2ME maps reveal disc features not observed in T2 maps. One example is the ?T2ME = 59.3 ± 2.5 ms difference between the hypo-intense region of the nucleus pulposus and the surrounding healthy nucleus observed in rostral portion of the L4/L5 disc (Figure 5 A & B). This difference may reveal biochemical differences not observable using standard spin echo imaging. Generally, the magic echo sequence provides greater dynamic range to T2 mapping studies and may eliminate artifacts from dipolar orientation effects or, conversely, to modulate these orientation effects.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

L4/L5 IVD ex vivo disc from a 42 y/o male (A) including labeled averaged disc profile (B) across the zone of hypointensity. (C) A similar T2 relaxation profile obtained from the L4/L5 disc of a 29 y/o male. The upper T2 profile (pink curve) is a magic echo profile, while the lower T2 profile (purple) is spin echo profile.

T1? MRI

There has been considerable amount of work on biological tissues using T MR spectroscopy and imaging dealing with tumors, muscle, myocardium, blood flow and cartilage [3646]. In T MRI, a long-duration, low-power radiofrequency (RF) pulse cluster referred to as “spin-lock” (SL) pulse cluster is applied to the magnetization in the transverse plane (Figure 6). The first RF pulse tips the longitudinal magnetization into the transverse plane. Next, a two phase-alternating spin-lock pulses are applied along the same direction as the transverse magnetization. During this time, the magnetization is said to be “spin-locked” and undergoes relaxation in the presence of a B1 field of the spin-lock pulses in the rotating frame, a process similar to T 1 relaxation in the presence of main magnetic field, B0. The phase-alternating spin-lock pulses are meant to refocus the effect of inhomogeneous RF fields [40]. The spin-locked magnetization will relax with a time constant T, the spin-lattice relaxation in the rotating frame, during the spin-locking duration. The spin-lock field reduces the effect of dipolar relaxation and background gradients on the signal. Consequently, T is always greater than T 2. In a typical T mapping experiment, the duration of the SL pulse is incremented in tens of milliseconds while the amplitude of SL pulse (γB1~500Hz) is fixed.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

T1? preparation pulse cluster.

T-weighted MRI can generate tissue contrast based on variations in protein content. Previous studies have shown that T MRI can map the distribution of PG in cartilage [47, 48]. An in vivo feasibility study by Auerbach et al reported a significant correlation between T and degenerative disc grade in asymptomatic 40–60 year old subjects [49]. A previous study in cadaveric lumbar spines from our laboratory demonstrated a significant linear correlation between T and proteoglycan within the nucleus and degenerative grade, as assessed using the Pfirrmann classification [50]. In another study investigating the relationship between T1? and IVD degeneration, nine human cadaver spine specimens (mean age: 45 years, range: 22~66 years) were scanned on a Siemens Sonata 1.5 T clinical MR scanner with the vendor-supplied 8-channel spine array coil. For each specimen, five T1?-weighted images (TSL=15,30,45,60,75ms) were obtained using a spin-lock prepared spin-echo pulse sequence. Afterwards, a region of interest was selected in the L2/L3 IVD NP by a single observer. The mean T1? value for each IVD NP’s mean T1? and standard deviation were obtained using ImageJ software. In Figure 7, the decrease in T1? of the NP as a result of aging can be clearly seen from the overlaid T1? maps as well as the T1? vs. age plot (unpublished data). Recently, it was demonstrated that the T relaxation time constant correlates strongly with PG changes in bovine cartilage whereas the correlation between T2 relaxation time constant and PG change is less strong [51]. It has also been shown that in bovine as well as in ex vivo human cartilage, the T relaxation time is significantly higher (~50%) than T 2. This increase in relaxation time value is reflected in the improved SNR in T1? maps. Another advantage of T imaging is that it provides a unique contrast between cartilage, fluid and other structures in the joint. The above advantages of T imaging potentially lead to the detection of early degenerative changes with high accuracy and precision.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Image on the left shows a color T map overlaid on a T1-weighted image (grayscale) of the lumbar region from a 22 year-old and a 59 year-old human cadaver spine. The graph on the right plots average T1? value of the NP region for each L2/L3 IVD against its specimen’s age. The standard deviation of all T1? values within each NP region was graphed as the error bar. A linear fit of the data points yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.82, which suggests a strong relationship between T1? of NP and the specimen’s age.

Ongoing research by our group has focused on the development of a pulse sequence capable of acquiring 3D T1? maps of human spine IVDs within a clinically acceptable time frame (<30 min). This new MR pulse sequence (SLIPS) appends the T1? magnetization preparation pulse (Figure 6) to a fast 3D acquisition scheme based on a balanced steady-state free precession technique. Previous often relied on 2D T1?-prepped pulse sequences. The 2D images are not useful for assessing disc volume information. In addition, in longitudinal studies that measure disc height repeatedly, one cannot obtain the exact slice in subsequent scans. SLIPS address both problems by acquiring a 3D image that completely covers the IVD (Figure 8). 3D T1? map can be calculated using a series of 5 3D images with TSL values ranging from 1 to 60 ms. Each IVD can then be segmented from the 3D T1? map, and their volumes are subsequently calculated.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Consecutive 2D images of the human spine in vivo from a 3D SLIPS dataset. The subject was a 22 year-old male volunteer with no prior history of back injury or DDD. A total of five datasets were collected, with TSL values ranging between 1 to 60 ms. (Data shown has TSL=10ms.) The total scanning time was less than 10 minutes. The right side of this figure s include a T1? map of the 7th image slice in the original 3D dataset.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, quantitative MRI has the potential to identify and quantify the early biochemical disc changes that characterize early DDD. Standard T1 and T2 relaxation mapping are capable of detecting biochemical changes in the NP but have limitations, including increased scan time, limited dynamic range, and a lack of consistency between in vivo and in vitro values. Recent advancements in MRI, such as sodium MRI, magic echo, and T1? MRI, have been shown to be even more sensitive to PG degradation in the NP. As these quantitative MRI methods are still in the research phase, their efficacy still needs to be more fully evaluated in a clinical setting. However, preliminary clinical data on sodium, magic echo, and T1? MRI have demonstrated great potential to become noninvasive quantitative diagnostic tools for early DDD.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Errico TJ. Lumbar disc arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005:106–117. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000165718.22159.d9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cassidy JJ, Hiltner A, Baer E. Hierarchical structure of the intervertebral disc. Connect Tissue Res. 1989;23:75–88. doi: 10.3109/03008208909103905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Marchand F, Ahmed AM. Investigation of the laminate structure of lumbar disc anulus fibrosus. Spine. 1990;15:402–410. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199005000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Eyre DR. Biochemistry of the intervertebral disc. International Review of Connective Tissue Research. 1979;8:227–291. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-363708-6.50012-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Oegema TR. Biochemistry of the intervertebral disc. Clinics in Sports Medicine. 1993;12:419–439. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Antoniou J, Steffen T, Nelson F, Winterbottom N, Hollander AP, Poole RA, Aebi M, Alini M. The human lumbar intervertebral disc: evidence for changes in the biosynthesis and denaturation of the extracellular matrix with growth, maturation, ageing, and degeneration. J Clin Invest. 1996;98:996–1003. doi: 10.1172/JCI118884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sieber AN, Kostuik JP. Concepts in nuclear replacement. Spine J. 2004;4:322S–324S. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.07.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Andersson GB. What are the age-related changes in the spine? Baillieres Clin Rheumatol. 1998;12:161–173. doi: 10.1016/s0950-3579(98)80010-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Erkintalo MO, Salminen JJ, Alanen AM, Paajanen HE, Kormano MJ. Development of degenerative changes in the lumbar intervertebral disk: results of a prospective MR imaging study in adolescents with and without low-back pain. Radiology. 1995;196:529–533. doi: 10.1148/radiology.196.2.7617872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Luoma K, Riihimaki H, Luukkonen R, Raininko R, Viikari-Juntura E, Lamminen A. Low back pain in relation to lumbar disc degeneration. Spine. 2000;25:487–492. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200002150-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Urban JPG, Maroudas A, Bayliss MT, Dillon J. Swelling pressures of proteoglycans at the concentrations found in cartilaginous tissues. Biorheology. 1979;16:447–464. doi: 10.3233/bir-1979-16609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kirkaldy-Willis WH, Wedge JH, Yong-Hing K, Reilly J. Pathology and pathogenesis of lumbar spondylosis and stenosis. Spine. 1978;3:319–328. doi: 10.1097/00007632-197812000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Morgan S, Saifuddin A. MRI of the lumbar intervertebral disc. Clin Radiol. 1999;54:703–723. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(99)91173-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gunzburg R, Fraser RD, Moore R, Vernon-Roberts B. An experimental study comparing percutaneous discectomy with chemonucleolysis. Spine. 1993;18:218–226. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199302000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Luoma K, Vehmas T, Riihimaki H, Raininko R. Disc height and signal intensity of the nucleus pulposus on magnetic resonance imaging as indicators of lumbar disc degeneration. Spine. 2001;26:680–686. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200103150-00026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bashir A, Gray ML, Burstein D. Gd-DTPA2− as a measure of cartilage degradation. Magn Reson Med. 1996;36:665–673. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910360504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Burstein D, Velyvis J, Scott KT, Stock KW, Kim YJ, Jaramillo D, Boutin RD, Gray ML. Protocol issues for delayed Gd(DTPA)2−-enhanced MRI (dGEMRIC) for clinical evaluation of articular cartilage. Magn Reson Med. 2001;45:36–41. doi: 10.1002/1522-2594(200101)45:1<36::aid-mrm1006>3.0.co;2-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ibrahim MA, Haughton VM, Hyde JS. Enhancement of intervertebral disks with gadolinium complexes: comparison of an ionic and a nonionic medium in an animal model. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1994;15:1907–1910. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bertagnoli R, Kumar S. Indications for full prosthetic disc arthroplasty: a correlation of clinical outcome against a variety of indications. Eur Spine J. 2002;11 (Suppl 2):S131–136. doi: 10.1007/s00586-002-0428-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Boden SD, Balderston RA, Heller JG, Hanley EN, Jr, Zigler JE. An AOA critical issue. Disc replacements: this time will we really cure low-back and neck pain? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A:411–422. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Buckwalter JA. Aging and degeneration of the human intervertebral disc. Spine. 1995;20:1307–1314. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199506000-00022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chatani K, Kusaka Y, Mifune T, Nishikawa H. Topographic differences of 1H-NMR relaxation times (T1, T2) in the normal intervertebral disc and its relationship to water content. Spine. 1993;18:2271–2275. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199311000-00022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chiu EJ, Newitt DC, Segal MR, Hu SS, Lotz JC, Majumdar S. Magnetic resonance imaging measurement of relaxation and water diffusion in the human lumbar intervertebral disc under compression in vitro. Spine. 2001;26:E437–444. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200110010-00017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Antoniou J, Demers CN, Beaudoin G, Goswami T, Mwale F, Aebi M, Alini M. Apparent diffusion coefficient of intervertebral discs related to matrix composition and integrity. Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;22:963–972. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2004.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Niinimaki JL, Parviainen O, Ruohonen J, Ojala RO, Kurunlahti M, Karppinen J, Tervonen O, Nieminen MT. In vivo quantification of delayed gadolinium enhancement in the nucleus pulposus of human intervertebral disc. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006;24:796–800. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kuo PH, Kanal E, Abu-Alfa AK, Cowper SE. Gadolinium-based MR contrast agents and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. Radiology. 2007;242:647–649. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2423061640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Stobbe R, Beaulieu C. In vivo sodium magnetic resonance imaging of the human brain using soft inversion recovery fluid attenuation. Magn Reson Med. 2005;54:1305–1310. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hillenbrand HB, Becker LC, Kharrazian R, Hu K, Rochitte CE, Kim RJ, Chen EL, Ertl G, Hruban RH, Lima JA. 23Na MRI combined with contrast-enhanced 1H MRI provides in vivo characterization of infarct healing. Magn Reson Med. 2005;53:843–850. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Steidle G, Graf H, Schick F. Sodium 3-D MRI of the human torso using a volume coil. Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;22:171–180. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2003.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Shapiro EM, Borthakur A, Gougoutas A, Reddy R. 23Na MRI accurately measures fixed charge density in articular cartilage. Magn Reson Med. 2002;47:284–291. doi: 10.1002/mrm.10054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Borthakur A, Shapiro EM, Akella SV, Gougoutas A, Kneeland JB, Reddy R. Quantifying sodium in the human wrist in vivo by using MR imaging. Radiology. 2002;224:598–602. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2242011039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lesperance LM, Gray ML, Burstein D. Determination of fixed charge density in cartilage using nuclear magnetic resonance. J Orthop Res. 1992;10:1–13. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100100102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Grenier D, Pascui O, Briguet A. Dipolar contrast for dense tissues imaging. J Magn Reson. 2000;147:353–356. doi: 10.1006/jmre.2000.2188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Rommel E, Hafner S, Kimmich R. Nmr Imaging of Solids by Jeener-Broekaert Phase Encoding. Journal of Magnetic Resonance. 1990;86:264–272. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hafner S, Demco DE, Kimmich R. Magic-Echo Solid-State Nmr Imaging. Measurement Science & Technology. 1991;2:882–885. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Santyr GE, Henkelman RM, Bronskill MJ. Spin locking for magnetic resonance imaging with application to human breast. Magn Reson Med. 1989;12:25–37. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910120104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lamminen AE, Tanttu JI, Sepponen RE, Pihko H, Korhola OA. T1rho dispersion imaging of diseased muscle tissue. British Journal of Radiology. 1993;66:783–787. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-66-789-783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Dixon WT, Oshinski JN, Trudeau JD, Arnold BC, Pettigrew RI. Myocardial suppression in vivo by spin locking with composite pulses. Magn Reson Med. 1996;36:90–94. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910360116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Markkola AT, Aronen HJ, Paavonen T, Hopsu E, Sipila LM, Tanttu JI, Sepponen RE. T1rho dispersion imaging of head and neck tumors: a comparison to spin lock and magnetization transfer techniques. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1997;7:873–879. doi: 10.1002/jmri.1880070516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Charagundla SR, Stolpen AH, Leigh JS, Reddy R. Off-resonance proton T1ρ dispersion imaging of 17O-enriched tissue phantoms. Magn Reson Med. 1998;39:588–595. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910390412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Mlynarik V, Trattnig S, Huber M, Zembsch A, Imhof H. The role of relaxation times in monitoring proteoglycan depletion in articular cartilage. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;10:497–502. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1522-2586(199910)10:4<497::aid-jmri1>3.0.co;2-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Grohn OHJ, Kettunen MI, Makela HI, Penttonen M, Pitkanen A, Lukkarinen JA, Kauppinen RA. Early detection of irreversible cerebral ischemia in the rat using dispersion of the magnetic resonance imaging relaxation time, T1rho. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2000;20:1457–1466. doi: 10.1097/00004647-200010000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Poptani H, Duvvuri U, Miller CG, Mancuso A, Charagundla S, Fraser NW, Glickson JD, Leigh JS, Reddy R. T1rho imaging of murine brain tumors at 4 T. Acad Radiol. 2001;8:42–47. doi: 10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80742-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Duvvuri U, Charagundla SR, Kudchodkar SB, Kaufman JH, Kneeland JB, Rizi R, Leigh JS, Reddy R. Human knee: in vivo T1(rho)-weighted MR imaging at 1.5 T--preliminary experience. Radiology. 2001;220:822–826. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2203001662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Borthakur A, Wheaton AJ, Gougoutas AJ, Akella SV, Regatte RR, Charagundla SR, Reddy R. In vivo measurement of T1rho dispersion in the human brain at 1.5 tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;19:403–409. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Wheaton AJ, Casey FL, Gougoutas AJ, Dodge GR, Borthakur A, Lonner JH, Schumacher HR, Reddy R. Correlation of T1rho with fixed charge density in cartilage. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;20:519–525. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Akella SV, Reddy Regatte R, Gougoutas AJ, Borthakur A, Shapiro EM, Kneeland JB, Leigh JS, Reddy R. Proteoglycan-induced changes in T1rho-relaxation of articular cartilage at 4T. Magn Reson Med. 2001;46:419–423. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Borthakur A, Shapiro EM, Beers J, Kudchodkar S, Kneeland JB, Reddy R. Sensitivity of MRI to proteoglycan depletion in cartilage: comparison of sodium and proton MRI. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2000;8:288–293. doi: 10.1053/joca.1999.0303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Auerbach JD, Johannessen W, Borthakur A, Wheaton AJ, Dolinskas CA, Balderston RA, Reddy R, Elliott DM. In vivo quantification of human lumbar disc degeneration using T1rho-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Spine J. 2006;15 (Suppl 15):338–344. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0083-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Johannessen W, Auerbach JD, Wheaton AJ, Kurji A, Borthakur A, Reddy R, Elliott DM. Assessment of human disc degeneration and proteoglycan content using T1rho-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Spine. 2006;31:1253–1257. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000217708.54880.51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Regatte RR, Akella SV, Borthakur A, Kneeland JB, Reddy R. Proteoglycan depletion-induced changes in transverse relaxation maps of cartilage: comparison of T2 and T1rho. Acad Radiol. 2002;9:1388–1394. doi: 10.1016/s1076-6332(03)80666-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES