Skip to main content
The Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases logoLink to The Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases
. 2002 Jan-Feb;13(1):34–41. doi: 10.1155/2002/492656

The buccale puzzle: The symbiotic nature of endogenous infections of the oral cavity

John Ruby 1, Jean Barbeau 2
PMCID: PMC2094851  PMID: 18159372

Abstract

The indigenous, 'normal', microflora causes the majority of localized infectious diseases of the oral cavity (eg, dental caries, alveolar abscesses, periodontal diseases and candidiasis). The same microflora also protects the host from exogenous pathogens by stimulating a vigorous immune response and provides colonization resistance. How can a microflora that supports health also cause endogenous oral disease? This paradoxical host-symbiont relationship will be discussed within the dynamic of symbiosis.

Symbiosis means 'life together' - it is capable of continuous change as determined by selective pressures of the oral milieu. Mutualistic symbiosis, where both the host and the indigenous microflora benefit from the association, may shift to a parasitic symbiosis, where the host is damaged and the indigenous microflora benefit. Importantly, these are reversible relationships. This microbial dynamism, called amphibiosis, is the essential adaptive process that determines the causation of endogenous oral disease by a parasitic microflora or the maintenance of oral health by a mutualistic microflora.

Complex microbial consortiums, existing as a biofilm, usually provide the interfaces that initiate and perpetuate the infectious assault on host tissue. The ecology of the various oral microhabitats is critical for the development of the appropriate selecting milieux for pathogens. The microbiota associated with dental caries progression is primarily influenced by the prevailing pH, whereas periodontal diseases and pulpal infection appear to be more dependent on redox potential. Candidiasis results from host factors that favour yeast overgrowth or bacterial suppression caused by antibiotics. Oral health or disease is an adventitious event that results from microbial adaptation to prevailing conditions; prevention of endogenous oral disease can occur only when we realize that ecology is the heart of these host-symbiont relationships.

Key Words: Candidiasis, Dental caries, Normal flora, Oral infection, Periodontal diseases, Symbiosis


"Everything is everywhere; but the milieu selects...in nature and in the laboratory." Bass Becking, 1934 (1)

Why does our lifelong infection with the indigenous "normal" microflora of the mouth cause disease? A microflora that is vastly complex and well-adapted to a variety of microenvironments; a consortium of microorganisms composed of over 500 species with the majority still unidentified (2). A microflora we begin to acquire soon after birth, are symbiotically associated with them for life; and then, passed on to the next generation for continuous co-evolution with the host (3,4). A symbiotic microflora, when mutualistic with its host, stimulates a vigorous immune response and provides colonization resistance; both of which protect us from overt pathogens that may cause exogenous infectious disease (5). A microflora that is usually benign and essential for our well-being, yet, a protean microflora that may become parasitic and cause a variety of infectious oral diseases, e.g., dental caries, pulpal infections, periodontal diseases and mucocutaneous candidiasis (6). How can the same microflora that supports health also cause endogenous disease? This is the buccale puzzle.

The key to unraveling this puzzle will be to define the dynamic process intrinsic to relationships between the host and microbial symbionts of the oral cavity. This dynamic is symbiosis or "life together". Once established, stable climax microbial communities are uniquely ours for a lifetime. They are associated intimately with the host and are in continuous flux because they adapt to the selective pressures of the oral milieu. Microbial adaptation in the human ecosystem will be viewed as an amphibiotic response. An amphibiont is an organism with "a spectral position between probiosis and pathogenicity" as defined by Theodor Rosebury (7). Because endogenous disease is caused by heterogeneous microbial populations within biofilms, amphibiosis will be viewed as a process of change caused by microbial consortiums as a whole. Amphibiosis is the essential process that determines the causation of endogenous infectious disease by a parasitic microflora or the maintenance of oral health by a mutualistic microflora, and is congruent with the 'ecological plaque hypothesis' proposed by Philip Marsh (8). This is the cognitive framework that facilitates our understanding of ecological relationships involving complex communities of microorganisms as they interact with the host, that results in either health or disease - the key to the buccale puzzle.

SYMBIOSIS

The etymology of symbiosis is from the Greek meaning 'living together'. The term was introduced into biology in 1878 by Anton de Bary and defined as "the living together of unlike organisms" (9). In 1876, Pierre-Joesph van Beneden, in his book Animal Parasites and Messmates, discussed the terms 'parasitism', 'commensalism', and 'mutalism' within the context of symbiosis. He wrote: the parasite "is he whose profession is to live at the expense of his neighbor, and whose only employment consists in taking advantage of him, but prudently, so as not to endanger his life"; the commensal "is he who is received at the table of his neighbor to partake with him of the produce of his day's fishing...the messmate does not live at the expense of his host; all that he desires is a home or his friend's superfluities," and the "mutualists are animals which live on each other, without being either parasites or messmates...some render each other mutual services..." (9). Current definitions support the ideas of these early biologists. Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary, 29th edition (10), defines symbiosis as

...the living together or close association of two dissimilar organisms, each of the organisms being known as a symbiont. The association may be beneficial to both (mutualism), beneficial to one without effect on the other (commensalism), beneficial to one and detrimental to the other (parasitism)...

Stanier et al, in The Microbial World (11) embrace this definition and go on, importantly, to suggest that the character of the symbiosis is subject to change, depending on environmental conditions.

In mutalistic symbiosis both partners benefit from the association; in parasitic symbiosis one partner benefits, but the second gains nothing and often suffers more or less severe damage...the nature of a particular symbiosis can shift under changing environmental conditions, so that a relationship that starts out as mutualistic may become parasitic, or vice versa (11).

Symbiosis is a dynamic state capable of change, and this dynamism is called amphibiosis.

Symbiosis has also been defined more narrowly as mutualism or a close association bringing benefit to both the host and symbiont. In Jan Sapp's Evolution by Association (9), he attributes symbiosis being equated with mutualism as in 19th century sociopolitical thought. In response to social Darwinism, symbiosis was given a beneficial denotation and evolved into mutualism (9). It is critical the original concept of symbiosis (living together) be maintained. The language used for investigations of indigenous microbial populations interacting with host surfaces must be clear and have a consensus of understanding among investigators. Defining symbiosis solely as mutualism is restrictive and limits our use of language. Therefore, to truly understand this phenomenon, symbiosis must maintain its intended meaning-that of life together. Clear knowledge of this term is an essential first step to understand the infinite possibilities that characterize the dynamic nature of host-symbiont interactions.

DENTAL CARIES

Dental caries is a localized, progressive decay of teeth, initiated by demineralization of the outer surface of the tooth due to organic acids produced locally by bacteria that ferment deposits of dietary carbohydrates. With progressive loss of tooth mineral and secondary destruction of tooth protein by continued bacterial action, cavities form which, if untreated, extend and destroy most of the tooth, often leading to serious infection of the surrounding tissues...The development of caries requires critical relationships between tooth surface, oral microbiota and dietary carbohydrate (12).

The tooth is a unique anatomical tissue. Crown emamel and root cementum are nonshedding surfaces. Once teeth erupt into the oral cavity they are immediately coated with salivary glycoproteins which act as a substrate for subsequent colonization by microorganisms. The growth and coaggregation of microbes on the surfaces of teeth result in the development of an adherent biofilm, otherwise known as dental plaque (13). Plaque has a propensity to accumulate in retentive tooth areas that are free of shear forces generated by the oral musculature or dental mastication, (eg, occlusal pits and fissures, approximal contacts, the gingival area surrounding the tooth and interfaces between fillings and surface enamel). Dental plaque is required for the formation of dental caries (14). However, dental caries is a conditional disease in that fermentable carbohydrates, primarily sucrose, are necessary for the formation of lactic acid (15). Lactic acid is the endproduct of glycolytic bacterial metabolism. When a pH of less than 5.5 is reached, surface demineralization usually occurs with eventual cavitation. The the mutans streptococci (Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sobrinus) and lactobacilli are the primary etiologic agents of dental caries.Actinomyces species are also involved in root surface caries (16,17). Oral cavities with healthy dentitions usually have decreased numbers of mutans streptococci in plaque deposits and low lactobacilli counts in saliva, and high counts of Streptococcus sanguinis (18). Reduced salivary flow and increased frequency of sugar consumption both appear to be major contributors to the carious process. Reduced salivary flow results in increased fermentable carbohydrate retention, loss of fermentable substrate dilution and a diminished buffer capacity intrinsic to saliva, all of which lead to low pH conditions within the plaque. Sucrose is selective for the establishment of cariogenic microorganisms (19). The intermittent consumption of sucrose in people's diets sets up an enrichment culture within the oral cavity for the selection of chemoorganotrophic microorganisms that have evolved efficient metabolic pathways for energy production and storage during feast or famine conditions. Dental caries can, therefore be viewed as a microbial adaptation to high energy fluxes occurring in the oral cavity. Lactic acid bacteria are microorganisms that have evolved physiological machinery to compete efficiently under these conditions (20).

The capacity of lactic acid bacteria to produce [acidogenic] and tolerate [aciduric] a relatively high concentration of lactic acid is of great selective value, since it enables them to eliminate competition from most other bacteria in environments that are rich in nutrients. This is shown by the fact that lactic acid bacteria can be readily enriched from natural sources through the use of complex media with a high sugar content. Such media, of course, support the growth for many other chemoorganotrophic bacteria, but the competing organisms are almost completely eliminated as growth proceeds by the accumulation of lactic acid, formed through the metabolic activity of the lactic acid bacteria (11).

Mutans streptococci and lactobacilli are both acidogenic and aciduric; their ability to thrive under low pH acid conditions in times of sucrose availability gives them a selective advantage over oral bacteria that are not acid tolerant (21). Although mutans streptococci and lactobacilli share the foregoing physiology belonging the lactic acid bacteria, they also have other characteristics that demonstrate further their highly specialized adaptation to environments where carbohydrate availability is in continuous flux. The synthesis of intracellular iodophilic polysaccharide (IPS) in times of carbohydrate excess, with later utilization of these storage compounds during energy deprivation, illustrates how these microorganisms have developed the enzymatic capability to survive under these special conditions of unbalanced growth. Extracellular reserve polymers in the form of fructans are degraded by mutans streptococci and may have a role similar to IPS (15). The affinity of mutans streptococci to colonize the dentition is enhanced in the presence of sucrose; this appears to be due to the synthesis of extracellular glucans from sucrose by glucosyltransferases. Glucans function as a matrix for mutans streptococci accumulation in dental plaque. Moreover, glucans produce a biofilm with lower cell density resulting in the rapid uptake of sucrose and concomitant acid production (15). In addition S. mutans have developed a high affinity transport system for sugar uptake during carbohydrate limiting conditions. The phosphoenolpyruvate phosphotransferase system (PEP-PTS) could provide relevant selective advantages (22).

The ability of S. mutans and other facultative anaerobes to persist in the oral environment is at least partly due to their ability to extract energy for biosynthesis from a wide variety of carbohydrates present in the diet of the host...the PEP-PTS offers several important physiological advantages to such microorganisms, which live in ecological niches where environmental conditions are such that the energy source for biosynthesis and growth is widely varied and fluctuates rapidly. These advantages are as follows: (i) By tightly coupling sugar transport with its subsequent metabolism, the rates of both processes become interdependent, enabling fine control and rapid adaptation to changing environmental conditions. (ii) If conditions change so that the energy source becomes limited (as in the oral cavity during fasting), the energy-generating system allows for conservation of ATP because the intracellular transport product is a sugar phosphate that can enter metabolic pathways without further expenditure of energy. (iii) For microorganisms that synthesize and store IPS, PEP-PTS participates in three metabolic systems: transport, glycolysis, and IPS synthesis. By linking catabolism of sugar with biosynthesis of IPS, PEP-PTS acts as an interlocking metabolic key that enables the cell to tune its overall physiology to a changing environment (23).

The continued exposure of the oral cavity to sucrose fluxes would select microorganisms (mutans streptococci and lactobacilli) that have evolved enzyme systems that permit them to function and, therefore, to compete efficiently under these unbalanced growth conditions, and dental caries would be the adventitious result. Americans on average consume approximately 1 kg of sugar weekly (24). This dietary pressure may affect selective changes in environmental conditions that, in turn, alter the symbiotic nature of the plaque microflora from a state of mutualism to one of parasitism under these rather special conditions of unbalanced growth. Cariogenicity would be a manifistation of an amhibiotic shift (20).

PULPAL INFECTION

The dental pulp, a vascularized connective tissue lined with odontoblasts, is housed within the tooth and is quite vulnerable to bacterial insult. Pulp tissue exposed to oral bacteria either through trauma or deep dental caries invariably becomes infected and abscessed. Pulpal infections are usually endogenous infections that are caused by a mixture of obligate anaerobes that rely on serum and pulp tissue as their primary source of nutrients. As a result these microorganisms tend to be proteolytic and ferment peptides and amino acids for their energy requirements. A low redox potential (Eh), or the ratio of oxidized components to reduced components in a system, results from continued anaerobic metabolism of degraded proteins within a closed pulp chamber. The infected root canal's low Eh environment of the selects for a restricted group of anaerobic microorganisms that are capable of progressive protein degradation and extensive amino acid fermentation. These microorganisms primarily consists of Bacteroides species, Porphyromonas endodontalis, Eubacterium species, Fusobacterium nucleatum and Peptostreptococcus micros. The exposure of the dental pulp to the indigenous oral microflora results in a parasitic symbiosis causing pulpal necrosis and alveolar abscess formation that may potentially endanger the host (25,26).

PERIODONTAL DISEASES

Inflammatory diseases of the periodontium are caused by the indigenous microflora living in the gingival sulcus or periodontal pocket between the tooth and the non-keratinized gingival sulcular epithelium. During active disease, microbial populations approach 1011 organisms/gram wet weight of plaque biofilm, with more than 500 species present. Germ-free animals do not have inflammatory periodontal disease, and the use of antibiotics is therapeutic for the clinical management of periodontal infections. Both of these facts indicate that bacteria are the primary etiologic agents (27). The complexity of host-symbiont relationships in periodontal diseases is daunting. The oral host defenses are essential for well-being, however, they may also contribute to pathogenesis. The host response is in a delicate balance of co-recoginition with their microbial neighbors that live on the other side of the sulcular epithelium. Immune surveillance and the inflammatory response are fundamental host components involved in the regulation of periodontal disease progression, and refer to comprehensive reviews on the subject (28,29).

The microflora found in the healthy gingival sulcus are usually Gram positive, facultative anaerobes primarily composed of Streptococcus anginosus and Actinomyces naeslundii (30). If dental plaque is permitted to accumulate with the curtailment of oral hygiene, Gram-negative species, along with motile forms, increase proportionally with the severity of gingival inflammation (31). The onset of gingivitis results in greater species diversity and the emergence of obligate anaerobes that include spirochetes, Fusobacterium nucleatum and Bacteroides species (32,33). The progression to advanced periodontitis, with the formation of deep periodontal pockets and loss of alveolar bone is associated with Porphyphomonas gingivalis, Bacteroides forsythus and Treponema denticola (the so-called 'red complex') (34). As gingival inflammation intensifies, there is an increase in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) flow (35), and a lowering of Eh, both of which indicate a transition to a highly anaerobic environment. The mean Eh for a healthy gingival sulcus is +73 mV, whereas the mean Eh for a periodontal pocket is -48 mV (36). Compared to supragingival plaque that is exposed to dietary carbohydrates, subgingival plaque is primarily an asaccrolytic, proteolytic microflora (37). Bleeding that is associated with gingival inflammation releases red blood cells into sulcular environment where they may be lysed by bacterial hemolysins (38). The availability of iron in the form of heme (39), and GCF, a rich source of serum protein, would be highly selective for proteolytic microorganisms (40). Laboratory studies by ter Steeg and van der Hoeven (41) looked at the changes in subgingival bacteria when they were enriched on human serum. The prolonged growth of subgingival consortiums in a chemostat led to the enrichment of proteolytic microorganisms that were characterized by their progressive protein degradation and extensive amino acid fermentation. The proportional increase of Peptostreptococcus micros, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Eubacterium brachy and T denticola reflected the changes occurring in the subgingival microflora during the natural history of gingivitis (41).

The subgingival microflora is a highly interactive microbial community capable of synergistic catabolism within this food web of endogenous nutrients. Sequential reduction in redox potential occurs by the autogenic succession of microbes (42). For example, aerotolerant facultative anaerobes initially reduce available oxygen, a highly reactive electron acceptor. As the syntrophic metabolic activity of these anaerobic consortiums continues, heterotrophic compounds would be reduced to acetate, butyrate, ethanol, formate, lactate, propionate and succinate, each creating a niche for continued anaerobic respiration (43). The reduction of these fermentative end products leads to methane production by methanogenic bacteria at the bottom of the energy sink. Methanogenic archaebacteria have been isolated from dental plaque (44). Concomitantly, there would be a drop in Eh as the ratio of reduced to oxidized products increases, making Eh a primary selective pressure in the subgingival microenvironment (45).

Physiological cleansing of the gingival sulcus by GCF is essential for maintaining periodontal health. Stagnation of GCF and the retention of anaerobic microbial communities appear to be significant determinants in the pathogenesis of periodontal diseases. The accumulation of dental plaque biofilm resulting from soft diets, poor oral hygiene, orthodontic bands, restorations with overhanging margins, calculus or foreign objects lodged in the gingival sulcus may lead to an enhanced inflammatory response due to allogenic change (5,46). The selection and propagation of proteolytic anaerobes are key events in the cascading reduction of heterotropic compounds that leads to anaerobiasis, and is driven by microbial syntrophy. The lowering of Eh causes an ampibiotic shift from a mutualistic symbiosis to parasitic symbiosis. In addition, enhanced virulence expression could occur within the subgingival microflora as Eh levels fall (47,48). P gingivalis demonstrated increased hemagglutination and Arg-gingipain activity at a low redox potential (49). Modulation of virulence could be directly affected by Eh levels. The therapeutic use of methylene blue, which potentially elevates the redox potential in the subgingival environment, has been utilized in the management of periodontal disease. Shifts in microbial composition from Gram-negative, motile anaerobes to Gram-positive, non-motile facultative anaerobes along with improvement in periodontal health suggest that Eh is an important environmental derteminent for the selection of a mutualistic microflora (50,51). Furthermore, cigarette smoking lowers the Eh in the subgingival environment and could, therefore, select for a parasititc microflora (52); cigarette smoking is a significant predisposing environmental factor in the pathogenesis of periodontal disease (53).

The selection of a parasitic microflora is essential for disease initiation, however, the host response is central to pathogenesis. Impairment of immune function or aberration of the inflammatory response could exacerbate pre-existing periodontal infections or result in unique syndromes. Periodontitis is an endogenous infection with a polymicrobial etiology; the host response could account for the varied manifestations of this pandemic disease (54).

CANDIDIASIS

Colonization of oral tissues and prostheses by yeasts

The oral cavity presents a number of surfaces for Candida adhesion. These surfaces include epithelial cells, inert polymers of dentures, orthodontic appliances, teeth and oral bacteria. Yeasts are normal inhabitants of the oral ecosystem. Although Candida albicans has been identified as the major representative of the yeast community other species of yeast or fungi may be present : Candida dubliniensis, Candida glabrata, Candida tropicalis, Candida krusei, Candida parapsilosis Trichosporon capitum and Cryptococcus neoformans. The presence of yeasts, per se is not an indication of infection or disease. C albicans is detected in 20% of healthy individuals. The carriage rate may reach more than 40% in hospitalized individuals, which points at an exogeneous, nosocomial acquisition of the yeasts. The carriage rate of Candida species rises under certain conditions: broad spectrum antibiotic therapy, xerostomia, immunosuppressive therapy, use of steroids in inhalers, diseases like AIDS and the introduction of dentures or certain orthodontic appliances into the oral ecosystem. Colonization of the oral cavity by Candida species was defined by Cannon (55) as the acquisition and maintenance of a stable population of yeast cells which does not give rise to clinical disease. If the rate of removal is greater than that of acquisition and growth, clearance will take place. If the rate is lower and there is tissue damage, it will lead to candidiasis (55).

Denture-related stomatitis and the significance of oral biofilms

Denture-related stomatitis is a common condition among wearers of complete dentures. It typically develops on the upper maxilla of denture wearers (30% to 75%) and in young patients who wear palate expansion appliances, orthodontic appliances, and partial or complete dentures . It can result in minor (Newton Type I) to severe (Newton Type II) inflammation, and may cause irreversible hyperplasia (Newton Type III). Although generally not painful, stomatitis can cause enough discomfort to force patients to remove their dentures. This can have an impact on eating habits and morbidity and the success or failure of orthodontic treatments. The etiology of denture stomatitis is complex and multifactorial; however, it shows a strong association with the opportunistic yeast, C albicans.

Denture plaque formation is now thought to be a trigger of the inflammatory process or can offer a suitable field for the colonization by opportunistic yeasts. In plaque, microorganisms organize into complex structures that reach equilibrium for a given environment or maximize their growth and resistance potential by taking advantage of other microorganisms and the surrounding environment. These structures, called biofilms, are functionally, organized assemblies of microorganisms encased in an extracellular matrix composed mainly of polysaccharides. This microbial community adheres strongly to the denture where it thrives on nutrients provided by the oral ecosystem. The intrinsic properties of denture plaque make it an important microbial reservoir, which can lead to persistent and recurrent infections in denture wearers. It has been shown that C albicans can form biofilm in pure culture. Microorganisms growing in biofilms are better able to resist assaults from the surrounding environment. Denture biofilms are hard to remove or control and it is thought that some yet unidentified factors may allow the transformation of 'healthy' plaque toward a pathogenic microbial community which may be responsible for at least three health-related problems: induction of inflammatory lesions and stomatitis or mucosal infections; oral colonization by endogenous and exogenous opportunistic pathogens and cross contamination; systemic diseases and remote infections.

The difficulty that pathogenic or opportunistic species, including yeats, experience in colonizing oral ecosystems may, on the one hand, be related to: interbacterial competition for available space and nutrients; the absence of ligands (adhesins) that allow atypical pathogens to adhere to surfaces; the production of bacteriocins by oral bacteria; the production of surfactants by certain bacteria; and host defense mechanisms. On the other hand, proteolytic bacteria in dental or denture plaque may promote colonization by atypical pathogens by degrading fibronectin on oral surfaces (56,57). In addition, synthetic materials, (eg, acrylic) implanted in the mouth may offer suitable surfaces for colonization by some pathogens (58,59).

The very high prevalence of C albicans in people who wear dentures (85%), while only 20% of people who do not wear dentures are infected with C albicans, is evidence for the selective pressure of dentures within the oral cavity (60). The literature shows that C albicans colonizes dentures much more frequently than the mucosa in contact with the denture. Even though the proportion of C albicans in plaque on dentures increases up to 100- fold in stomatitis patients, the yeast population represents less than 1% of the cultivable microbial population isolated from dentures. Preliminary studies with young people who wear partial or complete dentures, palate expansion appliances, or orthodontic appliances (Hawley type) indicate that C albicans is just as prevalent in this population. Although C albicans is mainly associated with stomatitis, it is a major opportunistic pathogen that is increasingly involved in serious nosocomial infections (septicemia and pneumonia).

Oral biofilms under the influence of selection forces

As mentioned previously, the presence of C albicans is strongly associated with denture stomatitis; however, the exact role of the yeast in the inflammatory process is still unknown. C albicans does not penetrate the mucosa, thus it may exert its effects by releasing virulence factors like the aspartyl proteases (SAPs)(61). It has been proposed that C albicans does not act alone and that other oral microorganisms may contribute to the disease induction and progression. In this regard, denture plaque may be implicated since it is known that C albicans will colonize acrylic more easily if oral streptococci (S. mutans, Streptococcus gordonii, S. sanguinis, Streptococcus salivarius) are already present (62). C albicans' SAPs may be induced in a low pH environment. If denture plaque reacts like dental plaque it is likely that sugar will cause production of acid. Mannoproteins present on the surface of C albicans may possess immunomodulatory properties (63), and these molecules along with other biofilm exopolymers may induce inflammation.

Oral biofilm formation is under the control of different factors that exert both negative and positive selection on the microbial flora. An imbalance in one or many of these factors may have a major influence on the composition of microbial communities and may result in the transition from a 'healthy' plaque to a pathogenic plaque. One of these factors is Beta-defensin. Beta-defensin is an antimicrobial peptide produced by epithelial cells of a variety of tissues including oral mucosa (64), and has a wide spectrum, acting on Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Human beta-defensin-1 is constitutive and it serves as a local defense system, possibly to control the local microbial flora. Beta-defensin-2 is also produced by epithelial cells, but its production is induced during inflammation (65). The production is very localized. Beta-defensins may act locally, similar to antibiotics. It is thus possible that the presence of beta-defensin (h-BD2) pertubates the flora in a localized manner and favors the establishment of C albicans. The possibilty that inflammation may precede the colonization by C albicans has been proposed Budtz- Jorgenson and Bertram (66).

CONCLUSIONS

We acquire an autochthonous indigenous microflora that is with us for life. A microflora uniquely ours, difficult to change or replace with probiotics, and of vast complexity with numbers reaching 1014/ individual body surface (67). Beginning immediately after birth and continuing, the microflora from our mother or other intimate contacts are transmitted to the surfaces of our bodies (68). Over time they evolve into mature complex ecosystems that form stable, yet protean, host-symbiont relationships with the host (69). These climax microbial communities become physiologically and genetically diverse as they adapt to the constantly changing environments of our body surfaces (70,71). Moreover, they are homeostatic systems that exist in a state of physiological equilibrium in both health and disease.

The established microbial consortiums of the oral cavity colonize or infect a variety of microhabitats; collectively they contain a composite of all the necessary microorganisms for either localized health or endogenous disease (72). They are continuously bathed in saliva and subjected to the oral functions of mastication and swallowing. The flow and mixing of saliva facilitates microbial dispersion throughout the oral cavity. Microbial availability enriches the selection processes, and promotes diversity among the myriad of ecohabitats within the oral cavity. The indigenous microflora is capable of engendering health or causing endogenous disease, as determined by the microbial populations selected for by the oral milieu (73).

Oral health or disease is an adventitious event that results from microbial adaptation to the prevailing conditions of the moment. The clinician's intervention for the prevention of endogenous disease can occur only when we realize that ecology is the heart of these host-symbiont relationships. Understanding the processes of change that result in early childhood caries, chronic periodontal diseases, candidiasis or pulpal infections will enable the development of holistic strategies for their prevention. We need to know how to select for the appropriate oral microbes that result in health rather than disease. This will occur only when we look at amphibiosis from an ecological perspective.

References

  • 1.Leadbetter ER. Prokaryotic diversity: form, ecophysiology, and habitat. In: Hurst, CJ, Knudsen GR, McInerney MJ, Stetzenbach LD, Walter MV, eds. Manual of Environmental Microbiology,Washington DC: ASM, 1997:14-24. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Paster BC, Boches SK, Galvin JL, et al. Bacterial diversity in human subgingival plaque.J Bacteriol 2001;183:3770-83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Caufield PW. Dental caries - a transmissible and infectious disease revisited: a position paper.Pediatr Dent 1997;19:491-98. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Socransky SS, Manganiello SD. The oral microbiota from birth to senility.J Periodont 1971;42:485-94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Marsh P, Martin M. Oral Microbiology. 4th edn.Oxford, England: Wright, 1999 [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Loesche W. Ecology of the oral flora. In: Newman MG, Nisengard R, eds. Microbiology and Immunology,Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Co, 1994:307-14. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rosebury T. Microorganisms Indigenous To Man.New York: McGraw Hill Book Co. 1962. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Marsh PD. Microbial ecology of dental plaque and its significance in health and disease.Adv Dent Res 1994;8:263-71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sapp J. Evolution by Association.New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dorland I,Newman WA. Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary, 29th edn.Philadelphia:W.B. Saunders Co, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Stanier RY, Ingraham JL, Wheelis ML, Painter PR. The Microbial World.Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall Co. 1986. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Scherp H. Dental caries: prospects for prevention.Science 1971;73:1199-203. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kolenbrander P.Oral microbial communities: biofilm, interactions, and genetic systems.Annu Rev Microbiol 2000;54:413-37 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Loesche W. Role of Streptococcus mutans in human dental decay.Microbiol Rev 1986;50:353-80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Liljemark WF, Bloomquist. Human oral microbial ecology and dental caries and periodontal diseases.Crit Rev Biol Med 1996;7:180-98 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.van Houte J. Role of micro-organisms in caries etiology.J Dent Res 1994;73:672-81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Brailsford SR, Shah B, Simons D, et al. The predominant aciduric microflora of root-caries lesions.J Dent Res 2001;80:1828-33 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.De Stoppelaar JD, van Houte J, Backer Dirks O. The effect of carbohydrate restriction on the presence of Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sanguis and iodophilic polysaccharide-producing bacteria in human dental plaque.Caries Res 1970;4:114-23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.van Palenstein Helderman WH, Matee MIN, van der Hoeven JS, Mikx FHM. Cariogenicity depends more on diet than the prevailing mutans streptococcal species.J Dent Res 1996;75:535-45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ruby JD, Goldner M, Hargreaves JA. Streptococcus mutans: an assessment of its physiological potential inrelation to dental caires.Rev Can Biol 1978;37:273-90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Burne RA. Oral streptococci... products of their environment.J Dent Res 1998;77:445-52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hamilton IR. Ecological basis of dental caries. In: Kuramitsu HK, Ellen RP, eds.Oral Bacterial Ecology, Norfolk, England: Horrizon Scientific Press, 2000:219-274. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Calmes RB. Involvement of phosphoenolpyruvate in the catabolism of caries-conducive disaccharides by Streptococcus mutans: lactose transport.Infect Immun 1978;19:934-41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Nordsiek FW. The sweet tooth.Am Scientist 1972;60:41-5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bartlett JG, Gorbach SL. Anaerobic infections of the head and neck. In: Roth GI, Calmes RB, eds.Oral Biology, St. Louis, C.V. Mosby Co, 1981:401-28. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sundqvist G. Ecology of the root canal.J Endodont 1992;9:427-30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Socransky SS. Relationship of bacteria to the etiology of periodontal disease.J Dent Res 1970;49:203-18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Darveau R. Oral innate host defense responses: interactions with microbial communities and their role in the development of disease. In: Kuramitsu HK, Ellen RP, eds.Oral Bacterial Ecology, Norfolk, England: Horrizon Scientific Press, 2000:169-218. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Genco RJ. Host resonses in periodontal diseases: current concepts.J Periodont 1992;63:338-55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Marsh P. Oral ecology and its impact on microbial diversity. In: Kuramitsu HK, Ellen RP, eds.Oral Bacterial Ecology, Norfolk, England: Horrizon Scientific Press, 2000:11-65. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Loe H, Theilade E, Jensen S. Experimental gingivitis in man.J Periodont 1965;36:177-87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Moore WEC. Microbiology of periodontal diseases.J Periodont Res 1987;22:335-41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Moore WEC, Moore LVH. The bacteria of periodontal diseases.Periodont 2000 1994;5:66-77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Socransky SS, Haffajee AD, Cugini MA, Smith C, Kent Jr RL. Microbial complexes in subgingival plaque.J Clin Periodont 1998;25:134-44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lamster IB, Hartley LJ, Vogel RI. Development of a biochemical profile for gingival crevicular fluid.J Periodont 1985;56:S13-21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kenney EB, Ash MM. Oxidation reduction potential of developing plaque, periodontal pockets and gingival sulci.J Periodont 1969;40:630-33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bloomquist CG, Liljemark WF. Dental plaque. In: Nataro JP, Blaser MJ, Cunningham-Rundles, eds.Persistent Bacterial Infections, Washington: ASM, 2000:409-422. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Grenier D. Characteristics of hemolytic and hemagglutinating activities of Treponema denticola.Oral Microbiol Immunol 1991;6:246-49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Mukherjee S. The role of crevicular fluid iron in periodontal disease.J Periodont 1985;56:22-27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Genco CA, Dixon DW. Emerging strategies in microbial haem capture.Mol Microbiol 2001;39:1-11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.ter Steeg PF, van der Hoeven JS. Development of periodontal microflora on human serum.Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease 1989;2:1-10. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Grenier D, Mayrand D. Periodontitis as an ecological imbalance. In: Kuramitsu HK, Ellen RP, eds. Oral Bacterial Ecology Norfolk, England: Horrizon Scientific Press, 2000:275-310. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Shah NH, Gharbia SE. Oral and dental disease. The biochemical milieu of the host in the selection of anaerobic species of the oral cavity.Clin Infect Dis 1995;20:S291-300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Belay N, Johnson R, Rajagopal B, Conway de Macario E, Daniels L. Methanogenic bacteria from human dental plaque.Appl Environ Microbiol 1988;54:600-03. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Goldner M. The biological aspects of oral pathogenicity.J Hygeine Epidem Microbiol Immunol 1981;25:431-8 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Newman HN. Plaque and chronic inflammatory periodontal disease.J Clin Periodont 1990;17:533-41 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Marett D, Lacey B, Goldner M. Microbial pathogenesis: an energetic interpretation.Speculations Sci Tech 1994;17:301-07. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Goldner M. Virulence modulon theory of pathogenicity.Acta Biotheoretica 1997;45:81-85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Leke N, Grenier D, Goldner M, Mayrand D. Effects of hydrogen peroxide on growth and selective properties of Poryphymonas gingivalis.FEMS Microbiol Lett 1999;174:347-53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Wilson M, Gibson M, Strahan D, Harvey W. A preliminary evaluation of the use of a redox agent in the treatment of chronic periodontitis.J Periodont Res 1992;27:522-27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Ower PC, Ciantar M, Newman HN, Wilson M, Bulman JS. The effects of chronic periodontitis of a subgingivally-placed redox agent in a slow release device.J Clin Periodont 1995;22:494-500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kenny EB, Saxe SR, Bowles RD. The effect of cigarette smoking on anaerobiosis in the oral cavity.J Periodont 1975;46:82-85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Zambon JJ, Grossi SG, Machtei EE, Ho AW, Dunford R, Genco RJ. Cigarette smoking increases the risk for subgingival infection with periodontal pathogens.J Periodont1996;67:1050-54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Darveau RP, Tanner A, Page, RC. The microbial challenge in periodontitis.Periodont 2000 1997;14:12-32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Cannon, RD, Chaffin WL. Oral colonization by Candida albicans.Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1999;10:359-83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Wilkström M, Linde A. Ability of oral bacteria to degrade fibronectin.Infect Immun 1986;51:707-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Childs WC, Gibbons RJ. Selective modulation of bacterial attachment to oral epithelial cells by enzyme activities associated with poor oral hygiene.J Periodont 1990;25:172-78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Cunliffe D, Smart CA, Alexander C, Vulfson EN. Bacterial adhesion at synthetic surfaces.Appl Environ Microbiol 1999;65:4995-5002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Edgerton M, Scannapieco FA, Reddy MS, Levine MJ. Human submandibular-sublingual saliva promotes adhesion of Candida albicans to polymethylmethacrylate.Infect Immun 1993;61:2644-52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Cannon RD, Chaffin WL. Oral colonization by Canida albicans.Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1999;10:359-83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Naglik JR, Newport G, White TC, et al. In vivo analysis of secreted aspartyl proteinase expression in human oral candidiasis.Infec Immun 1999;67:2482-2490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Fellermann K, Stange EF. Defensins - innate immunity at the epithelial frontier.Eur J Gastroenter Hepatol 2001;13:771-76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Pietrella D, Cherniak R, Strappini C, et al. A. Role of mannoprotein in induction and regulation of immunity to Cryptococcus neoformans.Infect Immun 2001;69:2808-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Mathews M, Jia HP, Guthmiller JM, et al. Production of beta-defensin antimicrobial peptides by the oral mucosa and salivary glands.Infec Immun 1999;67:2740-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Schonwetter BS, Stolzenberg ED, Zasloff MA. Epithelial antibiotics induced at sites of inflammation.Science 1995;267:1645-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Budtz-Jorgensen E, Bertram U. Denture stomatitis I. The etiology is relation to trauma and infection.Acta Odontol Scand 1970;28:61-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Henderson B, Wilson M. Commensal communism and the oral cavity.J Dent Res 1998;77:1674-83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Bettelheim KA. The natural history and ecology of commensal human flora. In: Nataro JP, Blaser MJ, Cunningham-Rundles, eds. Persistent Bacterial Infections, Washington: ASM, 2000:101-14. [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Wold AE, Adlerberth I. Pathological consequences of commensalism. In: Nataro JP, Blaser MJ, Cunningham-Rundles, eds.Persistent Bacterial Infections, Washington: ASM, 2000:115-44. [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Kilian M. Clonal basis of bacterial virulence. In: Guggenheim B, Shapiro S, eds.Oral Biology at the Turn of the Century, Basel: Karger, 1988:131-42. [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Bowden GHW. Oral biofilm an archive of past events? In: Newman H, Wilson M, eds. Dental Plaque Revisited: Oral Biofilm in Health and Disease.Cardiff: Bioline Publishing, 1999:211-35. [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Tanner ACR, Milgrom PM, Kent R Jr, et al. The microbiota of young children from tooth and tongue samples.J Dent Res 2002;81:53-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Marcotte H Lavoie MC. Oral microbial ecology and the role of salivary immunoglobulin A.Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 1998;62:71-109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES