Skip to main content
The Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases logoLink to The Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases
. 2001 Mar-Apr;12(2):93–97. doi: 10.1155/2001/250697

Beliefs and behaviours of parents regarding antibiotic use by children

Sean M Bagshaw 3, James D Kellner 1,2,3
PMCID: PMC2094800  PMID: 18159323

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To determine parents' beliefs and behaviours about antibiotic use by their children in the ambulatory setting.

DESIGN:

Cross-sectional survey, where a self-administered questionnaire was completed by adult caregivers of children before the medical assessment of the child.

SETTING:

Three paediatric acute care settings (paediatric emergency department [PED], group paediatric practice and after hours walk-in medical clinic).

POPULATION STUDIED:

Adult caregivers (n=114; 76% mothers, 19% fathers and 4% other caregivers) of children brought for acute care were surveyed.

MAIN RESULTS:

Forty-one caregivers completed the survey in the PED, 37 in the paediatric office and 36 in the walk-in clinic. They believed that antibiotics were appropriate for ear infections (86%), pharyngitis (77%), bronchitis (49%), sinus colds (20%), cough (12%), colds (8%) and influenza (8%). Sixty-eight per cent of children had received antibiotics in the previous year. Thirteen per cent of caregivers reported previously requesting an antibiotic for their child, 18% believed a previous antibiotic prescription had been unnecessary and 19% had not complied with prescriptions in the past. Concerns about antibiotic use included antibiotic resistance (50%), harm to the immune system (40%), adverse effects (28%) and lack of efficacy (19%).

CONCLUSIONS:

In this population, parental knowledge and understanding of indications for antibiotics and their adverse effects were good; however, incorrect beliefs and disagreements with physicians did occur. To improve patterns of antibiotic use by children, it will be necessary to understand parents' beliefs, behaviours and information sources better so that misconceptions and disagreements with caregivers can be addressed appropriately.

Key Words: Antibiotic resistance, Antibiotics, Questionnaire survey


Microbial resistance to antibiotics continues to emerge as a significant global health problem (1). The use of antibiotics is the most important factor contributing to the development of antibiotic resistance by bacteria (2,3). Antibiotics are frequently prescribed for conditions that do not warrant their use, such as the common cold, purulent rhinitis and acute bronchitis (2,4,5). A recent Canadian study found that in the province of Saskatchewan in 1995, 51% of antibiotics prescribed to children younger than five years of age with respiratory infections were unnecessary (6).

In recent years, many local, regional and national programs to promote the reduced and judicious use of antibiotics have been initiated, and are directed at both health professionals and the general public (2,7,8). An important element of these programs is to provide information about appropriate indications for antibiotics. The overall number of prescriptions written for antibiotics has declined 15%, from 27.3 million prescriptions in 1995 to 23.2 million prescriptions in 1998 (9). The factors that have led to this reduction cannot be readily measured, but it is probable that educational programs promoting prudent antibiotic use have contributed to it. Reduced antibiotic consumption by individuals and whole communities has been associated with the reduced prevalence of antibiotic resistance to specific bacteria (10-12).

Limited data are published about the beliefs and behaviours of parents and caregivers regarding antibiotic use for their children (13-15). We wished to study this issue at a time of increasing awareness by health professionals and the general public about antibiotic overuse in Canada.

DATA AND METHODS

Questionnaire and patient population:

A self-administered questionnaire was offered to parents and caregivers who brought their children for acute medical care to one of three settings in Calgary, Alberta (population around 900,000). One setting was the paediatric emergency department (PED) at the Alberta Children's Hospital (ACH). Children requiring emergency care may also be seen at other Calgary general hospitals, but the ACH is the only tertiary care child health facility in southern Alberta. The emergency department has about 42,000 visits annually. The second setting was a group paediatric practice with five paediatricians. The third setting was an evening walk-in clinic managed by the same group of paediatricians. The group practice provides consultative care only, and cares for children with a mix of complicated and simple medical problems (this is also the case with most other paediatric practices in Calgary). The walk-in clinic serves practice patients requiring unscheduled care and welcomes nonreferred children for unscheduled visits.

One investigator (SMB) approached the parent(s) or caregiver(s) in the waiting room of each facility and invited them to participate and complete the English language questionnaire. Parents completed the questionnaire in the waiting room or assessment room before their child was examined.

Questions were asked about demographic information, previous antibiotic use, beliefs about the indications for antibiotics, adverse effects of antibiotics, and disagreements between parents and physicians regarding use of medications. Some of the questionnaire was based on a survey conducted in Massachusetts (13). There were 19 questions and nine subquestions. Some questions were closed-ended, eg, "Have you ever requested that a doctor prescribe an antibiotic for your child?" (possible responses: yes, no). Others were partially closed-ended with an open-ended subquestion, eg, "Have you ever given an antibiotic to your child without consulting a doctor?" (possible responses: yes, no, and if yes, where did you get the antibiotics?). Some questions were partially closed-ended, eg, "For what illnesses do you think that antibiotics are helpful?" (possible responses: 12 different conditions and an open-ended "other" to be completed by the respondent). Commonly used terms to describe infectious conditions were used without providing a particular definition of the term, eg, "strep throat", "sinus cold". Following the physician's assessment, the child's diagnosis and determination of whether an antibiotic was prescribed were recorded.

Analysis:

All data were recorded in Excel (Version Excel 98; Microsoft, USA) and analyzed with SPSS (Version 6.1.1; SPSS, USA). Categorical data were summarized and reported as simple proportions. Continuous data were summarized and reported as means and medians. Differences among groups on categorical variables were tested with the χ2 test or Fisher's exact test. Differences among groups on continuous variables were tested with the unpaired Student's t test and one-way ANOVA.

RESULTS

The survey was conducted from November 1998 to February 1999. The questionnaire was offered to 116 adult caregivers, and 114 (98%) agreed to complete it. Data are presented from questions that were completed by 95% or more of participants. Eighty-seven participants were mothers (76%), 22 were fathers (19%) and five (4%) were other adult caregivers. Throughout the remainder of the present paper, the term parents will be used in place of the term caregiver. Forty-one questionnaires (36%) were completed in the PED, 37 (33%) in the paediatricians' office and 36 (32%) in the walk-in clinic. Characteristics of each group are presented in Table 1. The median age of all presenting children was 39 months (range 0 to 196 months), and 65% were younger than five years of age. At the visit when the questionnaire was completed, 64% of children were diagnosed with an infectious condition, and 23% were prescribed an antibiotic.

TABLE 1.

Demographic characteristics of groups participating in a survey of parents' views on antibiotic use

Study sites
Variable Overall (%) PED (n=41)(%) Office (n=37)(%) Walk-in (n=36)(%) P*
Average age of child (months) 54 34 81 48 <0.001
Average age of parent completing questionnaire (years) 35 31 38 34 <0.001
Two parents in home 88 (79) 28 (70) 29 (81) 31 (86) 0.22
One or more siblings 91 (81) 28 (70) 32 (89) 31 (86) 0.07
Child attends daycare 24 (21) 15 (37) 4 (11) 5 (14) 0.009
Child attends school 39 (34) 6 (15) 22 (60) 11 (31) 0.001
Child previously brought to this location 95 (83) 28 (68) 34 (92) 33 (92) 0.005
Usual setting where child brought for care
PED 22 (20) 17 (47) 2 (5) 3 (9) <0.001
Paediatricians' office 47 (44) 4 (11) 30 (81) 13 (37) <0.001
Paediatric walk-in clinic 17 (16) 0 (0) 0 (0) 17 (48) <0.001
Family physician 11 (10) 10 (28) 1 (3) 0 (0) <0.001
Other 11 (10) 5 (14) 4 (11) 2 (6) 0.52
*

Comparison of paediatric emergency department (PED), group paediatricians' office (Office) and after hours walk-in clinic in group paediatricians' office (Walk-in)(one-way ANOVA for comparison of means and χ2 test for comparison of proportions)

Table 2 summarizes parental beliefs about whether antibiotics are indicated for a variety of specific conditions. There were no differences in responses gathered from each of the three settings for all conditions with more than 10 responses. For conditions with fewer than 10 responses, valid comparisons could not be made. Table 3 summarizes parental concerns about their child taking antibiotics. Parents at the PED were more concerned about side effects than parents seen in the paediatrician's office or walk-in clinic (44%, 19% and 22%, respectively; P=0.04). No other differences were seen among the groups. Again, for conditions with fewer than 10 responses, valid comparisons could not be made.

TABLE 2.

Parental beliefs about indications for antibiotics (n=114)

Condition Number of parents stating that antibiotics are indicated (%)
Ear infections 98 (86)
Urine infections 89 (78)
Pharyngitis/strep throat 88 (77)
Bronchitis 56 (49)
Sinus colds 23 (20)
Cough 14 (12)
Colds 9 (8)
Influenza 9 (8)
Fever 7 (6)
Diarrhea 6 (5)
Asthma 6 (5)
Allergies 2 (2)

Parents were asked to select none, any or all of the above list of conditions from a checklist and so multiple responses were possible

TABLE 3.

Parental concerns about their child taking antibiotics (n=114)

Condition Number of parents stating that antibiotics are indicated (%)
Will cause resistance to antibiotic 58 (50)
May harm child's immunity 45 (40)
Side effects 33 (28)
May not work 22 (19)
May be difficult to give 15 (13)
Cost 6 (5)
None 27 (24)

Parents were asked to select none, any or all of the above list of conditions from a checklist and so multiple responses were possible

Table 4 summarizes the recent history of antibiotic use as well as parental beliefs regarding antibiotic use by their children. No difference in the number of courses of antibiotics was reported for those children attending child care centres compared with those not attending child care centres. Of the 21 parents (18%) who reported that a physician previously prescribed an unnecessary antibiotic for their child, 11 (52%) did not comply with the recommendations.

TABLE 4.

Antibiotic use and parental behaviours and beliefs regarding antibiotic use by their children

Study sites
Variable Overall (%) PED (n=41)(%) Office (n=37)(%) Walk-in (n=36)(%) P*
History of antibiotic use
  ≥1 antibiotic given to child in previous 3 months 39 (36) 13 (32) 13 (37) 13 (36) 0.85
  ≥1 antibiotic given to child in previous year 75 (68) 27 (66) 22 (65) 26 (74) 0.31
  >1 course antibiotic needed to cure previous infection 44 (39) 9 (23) 17 (47) 18 (50) 0.02
  Leftover antibiotic after last course of treatment 21 (20) 8 (22) 4 (11) 9 (26) 0.27
Parental behaviours and beliefs
  Parent gave antibiotic to child before physician visit in past 5 (5) 0 (0) 2 (6) 3 (9) 0.18
  Parent requested antibiotic from physician in past 15 (13) 3 (7) 8 (22) 4 (11) 0.14
  Parent requested specific antibiotic in past 22 (19) 4 (10) 10 (27) 8 (22) 0.13
  Parent believed physician gave unnecessary antibiotic in past 21 (18) 4 (10) 9 (24) 8 (22) 0.20
  Parent did not comply with a prescription from a physician in past 17 (19) 4 (12) 4 (16) 9 (27) 0.24
*

Comparison of paediatric emergency department (PED), group paediatricians' office (Office) and after hours walk-in clinic in group paediatricians' office (Walk-in)(χ2 test)

DISCUSSION

This survey from three different acute care settings found that although parental knowledge of indications for antibiotics and understanding of adverse effects of antibiotics were good, there were some incorrect beliefs. Antibiotic use by children was very common in this population, and many children had required multiple courses of antibiotics to treat a single infection. Not infrequently, parents asked a physician for an antibiotic for their child or had received antibiotic prescriptions that they thought were unnecessary.

Disagreements between parents and physicians about the need for antibiotics may not be verbally acknowledged and addressed during individual visits to acute care settings. Parents have reported being content with the recommendation of their physician whether an antibiotic is prescribed for their child, provided adequate reasoning and reassurance were given (15). Further, a study of adults with respiratory infections found that patients were satisfied with a visit to their physician when their physician took enough time to discuss the illness regardless of whether an antibiotic was prescribed (16). The present survey did not evaluate physician knowledge and attitudes, and did not determine the details of previous disagreements between parents and a physician. However, based on an informal survey of physicians in the PED and the group practice, most had attended continuing education sessions on the topic of appropriate antibiotic use, and a few had taught family physicians on the topic by the time of the study. The amount of self-education by these physicians through reading and consultation with experts is not known. Physicians in both settings provided verbal information to families about appropriate antibiotic use, but written materials on the topic were not provided by either group. Thus, the overall level of physician knowledge about appropriate antibiotic use in these settings was likely quite high.

Some parents believe that antibiotics are useful for conditions where no benefit has been proven, including acute bronchitis and upper respiratory infections (17,18). The findings of the present survey are similar to those reported in other recent studies of parents and adult patients (13,19), and a parent focus group study (15). It is probable that physician antibiotic prescribing practices contribute to misconceptions of parents about appropriate indications for antibiotics. Antibiotics are often prescribed for upper respiratory tract infections, common colds, pharyngitis (without testing for Streptococcus pyogenes) and bronchitis (5,6,20). An adult study found that the strongest predictor of a patient's belief in the effectiveness of antibiotics was previously receiving antibiotics for a similar illness (19).

This survey did not evaluate whether the knowledge of parents about appropriate indications for antibiotics has changed in recent years as public information campaigns have addressed antibiotic overuse in Canada and the number of antibiotic prescriptions has begun to decline. Nor did it address where parents obtain their information about antibiotics. Physicians are clearly important providers of information to patients about indications for antibiotics. However, the importance of other sources of information (eg, lay press) is not yet known.

There were differences among the three study groups. Most notably, there were differences among children from the PED and the other two groups from the group paediatric practice office and the after hours paediatric walk-in clinic operating in the same office. However, the responses to the survey questions by each group were not significantly different for the most part. The small sample size of this survey limited the statistical power to detect some differences among the groups. In addition, because the average age of parents was quite high in all settings and only a small proportion of children were regularly cared for by a family physician, it is possible that the study population is not representative of all Canadian families, thus limiting the generalizability of our results.

CONCLUSIONS

Parents attending different acute care settings have good, but not completely accurate, knowledge and understanding of the indications for antibiotics and their adverse effects. Also, disagreements with physicians about antibiotic use occur frequently. This survey was conducted after the initiation of many local, regional and national programs to promote reduced and judicious use of antibiotics (2,7,8). Such programs have been directed at both health professionals and the general public. However, to date, there is no information about what forms of education have been most effective for each group. Future studies should address where and how parents and health professionals get information about antibiotics use, and how that information influences beliefs and behaviours. This will help focus resources on the most effective interventions to promote and sustain appropriate antibiotic use.

Acknowledgments

We thank the staff of the Alberta Children's Hospital Emergency Department and the Kaleidscope Pediatric Consultants for their assistance and support of this study.

References

  • 1.O'Brien TF. The global epidemic nature of antimicrobial resistance and the need to monitor and manage it locally.Clin Infect Dis 1997;24(Suppl 1):S2-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dowell SF, Marcy SM, Phillips WR, Gerber MA, Schwartz B. Principles of judicious use of antimicrobial agents for pediatric upper respiratory tract infections.Pediatrics 1998;101(Suppl):163-5. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Levy SB. The Antibiotic Paradox: How Miracle Drugs are Destroying the Miracle. New York: Plenum, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Schwartz RH, Freij BJ, Ziai M, Sheridan MJ. Antimicrobial prescribing for acute purulent rhinitis in children: a survey of pediatricians and family practitioners.Pediatr Infect Dis J 1997;16:185-90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pennie RA. Prospective study of antibiotic prescribing for children.Can Fam Physician 1998;44:1850-6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wang EE, Einarson TR, Kellner JD, Conly JM. Antibiotic prescribing for Canadian preschool children: evidence of overprescribing for viral respiratory infections.Clin Infect Dis 1999;29:155-60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Schwartz B. Preventing the spread of antimicrobial resistance among bacterial respiratory pathogens in industrialized countries: the case for judicious antimicrobial use.Clin Infect Dis 1999;28:211-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Controlling antimicrobial resistance: An integrated action plan for Canadians.Can Commun Dis Rep 1997;23(Suppl 7) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.IMS Health Canada, 1999.
  • 10.Austin DJ, Kristinsson KG, Anderson RM. The relationship between the volume of antimicrobial consumption in human communities and the frequency of resistance.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999;96:1152-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Seppala H, Klaukka T, Vuopio-Varkila J, et al. The effect of changes in the consumption of macrolide antibiotics on erythromycin resistance in group A streptococci in Finland. Finnish Study Group for Antimicrobial Resistance.N Engl J Med 1997;337:441-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Brook I, Gober AE. Prophylaxis with amoxicillin or sulfisoxazole for otitis media: Effect on the recovery of Penicillin-resistant bacteria from children.Clin Infect Dis 1996;22:143-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Palmer DA, Bauchner H. Parents' and physicians' views on antibiotics.Pediatrics 1997;99:e6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mangione-Smith R, McGlynn EA, Elliott MN, Krogstad P, Brook RH. The relationship between perceived parental expectations and pediatrician antimicrobial prescribing behaviour.Pediatrics 1999;103:711-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Barden LS, Dowell SF, Schwartz B, Lackey C. Current attitudes regarding use of antimicrobial agents: results from physicians' and parents' focus group discussions.Clin Pediatr 1998;37:665-72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hamm RM, Hicks RJ, Bemben DA. Antibiotics and respiratory infections: are patients more satisfied when expectations are met?J Fam Pract 1996;43:56-62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.O'Brien KL, Dowell SF, Schwartz B, Marcy M, Phillips WR, Gerber MA. Cough illness/bronchitis - Principles of judicious use of antimicrobial agents.Pediatrics 1998;101:178-81. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rosenstein N, Phillips WR, Gerber MA, Marcy SM, Schwartz B, Dowell SF. The common cold - Principles of judicious use of antimicrobial agents.Pediatrics 1998;101:181-4. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mainous AG III, Zoorob RJ, Oler MJ, Haynes DM. Patient knowledge of upper respiratory infections: implications for antibiotic expectations and unnecessary utilization.J Fam Pract 1997;45:75-83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Nyquist AC, Gonzales R, Steiner JF, Sande MA. Antibiotic prescribing for children with colds, upper respiratory tract infections, and bronchitis.JAMA 1998;279:875-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES