Skip to main content
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases logoLink to Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
. 2007 Nov;66(Suppl 3):iii2–iii22. doi: 10.1136/ard.2007.081430

Updated consensus statement on biological agents for the treatment of rheumatic diseases, 2007

D E Furst 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14, F C Breedveld 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14, J R Kalden 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14, J S Smolen 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14, G R Burmester 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14, J Sieper 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14, P Emery 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14, E C Keystone 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14, M H Schiff 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14, P Mease 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14, P L C M van Riel 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14, R Fleischmann 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14, M H Weisman 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14, M E Weinblatt 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14
PMCID: PMC2095281  PMID: 17934088

As in previous years, the consensus group to consider the use of biological agents was constituted by rheumatologists from the universities of Erlangen, Leiden and Vienna in Europe in cooperation with other universities in the USA, Canada and Europe. Pharmaceutical industry support was obtained from a number of companies, but these companies had no part in the decisions regarding the specific programme or about the academic participants at this conference. These sponsors participated in the initial small breakout groups with emphasis on supplying factual information. The companies, on the other hand, had no part in the larger, final consensus group or in the final consensus statement.

The perspective of this consensus is from the treating physician's point of view.

The 160 rheumatologists and bioscientists who attended the consensus conference were chosen from a worldwide group of physicians and other scientists from 21 countries, with expertise in the use of biological agents for the treatment of rheumatic diseases. The number of attendees and participants was limited so that not everyone who might have been interested could be invited.

Based on the new data regarding TNF blocking agents, B cell‐specific agents & IL1rα, an update of the previous consensus statement is appropriate.1 The consensus statement is annotated to document the credibility of the data supporting it as much as possible. This annotation is that of Shekelle et al. and is described in an appendix.2 We have modified the Shekelle annotation by designating all abstracts as “Category D evidence”, whether they describe well‐controlled trials or not, based on a need to be able to describe details of the studies and results. As the number of possible references has become so large, reviews are sometimes used and, if they contain Category A references, will be referred to as Category A evidence. All participants reviewed relevant clinical published articles relating to tumour necrosis factor (TNF) and interleukin (IL) 1 blocking agents, and abatacept and rituximab. They were given a draft consensus statement and were asked to revise the document in small discussion groups; open discussion of the revisions led to a final document, representing this updated consensus statement.

General statements

Individual patients differ in the aggressiveness of their disease and its concomitant structural damage, the effect of their disease on their quality of life, and the symptoms and signs engendered by their disease. They also differ in their susceptibility to, and expression of, side effects to drugs. All these factors must be examined when considering biological treatment for a patient, as must the toxicity of previous and/or alternative disease‐modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) use.

As increasing evidence has accumulated for treating psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) with biological agents, efficacy and clinical use for these diseases will be treated separately from rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Adverse reactions, however, will remain combined for all indications. In general, in RA, when measuring response to therapy or when following patients over time, the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response criteria (as a combined index) should not be used in a clinical practice setting to monitor individual response, although some validated measure of response (such as those which follow) should be employed (Category B evidence3). Validated quantitative measures such as Disease Activity Score (DAS), Simple Disease Activity Index (SDAI), Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index (HAQ‐DI), visual analogue scales (VAS) or Likert scales of global response or pain by the patient or global response by the physician, other validated measures of pain for individual patient care, joint tenderness and/or swelling counts, and laboratory data all may be used and may be the most appropriate measures for individual patients (Category B evidence3,4). The physician should evaluate a patient's response using the above measures to determine the patient's status and improvement.

For PsA, measures of response such as joint tenderness and swelling, global and pain response measures, functional indices and acute phase reactants have been used and appear responsive (Category A evidence5). For AS, measures such as the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), and the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) have been used in a clinical trial setting but have not been validated for the routine clinical practice setting. Measures such as joint tenderness and swelling, spinal motion, global and pain response measures, functional indices and acute phase reactants have been used and are validated (Category A evidence6,7,8,9,10).

The use of biological agents will require physicians experienced in the diagnosis, treatment and assessment of RA, PsA, AS and other rheumatic diseases. These physicians will need to make long‐term observations for efficacy and toxicity, including cohorts, registries and so on. Because these agents have toxicities, patients or their representatives should be provided with information about potential risks and benefits so that they may give informed consent for treatment.

TNF blocking agents

TNF blocking agents differ in composition, precise mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, biopharmaceutical properties and so on, but this document emphasises areas of commonality. Data that clearly have differentiated compounds will be discussed if such areas can be identified.

Indications

Rheumatoid arthritis

In most patients, TNF blockers are used in conjunction with another DMARD, usually methotrexate (MTX). TNFα blocking agents have also been used successfully with other DMARDs, including sulfasalazine and leflunomide (Category A/B evidence11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37). There is evidence that TNF blockers are effective for the treatment of RA in MTX‐naive patients (Category A evidence,12,13,14,15,16,17,21,22,26,27,31,34,36 Category D evidence19,24,25). TNF blocking agents can be used as the first DMARD in some patients (Category A evidence,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,22,26,27,28,31,33,36 Category D evidence19,26,35,36). Adalimumab and etanercept are both approved as monotherapy for RA. Infliximab is only approved for use with MTX in RA. However, observational data indicate that infliximab, too, is sometimes used as monotherapy (Category C evidence11,23,37). Evidence from several randomised controlled trials suggests that the combination of a TNF blocking agent and MTX yields superior results for RA when compared with monotherapy, particularly with respect to excellent clinical responses (ACR 70, European League Against Rheumatism remission) and radiological outcomes (Category A evidence).11,12,13,14,15,16,18,19,20,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,37

Evidence has become available which shows that TNF‐blocking agents are cost‐effective from a societal perspective (Category D evidence38,39).

Psoriatic arthritis

The three available anti‐TNF medications, etanercept, infliximab and adalimumab, have been approved globally for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) based on demonstration of control of signs and symptoms of joint and skin disease, improvement of function (HAQ), quality of life (SF‐36), and inhibition of structural damage evidenced by x ray (Category A evidence40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47).

A comparator trial of methotrexate versus anti‐TNF therapy showed that the latter yielded superior results in joint and skin signs and symptoms, function and quality of life (Category B evidence47,48).

Preliminary data suggest that anti‐TNF therapy can benefit cardiovascular risk in PsA (Category A evidence49). Anti‐TNF therapy has been demonstrated to reduce healthcare resource utilisation (Category B evidence50), and improve employment status, time lost from work and productivity (Category B evidence44).

Ankylosing spondylitis

Adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab have been approved for the treatment of severe, active AS in Europe and North America (Category A evidence,6,7,8,9,10,51,52,53,54,55,56 Category D evidence57). In the clinical trials, efficacy of the TNF blocking agents was demonstrated as monotherapy as well as with concomitant second‐line agents including sulfasalazine or MTX (Category A evidence6,7,8,9,10,51,52,53,54,55,56). TNFα blocking agents maintain efficacy over 1–5 years in open‐label studies (Category B evidence55,56,58).

The approved doses of TNF blockers for treatment of AS are as follows: infliximab, 5 mg/kg intravenously every 6–8 weeks after induction; etanercept, subcutaneously 25 mg twice a week or 50 mg once a week; and adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneously every other week (Category A and B evidence6,7,8,9,10,38,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59). No dose‐ranging studies have been done with any of these drugs. There is no evidence that one TNF blocking agent is more effective than any other for the treatment of musculoskeletal manifestions of AS. TNF blocking agents used for AS may reduce economic resource utilisation (Category D evidence38).

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis of the polyarticular type

Adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab have been approved for juvenile idiopathic arthritis of the polyarticular type (Category A evidence;60,61,62 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Summary Basis of Approval).

Use in other rheumatic diseases or those with prominent rheumatic manifestations

Chronic inflammatory bowel disease

Infliximab has been approved to treat luminal and fistulising Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis in the USA (Category A evidence;63,64 FDA Summary Basis of Approval). Infliximab is approved for ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease in Europe (Category A evidence;65,66 European Medicines Agency Summary). Adalimumab is approved for Crohn's disease in the USA.

Controlled trials that demonstrated a difference from placebo or positive control

  • Etanercept was effective for treating some of the mucocutaneous manifestations of Behçet's syndrome compared with placebo over 4 weeks (Category A evidence67).

  • Etanercept improved hepatitis C viraemia but not symptoms, compared with placebo, when given on a background of interferon αand ribavirin (Category A evidence68).

  • Infliximab improved the signs and symptoms of ulcerative colitis (abstracts from double blind trials (Category D evidence, n = 364 patients in each of two trials)65,66).

  • Infliximab improved Pyoderma gangrenosum (abstract of a double blind trial (Category D evidence, n = 3069)).

  • Infliximab improved pulmonary sarcoidosis (Category A evidence, n = 8670).

Controlled trials that failed to demonstrate a difference from placebo

  • Etanercept and infliximab in Sjögren's syndrome (Category A evidence71,72,73) (see also anecdotal data in table 1).

  • Etanercept in Wegener's granulomatosis (Category A evidence74) (see also anecdotal data in table 1).

  • Etanercept in autoimmune ear disease (Category A evidence,75 very small (n = 21)).

  • Infliximab in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (Category A evidence,76 very small (n = 30)).

  • Infliximab for disc herniation (abstract of a double blind trial, Category D evidence,77 very small (n = 40)).

  • Infliximab in giant cell arteritis (GCA) (Category B evidence,78 very small (n = 44)).

  • Infliximab for polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) (abstract of a double blind trial, Category B evidence,79 very small (n = 51)).

  • Anecdotal series or studies with promising results (see Appendix 1).

Clinical use

Rheumatoid arthritis and juvenile idiopathic arthritis

TNF blocking agents, when given up to the maximum approved dosing regimens for RA and juvenile idiopathic arthritis of the polyarthritic variety, are expected to lead to significant, documentable improvement in symptoms, signs and/or laboratory parameters within 12 weeks (Category A and B evidence6,7,8,9,10,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,22,24,25,26,27,28,29,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,56,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93). There is no evidence that any one TNF blocking agent should be used before another one can be tried, just as there is no evidence that any TNF blocker is more effective than any other in RA (Category A and B evidence12,15,24,85,88,89,90,94,95). Patients have been switched from one TNF blocking agent to another, but no well‐controlled switch trials have been published (Category B and D evidence58,72,85,88,89,90,94,95,168,169,170,171). There is evidence that loss of response to a TNF blocking agent can occur and studies suggest that failure to respond to one TNF blocking agent does not preclude response to another (Category B and D evidence85,88,89,90,94,95).

Initial observational data suggest the possibility that primary non‐responding patients are less likely to respond to a second anti‐TNF agent. Patients who have not tolerated one TNF blocker may respond to a second but are also less likely to tolerate a second TNF blocking agent (Category B and D evidence85,90,94,95). The optimal therapy of patients not responding to TNF blockers remains to be determined.

Individually important responses including patient‐oriented measures (eg, HAQ‐DI, patient's global VAS, Medical Outcome Survey Short Form 36 (SF‐36)) or physical measures (for example, joint tenderness)) should be demonstrated within 12 weeks for RA (Category A evidence6,7,8,9,10,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,25,26,27,28,29,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,56,80,81,82,83,84). If such improvement occurs, treatment should be continued. If patients show no response to these agents, their continued use should be re‐evaluated. Observations with infliximab suggest that increasing the dose or reducing the dosing intervals may provide additional benefit in RA, as may the addition or substitution of other DMARDs (Category A evidence15,18,31,37). Raising the dose of etanercept does not seem to have an added benefit at 12 or 24 weeks in RA (Category D evidence89,90,91). However, because regression to the mean may occur, caution is needed when interpreting apparent improvements following dose escalation in practice (Category C evidence92).

There are data showing that TNF blocking agents slow and/or inhibit radiographic progression in RA, even in some patients without a clinical response (Category A evidence12,15,19,21,22,27,34,40,82,84,93,96). Although some RA patients without measurable clinical response have slowing of radiographic progression (Category A evidence34,93,97), the long‐term clinical implications of these changes still remain unknown.

Psoriatic arthritis

As noted above, the three available anti‐TNF medications, etanercept, infliximab and adalimumab, have been approved globally for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA).40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,98,99,100,101 In addition, statistically significant improvement of enthesitis and dactylitis has been demonstrated with infliximab.42,100,102,103 Also, improvement of fatigue has been noted with adalimumab.40 Improvement of signs and symptoms, function and quality of life occurs within 12 weeks.40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51 A systematic evidence‐based review of the various domains of PsA (joints, enthesitis, spondyloarthropathy, skin) and efficacy of their treatment has recently been published.99,100,101,103,104,105,106,107,108

Durability of clinical and radiographic data at 2 years in PsA has been demonstrated with etanercept and adalimumab.43,47 Similar durability at 1 year has been demonstrated with infliximab in PsA.44,46

Preliminary data suggest that one can achieve benefit for joint and skin signs and symptoms by switching to a different anti‐TNF medication, even if efficacy from a previous anti‐TNF agent was never achieved, was lost or if toxicity occurred.48,49,50,109,110

Anti‐TNF therapy is superior to methotrexate for joint and skin signs and symptoms, function and quality of life.48

An exploratory trial with anakinra in PsA failed to demonstrate significant clinical or synovial improvement as determined histologically and by MRI.111 An exploratory trial with efalizumab, approved for the treatment of psoriasis in the USA and Europe, failed to show statistically significant improvement in PsA.112 An exploratory trial with alefacept, approved for treatment of psoriasis in the USA, did show statistically significant improvement in joint and skin signs and symptoms in PsA.113

Safety

Safety and tolerability of anti‐TNF therapy in PsA is no different than an RA clinical trial. Psoriasis, particularly pustular psoriasis, can rarely occur when using anti‐TNF therapy.109

Ankylosing spondylitis

Generally, a reduction in signs and symptoms, and improvement in quality of life will be observed by 12–16 weeks in response to treatment with a TNF blocking agent.114 In clinical trials, improvement in signs and symptoms was assessed by patient‐reported outcomes (BASDAI, BASFI, patient global VAS, SF‐36), physical measures and laboratory parameters. The Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis working group has published recommendations for the use of TNF blocking agents in AS (Category A evidence54,115). If a 50% improvement or an absolute improvement of 2 points (on a 0–10 scale) of the BASDAI is not reached within 12 weeks, their continued use should be re‐evaluated (Category A and B evidence6,7,9,10,53,54,57,81,115).

Several studies have demonstrated that active inflammation of the sacroiliac joints or spine, as shown by MRI, is significantly reduced by all three TNF blocking agents (Category C evidence).41,42,43,57 Inhibition of radiographic progression, as measured by plain radiography, has not been evaluated in prospective randomised controlled trials in AS. In addition, changes in MRI findings have not yet been correlated with changes in plain radiographs in the spine or sacroiliac joints in patients with AS (Category C evidence).57,116,117

Other for the treatment of AS

Clinical trial data with conventional DMARDs are few but suggest efficacy of sulfasalazine for the peripheral, but not spinal, manifestations of AS.54,115 In those who fail to respond to sulfasalazine, a TNF blocking agent should be considered next (Category D evidence115).

The IL‐RA antagonist anakinra has been investigated in two open‐label studies in AS with no clear efficacy (see section on IL1 receptor blockade). No data are available at the moment regarding efficacy of other biologicals such as rituximab or abatacept in AS.

Warnings/adverse events

General reviews of TNF blocking agent safety have been published.20,51,58,95,118,119,120

Infections

An increased susceptibility to tuberculosis (TB) or reactivation of latent TB should be considered a characteristic of TNF blocking agents. The risk of TB is increased by the use of DMARD per se and is increased further by TNF blocking agents.121,122,123

The clinical picture of active TB may be atypical in these patients (for example, miliary or extrapulmonary presentations) as has been seen with other immunocompromised patients (Category C evidence118,119,123,124,125,126). There have been more reported cases of TB as a proportion of the total number of individuals treated in patients using infliximab and adalimumab than using etanercept (Category C evidence118,120,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129). This may be due in part to differences in mechanism of action, biology or kinetics as compared to the soluble receptor (Category D evidence)123,126,128 but may also be, in part, due to the fact that populations treated with the various TNF blocking agents differ and the data come from registries and voluntary reporting systems. No head‐to‐head comparisons among TNF blocking agents have been carried out and thus no definitive data on comparisons between these agents are available regarding the incidence of reactivation of latent TB.

Screening of patients about to start TNF blocking agents has reduced the risk of activating TB for patients treated with these agents (Category B evidence118,119,123,129,130,131). Every patient should be evaluated for the possibility of latent TB, including a history that includes evaluation for the risk of latent TB (Category B evidence58,119,120,126,127,129,132). This history should include seeking a history of prior exposure, prior drug addiction or active drug addiction, HIV infection, birth or extended living in a region of high TB prevalence and a history of working or living in TB high‐risk settings such as jails, homeless shelters and drug rehabilitation centres (Category D evidence132). In addition, physical examination and screening tests such as skin tests and chest radiographs should be carried out before anti TNF‐therapy is initiated, according to local recommendations (Category B, C and D evidence118,119,122,123,129,130,131). Continued vigilance is required to prevent activation of latent tuberculosis or acquisition of new cases. The role of repeated or serial tuberculin skin testing during anti‐TNF therapy is unclear. In the USA, repeat or annual testing has not been recommended in this or other settings of immune suppression unless patients are at risk for ongoing TB exposure.132

In treating latent TB, the optimal timeframe between starting preventive therapy for latent TB infection and starting TNF blockade is unknown. Given the low numbers of bacilli present in latent TB infection, it is likely that waiting long time periods between initiating preventive TB therapy and TNF blockade are unnecessary. While there are no prospective trials assessing this question, observational data from Spain suggest that initiating isoniazid therapy 1 month prior to TNF blockade substantially decreases the risk of latent TB reactivation (Category C evidence122,129,130,131).

Treatment of TB in immunocompromised hosts is as effective as in non‐immunocompromised patients, suggesting that long periods of preventive treatment prior to starting TNF blocking agents may not be as necessary as previously thought. Prior to initiating preventive anti‐TB therapy in accordance with local guidelines, consulting with a TB expert should be considered.

Opportunistic infections have occurred in the setting of TNF blocking agent use (Category C evidence12,13,15,16,17,19,20,21,22,24,25,64,84,118,119,120,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141). Particular vigilance is needed when considering those infections whose containment is macrophage/granuloma‐dependent, such as listeriosis, coccidiomycosis or histoplasmosis, including reactivation of latent histoplasmosis, (Category C and D evidence118,119,120,126,127,134,137,139,140,141,142) but the incidence of opportunistic infections is extremely low (Category C and D evidence126,127,129).

Serious bacterial infections have been observed in patients receiving TNF blocking agents at rates between 0.07 and 0.09/patient year compared with 0.01–0.06/patient year in controls using other DMARDs but not TNF blocking agents (Category C evidence118,119,120,143,144). Risk ratios of 1 to up to 3 were documented (Category B evidence144,145). High doses of TNF blocking agents may further increase the risk of serious infections (Category B evidence146). Other studies indicate that serious infections in certain sites are more common when using TNF blocking agents, such as the skin, soft tissues and joints (Category B evidence144,147).The possible contribution of corticosteroids to increasing the risk of infection should always be considered (Category C evidence148). The incidence of other infections (not designated as serious) may be increased when using TNF blocking agents (relative risk (RR) 2.3–3.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4 to 5.1) (Category C evidence143). The incidence of serious infections is higher when IL1rα and etanercept or abatacept with any of several biologicals are used in combination (3.9% in combination vs 1.0–1.6% in controls) (Category A evidence118,119,120,149,150). Therefore, a combination of biologicals is not recommended. TNF blocking agents should not be started or their discontinuation should be considered when serious infections and/or opportunistic infections occur, including septic arthritis, infected prostheses, acute abscess, osteomyelitis, sepsis, systemic fungal infections and listeriosis (Category C evidence; FDA12,13,15,16,17,19,20,21,22,24,25,33,64,84,119,120,126,134,135,137,139,140,141,142,145). Treatment with TNF blockers in such patients may be resumed if the infections have been treated adequately (Category D evidence; FDA 120,123,124,125,126,134,137,139,140,141,142,145).

TNF blocking agents do not significantly influence the development of protective antibodies after vaccination, although there is a small decrease in the prevalence of adequate protection and titre of response, especially in combination with methotrexate (Category B evidence151,152). Vaccination with live attenuated vaccines (eg, BCG, yellow fever) is not recommended (Category D evidence).

Injection site/infusion reactions

In placebo‐controlled trials, injection site reactions, most of which were mild to moderate but some of which resulted in drug discontinuation, were more common with subcutaneously administered TNF blocking agents than with placebo (Category B evidence10,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,24,25,31,32,33,61,62,82,83,96,119). One study indicates that human antichimeric antibodies (HACA) against infliximab was associated with decreased response and increased infusion reactions (Category C evidence153). Infusion reactions after infliximab and adalimumab are uncommon and are usually mild to moderate, but may, rarely, be serious (Category A evidence,12,15,21,24,25,31,62,82,83,96,119 Category B and C evidence18,22,63,84).

Treatment limiting infusion reactions can be treated by the use of corticosteroids or antihistamines, or by slowing the infusion rate (Category C and B evidence 153,154).

Malignancies

The incidence of lymphoma is increased in chronic inflammatory diseases such as RA. This increase is associated with high disease activity (Category C evidence155,156). The risk for lymphoma is increased two to fivefold in patients with RA as compared to the general population (especially non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma). A similar risk is seen in RA patients who have received anti‐TNF therapy (Category C evidence120,155,157). There are conflicting data about whether there is an increased risk for lymphoma and solid malignancies with anti‐TNF therapies for RA. Several large observational databases and a case control study did not demonstrate an increased incidence of solid tumours in patients receiving TNF blocking agents compared with matched controls, while two meta‐analyses of anti‐TNF therapies (on infliximab and adalimumab) reported a higher rate of solid malignancies including skin cancers (Category A and C evidence156,157,158,159,160,161). One population‐based study showed that the incidence of both melanoma and non‐melanoma skin cancer were slightly increased when TNF blocking agents were used (RR: 1.4–2.0; Category C evidence160). In patients at risk for malignancies (for example, smokers) or in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), there may be an increased risk of lung cancers. In a trial of patients with COPD assigned to infliximab versus placebo, nine developed lung cancers during the trial and another four lung cancers were found during open‐label follow‐up (Category A evidence162). In a study of Wegener's granulomatosis, the use of etanercept with cyclophosphamide was associated with six solid malignancies versus none in the cyclophosphamide–placebo group (Category A evidence163). The concomitant use of azathioprine with infliximab in adolescents has been associated with the occurrence of rare hepatosplenic lymphomas (FDA). There is limited information about the risk of developing a future malignancy in patients receiving anti‐TNF therapy who had a previous malignancy (Category D evidence164). Vigilance with respect to the occurrence of lymphomas and other malignancies, including recurrence of solid tumours, remains warranted in patients using these medications.

Haematological

Rare instances of pancytopaenia and aplastic anaemia have been reported (Category A and C evidence18,31,33,82,119,165). If haematological adverse events occur, TNF blockers should be stopped and patients evaluated for evidence of other underlying disease or other causative medications (Category D evidence).

Cardiovascular

High‐dose infliximab (10 mg/kg) appears to be associated with an increased relative risk of worsening congestive heart failure (CHF) and mortality, particularly in RA patients with New York Heart Association class III–IV CHF (Category B and D evidence118,120,166,167). There is presently no substantive evidence that infliximab 5 mg/kg, or etanercept at 25 mg twice a week increases the incidence of CHF or CHF‐related mortality in patients with functional class I CHF (Category B and D evidence118,166,167). However, it should be noted that well‐controlled RA studies have excluded patients with complicating illnesses, including CHF, and RA per se appears to be associated with increased atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and ASCVD‐related mortality (Category C evidence118). One RA study using infliximab demonstrated an increase in total, HDL and LDL lipids (Category D evidence168). One cohort observational study in RA patients without overt CHF showed a possible decrease in myocardial infarction‐related mortality when using TNF blocking agents (Category D evidence3,169). Each patient's risk versus benefit should be carefully considered before TNF blocking agents are begun or continued (Category D evidence; FDA).

Pulmonary

Rare instances of new onset interstitial lung disease have been documented in patients using infliximab both with and without baseline pulmonary findings (Category C171 and D evidence170,171).

Hepatitis

The long‐term safety of TNF blockers in patients with chronic viral hepatitis is not known. In Hepatitis C, observational studies and one controlled investigation revealed that etanercept did not have an effect on viral load and there was no increased incidence of adverse effects; in addition, there was evidence, in this study, that symptoms and liver function tests improved (Category C and D evidence167,172,173,174,175,176,177,178).

With respect to hepatitis B, patients treated with all three agents have experienced increased symptoms and worsening of viral load (Category C evidence,173 Category D evidence.177,179). Elevations have been observed in liver function tests with therapeutic strategies employing the use of adalimumab, infliximab and etanercept with ALT‐AST elevated in 3.5–4.9% and elevations of these liver enzymes >2X ULN in about 0.1–0.2%, although concomitant medications and other clinical circumstances confound the interpretation of this information (FDA; Category C evidence18,173,175,176,177,180,181). As a result, specific warnings regarding hepatitis B reactivation have been added to the US label by the FDA (FDA). Therefore TNF blockers should not be used in patients with known hepatitis B infection; in the event that hepatitis B infection is discovered during use of TNF blockers, prophylactic antiviral therapy can be employed (Category C evidence;58,173,177,179,182 Canadian Regulatory Authorities).

The follow‐up and monitoring for liver function test elevations should be governed by the patient's concomitant medications, conditions and patient‐related risk factors.

Conception and pregnancy

There is insufficient information at present to safely counsel the continuation of TNF blockers during pregnancy. Some women have become pregnant while being treated with TNF blocking therapy. A small pharmacovigilance study and a survey study comprising about 200 pregnancies in women being treated with TNF blockers187 revealed that the rates of normal live births, miscarriages and therapeutic terminations in patients taking TNF blockers did not differ from published rates for the normal population (Category D evidence183,184,185,186,188,189). Pre‐pregnancy planning is strongly recommended in patients who are either on TNF blockers or considering their use; the need for disease control with alternate methods should be the subject of these conversations. There are no data available on the subsequent safety of a pregnancy if the male partner is taking TNF blockers.

It is advised that women and physicians discuss the issue of TNF blocking therapy when pregnancy planning takes place or if pregnancy is discovered during ongoing TNF blocking therapy, and that this discussion is documented.

Using peak concentrations as a measure, only about 0.0001% of the peak plasma concentration of etanercept is found in the breast milk (Category D evidence190).

Autoimmune‐like syndromes

Antiphospholipid syndrome, syndromes resembling drug‐induced lupus and vasculitis have occurred in patients receiving TNF blocking agents, and treatment should be stopped if there is clinical evidence of a drug‐induced lupus‐like syndrome. These symptoms are highly likely to resolve on discontinuation of the TNF blocking agent (Category C and D evidence31,33,63,82,118,120,191,192,193,194,195,196,197,198,199). There is an increased incidence of several autoantibodies (for example, antinuclear antibody (ANA), anti‐double‐stranded DNA) after infliximab and it is probably not a class effect (category C evidence191,192,193,194,195,198,199). However, there is no evidence that patients with RA who had, or develop, a positive ANA, anticardiolipin antibodies and/or dsDNA are at significantly increased risk for the development of drug‐induced lupus (FDA; Category C and D evidence18,31,82,120,191,192,196,197,198,199).

Neurological diseases

The incidence of demyelinating‐like syndromes, optic neuritis, transverse myelitis, multiple sclerosis and Parkinson's disease is no greater than expected in the general population (Category C evidence31,82,120,165,200,201,202). However, rare cases of these syndromes have been reported, more often with etanercept than with infliximab, most but not all improving or remitting after the TNF blocker was withdrawn (Category C evidence82,120,165,200,201,202,203). There is insufficient evidence to suggest that TNFα blockers unmask latent disease, although this remains a possibility. These agents should be stopped if a demyelinating‐like disorder or optic neuritis occurs. Patients with a history of definite demyelinating disease or optic neuritis should not receive TNF blocking agents (Category D evidence).

Psoriatic skin lesions

Some cases of new‐onset psoriatic skin lesions or exacerbations of pre‐existing psoriasis have been reported in patients with RA who used TNF blocking agents. (Category C evidence109).

Issues specific to PsA

Safety and tolerability data with anti‐TNF medications in PsA have not demonstrated any adverse events that were significantly different from RA trials. However, because liver biopsy studies suggest that patients with psoriasis and PsA demonstrate a greater proclivity for hepatotoxicity with MTX therapy than RA patients (Category B evidence204), it is not known if the safety profile from RA trials is completely comparable with PsA.

Precautionary statements

The safety of TNF blockade is unknown or has not been established in the following situations:

  • HIV, and so on

  • during lactation.

Other areas where knowledge is lacking are highlighted in the consensus group's recommendations for areas most urgently requiring further research.

Research

Among a number of potential areas requiring action and/or further research, the consensus group felt the following projects or directions were most important in each of three areas: registries, efficacy and toxicity.

Registry

  1. Long‐term registries continue to be needed to monitor the toxicity of biologicals and are strongly recommended, requiring a cooperative effort between payers, government, industry and rheumatologists.

  2. Registries of pregnancy outcomes under anti‐TNF therapy (and after cessation of therapy) should be continued.

Efficacy

  1. What are the optimal dosing regimens when using TNF blocking agents?

  2. Are there predictors of toxicity for TNF blocking agents?

  3. Is there a correlation between radiological effect and long‐term effectiveness for TNF blocking agents?

  4. What are the outcomes in patients treated with TNF blocking agents where disease activity persists without joint destruction and where joint destruction is observed with little disease activity?

  5. Can biologicals be administered at lower than currently used doses and/or at dosing intervals longer than currently employed to slow or halt radiographic progression of RA in the absence of an ACR 20 response?

  6. What is the effect of TNF blocking agents on growth in children with juvenile chronic arthritis?

  7. What, if any, dose response exists for the use of TNF blocking agents in PsA and/or AS?

  8. Do AS patients with advanced spinal fusion respond to TNF blocking agents?

  9. Do TNF blocking agents decrease the incidence of cardiovascular events or cerebrovascular incidents?

  10. What are the predictors of response to TNF blocking agents in early and advanced AS?

  11. Can TNF blocking agents be discontinued after an initial response?

Safety

  1. Can TNF blocking agents be used safely in pregnant women?

  2. What is the safety profile of TNF blocking agents during surgery? How does it compare with the safety profile of patients undergoing surgery without concomitant TNF blocker use?

  3. What duration of tuberculosis prophylaxis/treatment is necessary when patients are being treated with TNF blocking agents?

  4. Can TNF blocking agents be used in patients with a history of lymphoma and non‐Hodgkin lymphoma or solid tumours? What is the time interval needed before TNFα blockers can be used after patients with malignancies have reached a full remission?

  5. What is the sensitivity and specificity of the quantiferon test compared with the purified protein derivative (PPD) in RA patients?

Summary

TNF blocking agents have proved to be effective DMARDs and are a major advance in the treatment of RA, PsA, AS and juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Their use is expanding to other rheumatic diseases. Studies in selected areas of efficacy, toxicity and general use of TNF blocking agents are needed to help further define the most appropriate use of these agents. Further considerations when using TNF blocking agents in these diseases should balance efficacy, toxicity and cost issues, and recognise that data in subpopulations are still being acquired. It is hoped that this statement, which is based on the best evidence available at this time and is modified by expert opinion, will facilitate the optimal use of these agents for patients with RA.

IL1 blocking agents

Only one IL1 blocking agent (anakinra) has been approved and the discussion below refers to this agent.

Indications

Anakinra may be used for treatment of active RA, alone or with MTX, at a dose of 100 mg per day subcutaneously (Category A evidence205,206,207,208,209,210). In Europe, the anakinra label requires its use with methotrexate. Anakinra is recommended for the treatment of active RA after an adequate trial of another conventional DMARD, of which MTX is a common example (Category D evidence). The safety of anakinra has also been studied with other DMARDs (Category A evidence207,208).

The use of anakinra as the first DMARD for the treatment of RA should, at present, be limited because no trials in early RA have been published.

Anakinra has been investigated in two open‐label studies in AS with no clear efficacy (see section on IL1 receptor blockade).211,212

Anakinra has been studied for a variety of off‐label indications (see Appendix 2). It appears to be highly active in the auto‐inflammatory syndromes (also called “periodic fever syndromes”), such as Muckle–Wells syndrome, neonatal‐onset multisystem inflammatory disease (NOMID) and TNF receptor‐associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS). It also appears to be active in systemic‐onset juvenile arthritis and adult‐onset Still's disease. It has been used to treat osteoarthritis (Category D evidence213,214) and SLE (Category D evidence215,216).

Clinical use

Anakinra can lead to significant improvement in symptoms, signs and/or laboratory parameters within 16 weeks, and can slow the rate of radiographic progression (Category A evidence205,206,209). If improvement is not observed by 16 weeks, the continued use of anakinra should be re‐evaluated.

Trials of patients failing TNF blocking agents demonstrate mixed responses (Category C evidence210). Anakinra did not inhibit anti‐tetanus antibody response in a controlled trial (Category A evidence217). A dose‐related incidence of injection site reactions, affecting up to 70% of patients, has occurred with the use of anakinra. These reactions often do not require treatment and seem to moderate with continued use in some patients (Category A evidence205,206,207). There are no data to advise either termination or continuation of anakinra if a woman becomes pregnant.

Warnings

Serious infections are increased in patients receiving anakinra, and its incidence is higher than in patients with RA using other DMARDs. This increased incidence was magnified by corticosteroid use (Category A evidence208). Anakinra should not be started or should be discontinued when serious infections occur (Category A evidence,12,36,61,96 Category D evidence34). Treatment with anakinra in such patients should only be resumed if the infection(s) has been adequately treated (Category D evidence). To date, there is no indication that anakinra is associated with an increased incidence of TB (Category D evidence).

In combination with etanercept, there was an increased rate of serious infections compared to either monotherapy, and no increase in efficacy. Therefore, the combination should not be used (Category A evidence150).

Precautionary statements

The safety of anakinra is unknown or has not been established in the following situations:

  • lymphoma, lymphoproliferative and other malignancies

  • during pregnancy and/or lactation.

Other areas where knowledge is lacking are highlighted in the consensus group's recommendations for areas most urgently requiring further research.

Research

Among a number of potential areas requiring action and/or further research, the consensus group felt the following projects or directions were most important in each of three areas: registries, efficacy and toxicity.

Registry

  1. Long‐term registries to monitor the toxicity of biologicals are recommended, requiring a cooperative effort between payers, government, industry and rheumatologists.

  2. Registries of pregnancy outcomes under anakinra blocking therapy (and after cessation of therapy) should be continued.

Efficacy

  1. What is the efficacy of anakinra in polyarticular juvenile arthritis, systemic‐onset juvenile and other rheumatic diseases including osteoarthritis?

Toxicity

  1. Can anakinra be used in patients who cannot be treated with TNF blocking agents because they have a history of TB or latent TB and cannot tolerate appropriate therapy for the latter, for some reason?

Summary

Anakinra is effective for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis but its specific place (for example, before or after TNF blocking agents) in the rheumatological armamentarium is not yet defined. Publication of studies in selected areas of efficacy, toxicity and general use of anakinra is needed to help further define the most appropriate use of these agents. Further considerations when using anakinra in this disease must include cost issues and the recognition that data in subpopulations are still being acquired. It is hoped that this statement, which is based on the best evidence available at the time of its creation and is modified by expert opinion, will facilitate the optimal use of anakinra for patients with RA.

Abatacept

One agent which modulates T cell activation (abatacept) has been approved, and references are therefore to this product.

Indications

Abatacept is approved in North America for use alone or with background DMARDs for treatment of active RA. It is administered as intravenous infusions of up to 10 mg/kg (500 mg for weights less than 60 kg; 750 mg for weights of 60–100 kg and 1000 mg for weights over 100 kg) at 0, 2, 4 weeks then monthly (FDA product label218,219). However, it is not recommended for use with other biologicals (although there are no data regarding the use of rituximab in combination with abatacept). Abatacept is recommended for treatment of active RA after an adequate trial of MTX, another effective DMARD or TNFα blocking agent (Category A evidence218,219,220,221,222).

Abatacept may be substituted directly for the next dose of a TNF blocking agent, when switching is undertaken (Category C evidence223). Abatacept has been used with MTX and other DMARDs (Category A evidence149). (Pharmacoeconomics studies are being carried out (Category D evidence).)

Clinical use

Abatacept is indicated to decrease signs and symptoms (including major clinical response), slow and/or inhibit progression of structural damage and improve physical function in adult patients with moderate to severely active RA who have had an inadequate response to one or more DMARDs such as MTX or TNF blocking agents (Category A evidence,218,219,223 FDA label). Improvement occurs within 16 weeks, although additional improvement can occur for up to 2 years (Category D evidence).224,225 If clinical improvement occurs, treatment should be continued (Category D evidence);where no meaningful improvement occurs within 12–16 weeks the continued use of abatacept should be re‐evaluated.

Abatacept in combination with MTX inhibits radiographic progression in RA (category A evidence149,219,224). A study of abatacept for psoriasis vulgaris showed efficacy (Category C evidence226).

There is evidence for efficacy in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (Category C evidence227). Studies in early RA, undifferentiated arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus are ongoing (Category D evidence).

Warnings

An increased incidence of serious infection has been observed when comparing abatacept to placebo (3.0% with abatacept vs 1.9% with placebo). In combination with other biological agents, the rate of serious infections is 4.4% (vs 1.5% in controls).228 The use of abatacept with other biologicals is not recommended (Category A evidence221,228). There are no data regarding the combination of abatacept and rituximab. Patients with COPD treated with abatacept had more adverse events than patients treated with placebo; therefore use in RA patients with COPD should be undertaken with caution (Category D evidence149).

Based on theoretical concerns, live vaccines should not be given with abatacept or within 3 months of using abatacept (Category D evidence).

A numerical imbalance was reported in the number of lung cancers observed in the placebo‐controlled trials (4 abatacept, 0 controls). An additional nine cases were reported during open‐label extension studies (cumulatively 13 cases/4134 patient years). The overall incidence of lung cancer in abatacept‐treated patients during these studies was not higher than expected, based on large RA cohorts, although it was higher than in the general population.

There has been one case of lymphoma occurring in double‐blind period with abatacept versus 0 in the placebo group and four additional cases in the open‐label extension (cumulatively 5/4134 patient years) (Category B evidence229). While this number is consistent with that expected from large RA cohorts, ongoing surveillance is necessary.

All patients in abatacept phase 3 trials were screened for TB and excluded if the screen was positive. The risk for activation of latent TB or for developing new TB when using abatacept is unknown. Until the risk is known, it is prudent to screen patients considered for abatacept therapy for TB according to local practice (Category D evidence).

Precautionary statements

The safety of abatacept is unknown or has not been established in the following situations:

  • viral infections, including HIV, hepatitis B and C

  • during pregnancy and/or lactation.

Other areas where knowledge is lacking are highlighted in the consensus group's recommendations for areas most urgently requiring further research.

Research

Among a number of potential areas requiring action and/or further research, the following projects or directions are important in each of three areas: registries, efficacy and toxicity:

Registry

  1. As per anti‐TNF agents.

Efficacy

  1. What is the efficacy of abatacept in polyarticular juvenile arthritis, early arthritis, systemic lupus undifferentiated early arthritis and other rheumatic diseases?

  2. Rituximab versus abatacept in TNF failures.

Toxicity

  1. Can abatacept be used in patients who cannot be treated with TNF blocking agents because of CHF, demyelinating diseases, serious infections or tuberculosis?

Rituximab

Rituximab is a chimeric anti‐CD20 monoclonal antibody, which was approved in 1997 for treatment of indolent CD20, B cell non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma. More than 1 000 000 patient exposures (usually four infusions per patient) have been documented over 9 years in post‐marketing surveillance of these non‐rheumatic diseases. Recently, a consensus statement on the use of rituximab in patients with RA (Category D evidence248) has been published.

Indications

Rituximab has been approved by the FDA in the USA for the treatment of moderate‐to‐severe RA in patients who have had an inadequate response to TNF inhibitors (Category A and D evidence;230,231,232 FDA and European Medicines Agency label; Category C and D evidence233,234,235,236,237,238,239). Patients should have at least moderate disease activity despite MTX therapy. Rituximab is administered intravenously as two 1 g rituximab infusions (given with 100 mg methylprednisolone or equivalent) separated by an interval of 2 weeks; two 500 mg doses can also be used with little decrease in efficacy (Category A evidence233,234,235,236,237,238,239,240). It may also be used when TNF inhibitors are not suitable (Category D evidence232,241,242). In RA, it may be used alone or in combination with MTX (Category A and D evidence230,231,232,241,242,243,244). Appropriate supportive equipment should be available when rituximab is used in case of rare anaphylactoid reactions.

Current evidence on the efficacy of rituximab relates to rheumatoid factor (RF) positive patients (Category D evidence233,234). Divergent ACR responses were seen with rituximab in RF‐negative patients, in TNF non‐responders and in DMARD non‐responders (Category D evidence233,234,235). Patients who were both RF and anti‐CCP negative had a reduced response in TNF non‐responders (Category D evidence242,244). Since small numbers of RF‐negative patients were evaluated, the role of RF and anti‐CCP antibodies is not clear.

Clinical use

In clinical trials, rituximab results in significant improvement in signs and symptoms and/or laboratory measures by 8–16 weeks (Category D evidence230,231,232,233,234,235,236,237,238,241,242,243,244) in patients with an inadequate response to MTX who have failed conventional DMARDS or have one or more TNF inhibitors (Category A evidence240,245). Improvement has also been demonstrated in patient‐related outcomes such as HAQ‐DI, patient global VAS, fatigue, disability and quality of life. Evidence from randomised controlled trials show that the combination of rituximab with MTX yields superior clinical efficacy for RA when compared with monotherapy (Category A evidence233,234,235,240,245). The optimal treatment schedule is currently under investigation (Category D evidence230,233,234,235,242,244). Preliminary data have shown that repeat treatment courses are effective in previously responsive RA patients (Category D evidence;236 FDA). Most of the patients who received subsequent courses did so after 24 weeks after the previous course and none received repeated courses earlier than 16 weeks from the previous course (Category D evidence;236 FDA). No data are available on repeated treatment in patients who failed to respond to the initial course.

There are data indicating that rituximab can slow radiographic progression in patients who have had an inadequate response to one or more TNF inhibitors (Category D evidence234).

Rituximab has been used in primary Sjögren's syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus, Wegener's granulomatosis, hepatitis C‐associated cryoglobulinaemia, antineutrophilic cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA), associated vasculitis disorders other than Wegener's such as polyarteritis nodosa, dermatomyositis/polymyositis (Category C evidence), autoimmune haemolytic anaemia, idiopathic thrombocytopenia purpura, antiphospholipid syndrome and scleroderma (see Appendix 3).

Warnings

The most frequent adverse events are infusion reactions, which are most common with the first infusion of each course (approximately 35%) and are reduced with the second infusion (approximately 10%). Intravenous corticosteroids were shown to reduce the incidence and severity of infusion reactions by about 30% without changing efficacy (Category A, C and D evidence230,231,233,234,235,240,241,242,244).

Recently, two cases of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) have been communicated in cases of patients with severe SLE who had received an extensive additional immunosuppressive therapy. Twenty‐three cases of PML in SLE cases not using rituximab have also been documented. Twenty‐seven cases of PML are known in the NHL literature. It is unclear whether this incidence reflects the overall PML occurrence in these heavily immunocompromised individuals. As of today, no case of PML has been reported in RA (FDA reports).

Serious infections, including bacterial infections, have been observed in patients receiving rituximab. Similar to the anti‐TNF agents and the other biologicals, a small increase in serious infections (not intracellular infections) in patients receiving rituximab 2×1000 mg compared to placebo has occurred: 4.7/100 versus 3.2/100 patient years in the DANCER study and 5.2/100 versus 3.7/100 patient years in the REFLEX trial (Category D evidence230,233,234,235,239,241).

Rituximab should not be given in the presence of serious or opportunistic infections (Category D evidence).

In general, patients who did not respond to TNF inhibitors will also have been pre‐screened for the presence of active or latent TB. In the RA clinical trials of rituximab in TNF inhibitor non‐responders, patients with active TB were excluded. Others were screened by chest x ray, but were not screened for latent TB by PPD testing. Moreover, there is no evidence of an increased frequency of TB in patients with lymphoma treated with rituximab (Category D evidence). Based on expert opinion, it is felt that at this time there is no evidence indicating the necessity to screen for TB prior to initiating rituximab in RA (Category D evidence).

Since decreased levels of immunoglobulin (Ig) M, A and G have been observed with rituximab, it may be useful to determine baseline Ig levels (Category D evidence,231,237,241,244). In clinical trials no increase in serious infections have been reported in the very few patients with reduced levels of IgM after rituximab therapy compared to their normal IgM levels previously (Category D evidence237,244). Further analyses are required to address this issue. B cell levels have been measured in clinical trials but their utilisation in routine practice has not been proven. Depletion of peripheral levels of the CD20+ B cell subpopulation was not found to be predictive of achieving or maintaining a clinical response in RA patients (Category D evidence238). This suggests that the timing of retreatment should be based on disease activity rather than repletion of peripheral B cell levels (Category D evidence).

The safety of TNF inhibitor use in patients (n = 78) who did not respond to rituximab and who had B cell levels below normal demonstrated a numerical increase in serious infections (Category D evidence239). Further data are needed to address this important issue.

Since rituximab causes B cell depletion, it is recommended that any vaccinations required by the patient, such as those to prevent pneumonia and influenza, should be given before commencing this agent. While on therapy, appropriate vaccination (such as against influenza) should be given when indicated, although the success may be suboptimal.

Until further data are available, the use of live attenuated vaccines should only be given prior to the use of rituximab (Category D evidence).

Patients should be screened for hepatitis B and C before starting rituximab as hepatitis B reactivation has been reported in oncological practice (Category D evidence246).

Until further data are available, rituximab should not be used during pregnancy.

There is no evidence that rituximab is associated with an increased incidence of solid tumours in RA. Nevertheless, vigilance regarding the occurrence of solid malignancies remains warranted during treatment with rituximab (Category D evidence).

Research

The consensus group felt the following projects or directions were most important in each of three areas: registry, efficacy and toxicity.

Registry

  1. As per anti‐TNF agents.

Efficacy

  1. What is the minimal effective dose of rituximab?

  2. What is the optimal strategy in using rituximab including timing, repeat dosing and combination with other drugs?

  3. Are there predictors of treatment response?

  4. What is the long‐term efficacy of repeat dosing?

  5. What are the cost‐effectiveness and ethical issues when treating patients with rituximab?

  6. What are the mechanisms underlying the efficacy of rituximab?

  7. Is induction therapy with rituximab possible with subsequent withdrawal or dose reduction?

  8. What is the role of rituximab in the treatment of other rheumatoid diseases (for example, systemic lupus erythematosus, scleroderma, myositis, Sjögren's syndrome, vasculitis, psoriatic arthritis and AS)?

Safety

  1. What are the safety issues associated with long‐term B cell depletion and lowered Ig levels?

  2. What is the safety profile with respect to immunoglobulin reduction vis‐a‐vis infection and response to vaccination?

  3. Does rituximab increase the frequency of TB and opportunistic infection?

  4. Can TNF blocking agents and other immunomodulators be used safely in patients with B cell depletion who are unresponsive to rituximab?

  5. What are the optimal strategies including vaccination to lower the risk of infection during treatment with rituximab?

  6. Can rituximab be used safely in pregnant and lactating women?

  7. Will long‐term use of rituximab result in secondary loss of effect?

  8. Will long‐term use of rituximab substantially reduce the incidence of B cell lymphoproliferative disorders?

  9. Can rituximab be used in patients with remote or current solid malignancies?

  10. Can rituximab be used safely in hepatitis C?

Abbreviations

abs - abstract

ACR - American College of Rheumatology

ANA - antinuclear antibody, AS, ankylosing spondylitis

ASCVD - atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease

BASDAI - Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index

BASFI - Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index

CDAI - Clinical Disease Activity Index

CHF - congestive heart failure

COPD - chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

DAS - Disease Activity Score

DMARD - disease‐modifying antirheumatic drug

FDA - Food and Drug Administration

HAQ‐DI - Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index

MTX - methotrexate

PPD - purified protein derivative

PsA - psoriatic arthritis

RA - rheumatoid arthritis

SDAI - Simple Disease Activity Index

TB - tuberculosis

VAS - visual analogue scale

Appendices: categories of evidence

  • Category A evidence: based on evidence from at least one randomised controlled trial or meta‐analyses of randomised controlled trials.

  • Category B evidence: based on evidence from at least one controlled trial without randomisation or at least one other type of experimental study, or on extrapolated recommendations from randomised controlled trials or meta‐analyses.

  • Category C evidence: based on non‐experimental descriptive studies such as comparative studies, correlational studies and case control studies which are extrapolated from randomised controlled trials, non‐randomised controlled studies or other experimental studies.

  • Category D evidence: based on expert committee reports or opinions or clinical experience of respected authorities or both, or extrapolated recommendations from randomised controlled trials, meta‐analyses, non‐randomised controlled trials, experimental studies or non‐experimental descriptive studies.

Note: abstracts have not been considered in the above evidence scheme, as they are not complete and may change by the time the data are published, or they may not be published as full papers at all. Evidence from abstracts alone, therefore, is considered as Category D evidence and noted as “abs” until those data are published as a complete, peer‐reviewed paper.

Appendix 1: Anecdotal studies of anti‐TNF agents

Anecdotal studies of anti‐TNF agents.

Disease Author(s) Medication No. of patients
Adult Still's disease Huffstutter and Sienknechet247 Infliximab 2
Kraetsch et al248 Infliximab 6
Weinblatt et al149 Etanercept 12
Fernandez‐Nibro249 Etanercept 3
Amyloidosis Elkayam et al250 Infliximab 1
Gottenberg et al251 Etanercept/infliximab 15
Ortiz‐Santamaria et al252 Infliximab 6
Tomero et al253 Infliximab 12
Kallinick et al525 Etanercept 1
Ravindran et al526 Etanercept 1
Smith et al254 Etanercept 1
Aphthous stomatitis Robinson and Guitart255 Etanercept 1
Vujevich and Zirwas256 Adalimumab 1
Atzini et al257 Etanercept 1
Back pain (incl sciatica) Sakellariou et al258 Infliximab 1
Genevay et al259 Etanercept 10
Behçet's disease Estrach et al260 Infliximab/adalimumab 7
Gulli et al261 Infliximab 1
Hassard et al262 Infliximab 1
Licata et al263 Infliximab 1
Melikoghu et al264 Etanercept 20
Morillas et al265 Adalimumab/etanercept
Rosenbaum et al266 Anti‐TNF 1
Saulsbury and Mann267 Infliximab 1
Sangle et al268 Infliximab 1
Sfikakis et al269 Infliximab 5
Sfikakis270 Infliximab 11
Ribi et al271 Infliximab 1
Sweiss et al272 Infliximab 3
Van Laar et at273 Adalimumab 6
Bronchiolitis Cortot et al274 Etanercept 1
Cirrhosis and alcoholic hepatitis Naveau et al176 Infliximab 36
Spahr et al275 Infliximab 20
Wendling et al182 Infliximab 1
Menon et al276 Etanercept 13
Cutaneous T cell lymphoma Tsimberidou et al277 Etanercept 13
Dermatitis, hidradenitis, miscellaneous Bongartz et al158 Infliximab 1
Cortis et al278 Etanercept 1
Cummins et al279 Etanercept 1
Massarotti and Sobell280 Etanercept 1
Zeichner et al281 Adalimumab 1
Csusak et al280 Etanercept 6
Jurgens‐Meyer et al Etanercept 1
Dermatomyositis Hengstman et al282 Infliximab 2
Miller et al283 Etanercept 10
Sprott et al284 Etanercept 1
Nzeusseu et al285 Infliximab 1
Saadeyh286 Etanercept 4
Norman et al287 Etanercept 2
Erythema nodosum refractory chronic Ortego‐Centeno et al288 Adalimumab 1
Familial Mediterranean fever Takada et al289 Etanercept 2
Ozgocmen et al290 Etanercept 1
Felty's syndrome Ghavami et al291 Etanercept 1
Giant cell arteritis Andonopoulos et al292 Infliximab 2
Cantini et al293 Infliximab 4
Tan et al294 Etanercept 1
Ahmed et al295 1
Graft vs host disease (acute) Wolff et al296 Etanercept 21
Uberti et al297 Etanercept 20
Kennedy et al298 Etanercept 20
Chiang et al299 Etanercept 8
Pavletic et al300 Etanercept 4
Andolina301 Etanercept 1
Graves ophthalmopathy Paridiena et al302 Etanercept 10
Hepatitis C Cacoub et al172 Interferon alfa 27
McMinn et al303 Etanercept 3
Peterson et al304 Infliximab/etanercept 24
Pritchard 305 Etanercept 1
Ince et al29FF127,174 Etanercept 12
Moreno et al306 Etanercept 5
Allen et al307 Etanercept 2
Marotte et al308 Etanercept 9
Rokhsar309 Etanercept 1
Magliocco and Gottlieb264 Etanercept 3
HIV Wallis et al310 Etanercept 16
Immunodeficiency (common variable) Smith and Skelton178 Etanercept 1
Lin et al311 Etanercept 1
Capeda et al312 Etanercept 7
Inclusion body myositis Barohn et al313 Etanercept 9 (ineffective)
Singh et al314 Etanercept 1
Juvenile‐onset HLA‐B27‐associated severe and refractory heal enthesitis Olivieri et al315 Adalimumab 1
Kawasaki's disease Weiss et al316 Infliximab 1
Burns et al317 Infliximab 16
Multicentric histiocytosis Lovelace et al318 Etanercept 1
Matejicka et al319 Etanercept 1
Kovach et al320 Etanercept 1
Myelodysplasia Birnbaum and Gentile321 Etanercept 1
Deeg et al322 Etanercept 14
Rosenfeld et al323 Etanercept 19 (ineffective)
Raza324 Etanercept 26
Maciejewski325 Etanercept 16
Periodic fever (children) Athreya et al326 Etanercept 3
Pigmented villonodular synovitis Kroot et al327 TNF 1
Polymyositis Hengstman et al282 Infliximab 2
Sprott et al284 Etanercept 1
Adams et al328 Adalimumab 2
Polychondritis Carter (with literature review)329 Infliximab 1
Ehresman330 Etanercept 5
Pyoderma gangrenosum Fonder et al331 Adalimumab 1
Heffernan et al332 Adalimumab 1
Osteoarthritis (erosine) Magnano et al333 Adalimumab 12
SAPHO syndrome Furst et al1 TNF
Anker and Coats166 Infliximab/etanercept 150
Sweiss et al334 Infliximab 3
Callejas‐Rubio et al335 Adalimumab 1
Korhonen et al336 Infliximab 12
Korhonen et al337 Infliximab 40
Lam et al338 Infliximab 18
Pasternack et al339 Etanercept 4
Tobinick and Davoodifar340 Etanercept 43
Khanna et al341 Etanercept 1
Utz et al342 Etanercept 17
Wagner et al343 Etanercept 2
Moul et al344 Adalimumab 1
Sarcoidosis Khanna et al343 Etanercept 1
Utz et al342 Etanercept 1
Hefferman et al345 Adalimumab 1
Callejas‐Rubio335 Adalimumab 1
Querfeld et al346 Etanercept 1
Sweiss et al272 Etanercept 1
Hobbs et al347 Etanercept 1
Scleroderma Ellman et al348 Etanercept 8
Bosello et al349 Etanercept 4
Silicone granulomas Pasternack et al339 Etanercept 2
Sjogren's syndrome Zandfelt et al350 Etanercept 15 (ineffective)
Sankar et al72 Etanercept 14 (ineffective)
Pessler et al351 Etanercept 1
Still's disease (include Adult onset) Fautrel et al352 Etanercept 20 (ineffective)
Stern et al353 Etanercept 1 (worsening)
Asherson et al354 Etanercept 1
Kumari et al355 Etanercept 1
Sweet's syndrome Gindi et al356 Etanercept 1
Yamanuchi et al357 Etanercept 24
Systemic lupus erythematosus Aringer et al358 Infliximab 6
Fantrel et al352 Etanercept 1(SCLE)
Lurati et al359 Etanercept 1
Jackson et al360 Etanercept 1(SCLE)
Norman et al287 Etanercept 1(SCLE)
Hernandez‐Ibarra et al361 N/A
Principi et al362 Infliximab 1
Takayasu's arteritis Hoffman et al363 Anti‐TNF 15
Della Rossa et al364 Infliximab 2
Tato et al365 Adalimumab 1
TRAP Hull et al366 Etanercept >50
Lamprecht et al367 Etanercept 2
Drewe et al368 Etanercept 1
Uveitis Estrach et al260 Infliximab/adalimumab 7
Joseph et al369 Infliximab 5
Smith et al370 Etanercept 7
Braun et al371 Etanercept/Infliximab 717 (uveitis in AS)
Foster et al372 Etanercept 20 (ineffective)
Biester et al373 Adalimumab 18
Foeldvari et al374 Anti‐TNF 47
Vazquez‐Cobain et al375 Adalimumab 14
Reiff et al376 Etanercept 10
Schmeling and Horneff377 Etanercept 20 (ineffective)
Guignard et al378 Adalimumab 8
Vasculitis (see also Behcet's, GCA, Takayasu's, Wegener's) Booth et al379 Infliximab 32
Feinstein and Arroyo380 Etanercept 1
Van dan Bijl381 Infliximab 11
Saji et al382 Infliximab 1 (Kawasaki's)
Sangle et al268 Infliximab 1 (Churg‐Syrauss)
Arbach et al383 Etanercept/infliximab 3
Wegener's granulomatosis Gause et al384 Infliximab 10
Sangle et al268 Infliximab 3

N/A, not available; TNF, tumour necrosis factor; TRAPS, TNF receptor‐associated periodic syndrome.

Appendix 2: Anecdotal studies of IL1ra (anakinra)

Anecdotal studies of IL1ra (anakinra).

Disease Author(s) No. of patients
Acute stroke Emsley et al385 34
Additional data in hereditary autoinflammatory disorders Leslie et al386 22
Adult‐onset Still's disease Rudinskaya et al387 1
Quartier P et al388 15
Aelion et al389 2
Haraoui B et al390 3
Kalliolias et al391 2
Nordstrom et al392 3
Kalliolias et al393 3
Fitzgerald et al394 4
Vasques Godinho et al395 1
Haibel et al 1
Tan et al212 1
Bone marrow transplant Antin et al396 186
Consider intra‐articular use of anakinra Birmingham et al397 7
Cytophagic histiocytic panniculitis Behrens et al398 1
FCAS Hoffman et al78 2
Metyas et al399 1
Diabetes mellitus Larsen et al CM 2007;356:1517 ?
GVD Anton et al396 8
Hyper‐IgD and periodic fever syndrome Bodar et al400 3
Rigante et al401 1
Juvenile idiopathic arthritis Verbsky et al402 2
Juvenile polyarticular arthritis Ilowite et al403 79
Ilowite et al404 86
Muckle–Wells syndrome Hawkins et al405 2
Saha et al406 1
Ramos et al407 1
Rynne et al408 1
Mirault et al409 1
Simon et al229 1
NOMID/CINCA Goldbach‐Mansky et al410 18 NOMID
Frenkel et al411 3
Rigante et al412 1 CINCA
Hawkins et al405 1
Seitz et al413 1
Granel et al414 1
Boschan et al 1
Callejas et al335 1
Namde et al415 20
Namde et al416 18
Namde et al417 18
Gattorno et al418 6 NOMID
Caroli et al419 12
Lovell et al420 2
Osteoarthritis Chevallier et al213 ?
Osteoarthritis (intra articular) Chevalier et al214 14
PAPA Dierselhuis et al421 1
Psoriatic arthritis Jung et al422 20
Gibbs et al423 12
Relapsing polychondritis Vounotrypidis et al424 1
Schnitzler's syndrome Martinez‐Tabouda et al425 1
Systemic lupus erythematosus Moosiq et al215 3
Ostendorf et al216 4
Systemic‐onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis Pascual et al426 9
Henrickson et al427 4
Reiff428 1
Lurati et al359 1
Mirkinson et al429 6
Verbsky et al402 2
Weiss et al430
Punaro et al431 13
Zeft et al432 12
Gattorno et al418
Gattorno et al433 15
Quartier et al388 23
Simon et al229 1

Appendix 3: Abstracts or anecdotal studies of rituximab

Abstracts or anecdotal studies of rituximab.

Disease Author(s) No. of patients
Rheumatoid arthritis Cohen et al.245 520
Emery et al.240 465
Strand et al.434 161
Edwards et al435 161
Popa et al.436 37
Higashida et al.437 17
Moore et al.438 10
Kneitz et al.439 5
Leandro et al.440 22
De Vita et al.441 5
Scheinberg et al.442 10
Maher et al.443 1
Cambridge et al.444 15
Leandro et al.445 24
Roll et al.446 17
Microscopic polyangiitis, Stasi et al.447 10
Eriksson et al.448 9
Microscopic polyangiitis, Churg‐Strauss syndrome Smith et al.449 11
Wegener's granulomatosis Aries et al.450 8
Keogh et al.451 10
Sanchez‐Cano et al.452 1
Tektonidou et al.453 1
Bachmeyer et al.454 1
Ferraro et al.455 1
Kallenbach et al.456 1
Memet et al.457 1
Specks et al.458 1
ANCA vasculitis Clatworthy et al.459 1
Churg‐Strauss syndrome Koukoulaki et al.460 2
Kaushik et al.461 1
Cryoglobulinaemia Type II and III Sansonno et al.462 20
CryoglobulinaemiaType II. Quartuccio et al.463 5
Cryoglobulinaemia Type III Basse et al.464 7
Cryoglobulinaemia hepatitis C virus Cai et al.465 1
Cryoglobulinaemia Type II hepatitis C virus Pekow et al.466 3
Cryoglobulinemia Type I non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma Telander et al.467 1
Cryoglobulinaemia Type II Bryce et al.468 8
Zaja et al.469 15
Arzoo et al.470 1
Basse et al.471 3
Ghijsels et al.472 1
Koukoulaki et al.460 1
Lamprecht et al.473 1
Zaja et al.469 15
Bryce et al.474 11
Cryoglobulinaemia Type I Nehme et al.475 2
Sjögren's syndrome Ring et al.476 1
Touma et al.477 1
Pijpe et al.478 15
Pijpe et al.479 1
Voulgarelis et al.480 6
Voulgarelis et al.481 4
Gottenberg et al.482 6
Ahmadi‐Simab et al.483 1
Harner et al.484 1
Somer et al.485 1
Shih et al.486 1
Ramos‐Casals et al.487 2
Juvenile idiopathic arthritis polyarticular Kuek et al.488 1
Juvenile idiopathic arthritis with EBV‐associated lymphoproliferative disorder (LPD) Kelaidi et al.489 1
Systemic lupus erythematosus Armstrong et al.490 1
Gormond‐Mennesson et al.491 26
Haddad et al.492 11
Jansson et al.493 2
Kotani et al.494 1
MacDermott et al.495 7
Marks, Tullus et al.496 7
Ng et al.497 7
Rech et al.498 1
Risselada et al.499 2
Smith et al.449 11
Tokunaga et al.500 10
Leandro et al.501,502 24
Anolik et al., Looney et al.503,504,505 17
Tokunga et al.506 5
Ng et al.497 24
Elderbauer et al.507 1
SLE Carroll et al.508 4
Jacobson et al.509 1
Vigna et al510 22
Antiphospholipid syndrome Ahn et al.511 1
Ames et al.512 1
Trappe et al.513 1
Veneri et al.514 1
Antiphospholipid syndrome and catastrophic antiphospholipd antibody syndrome Rubenstein et al.515 3
Myopathy Arlet et al.516 2
Antisynthetase syndrome Brulhart et al.517 1
Dermatomyositis Dinh et al.518 3
Lambotte et al.519 1
Chung et al.520 8
Levine et al.521 7
Dermatomyositis and polymyositis Noss et al.522 3
Chiappetta et al. 1
Still's disease Ahnadi et al.523 2

References

  • 1.Furst D E, Breedveld F C, Kalden J R, Smolen J S, Burmester G R, Bijlsma J W.et al Updated consensus statement on biological agents for the treatment of rheumatic diseases. Ann Rheum Dis 200465(Suppl 2)ii2–NaN15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Shekelle P G, Woolf S H, Eccles M, Grimshaw J. Clinical guidelines: developing guidelines. BMJ 1999318593–596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wolfe F, Pincus T, O'Dell J. Evaluation and documentation of rheumatoid arthritis disease status in the clinic: which variables best predict change in therapy. J Rheumatol 2001281712–1717. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Smolen J S, Breedveld F C, Schiff M H, Kalden J R, Emery P, Eberl G.et al A simplified disease activity index for rheumatoid arthritis for use in clinical practice. Rheumatology (Oxford) 200342244–257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gladman D D, Helliwell P, Mease P J, Nash P, Ritchlin C, Taylor W. Assessment of patients with psoriatic arthritis: a review of currently available measures. Arthritis Rheum 20045024–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Brandt J, Khariouzov A, Listing J, Haibel H, Sorensen H, Grassnickel L.et al Six‐month results of a double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial of etanercept treatment in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum 2003481667–1675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Braun J, Brandt J, Listing J, Zink A, Alten R, Golder W.et al Treatment of active ankylosing spondylitis with infliximab: a randomised controlled multicentre trial. Lancet 20023591187–1193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Davis J C, Jr, Van Der H D, Braun J, Dougados M, Cush J, Clegg D O.et al Recombinant human tumor necrosis factor receptor (etanercept) for treating ankylosing spondylitis: a randomized, controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 2003483230–3236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gorman J D, Sack K E, Davis J C., Jr Treatment of ankylosing spondylitis by inhibition of tumor necrosis factor alpha. N Engl J Med 20023461349–1356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Van Den B F, Kruithof E, Baeten D, Herssens A, de K F, Mielants H.et al Randomized double‐blind comparison of chimeric monoclonal antibody to tumor necrosis factor alpha (infliximab) versus placebo in active spondylarthropathy. Arthritis Rheum 200246755–765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Agarwal S K, Maier A L, Chibnik L B, Coblyn J S, Fossel A, Lee R.et al Pattern of infliximab utilization in rheumatoid arthritis patients at an academic medical center. Arthritis Rheum 200553872–878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bang L M, Keating G M. Adalimumab: a review of its use in rheumatoid arthritis. BioDrugs 200418121–139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Breedveld F C, Emery P, Keystone E, Patel K, Furst D E, Kalden J R.et al Infliximab in active early rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 200463149–155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Breedveld F C, Weisman M H, Kavanaugh A F, Cohen S B, Pavelka K, van V R.et al The PREMIER study: a multicenter, randomized, double‐blind clinical trial of combination therapy with adalimumab plus methotrexate versus methotrexate alone or adalimumab alone in patients with early, aggressive rheumatoid arthritis who had not had previous methotrexate treatment. Arthritis Rheum 20065426–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Culy C R, Keating G M. Etanercept: an updated review of its use in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Drugs 2002622493–2537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Elliott M J, Maini R N, Feldmann M, Long‐Fox A, Charles P, Katsikis P.et al Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with chimeric monoclonal antibodies to tumor necrosis factor alpha. Arthritis Rheum 1993361681–1690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Elliott M J, Maini R N, Feldmann M, Long‐Fox A, Charles P, Bijl H.et al Repeated therapy with monoclonal antibody to tumour necrosis factor alpha (cA2) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet 19943441125–1127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Fleischmann R M, Iqbal I, Stern R L. Considerations with the use of biological therapy in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Expert Opin Drug Saf 20043391–403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Furst D E, Keystone E, Maini R N, Smolen J S. Recapitulation of the round‐table discussion: assessing the role of anti‐tumour necrosis factor therapy in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 199938(Suppl 2)50–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Furst D E, Schiff M H, Fleischmann R M, Strand V, Birbara C A, Compagnone D.et al Adalimumab, a fully human anti tumor necrosis factor‐alpha monoclonal antibody, and concomitant standard antirheumatic therapy for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: results of STAR (Safety Trial of Adalimumab in Rheumatoid Arthritis). J Rheumatol 2003302563–2571. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Genovese M C, Bathon J M, Martin R W, Fleischmann R M, Tesser J R, Schiff M H.et al Etanercept versus methotrexate in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: two‐year radiographic and clinical outcomes. Arthritis Rheum 2002461443–1450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Harriman G, Harper L K, Schaible T F. Summary of clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis using infliximab, an anti‐TNFalpha treatment. Ann Rheum Dis 199958(Suppl 1)I61–I64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hyrich K L, Symmons D P, Watson K D, Silman A J. Comparison of the response to infliximab or etanercept monotherapy with the response to cotherapy with methotrexate or another disease‐modifying antirheumatic drug in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register. Arthritis Rheum 2006541786–1794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jones R E, Moreland L W. Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors for rheumatoid arthritis. Bull Rheum Dis 1999481–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kavanaugh A F. Anti‐tumor necrosis factor‐alpha monoclonal antibody therapy for rheumatoid arthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 199824593–614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Keystone E C, Kavanaugh A F, Sharp J T, Tannenbaum H, Hua Y, Teoh L S.et al Radiographic, clinical, and functional outcomes of treatment with adalimumab (a human anti‐tumor necrosis factor monoclonal antibody) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis receiving concomitant methotrexate therapy: a randomized, placebo‐controlled, 52‐week trial. Arthritis Rheum 2004501400–1411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Klareskog L, Van Der H D, de Jager J P, Gough A, Kalden J, Malaise M.et al Therapeutic effect of the combination of etanercept and methotrexate compared with each treatment alone in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: double‐blind randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004363675–681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Maini R N, Breedveld F C, Kalden J R, Smolen J S, Davis D, Macfarlane J D.et al Therapeutic efficacy of multiple intravenous infusions of anti‐tumor necrosis factor alpha monoclonal antibody combined with low‐dose weekly methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1998411552–1563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mariette X, Malalse M G, Rainer F.et al Adalimumab (Humira) is effective and safe with different traditional concomitant DMARDS in treating rheumatoid arthritis in real‐life clinical practice: a full‐set analysis of the REACT trial. ARD 200665(Suppl 11)FR10144 [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mariette X. ReAct Trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2007641382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Markham A, Lamb H M. Infliximab: a review of its use in the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Drugs 2000591341–1359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Pavelka K. Adalimumab in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Aging Health 20062533–545. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Scheinfeld N. Adalimumab (HUMIRA): a review. J Drugs Dermatol 20032375–377. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Smolen J S, Han C, Bala M, Maini R N, Kalden J R, Van Der H D.et al Evidence of radiographic benefit of treatment with infliximab plus methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis patients who had no clinical improvement: a detailed subanalysis of data from the anti‐tumor necrosis factor trial in rheumatoid arthritis with concomitant therapy study. Arthritis Rheum 2005521020–1030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.St Clair E W, van der Heijde D M, Smolen J S, Maini R N, Bathon J M, Emery P.et al Combination of infliximab and methotrexate therapy for early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized, controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 2004503432–3443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.van de Putte L B, Atkins C, Malaise M, Sany J, Russell A S, van Riel P L.et al Efficacy and safety of adalimumab as monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis for whom previous disease modifying antirheumatic drug treatment has failed. Ann Rheum Dis 200463508–516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Weaver A L, Lautzenheiser R L, Schiff M H, Gibofsky A, Perruquet J L, Luetkemeyer J.et al Real‐world effectiveness of select biologic and DMARD monotherapy and combination therapy in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: results from the RADIUS observational registry. Curr Med Res Opin 200622185–198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.van der Heijde D, Kivitz A, Schiff M H.et al Treatment with adalimumab reduces signs and symptoms and induces partial remission in patients with Ankylosing Spodylitis: 1 year results from ATLAS. Arthritis & Rheumatism 200654 (Suppl):s792 (abs 2017) [Google Scholar]
  • 39.van Vollenhoven R, Cullinane Carli C, Bratt J.et al Patients treated with TNFA antagonists increase their participation in the work‐force: potential for significant long‐term indirect cost gains. EULAR SAT02200. 2006 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 40.Mease P J, Gladman D D, Ritchlin C T, Ruderman E M, Steinfeld S D, Choy E H.et al Adalimumab for the treatment of patients with moderately to severely active psoriatic arthritis: results of a double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 2005523279–3289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Mease P J, Kivitz A J, Burch F X, Siegel E L, Cohen S B, Ory P.et al Etanercept treatment of psoriatic arthritis: safety, efficacy, and effect on disease progression. Arthritis Rheum 2004502264–2272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Mease P J, Goffe B S, Metz J, VanderStoep A, Finck B, Burge D J. Etanercept in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis: a randomised trial. Lancet 2000356385–390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Mease P J, Kivitz A J, Burch F X, Siegel E L, Cohen S B, Ory P.et al Continued inhibition of radiographic progression in patients with psoriatic arthritis following 2 years of treatment with etanercept. J Rheumatol 200633712–721. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kavanaugh A, Antoni C, Mease P, Gladman D, Yan S, Bala M.et al Effect of infliximab therapy on employment, time lost from work, and productivity in patients with psoriatic arthritis. J Rheumatol 2006332254–2259. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Antoni C, Krueger G G, de V K, Birbara C, Beutler A, Guzzo C.et al Infliximab improves signs and symptoms of psoriatic arthritis: results of the IMPACT 2 trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2005641150–1157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kavanaugh A, Krueger G G, Beutler A, Guzzo C, Zhou B, Dooley L T.et al Infliximab maintains a high degree of clinical response in patients with active psoriatic arthritis through 1 year of treatment: results from the IMPACT 2 trial. Ann Rheum Dis 200766498–505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Gladman D D, Mease P J, Ritchlin C T, Choy E H, Sharp J T, Ory P A.et al Adalimumab for long‐term treatment of psoriatic arthritis: forty‐eight week data from the adalimumab effectiveness in psoriatic arthritis trial. Arthritis Rheum 200756476–488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Heiberg M S, Kaufmann C, Rodevand E, Mikkelsen K, Koldingsnes W, Mowinckel P.et al The comparative effectiveness of anti‐TNF therapy and methotrexate in patients with psoriatic arthritis: 6‐month results from a longitudinal, observational, multicenter study. Ann Rheum Dis 2007661038–1042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Sattar N, Crompton P, Cherry L, Kane D, Lowe G, McInnes I B. Effects of tumor necrosis factor blockade on cardiovascular risk factors in psoriatic arthritis: a double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study. Arthritis Rheum 200756831–839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kimball A B, Jackson J M, Sobell J M, Boh E E, Grekin S, Pharmd E B.et al Reductions in healthcare resource utilization in psoriatic arthritis patients receiving etanercept therapy: results from the educate trial. J Drugs Dermatol 20076299–306. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Baeten D, Kruithof E, Van Den B F, Van den B N, Herssens A, Mielants H.et al Systematic safety follow up in a cohort of 107 patients with spondyloarthropathy treated with infliximab: a new perspective on the role of host defence in the pathogenesis of the disease? Ann Rheum Dis 200362829–834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Brandt J, Haibel H, Reddig J.et al Anti‐TNF alpha treatment of patients with severe anklyosing spondylitis: a one year follow‐up. Arthritis Rheum 200044(Suppl)S403 [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Brandt J, Kavenaugh A F, Listing J.et al Six months results of a German double‐blind placebo controlled Phase III clinical trial in active ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum 200446S429 [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Braun J, Pham T, Sieper J, Davis J, van der L S, Dougados M, Van Der H D. International ASAS consensus statement for the use of anti‐tumour necrosis factor agents in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 200362817–824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Braun J, Brandt J, Listing J, Zink A, Alten R, Burmester G.et al Two year maintenance of efficacy and safety of infliximab in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 200564229–234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Schiff M, Kavanaugh A, Weisman M, Segurado O. Safety and efficacy of more than 4 years of adalimumab therapy in rheumatoid arthritis. Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology, New Orleans. 18 February 2005
  • 57.Haibel H, Rudwaleit M, Brandt H C, Grozdanovic Z, Listing J, Kupper H.et al Adalimumab reduces spinal symptoms in active ankylosing spondylitis: clinical and magnetic resonance imaging results of a fifty‐two‐week open‐label trial. Arthritis Rheum 200654678–681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Schiff M H, Burmester G R, Kent J D, Pangan A L, Kupper H, Fitzpatrick S B.et al Safety analyses of adalimumab (HUMIRA) in global clinical trials and US postmarketing surveillance of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 200665889–894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Bansback N, Booner A, Marra C.et al A review of economic evaluations in ankylosing spondylitis: considerations and proposal for an omeract reference case. EULAR THU0528 2006 [PubMed]
  • 60.Cummins C, Connock M, Fry‐Smith A, Burls A. A systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation of new drug treatments for juvenile idiopathic arthritis: etanercept. Health Technol Assess 20021–43. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 61.Lovell D J, Giannini E H, Reiff A, Cawkwell G D, Silverman E D, Nocton J J.et al Etanercept in children with polyarticular juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Pediatric Rheumatology Collaborative Study Group. N Engl J Med 2000342763–769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Lovell D J, Giannini E H, Reiff A, Jones O Y, Schneider R, Olson J C.et al Long‐term efficacy and safety of etanercept in children with polyarticular‐course juvenile rheumatoid arthritis: interim results from an ongoing multicenter, open‐label, extended‐treatment trial. Arthritis Rheum 200348218–226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Baert F, Noman M, Vermeire S, Van A G, D' H G, Carbonez A.et al Influence of immunogenicity on the long‐term efficacy of infliximab in Crohn's disease. N Engl J Med 2003348601–608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Hanauer S B, Feagan B G, Lichtenstein G R, Mayer L F, Schreiber S, Colombel J F.et al Maintenance infliximab for Crohn's disease: the ACCENT I randomised trial. Lancet 20023591541–1549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Sandborn W, Rachmilewitz D, Hanauer S.et al Infliximab induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis: the Act 2 Trial. AGA Abstracts 2007688A104 [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Rutgeerts P, Feagan B G, Olsen A.et al A randomized placebo‐controlled trial of infliximab therapy for active ulcerative coiltis: Act 1 Trial. AGA Abstracts 2007689A105 [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Sfikakis P P, Markomichelakis N N, Alpsoy E, Assaad‐Khalil S, Bodaghi B, Gul A.et al Anti‐TNF therapy in the management of Behcet's disease: review and basis for recommendations. Rheumatology (Oxford) 200746736–741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Zein N N. Etanercept as an adjuvant to interferon and ribavirin in treatment‐naive patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection: a phase 2 randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study. J Hepatol 200542315–322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Brooklyn T N, Dunnill M G, Shetty A, Bowden J J, Williams J D, Griffiths C E.et al Infliximab for the treatment of pyoderma gangrenosum: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial. Gut 200655505–509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Kavaru M, duBois R M, Costabel U.et al Chest x‐ray assessment using a detailed scoring method in a randomized trail of infliximab in subjects with chronic pulmonary sarcoidosis. Chest 2007128(4)203s [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Mariette X, Ravaud P, Steinfeld S, Baron G, Goetz J, Hachulla E.et al Inefficacy of infliximab in primary Sjogren's syndrome: results of the randomized, controlled Trial of Remicade in Primary Sjogren's Syndrome (TRIPSS). Arthritis Rheum 2004501270–1276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Sankar V, Brennan M T, Kok M R, Leakan R A, Smith J A, Manny J.et al Etanercept in Sjogren's syndrome: a twelve‐week randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled pilot clinical trial. Arthritis Rheum 2004502240–2245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Steinfeld S D, Demols P, Salmon I, Kiss R, Appelboom T. Infliximab in patients with primary Sjogren's syndrome: a pilot study. Arthritis Rheum 2001442371–2375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Steinfeld S D, Demols P, Salmon I, Kiss R, Appelboom T. Infliximab in patients with primary Sjogren's syndrome: a pilot study. Arthritis Rheum 2001442371–2375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Cohen S, Shoup A, Weisman M H, Harris J. Etanercept treatment for autoimmune inner ear disease: results of a pilot placebo‐controlled study. Otol Neurotol 200526903–907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.van der Vaart H, Koeter G H, Postma D S, Kauffman H F, ten Hacken N H. First study of infliximab treatment in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005172465–469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Karppien J, Korhonen T, Paimela L.et al The efficacy of infliximab for disc herniation‐induced sciatica. A 1‐year follow‐up of first 2, a randomised controlled trial. OASIS 20071591383 [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Hoffman G S, Cid M C, Rendt‐Zagar K E, Merkel P A, Weyand C M, Stone J H.et al Infliximab for maintenance of glucocorticosteroid‐induced remission of giant cell arteritis: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2007146621–630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Salvarani C, Macchioni P, Manzini C, Paolazzi G, Trotta A, Manganelli P.et al Infliximab plus prednisone or placebo plusprednisone for the initial treatment of polymyalgia rheumatica: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2007146631–639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Bathon J M, Martin R W, Fleischmann R M, Tesser J R, Schiff M H, Keystone E C.et al A comparison of etanercept and methotrexate in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med 20003431586–1593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Combe B, C C.F.U.e.a. Double‐blind comparison of etanercept and sulphasalazine alone and combined in patients with active RA. Arthritis Rheum 200746(Suppl)S519 [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Jarvis B, Faulds D. Etanercept: a review of its use in rheumatoid arthritis. Drugs 199957945–966. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Moreland L W, Margolies G, Heck L W, Jr, Saway A, Blosch C, Hanna R.et al Recombinant soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor (p80) fusion protein: toxicity and dose finding trial in refractory rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 1996231849–1855. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Burmester G R, van de Putte L B, Rau P.et al Long term efficacy and safety of adalimumab monotherapy in patients with DMARD‐refractory RA: results from a two year study. Arthritis Rheum 200246(Suppl)S537 [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Cohen G, Courvoisier N, Cohen J D, Zaltni S, Sany J, Combe B. The efficiency of switching from infliximab to etanercept and vice‐versa in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 200523795–800. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Guis S, Balfour I, Bowyer S L.et al 308 A/G polymorphism in the tumor necrosis factor alpha gene influences outcome of etanercept treatment in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). OASIS 2007
  • 87.Van der Laken C J, Vujevich J, de Jager J P.et al Imaging and serum analysis of complex formation of radiolabeled infliximab and anti‐infliximab in responders and non‐responders to treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. OASIS 2007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 88.Buch M H, Seto Y, Bingham S J, Bejarano V, Bryer D, White J.et al C‐reactive protein as a predictor of infliximab treatment outcome in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: defining subtypes of nonresponse and subsequent response to etanercept. Arthritis Rheum 20055242–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Furst D E.et al PULSE study. [accepted abstract] ACR/ARHP Annual Scientific Meeting, Boston MA. 2007
  • 90.Furst D E.et al PULSE study. [accepted abstract] ACR/ARHP Annual Scientific Meeting, Boston MA. 2007
  • 91.Johnson A K, Schiff M H, Mease P J.et al Comparison of 2 Doses of Etanercept (50 vs 100 mg) in Active RA: A Randomized Double Blind Study. J Rheumatol 200633659–664. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.van Vollenhoven R F, Brannemark S, Klareskog L. Dose escalation of infliximab in clinical practice: improvements seen may be explained by a regression‐like effect. Ann Rheum Dis 200463426–430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Keystone E, Kavanaugh A F, Sharp J T.et al Adalimumab, a fully human anti‐TNF‐alpha monoclonal antibody, inhibits the progression of structural joint damage in patients with active RA despite concomitant methotrexate therapy. Arthritis Rheum 200246(Suppl)S205 [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Hochberg M C, Tracy J K, Hawkins‐Holt M, Flores R H. Comparison of the efficacy of the tumour necrosis factor alpha blocking agents adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab when added to methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 200362(Suppl 2)ii13–ii16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Maksymowych W P, Mallon C, Spady B, Peerani R. Alberta Capital Health region studies in rheumatoid arthritis prospective observational inception cohort: efficacy, adverse events and withdrawal. Arthritis Rheum 200144(Suppl)S82 [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Lipsky P E, van der Heijde D M, St Clair E W, Furst D E, Breedveld F C, Kalden J R.et al Infliximab and methotrexate in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Anti‐Tumor Necrosis Factor Trial in Rheumatoid Arthritis with Concomitant Therapy Study Group. N Engl J Med 20003431594–1602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Quinn M A, Conaghan P G, O'Connor P J, Karim Z, Greenstein A, Brown A.et al Very early treatment with infliximab in addition to methotrexate in early, poor‐prognosis rheumatoid arthritis reduces magnetic resonance imaging evidence of synovitis and damage, with sustained benefit after infliximab withdrawal: results from a twelve‐month randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 20055227–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Genovese M C, Mease P, Thomson G T, Kivitz A J, Perdok R J, Weinberg M A.et al Safety and efficacy of adalimumab in the treatment of patients with Psoriatic Arthritis who had failed disease‐modifying antirheumatic drug therapy. J Rheumatol 2007341040–1050. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Boehncke W H, Prinz J, Gottlieb A B. Biologic therapies for psoriasis. A systematic review. J Rheumatol 2006331447–1451. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Cassell S, Kavanaugh A F. Therapies for psoriatic nail disease. A systematic review. J Rheumatol 2006331452–1456. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Gladman D D, Mease P J. Towards international guidelines for the management of psoriatic arthritis. J Rheumatol 2006331228–1230. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Cauza E, Spak M, Cauza K, Hanusch‐Enserer U, Dunky A, Wagner E. Treatment of psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis vulgaris with the tumor necrosis factor inhibitor infliximab. Rheumatol Int 200222227–232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Helliwell P S. Therapies for dactylitis in psoriatic arthritis. A systematic review. J Rheumatol 2006331439–1441. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Kavanaugh A F, Ritchlin C T. Systematic review of treatments for psoriatic arthritis: an evidence based approach and basis for treatment guidelines. J Rheumatol 2006331417–1421. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Nash P. Therapies for axial disease in psoriatic arthritis. A systematic review. J Rheumatol 2006331431–1434. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Ritchlin C T. Therapies for psoriatic enthesopathy. A systematic review. J Rheumatol 2006331435–1438. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Soriano E R, McHugh N J. Therapies for peripheral joint disease in psoriatic arthritis. A systematic review. J Rheumatol 2006331422–1430. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Strober B E, Siu K, Menon K. Conventional systemic agents for psoriasis. A systematic review. J Rheumatol 2006331442–1446. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.de Gannes G C, Ghoreishi M, Pope J, Russell A, Bell D, Adams S.et al Psoriasis and pustular dermatitis triggered by TNF‐{alpha} inhibitors in patients with rheumatologic conditions. Arch Dermatol 2007143223–231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Delaunay C, Farrenq V, Marini‐Portugal A, Cohen J D, Chevalier X, Claudepierre P. Infliximab to etanercept switch in patients with spondyloarthropathies and psoriatic arthritis: preliminary data. J Rheumatol 2005322183–2185. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Gibbs A, Gogarty M, Veale D.et al Efficacy of anakinard (Kineret) in psoriatic arthritis, a clinical and immunohistological study. Ann Rheum Dis 200665(Suppl II)ii65–NaN216. [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Papp K, Mease P, Garovoy M.et al Efalizumab in patients with psoriatic arthritis: results of a phase II randomized double‐blind placebo controlled study. J Cutan Med Surg 20061157–66.17374316 [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Mease P J, Gladman D D, Keystone E C. Alefacept in combination with methotrexate for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis: results of a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study. Arthritis Rheum 2006541638–1645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Davis J C, Van Der H D, Dougados M, Woolley J M. Reductions in health‐related quality of life in patients with ankylosing spondylitis and improvements with etanercept therapy. Arthritis Rheum 200553494–501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Braun J, Davis J, Dougados M.et al First update of the international ASAS consensus statement for the use of anti‐TNF agents in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 200665316–320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Braun J, Landewe R, Hermann K G, Han J, Yan S, Williamson P.et al Major reduction in spinal inflammation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis after treatment with infliximab: results of a multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled magnetic resonance imaging study. Arthritis Rheum 2006541646–1652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Rudwaleit M, Baraliakos X, Listing J, Brandt J, Sieper J, Braun J. Magnetic resonance imaging of the spine and the sacroiliac joints in ankylosing spondylitis and undifferentiated spondyloarthritis during treatment with etanercept. Ann Rheum Dis 2005641305–1310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Hyrich K L, Silman A J, Watson K D, Symmons D P. Anti‐tumour necrosis factor alpha therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: an update on safety. Ann Rheum Dis 2004631538–1543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Keystone E C. Safety of biologic therapies: an update. J Rheumatol 200574(Suppl)8–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Khanna D, McMahon M, Furst D E. Safety of tumour necrosis factor‐alpha antagonists. Drug Saf 200427307–324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Bassard P, Kezouh A, Suissa S. Antirheumatic drugs and the risk of tuberculosis. Clinical Infectious Diseases 200643717–722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Ruderman E M, Markenson J A. Granulomatous infections and tumor necrosis factor antagonist therapies: update through June 2002. Arthritis Rheum 200348 (Suppl 9) [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Furst D E, Wallis R, Broder M, Beenhouwer D O. Tumor necrosis factor antagonists: different kinetics and/or mechanisms of action may explain differences in the risk for developing granulomatous infection. Semin Arthritis Rheum 200636159–167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Mohan A K, Cote T R, Block J A, Manadan A M, Siegel J N, Braun M M. Tuberculosis following the use of etanercept, a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor. Clin Infect Dis 200439295–299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Wallis R S, Broder M, Wong J, Beenhouwer D. Granulomatous infections due to tumor necrosis factor blockade: correction. Clin Infect Dis 2004391254–1255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Wallis R S, Broder M S, Wong J Y, Hanson M E, Beenhouwer D O. Granulomatous infectious diseases associated with tumor necrosis factor antagonists. Clin Infect Dis 2004381261–1265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Keane J, Gershon S, Wise R P, Mirabile‐Levens E, Kasznica J, Schwieterman W D.et al Tuberculosis associated with infliximab, a tumor necrosis factor alpha‐neutralizing agent. N Engl J Med 20013451098–1104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Saliu O Y, Sofer C, Stein D S, Schwander S K, Wallis R S. Tumor‐necrosis‐factor blockers: differential effects on mycobacterial immunity. J Infect Dis 2006194486–492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Tuberculosis associated with blocking agents against tumor necrosis factor‐alpha: California, 2002‐2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 200453683–686. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Carmona L, Gomez‐Reino J J, Rodriguez‐Valverde V, Montero D, Pascual‐Gomez E, Mola E M.et al Effectiveness of recommendations to prevent reactivation of latent tuberculosis infection in patients treated with tumor necrosis factor antagonists. Arthritis Rheum 2005521766–1772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Perez J L, Kupper H, Spencer‐Green G. Impact of screening for latent TB prior to initiating ANTI‐TNF therapy in North America and Europe. [abstract] EULAR Ann Rheum Dis 2005. Fri OPOCB
  • 132.Winthrop K L, Siegel J N, Jereb J, Taylor Z, Iademarco M F. Tuberculosis associated with therapy against tumor necrosis factor alpha. Arthritis Rheum 2005522968–2974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Cummins C, Connock M, Fry‐Smith A, Burls A. A systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation of new drug treatments for juvenile idiopathic arthritis: etanercept. Health Technol Assess 200261–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Bargstrom L, Yocum D, Tesser J.et al Coccidiomycosis (Valley Fever) occurring during infliximab therapy. Arthritis Rheum 200446s169 [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Doran M F, Crowson C S, Pond G R, O'Fallon W M, Gabriel S E. Frequency of infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis compared with controls: a population‐based study. Arthritis Rheum 2002462287–2293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Elkayam O, Caspi D, Reitblatt T, Charboneau D, Rubins J B. The effect of tumor necrosis factor blockade on the response to pneumococcal vaccination in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 200433283–288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Filler S G, Yeaman M R, Sheppard D C. Tumor necrosis factor inhibition and invasive fungal infections. Clin Infect Dis 200541(Suppl 3)S208–S212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Garrison L, McDonnell N D. Etanercept: therapeutic use in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 199958(Suppl 1)I65–I69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Lee J H, Slifman N R, Gershon S K, Edwards E T, Schwieterman W D, Siegel J N.et al Life‐threatening histoplasmosis complicating immunotherapy with tumor necrosis factor alpha antagonists infliximab and etanercept. Arthritis Rheum 2002462565–2570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Manadan A M, Block J A, Sequeira W. Mycobacteria tuberculosis peritonitis associated with etanercept therapy. Clin Exp Rheumatol 200321526. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Slifman N R, Gershon S K, Lee J H, Edwards E T, Braun M M. Listeria monocytogenes infection as a complication of treatment with tumor necrosis factor alpha‐neutralizing agents. Arthritis Rheum 200348319–324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Jain V V, Evans T, Peterson M W. Reactivation histoplasmosis after treatment with anti‐tumor necrosis factor alpha in a patient from a nonendemic area. Respir Med 20061001291–1293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Listing J, Strangefeld A, Rau R.et al Infections in RA patients treated with infliximab or etanercept. Ann Rheum Dis 200554433 [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Salliot C, Gossec L, Ruyssen‐Witrand A, Luc M, Duclos M, Guignard S.et al Infections during tumour necrosis factor‐alpha blocker therapy for rheumatic diseases in daily practice: a systematic retrospective study of 709 patients. Rheumatology (Oxford) 200746327–334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Jacobsson L T, Turesson C, Gulfe A.et al No increase of severe infections in RA patients treated with TNF‐blockers. OASIS 2007
  • 146.Westhovens R, Yocum D, Han J, Berman A, Strusberg I, Geusens P, Rahman M U. The safety of infliximab, combined with background treatments, among patients with rheumatoid arthritis and various comorbidities: a large, randomized, placebo‐controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 2006541075–1086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Dixon W G, Watson K, Lunt M, Hyrich K L, Silman A J, Symmons D P. Rates of serious infection, including site‐specific and bacterial intracellular infection, in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving anti‐tumor necrosis factor therapy: results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register. Arthritis Rheum 2006542368–2376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Wolfe F, Caplan L, Michaud K. Treatment for rheumatoid arthritis and the risk of hospitalization for pneumonia: associations with prednisone, disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs, and anti‐tumor necrosis factor therapy. Arthritis Rheum 200654628–634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Weinblatt M, Combe B, White A.et al Safety of abatacept in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis receiving background non‐biologic DMARDs: 1 year results of the ASSURE Trial. Ann Rheum Dis 20056460 [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Genovese M C, Cohen S, Moreland L, Lium D, Robbins S, Newmark R.et al Combination therapy with etanercept and anakinra in the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis who have been treated unsuccessfully with methotrexate. Arthritis Rheum 2004501412–1419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Kapetanovic M C, Saxne T, Nilsson J A, Geborek P. Influenza vaccination as model for testing immune modulation induced by anti‐TNF and methotrexate therapy in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Rheumatology (Oxford) 200746608–611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Fomin I, Caspi D, Levy V, Varsano N, Shalev Y, Paran D.et al Vaccination against influenza in rheumatoid arthritis: the effect of disease modifying drugs, including TNF alpha blockers. Ann Rheum Dis 200665191–194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Lequerre T, Vittecoq O, Klemmer N, Goeb V, Pouplin S, Menard J F.et al Management of infusion reactions to infliximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or spondyloarthritis: experience from an immunotherapy unit of rheumatology. J Rheumatol 2006331307–1314. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Augustsson J, Eksborg S, Ernestam S, Gullstrom E, van Vollenhoven R F. Low‐dose glucocorticoid therapy decreases risk for treatment‐limiting infusion reaction to infliximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Ann Rheum Dis. Published Online First: 16 August 2007. doi: 10.1136/ard.2007. 070771 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 155.Baecklund E, Ekbom A, Sparen P, Feltelius N, Klareskog L. Disease activity and risk of lymphoma in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: nested case‐control study. BMJ 1998317180–181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Geborek P, Bladstrom A, Turesson C, Gulfe A, Petersson I F, Saxne T.et al Tumour necrosis factor blockers do not increase overall tumour risk in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, but may be associated with an increased risk of lymphomas. Ann Rheum Dis 200564699–703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Prior P, Symmons D P, Hawkins C F, Scott D L, Brown R. Cancer morbidity in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 198443128–131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Bongartz T, Harle P, Friedrich S, Karrer S, Vogt T, Seitz A.et al Successful treatment of psoriatic onycho‐pachydermo periostitis (POPP) with adalimumab. Arthritis Rheum 200552280–282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Okada S K, Siegal J N. Anti‐TNF antibody therapy in RA and risk of serious infections and malignancies. JAMA 20062962201–2202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Askling J, Fored C M, Brandt L, Baecklund E, Bertilsson L, Feltelius N.et al Risks of solid cancers in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and after treatment with tumour necrosis factor antagonists. Ann Rheum Dis 2005641421–1426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Setoguchi S, Solomon D H, Avorn J, Katz J, Weinblatt M, Glynn R.et al Use of anti‐TNF alpha drugs and incidence of hematologic and solid cancers in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 200552 (Suppl) [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Rennard S I, Fogarty C, Kelson S I.et al The safety and efficancy of infliximab in moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007175926–934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Stone J H, Holbrook J T, Marriott M A, Tibbs A K, Sejismundo L P, Min Y I.et al Solid malignancies among patients in the Wegener's Granulomatosis Etanercept Trial. Arthritis Rheum 2006541608–1618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Watson K D, Dixon W G, Hyrich K L.et al Influences of Anti‐TNF therapy and previous malignancy on cancer incidence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA): Result from the BSR biologics register. EULAR 2006 June:21–24, Amsterdam
  • 165.Cush J, Spiera R. Etanercept update on “dear doctor” safety letter. Amer College of Rheum. Hotline. Nov 2002
  • 166.Anker S D, Coats A J. How to RECOVER from RENAISSANCE? The significance of the results of RECOVER, RENAISSANCE, RENEWAL and ATTACH. Int J Cardiol 200286123–130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Khanna D, McMahon M, Furst D E. Anti‐tumor necrosis factor alpha therapy and heart failure: what have we learned and where do we go from here? Arthritis Rheum 2004501040–1050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Tam L, Li E, Tomlinson B. Effects of infliximab treatment on insulin sensitivity and lipid profile in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). OASIS 2007879181 [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Jacobsson L T, Turesson C, Nilsson J.et al Treatment with TNF‐blockers is associated with reduced premature mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. EULAR 21–24 June 2006, Amsterdam 2006
  • 170.Martin L, Barr S, Green F, Fritzler M. Severe fatal complications associated with infliximab therapy in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2006332 [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Ostor A J, Chilvers E R, Somerville M F, Lim A Y, Lane S E, Crisp A J.et al Pulmonary complications of infliximab therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 200633622–628. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Cacoub P, Lidove O, Maisonobe T, Duhaut P, Thibault V, Ghillani P.et al Interferon‐alpha and ribavirin treatment in patients with hepatitis C virus‐related systemic vasculitis. Arthritis Rheum 2002463317–3326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Esteve M, Saro C, Gonzalez‐Huix F, Suarez F, Forne M, Viver J M. Chronic hepatitis B reactivation following infliximab therapy in Crohn's disease patients: need for primary prophylaxis. Gut 2004531363–1365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Ince A, Rusche W, Daud U, Ross S C, Weiss T D, Moore T L.et al Etanercept in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis patients with chronic hepatitis C infection. Ann Rheum Dis 200261(Su1) pp 191 [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Khanna M, Shirodkar M A, Gottlieb A B. Etanercept therapy in patients with autoimmunity and hepatitis C. J Dermatolog Treat 200314229–232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Naveau S, Chollet‐Martin S, Dharancy S, Mathurin P, Jouet P, Piquet M A.et al A double‐blind randomized controlled trial of infliximab associated with prednisolone in acute alcoholic hepatitis. Hepatology 2004391390–1397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Oniankitan O, Duvoux C, Challine D, Mallat A, Chevalier X, Pawlotsky J M.et al Infliximab therapy for rheumatic diseases in patients with chronic hepatitis B or C. J Rheumatol 2004317–109. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Smith K J, Skelton H. Common variable immunodeficiency treated with a recombinant human IgG, tumour necrosis factor‐alpha receptor fusion protein. Br J Dermatol 2001144597–600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Millonig G, Kern M, Ludwiczek O, Nachbaur K, Vogel W. Subfulminant hepatitis B after infliximab in Crohn's disease: need for HBV‐screening? World J Gastroenterol 200612974–976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Blum E, Katz J. Infliximab therapy and LFT abnormalities in patients with Crohn's disease. AGA Abstracts 2007A659–A660.
  • 181.Schiemann U, Kellner H. [Gastrointestinal side effects in the therapy of rheumatologic diseases]. Z Gastroenterol 200240937–943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Wendling D, Auge B, Bettinger D, Lohse A, Le H G, Bresson‐Hadni S.et al Reactivation of a latent precore mutant hepatitis B virus related chronic hepatitis during infliximab treatment for severe spondyloarthropathy. Ann Rheum Dis 200564788–789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Roux' C H, Brocq O, Breuil V, Albert C, Euller‐Ziegler L. Pregnancy in rheumatology patients exposed to anti‐tumour necrosis factor (TNF)‐alpha therapy. Rheumatology (Oxford) 200746695–698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Vesga L, Terdiman J P, Mahadevan U. Adalimumab use in pregnancy. Gut 200554890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Katz J A, Antoni C, Keenan G F, Smith D E, Jacobs S J, Lichtenstein G R. Outcome of pregnancy in women receiving infliximab for the treatment of Crohn's disease and rheumatoid arthritis. Am J Gastroenterol 2004992385–2392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Antoni C E, Furst D E, Manger B.et al Outcome of pregnancy in women receiving infliximab for the treatment of Crohn's disease or rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 200144(Suppl)S152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Chambers C D, Johnson D L, Jones K L. Pregnancy outcome in women exposed to anti‐TNF‐alpha medications: The OTIS Rheumatoid Arthritis in Pregnancy Study. [abstract] ARD EULAR 200766(sup II)THUR0162 [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Chambers C D, Johnson D L, Jones K L. Adalimumab and pregnancy outcome: The OTIS Autoimmune Diseases in Pregnancy Project. The OTIS Collaborative Research Group University of San Diego. Amer Acad Derm 200756(2)AB10 [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Joven B E, Garcia‐Gonzalez A J, Ruiz T.et al Pregnancy in women receiving anti‐TNF‐alpha therapy. Experience in Spain. OASIS. 2007 Pres;884:Poster 186
  • 190.Ostensen M. Etanercept in breast milk. Letter to the Editor. J Rheumatol 2004311017–1018. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Allanore Y, Sellam J, Batteux F, Job D C, Weill B, Kahan A. Induction of autoantibodies in refractory rheumatoid arthritis treated by infliximab. Clin Exp Rheumatol 200422756–758. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Hanauer S B, Wagner C L, Bala M, Mayer L, Travers S, Diamond R H.et al Incidence and importance of antibody responses to infliximab after maintenance or episodic treatment in Crohn's disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 20042542–553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Chadha T, Hernandez J E. Infliximab‐related lupus and associated valvulitis: a case report and review of the literature. Arthritis Rheum 200655163–166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Pallotta P, Cianchini G, Ruffelli M, Puddu P. Infliximab‐induced lupus‐like reaction in a patient with psoriatic arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 200645116–117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Perez‐Garcia C, Maymo J, Lisbona Perez M P, Almirall B M, Carbonell A J. Drug‐induced systemic lupus erythematosus in ankylosing spondylitis associated with infliximab. Rheumatology (Oxford) 200645114–116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Bingham S J, Barcelos A, Buch M.et al Induction of serological lupus in patients on leflunomide and infliximab. Arthritis Rheum 200246(Suppl)S168 [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Christopher L, Wigley F. TNF‐alpha antagonists induce lupus‐like syndrome in patients with scleroderma and polyarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 200246(Suppl)S358 [Google Scholar]
  • 198.De R L, Kruithof E, Van D N, Hoffman I E, Van den B N, Van Den B F.et al Antinuclear antibodies following infliximab treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or spondylarthropathy. Arthritis Rheum 2003481015–1023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Eriksson C, Engstrand S, Sundqvist K G, Rantapaa‐Dahlqvist S. Autoantibody formation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with anti‐TNF alpha. Ann Rheum Dis 200564403–407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200.Mohan N, Edwards E T, Cupps T R, Oliverio P J, Sandberg G, Crayton H.et al Demyelination occurring during anti‐tumor necrosis factor alpha therapy for inflammatory arthritides. Arthritis Rheum 2001442862–2869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201.Jarand J, Zochodne D W, Martin L O, Voll C. Neurological complications of infliximab. J Rheumatol 2006331018–1020. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202.Shin I S, Baer A N, Kwon H J, Papadopoulos E J, Siegel J N. Guillain‐Barre and Miller Fisher syndromes occurring with tumor necrosis factor alpha antagonist therapy. Arthritis Rheum 541429–1434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203.Ruppert M, De C L, van O J, Hubens G, Balliu L, Vaneerdeweg W. Intestinal necrosis in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis receiving anti‐TNF treatment. Acta Chir Belg 2006106225–227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204.Whiting‐O'Keefe Q E, Fye K H, Sack K D. Methotrexate and histologic hepatic abnormalities: a meta‐analysis. Am J Med 199190711–716. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 205.Bresnihan B. The safety and efficacy of interleukin‐1 receptor antagonist in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 20013017–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206.Bresnihan B, Newmark R, Robbins S, Genant H K. Effects of anakinra monotherapy on joint damage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Extension of a 24‐week randomized, placebo‐controlled trial. J Rheumatol 2004311103–1111. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 207.Fleischmann R M, Schechtman J, Bennett R, Handel M L, Burmester G R, Tesser J.et al Anakinra, a recombinant human interleukin‐1 receptor antagonist (r‐metHuIL‐1ra), in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a large, international, multicenter, placebo‐controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 200348927–934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208.Fleischmann R M, Tesser J, Schiff M H, Schechtman J, Burmester G R, Bennett R.et al Safety of extended treatment with anakinra in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2006651006–1012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 209.Fleischmann R, Stern R, Iqbal I. Anakinra: an inhibitor of IL‐1 for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Expert Opin Biol Ther 200441333–1344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 210.Schiff M H. Lack of response to anakinra in rheumatoid arthritis following failure of tumor necrosis factor alpha blockade: comment on the article by Buch et al. Arthritis Rheum 200552364–365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211.Haibel H, Rudwaleit M, Listing J, Sieper J. Open label trial of anakinra in active ankylosing spondylitis over 24 weeks. Ann Rheum Dis 200564296–298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 212.Tan A L, Marzo‐Ortega H, O'Connor P, Fraser A, Emery P, McGonagle D. Efficacy of anakinra in active ankylosing spondylitis: a clinical and magnetic resonance imaging study. Ann Rheum Dis 2004631041–1045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 213.Chevalier X, Mugnier B, Bouvenot G. [Targeted anti‐cytokine therapies for osteoarthritis]. Bull Acad Natl Med 20061901411–1420. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 214.Chevalier X, Giraudeau B, Conrozier T, Marliere J, Kiefer P, Goupille P. Safety study of intraarticular injection of interleukin 1 receptor antagonist in patients with painful knee osteoarthritis: a multicenter study. J Rheumatol 2005321317–1323. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 215.Moosig F, Zeuner R, Renk C, Schroder J. IL‐1RA in refractory systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 200413605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 216.Ostendorf B, Iking‐Konert C, Kurz K, Jung G, Sander O, Schneider M. Preliminary results of safety and efficacy of the interleukin 1 receptor antagonist anakinra in patients with severe lupus arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 200564630–633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 217.Handwerger B, Kafka S, Dhillon G, Thomson G, Dunn M, Ferbas J.et al Effects of Anakinra (KINERET) on vaccine response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Annual Meeting of the American College of Rheumatology, San Antonio, Texas, USA, No. 1477, 16 October 2004
  • 218.Genovese M C, Becker J C, Schiff M, Luggen M, Sherrer Y, Kremer J.et al Abatacept for rheumatoid arthritis refractory to tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibition. N Engl J Med 20053531114–1123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 219.Kremer J M, Genant H K, Moreland L W, Russell A S, Emery P, Bud‐Mendoza C.et al Effects of abatacept in patients with methotrexate‐resistant active rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2006144865–876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 220.Kremer J M, Westhovens R, Leon M, Di G E, Alten R, Steinfeld S.et al Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis by selective inhibition of T‐cell activation with fusion protein CTLA4Ig. N Engl J Med 20033491907–1915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 221.Kremer J M, Dougados M, Emery P, Durez P, Sibilia J, Shergy W.et al Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with the selective costimulation modulator abatacept: twelve‐month results of a phase iib, double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 2005522263–2271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 222.Moreland L W, Alten R, Van Den B F, Appelboom T, Leon M, Emery P.et al Costimulatory blockade in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a pilot, dose‐finding, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled clinical trial evaluating CTLA‐4Ig and LEA29Y eighty‐five days after the first infusion. Arthritis Rheum 2002461470–1479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 223.Schiff M, Pritchard C, Teng J.et al The safety of Abatacept in patients with active RA and inadequate response to anti‐TNF therapy: results from the ARRIVE trial. [abstract] ARD EULAR 2007:OP0212
  • 224.Genovese M C, Schiff M, Luggen M.et al Sustained efficacy and safety through two years in patients with RA in the long term extension of the ATTAIN trial. Arthritis & Rheum 200654s244498 [Google Scholar]
  • 225.Kremer J, Westhovens R, Russell A.et al Long‐term efficacy of abatecept through 2 years of treatment in rheumatoid arthritis patients in the AIM Trial. Arthritis Rheum 200654(Suppl 9)s247 [Google Scholar]
  • 226.Abrams J R, Lebwohl M G, Guzzo C A, Jegasothy B V, Goldfarb M T, Goffe B S.et al CTLA4Ig‐mediated blockade of T‐cell costimulation in patients with psoriasis vulgaris. J Clin Invest 19991031243–1252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 227.Lovell D, Ruperto N, Prieur A.et al Assessment of open label co‐stimulation blockade with abatacept in children and adolescents with active juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Arthritis Rheum 200654(Suppl 9)s326 [Google Scholar]
  • 228.Moreland L W, Combe B, Steinfeld S.et al An integrated safety analysis of abatacept in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) across patient types and background therapies. Ann Rheum Dis Eular. 2006;65(Su11) pp 110
  • 229.Simon T, Smitten A, Franklin J.et al Malignancies in RA abatacept clinical development program and updated epidemiological assessment. ARD EULAR 2007 66;sup II; Fri OP0124
  • 230.Emery P, Fleischman R M, Filipowicz‐Sosnowska A.et al Rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis: a double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, dose‐ranging trial. Arthritis Rheum 2005521917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 231.Emery P, Sheeran T, Lehane P B, Saiedabadi N, Shaw T M. Efficacy and safety of rituximab at 2 years following a single treatment in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 200450(Suppl 9)S659 [Google Scholar]
  • 232.Keystone E C, Burmester G R, Furie R, Loveless J E, Emery P, Cravets M W.et al Improved quality of life with rituximab plus methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis who experienced inadequate response to one or more anti‐TNF‐alpha therapies. Arthritis Rheum 200552287 [Google Scholar]
  • 233.Fleischmann R, Racewicz A, Schechtman J.et al Rituximab efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis is independent of coadministration of glucocorticoids: Results from the Dose‐ranging Assessment iNternational Clinical Evaluation of Rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis (DANCER) Study. Arthritis Rheum 200552263 [Google Scholar]
  • 234.van Vollenhoven R, Schechtman J, Szczepanski L, Fleischmann R, Hazleman B L, Nash P.et al Safety and tolerability of rituximab in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA): results from the Dose‐ranging Assessment international Clinical Evaluation of Rituximab in RA (DANCER) study. Arthritis Rheum 200552263 [Google Scholar]
  • 235.van Vollenhoven R, Emery P, Fleischmann R M, Filipowicz‐Sosnowska A, Szczepanski L, Racewicz A.et al Safety and tolerability of rituximab in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA): results from the Dose‐ranging Assessment iNternational Clinical Evaluation of Rituximab in RA (DANCER) study. Ann Rheum Dis 200564(Suppl 3)432 [Google Scholar]
  • 236.Edwards J C, Cambridge G. Sustained improvement in rheumatoid arthritis following a protocol designed to deplete B lymphocytes. Rheumatology (Oxford) 200140205–211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 237.Emery P, Szczepanski L, Szechinski J, Filipowicz‐Sosnowska A, Edwards J C, Magrini F.et al Sustained efficacy at 48 weeks after single treatment course of rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 200348S439 [Google Scholar]
  • 238.Breedveld F C, Agarwal S K, Yin M, Ng C.et al Relationship between clinical response rituximab pharmacokinetics and peripheral B cell levels in Rheumatoid Arthritis. EULAR 2006 THU 0207
  • 239.Breedveld F C, Genovese M C, Emery P.et al Safety of TNF inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis patients previously treated with rituximab. EULAR 2006 THU 0206
  • 240.Emery P, Fleischmann R, Filipowicz‐Sosnowska A, Schechtman J, Szczepanski L, Kavanaugh A.et al The efficacy and safety of rituximab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate treatment: Results of a phase IIb double‐blind, placebocontrolled, dose‐ranging trial. (DANCER). Arthritis Rheum 2006541390–00. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 241.Cohen S B, Greenwald M, Dougados M R, Emery P, Furie R, Shaw T M.et al Efficacy and safety of rituximab in active RA patients who experienced an inadequate response to one or more anti‐TNF‐alpha therapies. Arthritis Rheum 2005521830 [Google Scholar]
  • 242.Looney R J. B cells as a therapeutic target in autoimmune diseases other than rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 200544(Suppl 2)ii13–ii17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 243.Edwards J C, Szczepanski L, Szechinski J, Filipowicz‐Sosnowska A, Emery P, Close D R.et al Efficacy of B‐cell‐targeted therapy with rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med 20043502572–2581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 244.Shaw T, Quan J, Totoritis M C. B cell therapy for rheumatoid arthritis: the rituximab (anti‐CD20) experience. Ann Rheum Dis 200362(Suppl 2)ii55–ii59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 245.Cohen S B, Emery P, Greenwald M W, Dougados M, Furie R, Genovese M.et al Rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis refractory to anti‐tumor necrosis factor therapy. Arthritis Rheum 2006542793–2806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 246.Tsutsumi Y, Kanamori H, Mori A, Tanaka J, Asaka M, Imamura M.et al Reactivation of hepatitis B virus with rituximab. Expert Opin Drug Saf 20054599–608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 247.Huffstutter J, Sienknechet C. Resistant adult still's disease treated with infliximab: a report of two cases. Arthritis Rheum 200246(Suppl)S326 [Google Scholar]
  • 248.Kraetsch H G, Antoni C, Kalden J R, Manger B. Successful treatment of a small cohort of patients with adult onset of Still's disease with infliximab: first experiences. Ann Rheum Dis 200160(Suppl 3)iii55–iii57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 249.Fernandez‐Nebro A, Tomero E, Ortiz‐Santamaria V, Castro M C, Olive A, de H M.et al Treatment of rheumatic inflammatory disease in 25 patients with secondary amyloidosis using tumor necrosis factor alpha antagonists. Am J Med 2005118552–556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 250.Elkayam O, Hawkins P N, Lachmann H, Yaron M, Caspi D. Rapid and complete resolution of proteinuria due to renal amyloidosis in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis treated with infliximab. Arthritis Rheum 200246571–2573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 251.Gottenberg J E, Merle‐Vincent F, Bentaberry F, Allanore Y, Berenbaum F, Fautrel B.et al Anti‐tumor necrosis factor alpha therapy in fifteen patients with AA amyloidosis secondary to inflammatory arthritides: a followup report of tolerability and efficacy. Arthritis Rheum 2003482019–2024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 252.Ortiz‐Santamaria V, Vals‐Roc M, Sanmarti M.et al Treatment of secondary amyloidosis with infliximab. Arthritis Rheum 200246(Suppl)S71 [Google Scholar]
  • 253.Tomero E, Carmona L, Gonzalez I.et al Infliximab in secondary amyloidosis complicating inflammatory arthropathies. Arthritis Rheum 200246S70 [Google Scholar]
  • 254.Smith G R, Tymms K E, Falk M. Etanercept treatment of renal amyloidosis complicating rheumatoid arthritis. Intern Med J 200434570–572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 255.Robinson N D, Guitart J. Recalcitrant, recurrent aphthous stomatitis treated with etanercept. Arch Dermatol 20031391259–1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 256.Vujevich J, Zirwas M. Treatment of severe, recalcitrant, major aphthous stomatitis with adalimumab. Cutis 200576129–132. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 257.Atzeni F, Sarzi‐Puttini P, Capsoni F, Mecchia M, Marrazza M G, Carrabba M. Successful treatment of resistant Behcet's disease with etanercept. Clin Exp Rheumatol 200523729. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 258.Sakellariou G T, Chatzigiannis I, Tstouridis I. Infliximab infusions for presistent back pain in two patients with Schmorl's nodes. Rheumatology 2005441588–1590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 259.Genevay S, Stingelin S, Gabay C. Efficacy of etanercept in the treatment of acute, severe sciatica: a pilot study. Ann Rheum Dis 2004631120–1123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 260.Estrach C, Mpofu S, Moots R J. Efficacy and safety of infliximab and adalimumab in Behçet's syndrome. Annual Scientific Meeting, American College of Rheumatology, Orlando, USA. 25 October 2003
  • 261.Gulli S, Arrigo C, Bocchino L, Morgante L, Sangari D, Castagna I.et al Remission of Behcet's disease with anti‐tumor necrosis factor monoclonal antibody therapy: a case report. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2003419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 262.Hassard P V, Binder S W, Nelson V, Vasiliauskas E A. Anti‐tumor necrosis factor monoclonal antibody therapy for gastrointestinal Behcet's disease: a case report. Gastroenterology 2001120995–999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 263.Licata G, Pinto A, Tuttolomondo A, Banco A, Ciccia F, Ferrante A.et al Anti‐tumour necrosis factor alpha monoclonal antibody therapy for recalcitrant cerebral vasculitis in a patient with Behcet's syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis 200362280–281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 264.Magliocco M A, Gottlieb A B. Etanercept therapy for patients with psoriatic arthritis and concurrent hepatitis C virus infection: report of 3 cases. J Am Acad Dermatol 200451580–584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 265.Morrillas‐Arques P, Callejas J, Iglesias‐Jimenez E.et al Etanercept/adalimumab in the treatment of Behcet's syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis 200665(Suppl II)374 [Google Scholar]
  • 266.Rozenbaum M, Rosner I, Portnoy E. Remission of Behcet's syndrome with TNFalpha blocking treatment. Ann Rheum Dis 200261283–284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 267.Saulsbury F T, Mann J A. Treatment with infliximab for a child with Behcet's disease. Arthritis Rheum 200349599–600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 268.Sangle S, Hughes G, D'Cruz D. Infliximab in the management of resistant systemic vasculitus: poor response and significant adverse effects. OASIS 2007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 269.Sfikakis P P, Theodossiadis P G, Katsiari C G, Kaklamanis P, Markomichelakis N N. Effect of infliximab on sight‐threatening panuveitis in Behcet's disease. Lancet 2001358295–296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 270.Sfikakis P P. Behcet's disease: a new target for anti‐tumour necrosis factor treatment. Ann Rheum Dis 200261(Suppl 2)ii51–ii53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 271.Ribi C, Sztajzel R, Delavelle J, Chizzolini C. Efficacy of TNF {alpha} blockade in cyclophosphamide resistant neuro‐Behcet disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005761733–1735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 272.Sweiss N J, Welsch M J, Curran J J, Ellman M H. Tumor necrosis factor inhibition as a novel treatment for refractory sarcoidosis. Arthritis Rheum 200553788–791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 273.van Laar J A, Missotten T, van Daele P L, Jamnitski A, Baarsma G S, van Hagen P M. Adalimumab: a new modality for Behcet's disease? Ann Rheum Dis 200766565–566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 274.Cortot A B, Cottin V, Miossec P, Fauchon E, Thivolet‐Bejui F, Cordier J F. Improvement of refractory rheumatoid arthritis‐associated constrictive bronchiolitis with etanercept. Respir Med 200599511–514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 275.Spahr L, Rubbia‐Brandt L, Frossard J L, Giostra E, Rougemont A L, Pugin J.et al Combination of steroids with infliximab or placebo in severe alcoholic hepatitis: a randomized controlled pilot study. J Hepatol 200237448–455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 276.Menon K V, Stadheim L, Kamath P S, Wiesner R H, Gores G J, Peine C J.et al A pilot study of the safety and tolerability of etanercept in patients with alcoholic hepatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 200499255–260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 277.Tsimberidou A M, Giles F J, Duvic M, Kurzrock R. Pilot study of etanercept in patients with relapsed cutaneous T‐cell lymphomas. J Am Acad Dermatol 200451200–204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 278.Cortis E, De B F, Insalaco A, Cioschi S, Muratori F, D'Urbano L E.et al Abnormal production of tumor necrosis factor (TNF): alpha and clinical efficacy of the TNF inhibitor etanercept in a patient with PAPA syndrome [corrected]. J Pediatr 2004145851–855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 279.Cummins D L, Hiatt K M, Mimouni D, Vander Kolk C A, Cohen B A, Nousari C H. Generalized necrobiosis lipoidica treated with a combination of split‐thickness autografting and immunomodulatory therapy. Int J Dermatol 200443852–854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 280.Cusack C, Buckley C. Etanercept: effective in the management of hidradenitis suppurativa. Br J Dermatol 2006154726–729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 281.Zeichner J A, Stern D W K, Lebwohl M. Intralesional etanercept for the treatment of necrobiosis lipoidica. Washington DC: Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology, 6 February 2004
  • 282.Hengstman G, van den Hoogen F, ven Engelen B.et al Anti‐TNF blockade with infliximab (Remicade) in polymyositis and dermatomyositis. Arthritis Rheum 200043(Suppl)S193 [Google Scholar]
  • 283.Miller M, Mendez E, Klein‐Gitelman M, Pachman L. Use of etanercept in juvenile dermatomyositis. Arthritis Rheum 200246(Suppl)S306 [Google Scholar]
  • 284.Sprott H, Glatzel M, Michel B A. Treatment of myositis with etanercept (Enbrel), a recombinant human soluble fusion protein of TNF‐alpha type II receptor and IgG1. Rheumatology (Oxford) 200443524–526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 285.Nzeusseu A, Durez P, Houssiau F. Successful use of infliximab in a case of refractory juvenile dermatomyositis. Arthritis Rheum 200144(Suppl)S90 [Google Scholar]
  • 286.Saadeyh C. Etanercept is effective in the treatment of polymyositis/dermatomyositis which is refractory to conventional therapy. Arthritis Rheum 200043(Suppl)S193 [Google Scholar]
  • 287.Norman R, Greenberg R G, Jackson J M. Case reports of etanercept in inflammatory dermatoses. J Am Acad Dermatol 200654S139–S142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 288.Ortego‐Centeno N, Callejas‐Rubio J L, Sanchez‐Cano D, Caballero‐Morales T. Refractory chronic erythema nodosum successfully treated with adalimumab. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 200721408–410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 289.Takada K, Aksentijevich I, Mahadevan V, Dean J A, Kelley R I, Kastner D L. Favorable preliminary experience with etanercept in two patients with the hyperimmunoglobulinemia D and periodic fever syndrome. Arthritis Rheum 2003482645–2651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 290.Ozgocmen S, Ozcakar L, Ardicoglu O, Kocakoc E, Kaya A, Kiris A. Familial Mediterranean fever responds well to infliximab: single case experience. Clin Rheumatol 20062583–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 291.Ghavami A, Genevay S, Fulpius T, Gabay C. Etanercept in treatment of Felty's syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis 641090–1091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 292.Andonopoulos A P, Meimaris N, Daoussis D, Bounas A, Giannopoulos G. Experience with infliximab (anti‐TNF alpha monoclonal antibody) as monotherapy for giant cell arteritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2003621116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 293.Cantini F, Niccoli L, Salvarani C, Padula A, Olivieri I. Treatment of longstanding active giant cell arteritis with infliximab: report of four cases. Arthritis Rheum 2001442933–2935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 294.Tan A L, Holdsworth J, Pease C, Emery P, McGonagle D. Successful treatment of resistant giant cell arteritis with etanercept. Ann Rheum Dis 200362373–374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 295.Ahmed M M, Mubashir E, Hayat S, Fowler M, Berney S M. Treatment of refractory temporal arteritis with adalimumab. Clin Rheumatol 2007261353–1355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 296.Wolff D, Roessler V, Steiner B, Wilhelm S, Weirich V, Brenmoehl J.et al Treatment of steroid‐resistant acute graft‐versus‐host disease with daclizumab and etanercept. Bone Marrow Transplant 2005351003–1010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 297.Uberti J P, Ayash L, Ratanatharathorn V, Silver S, Reynolds C, Becker M.et al Pilot trial on the use of etanercept and methylprednisolone as primary treatment for acute graft‐versus‐host disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 200511680–687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 298.Kennedy G A, Butler J, Western R, Morton J, Durrant S, Hill G R. Combination antithymocyte globulin and soluble TNFalpha inhibitor (etanercept) +/‐ mycophenolate mofetil for treatment of steroid refractory acute graft‐versus‐host disease. Bone Marrow Transplant 2006371143–1147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 299.Chiang K Y, Abhyankar S, Bridges K, Godder K, Henslee‐Downey J P. Recombinant human tumor necrosis factor receptor fusion protein as complementary treatment for chronic graft‐versus‐host disease. Transplantation 200273665–667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 300.Pavletic S Z, Klassen L W, Pope R, O'Dell J R, Traynor A E, Haire C E.et al Treatment of relapse after autologous blood stem cell transplantation for severe rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 200164(Suppl)28–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 301.Andolina M, Rabusin M, Maximova N, Di L G. Etanercept in graft‐versus‐host disease. Bone Marrow Transplant 200026929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 302.Paridaens D, van de Bosch F, van der Loos T L, Krenning E P, van Hagen P M. The effect of etanercept on Graves ophthalmopathy: a pilot study. Eye 2005191286–1289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 303.McMinn J R, Jr, Cohen S, Moore J, Lilly S, Parkhurst J, Tarantino M D.et al Complete recovery from refractory immune thrombocytopenic purpura in three patients treated with etanercept. Am J Hematol 200373135–140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 304.Peterson J R, Hsu F C, Simkin P A, Wener M H. Effect of tumour necrosis factor alpha antagonists on serum transaminases and viraemia in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and chronic hepatitis C infection. Ann Rheum Dis 2003621078–1082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 305.Pritchard C. Etanercept and hepatitis C. J Clin Rheumtol 19995179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 306.Moreno E, Erra A, Leon Y.et al Safety of etanercept treatment in patients with hepatitis B or C virus, and rheumatoid arthritis or ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis Eular 2004, FRI0106. [abstract]
  • 307.Parke Fa, Reveville J D. Anti‐tumor necrosis factor agents for rheumatoid arthritis in the setting of chronic hepatitis C infections. Arthritis & Rheum 200451800–804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 308.Marotte H, Fontanges E. Etanercept treatment for three months is safe in patients with rheumatological manifestations associated with hepatitis C virus. Rheumatology (Oxford) 20074697–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 309.Rokhsar C, Rabhan N, Cohen S R. Etanercept monotherapy for a patient with psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, and concomitant hepatitis C infection. J Am Acad Dermatol 200654361–362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 310.Wallis R S, Kyambadde P, Johnson J L, Horter L, Kittle R, Pohle M.et al A study of the safety, immunology, virology, and microbiology of adjunctive etanercept in HIV‐1‐associated tuberculosis. AIDS 200418257–264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 311.Lin J H, Liebhaber M, Roberts R L, Dyer Z, Stiehm E R. Etanercept treatment of cutaneous granulomas in common variable immunodeficiency. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2006117878–882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 312.Cepeda E, Williams F, Ishimori M, Weisman M. The use of anti‐tumor necrosis factor therapy in HIV positive individuals with rheumatic disease. Arthritis Rheum 200766(Suppl 1)5123–5124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 313.Barohn R J, Herbelin L, Kissel J T, King W, McVey A L, Saperstein D S.et al Pilot trial of etanercept in the treatment of inclusion‐body myositis. Neurology 200666S123–S124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 314.Singh R, Cuchacovich R, Huang W, Espinoza L R. Inclusion body myositis unresponsive to etanercept. J Clin Rheumatol 20017279–280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 315.Olivieri I, Scarano E, Gigliotti P, Giasi V, Padula A. Successful treatment of juvenile‐onset HLA‐B27‐associated severe and refractory heel thesitis with adalimumab documented by magnetic reasonance imaging. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2006451315–1317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 316.Weiss J E, Eberhard B A, Chowdhury D, Gottlieb B S. Infliximab as a novel therapy for refractory Kawasaki disease. J Rheumatol 200431808–810. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 317.Burns J C, Mason W H, Hauger S B, Janai H, Bastian J F, Wohrley J D.et al Infliximab treatment for refractory Kawasaki syndrome. J Pediatr 2005146662–667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 318.Lovelace K, Loyd A, Adelson D, Crowson N, Taylor J R, Cornelison R. Etanercept and the treatment of multicentric reticulohistiocytosis. Arch Dermatol 20051411167–1168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 319.Matejicka C, Morgan G J, Schlegelmilch J G. Multicentric reticulohistiocytosis treated successfully with an anti‐tumor necrosis factor agent: comment on the article by Gorman et al. Arthritis Rheum 200348864–866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 320.Kovach B T, Calamia K T, Walsh J S, Ginsburg W W. Treatment of multicentric reticulohistiocytosis with etanercept. Arch Dermatol 2004140919–921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 321.Birnbaum A J, Gentile P. Treatment of myelodysplasia in a patient with active rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Intern Med 2000133753–754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 322.Deeg H J, Gotlib J, Beckham C, Dugan K, Holmberg L, Schubert M.et al Soluble TNF receptor fusion protein (etanercept) for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome: a pilot study. Leukemia 200216162–164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 323.Rosenfeld C, Bedell C. Pilot study of recombinant human soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR:Fc) in patients with low risk myelodysplastic syndrome. Leuk Res 200226721–724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 324.Raza A, Dutt D, Dean L.et al Combination of thalidomide and embrel for the treatment of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Blood 200198273b [Google Scholar]
  • 325.Maciejewski J P, Risitano A M, Sloand E M, Wisch L, Geller N, Barrett J A.et al A pilot study of the recombinant soluble human tumour necrosis factor receptor (p75)‐Fc fusion protein in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Br J Haematol 2002117119–126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 326.Athreya B, Doughty R, Kastner D.et al Periodic fever syndrome in children. Arthritis Rheum 200043(Suppl)S117 [Google Scholar]
  • 327.Kroot E J, Kraan M C, Smeets T J, Maas M, Tak P P, Wouters J M. Tumour necrosis factor alpha blockade in treatment resistant pigmented villonodular synovitis. Ann Rheum Dis 200564497–499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 328.Adams A B, Kazim M, Lehman T J. Treatment of orbital myositis with adalimumab (Humira). J Rheumatol 2005321374–1375. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 329.Carter J D. Treatment of relapsing polychondritis with a TNF antagonist. J Rheumatol 2005321413. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 330.Ehresman G. Infliximab in the treatment of polychondritis. Arthritis Rheum 200246(Suppl)S170 [Google Scholar]
  • 331.Fonder M A, Cummins D L, Ehst B D, Anhalt J H. Adalimumab therapy for recalcitrant pyoderma gangrenosum. J Burns Wounds 20065e8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 332.Heffernan M P, Anadkat M J, Smith D I. Adalimumab treatment for pyoderma gangrenosum. Arch Dermatol 2007143306–308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 333.Magnano M D, Chakravarty E F, Broudy C, Chung L, Kelman A, Hillygus J.et al A pilot study of tumor necrosis factor inhibition in erosive/inflammatory osteoarthritis of the hands. J Rheumatol 2007341323–1327. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 334.Sweiss N, Curran J, Ellman N. TNF‐inhibition as a novel treatment for refractory sarcoidosis. Annual Scientific Meeting, American College of Rheumatology, Orlando, USA. 25 October 2003
  • 335.Callejas‐Rubio J L, Ortego‐Centeno N, Lopez‐Perez L, Benticuaga M N. Treatment of therapy‐resistant sarcoidosis with adalimumab. Clin Rheumatol 200625596–597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 336.Korhonen T, Karppinen J, Malmivaara A, Autio R, Niinimaki J, Paimela L.et al Efficacy of infliximab for disc herniation‐induced sciatica: one‐year follow‐up. Spine 2004292115–2119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 337.Korhonen T, Karppinen J, Paimela L, Malmivaara A, Lindgren K A, Jarvinen S.et al The treatment of disc herniation‐induced sciatica with infliximab: results of a randomized, controlled, 3‐month follow‐up study. Spine 2005302724–2728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 338.Lam K, Woods A, Hummers K, Wigley F. Efficacy and safety of etanercept in scleroderma joint disease. Arthritis Rheum 200552S588 [Google Scholar]
  • 339.Pasternack F R, Fox L P, Engler D E. Silicone granulomas treated with etanercept. Arch Dermatol 200514113–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 340.Tobinick E, Davoodifar S. Efficacy of etanercept delivered by perispinal administration for chronic back and/or neck disc‐related pain: a study of clinical observations in 143 patients. Curr Med Res Opin 2004201075–1085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 341.Khanna D, Liebling M R, Louie J S. Etanercept ameliorates sarcoidosis arthritis and skin disease. J Rheumatol 2003301864–1867. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 342.Utz J P, Limper A H, Kalra S, Specks U, Scott J P, Vuk‐Pavlovic Z.et al Etanercept for the treatment of stage II and III progressive pulmonary sarcoidosis. Chest 2003124177–185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 343.Wagner A D, Andresen J, Jendro M C, Hulsemann J L, Zeidler H. Sustained response to tumor necrosis factor alpha‐blocking agents in two patients with SAPHO syndrome. Arthritis Rheum 2002461965–1968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 344.Moul D K, Korman N J. Severe hidradenitis suppurativa treated with adalimumab. Arch Dermatol 1421110–1112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 345.Heffernan M P, Smith D I. Adalimumab for treatment of cutaneous sarcoidosis. Arch Dermatol 200614217–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 346.Querfeld C, Bachmann P, Guitart J. The effectiveness of etanercept in treating cutaneous sarcoidosis. A case report. Amer Acad Derm 200750(suppl 1)P55 [Google Scholar]
  • 347.Hobbs K. Chronic sarcoid arthritis treated with intraarticular etanercept. Arthritis Rheum 200552987–988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 348.Ellman M H, MacDonald P A, Hayes F A. Etanercept treatment for diffuse scleroderma: a pilot study. Arthritis Rheum 200043(Suppl)S392 [Google Scholar]
  • 349.Bosello S, De S M, Tolusso B, Zoli A, Ferraccioli G. Tumor necrosis factor‐alpha inhibitor therapy in erosive polyarthritis secondary to systemic sclerosis. Ann Intern Med 2005143918–920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 350.Zandbelt M M, de W P, van D P, Hoyng C B, van de P L, van den H F. Etanercept in the treatment of patients with primary Sjogren's syndrome: a pilot study. J Rheumatol 20043196–101. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 351.Pessler F, Monash B, Rettig P, Forbes B, Kreiger P A, Cron R Q. Sjogren syndrome in a child: favorable response of the arthritis to TNFalpha blockade. Clin Rheumatol 200625746–748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 352.Fautrel B, Sibilia J, Mariette X, Combe B. Tumour necrosis factor alpha blocking agents in refractory adult Still's disease: an observational study of 20 cases. Ann Rheum Dis 200564262–266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 353.Stern A, Riley R, Buckley L. Worsening of macrophage activation syndrome in a patient with adult onset Still's disease after initiation of etanercept therapy. J Clin Rheumatol 20017252–256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 354.Asherson R A, Pascoe L. Adult onset Still's disease: response to Enbrel. Ann Rheum Dis 200261859–860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 355.Kumari R, Uppal S S. Prolonged remission in adult‐onset Still's disease with etanercept. Clin Rheumatol 200625106–108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 356.Gindi V, Lowe N J, Koo S, Yamauchi P A. Treatment of Sweet's syndrome with the tumor necrosis factor antagonist etanercept in a patient with coexisting rheumatoid arthritis. Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology, New Orleans, USA. 18 February 2005
  • 357.Yamauchi P S, Turner L, Lowe N J, Gindi V, Jackson J M. Treatment of recurrent Sweet's syndrome with coexisting rheumatoid arthritis with the tumor necrosis factor antagonist etanercept. J Am Acad Dermatol 200654S122–S126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 358.Aringer M, Graninger W B, Steiner G, Smolen J S. Safety and efficacy of tumor necrosis factor alpha blockade in systemic lupus erythematosus: an open‐label study. Arthritis Rheum 2004503161–3169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 359.Lurati A, Teruzzi B, Salmaso A.et al Macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) during anti‐IL‐1 receptor therapy (anakinra) in a patient affected by systemic onset idiopathic juvenile arthritis (soJIA): a report and review of the literature. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J 20073(2)79–85. [Google Scholar]
  • 360.Lurati A, Teruzzi B, Salmaso A.et al Macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) during anti‐IL‐1 receptor therapy (anakinra) in a patient affected by systemic onset idiopathic juvenile arthritis (soJIA): a report and review of the literature. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J 20073(2)79–85. [Google Scholar]
  • 361.Hernandez‐Ibarra H, Gutierrez L, Juarez S.et al Prevalence, burden of illness and factors associated with neurocognitive dysfunction in Mexican patients with systemic lupus erythematous. Annual Scientific Meeting, American College of Rheumatology, Orlando, USA, No 378. 25 October 2003
  • 362.Principi M, Di L A, Ingrosso M, Pisani A, Marangi S, Amoruso A.et al Lupus nephritis improvement after anti‐tumor necrosis factor alpha monoclonal antibody (infliximab) treatment for Crohn's disease: a case report. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol 200426243–248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 363.Hoffman G S, Merkel P A, Brasington R D, Lenschow D J, Liang P. Anti‐tumor necrosis factor therapy in patients with difficult to treat Takayasu arteritis. Arthritis Rheum 2004502296–2304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 364.Della R A, Tavoni A, Merlini G, Baldini C, Sebastiani M, Lombardi M.et al Two Takayasu arteritis patients successfully treated with infliximab: a potential disease‐modifying agent? Rheumatology (Oxford) 2005441074–1075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 365.Tato F, Rieger J, Hoffmann U. Refractory Takayasu's arteritis successfully treated with the human, monoclonal anti‐tumor necrosis factor antibody adalimumab. Int Angiol 200524304–307. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 366.Hull K M, Drewe E, Aksentijevich I, Singh H K, Wong K, McDermott E M.et al The TNF receptor‐associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS): emerging concepts of an autoinflammatory disorder. Medicine (Baltimore) 200281349–368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 367.Lamprecht P, Moosig F, dam‐Klages S, Mrowietz U, Csernok E, Kirrstetter M.et al Small vessel vasculitis and relapsing panniculitis in tumour necrosis factor receptor associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS). Ann Rheum Dis 2004631518–1520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 368.Drewe E, McDermott E M, Powell R J. Treatment of the nephrotic syndrome with etanercept in patients with the tumor necrosis factor receptor‐associated periodic syndrome. N Engl J Med 20003431044–1045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 369.Joseph A, Raj D, Dua H S, Powell P T, Lanyon P C, Powell R J. Infliximab in the treatment of refractory posterior uveitis. Ophthalmology 20031101449–1453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 370.Smith J A, Thompson D J, Whitcup S M, Suhler E, Clarke G, Smith S.et al A randomized, placebo‐controlled, double‐masked clinical trial of etanercept for the treatment of uveitis associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 20055318–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 371.Braun J, Baraliakos X, Listing J, Sieper J. Decreased incidence of anterior uveitis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis treated with the anti‐tumor necrosis factor agents infliximab and etercept. Arthritis Rheum 2005522447–2451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 372.Foster C S, Tufail F, Waheed N.et al Efficacy of etanercept in preventing relapse of uveitis controlled by methotrexate. Arch Ophthalmol 2003121437–440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 373.Biester S, Deuter C, Michels H, Haefner R, Kuemmerle‐Deschner J, Doycheva D.et al Adalimumab in the therapy of uveitis in childhood. Br J Ophthalmol 200791319–324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 374.Foeldvari I, Nielsen S, Kummerle‐Deschner J, Espada G, Horneff G, Bica B.et al Tumor necrosis factor‐alpha blocker in treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis‐associated uveitis refractory to second‐line agents: results of a multinational survey. J Rheumatol 2007341146–1150. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 375.Vazquez‐Cobian L B, Flynn T, Lehman T J. Adalimumab therapy for childhood uveitis. J Pediatr 2006149572–575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 376.Reiff A, Takei S, Sadeghi S.et al Etanercept therapy in children with treatment‐resistant uveitis. Arthritis Rheum 2007441411–1415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 377.Schmeling H, Horneff G. Etanercept and uveitis in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2005441008–1011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 378.Guignard S, Gossec L, Salliot C Ruy, Ruyssen‐Witrand A, Luc M, Duclos M.et al Efficacy of tumour necrosis factor blockers in reducing uveitis flares in patients with spondylarthropathy: a retrospective study. Ann Rheum Dis 2006651631–1634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 379.Booth A, Harper L, Hammad T, Bacon P, Griffith M, Levy J.et al Prospective study of TNFalpha blockade with infliximab in anti‐neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody‐associated systemic vasculitis. J Am Soc Nephrol 200415717–721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 380.Feinstein J, Arroyo R. Successful treatment of childhood onset refractory polyarteritis nodosa with tumor necrosis factor alpha blockade. J Clin Rheumatol 200511219–222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 381.van der Bijl A E, Allaart C F, Van V J, Van D S, Breedveld F C. Rheumatoid vasculitis treated with infliximab. J Rheumatol 2005321607–1609. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 382.Saji T, Kemmotsu Y. Infliximab for Kawasaki syndrome. J Pediatr 2006149426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 383.Arbach O, Gross W L, Gause A. Treatment of refractory Churg‐Strauss‐syndrome (CSS) by TNF‐a blockade. Immunobiology 2002206495–501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 384.Gause A M, Arbach O, Reinhold‐Keller E.et al Induction of remission with infliximab in active generalized Wegener's granulomatosis is effective but complicated by severe infections. Annual Scientific Meeting, American College of Rheumatology, Orlando, USA No.450. 25 October 2003
  • 385.Emsley H C, Smith C J, Georgiou R F, Vail A, Hopkins S J, Rothwell N J.et al A randomised phase II study of interleukin‐1 receptor antagonist in acute stroke patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005761366–1372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 386.Leslie K S, Lachmann H J, Bruning E, McGrath J A, Bybee A, Gallimore J R.et al Phenotype, genotype, and sustained response to anakinra in 22 patients with autoinflammatory disease associated with CIAS‐1/NALP3 mutations. Arch Dermatol 20061421591–1597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 387.Rudinskaya A, Trock D. Successful treatment of a patient with refractory adult‐onset Still disease with anakinra. J Clin Rheumatol 20039330–332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 388.Quartier P, Lequerre T, Rosellini D.et al Anakinra in systemic‐onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis and adult onset Still's disease. EULAR OP0174 2007
  • 389.Aelion J A, Odhav S K. Prompt responses to treatment with anakinra in adult onset Stills disease. EULAR FRI0109 2004
  • 390.Haraoui B, Bourrelle D, Kaminska E. Anakinra in the treatment of adult‐onset Still's disease. EULAR FRI0148 2007
  • 391.Kalliolias G D, Georgiou P E, Antonopolus I A. Anakinra (AKR) Anakinra treatment in patients with adult‐onset Still's disease is fast, effective, safe and steroid sparing:experience from and uncontrolled trial. Ann Rheum Dis 200766842–843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 392.Nordstrom D, Aarnio M, Helve T.et al Favorable response to anakinra in refractory adult‐onset Still's disease. A clinical study is needed. ACR 20061623294 [Google Scholar]
  • 393.Kalliolias G, Antonopoulos L, Andonopoulos A, Liossis S. Beneficial effects of anakinra in patients with steriod‐resistant adult onset Still's disease. ACR 20061624295 [Google Scholar]
  • 394.Fitzgerald A A, Leclercq S A, Yan A, Homik J E, Dinarello C A. Rapid responses to anakinra in patients with refractory adult‐onset Still's disease. Arthritis Rheum 2005521794–1803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 395.Vasques Godinho F M, Parreira Santos M J, Canas da S J. Refractory adult onset Still's disease successfully treated with anakinra. Ann Rheum Dis 200564647–648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 396.Antin J H, Weisdorf D, Neuberg D, Nicklow R, Clouthier S, Lee S J.et al Interleukin‐1 blockade does not prevent acute graft‐versus‐host disease: results of a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial of interleukin‐1 receptor antagonist in allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Blood 20021003479–3482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 397.Birmingham J, Kraus V, Toth A. Clinical benefits of intra‐articular anakinra (kineret) of knee signs and symptoms of injury, arthritis and arthrofibrosis. ACR 2006F142(662) [Google Scholar]
  • 398.Behrens E M, Kreiger P A, Cherian S, Cron R Q. Interleukin 1 receptor antagonist to treat cytophagic histiocytic panniculitis with secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. J Rheumatol 2006332081–2084. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 399.Metyas S, Hoffman H. Anakinra prevents symptons of familial cold autoinflammatory syndrome and Raynaud's disease. J Rheumatol 200633(10)1–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 400.Bodar E J, van der Hilst J C, Drenth J P, van der Meer J W, Simon A. Effect of etanercept and anakinra on inflammatory attacks in the hyper‐IgD syndrome: introducing a vaccination provocation model. Neth J Med 200563260–264. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 401.Rigante D, Ansuini V, Bertoni B.et al Treatment with anakinra in the hyperimmunoglobulinemia D/periodic fever syndrome. Rheumatol Int 20062797–100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 402.Verbsky J W, White A J. Effective use of the recombinant interleukin 1 receptor antagonist anakinra in therapy resistant systemic onset juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2004312071–2075. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 403.Ilowite N T, Porras O, Reiff A.et al A twelve‐week open label safety and efficacy study of anakinra (KINERET) in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. EULAR OP0071 2003
  • 404.Ilowite N T, Reiff A, Rudge S R, Punaro M G, Martin J.et al A randomized, multi‐center, blinded, placebo‐controlled study with an open‐label run‐in period to evaluate anakinra in polyarticular‐course juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. [abstract] Arthritis & Rheum 200754s327723 [Google Scholar]
  • 405.Hawkins P, Larchmann H. Interleukin‐1‐receptor antagonist in the Muckle Wells syndrome. N Engl J Med 20033482583–2584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 406.Saha M, Rustin M, Swale V, Hawkins P. Muckle‐Wells syndrome successfully treated with an interleukin‐1 receptor antagonist. Br J Dermatol 2004151(Suppl 68)21–62. [Google Scholar]
  • 407.Ramos E, Arostegui J I, Campuzano S.et al Positive clinical and biochemical responses to anakinra in a 3‐year‐old patient with cryopyrin‐associated periodic cyndrome (CAPS). Rheumatology 2005441072–1073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 408.Rynne M, Maclean C, Bybee A, McDermott M F, Emery P. Hearing improvement in a patient with variant Muckle‐Wells syndrome in response to interleukin 1 receptor antagonism. Ann Rheum Dis 200665533–534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 409.Mirault T, Launay D, Cuisset L.et al Recovery form deafness in patients with muckle‐wells syndrome treated with anakinra. Arthritis Rheum 2007541697–1700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 410.Goldbach‐Mansky R, Daily N, Canna S.et al Neonatal‐onset multisystem inflammatory disease responsive to interleukin‐1B inhabition. N Engl J Med 2007355581–592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 411.Frenkel J, Wulffraat N, Kuis W. Anakinra in mutation‐negative NOMID/CINCA syndrome: comment on the articles by Hawkins et al and Hoffman and Patel. To the Editor. Arthtitis & Rheum 2007503738–3739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 412.Rigante D, Ansuini V, Calderelli M.et al Hydrocephalus in CINCA syndrome treated with anakinra. Childs Nerv Syst 200622334–337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 413.Seitz M, Kamgang R K, Simon H U, Villiger P M. Therapeutic interleukin (IL) 1 blockade normalises increased IL1 beta and decreased tumour necrosis factor alpha and IL10 production in blood mononuclear cells of a patient with CINCA syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis 2005641802–1803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 414.Granel B, Serratrice J, Disdier P, Weiller P J. Dramatic improvement with anakinra in a case of chronic infantile neurological cutaneous and articular (CINCA) syndrome. Rheumatology 200544689–690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 415.Namde M, Hill S, Duryea J, Plass N, Snyder C.et al Arthropathy in patients with neonatal onset multisystem inflammatory disease (NOMID). Arthritis & Rheum 200654s8032046 [Google Scholar]
  • 416.Namde M, Hildebrand P, Jain M.et al Functional outcomes in neonatal onset multisystem inflammatory disease (NOMID) after 12 months of treatment with the recombinant IL‐1 receptor antagonist anakinra. Ann Rheum Dis 200665(Suppl II)100 [Google Scholar]
  • 417.Namde M, Canna S, Plass N, Rubin A, Kim J, Snyder B.et al Twelve months after treating children with neonatal onset multisystem inflammatory disease (NOMID/CINCA) with the IL‐1 receptor antagonist anakinra. Ann Rheum Dis 200665(Suppl II)448 [Google Scholar]
  • 418.Gattorno M, Ferlito F, Pelagatti M A.et al Clinical and biological effects of treatment with anakinra in CINCA syndrome and in systemic onset JIA. Ann Rheum Dis 200665(Suppl II)252 [Google Scholar]
  • 419.Caroli F, Pontillo A, D'Osualdo A, Travan L, Ceccherini I, Crovella S.et al Clinical and genetic characterization of Italian patients affected by CINCA syndrome. Rheumatology (Oxford) 200746473–478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 420.Lovell D J, Bowyer S L, Solinger A M. Interleukin‐1 blockade by anakinra improves clinical symptoms in patients with neonatal‐onset multisystem inflammatory disease. Arthritis Rheum 2005521283–1286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 421.Dierselhuis M P, Frenkel J, Wulffraat N M, Boelens J J. Anakinra for flares of pyogenic arthritis in PAPA syndrome. Rheumatology (Oxford) 200544406–408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 422.Jung N, Hoheisel R, Haase I.et al Anakinra (IL1‐RA) in the treatment of patients with active psoriatic arthritis refractory to or intolerant of methotrexate (MTX). Ann Rheum Dis 200564(Suppl 3)1092 [Google Scholar]
  • 423.Gibbs A, Gogarty M, Bresnihan B.et al Moderate clinical response and absence of MRI or immunohistological change suggest that anakinra is ineffective in psoriatic arthritis. ACR 20061809481 [Google Scholar]
  • 424.Vounotrypidis P, Sakellariou G T, Zisopoulos D, Berberidis C. Refractory relapsing polychondritis:rapid and sustained response in the treatment with an IL‐1 receptor antagonist (anakinra). Rheumatology 200645491–492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 425.Martinez‐Toboada V, Fontalba A, Blanco R, Fernandez‐Luna J. Successful treatment of refractory Schnitzler Syndrome with anakinra: comment on the article by Hawkins et al. Arthritis Rheum 2005522226–2228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 426.Pascual V, Allantaz F, Arce E, Punaro M, Banchereau J. Role of interleukin‐1 (IL‐1) in the pathogenesis of systemic onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis and clinical response to IL‐1 blockade. J Exp Med 20052011479–1486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 427.Henrickson M. Sustained efficacy of anakinra in refractory systemic arthritis failing etanercept. Arthritis & Rheum 200552s83131 [Google Scholar]
  • 428.Reiff A. The use of anakinra in juvenile arthritis. Curr Rheumatol Rep 20057434–440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 429.Mirkinson L, Nagle D, Jones O, Kadom N. Anakinra therapy in a child with systemic‐onset juvenile rheumatoid arthritis after human herpesvirus 6 encephalitis. J Clin Rheumatol 20061283–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 430.Weiss J, Henrickson M, Walco G, Feinstein A, Kimura Y, Sanzari J.et al Combination therapy with anakinra and anti‐TNF agents in refractory systemic JIA (SJIA). Pediatric Rheumatology, Pres 2007134 [Google Scholar]
  • 431.Punaro L, Allantaz F, Stichweh D, Pascual V. Clinical and microarray follow‐up of systemic onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients threated with anakinra. OASIS 2007616 [Google Scholar]
  • 432.Zeft A, Schlesinger M, Bohnsack J. Anakinra in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: The Intermountain West Experience. ACR 20061704375 [Google Scholar]
  • 433.Gattorno M, Ferlito F, Pelagatti M A.et al Patterns of IL‐1 B secretion and response to anti‐IL‐1 treatment in Cias‐1 mutated patients and systemic onset JIA (soJIA). ACR 20062115 [Google Scholar]
  • 434.Strand V, Balbir G A, Pavelka K.et al Sustained benefit in rheumatoid arthritis following one course of rituximab: improvements in physical function over 2 years. Rheumatology (Oxford) 20061–9. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 435.Edwards J C, Szczepanski L, Szechinski J.et al Efficacy of B‐cell‐targeted therapy with rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med 20043502572–2581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 436.Popa C, Leandro M J, Cambridge G.et al Repeated B lymphocyte depletion with rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis over 7 years. Rheumatology (Oxford) 20071–5. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 437.Higashida J, Wun T, Schmidt S. Safety and efficacy of rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis refractory to disease modifying antirheumatic drugs and anti‐tumor necrosis factor treatment. J Rheumatol 2005322109–2115. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 438.Moore J, Ma D, Will R.et al A phase II study of rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis patients with recurrent disease following haematopoietic stem cell transplantation Bone Marrow Transplant200434241–247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 439.Kneitz C, Wilhelm M, Tony H P. Improvement of refractory rheumatoid arthritis after depletion of B cells. Scand J Rheumatol 20073382–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 440.Leandro M J, Edwards J C, Cambridge G. Clinical outcome in 22 patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with B lymphocyte depletion. Ann Rheum Dis 200261883–888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 441.De Vita S, Zaja F, Sacco S.et al Efficacy of selective B cell blockage in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: evidence for a pathogenetic role of B cells. Arthritis Rheum 2007462029–2033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 442.Scheinberg M, Hamerschlak N, Kutner J M.et al Rituximab in refractory autioimmune diseases: Brazilian experience with 29 patients (2002–2004). Clin Exp Rheumatol 20022465–69. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 443.Maher L, Wilson J G. Successful treatment of rheumatoid vasculitis‐associated foot drop with rituximab. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2006451450–1451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 444.Cambridge G, Stohl W, Leandro M J. Circulating levels of B lymphocyte simulator in patients with rheumatiod arthritis following rituximab treatment. Arthritis Rheum 200654723–732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 445.Leandro M J, Cambridge G, Ehrensten M.et al Reconstitution of peripheral blook B cells after depletion with rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 200654613–620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 446.Roll P, Palanichamy A, Kneitz C.et al Regeneration of B cell subsets after transient B cell depletion unsing anti‐CD20 antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2007542377–2386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 447.Stasi R, Stipa E, Del Poeta G.et al Long‐term observation of patients with anti‐neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody‐associated vasculitis treated with rituximab. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2006451432–1436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 448.Ericksson P. Nine patients with anti‐neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody‐positive vasculitus successfully treated with rituximab. J Intern Med 2005257540–548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 449.Smith K G C, Jones R B, Burns S M.et al Long‐term comparison of rituximab treatment for refractory systemic lupus erythematosus and vasculitus. Arthritis Rheum 2006542970–2982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 450.Aries P M, Hellmich B, Voswinkel J.et al Lack of efficacy of rituximab in Wegener's granulomatosis with refractory grandulomatous manifestations. Ann Rheum Dis 200665853–858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 451.Keogh K A, Ytterberg S R, Fervenza F C.et al Rituximab for refractory Wegener's granulomatosis: report of a prospective, one‐label pilot trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007173180–187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 452.Sanchez‐Cano D, Callejas‐Rubio J L, Rios‐Fernandez R.et al Use of rituximab in Wegener's granulomatosis: comment on the article by Wong. Nephrol Dial Transplant 200722958–959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 453.Tektonidou M G, Skopouli F N. Sustained 3‐year remission aftr rituximab treatment in a patient with refractory Wegener's granulomatosis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 200624S103. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 454.Bachmeyer C. Rituximab is an alternative in a case of contra‐indication of cyclophosphamide with Wegener's granulomatosis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2005201274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 455.Ferraro A J, Day C J, Drayson M T.et al Effective thearpeutic use of Rituximab in refractory Wegener's granulomatosis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 200520622–625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 456.Kallenbach M, Duan H, Ring T. Rituximab induced remission in a patient with Wegener's granulomatosis. Nephron Clin Pract 200599c92–c96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 457.Memet B, Rudinskaya A, Kerbs T.et al Wegener's granulomatosis with massive intracerebral hemorrhage. J Clin Rheumatol 200511318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 458.Specks U, Fervensa, McDonald T J.et al Response of Wegener's granulomatosis to anti‐CD20 chimeric monoclonal antibody therapy. Arthritis Rheum 2007442840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 459.Clatworthy M R, Jayne D R W. Acquired hemophilia in association with ANCA‐associated vasculitis: response to rituximab. Am J Kidney Dis 200647680–682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 460.Koukoulaki M, Smith K G C, Jayne D R W. Rituximab in Churg‐Strauss syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis 200665557–559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 461.Kaushik V, Reddy H V, Bucknall R C. Successful use of rituximab in a patient with recalcitrant Churg‐Strauss symdrome. Ann Rheum Dis 2006651116–1117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 462.Sansonno D, De Re V, Lauletta G. Monoclonal antibody treatment of mixed cryoglobulinemia resistant to interferon alpha with an anti‐CD20. Blood 20031013818–3826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 463.Quartuccio L, Soardo G, Romano G.et al Rituximab treatment for glomerulonephritis in HCV‐associated mixed cryoglobulinaemia: efficacy and safety in the absence of steroids. Rheumatology (Oxford) 200745824–846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 464.Bassee G, Ribes D, Kamar N.et al Rituximab therapy for mixed cryoglobulinemia in seven renal transplant patients. Transplant Proc 2007382308–2310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 465.Cai F Z J, Ahern M, Smith M. Treatment of cryoglobluinemia associated peripheral neuropathy with rituximab. J Rheumatol 2006331197–1198. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 466.Pekow J, Chung R T. Treatment of type II cryoglobulinemia associated with hepatitis C with rituximab. J Clin Gastroenterol 200640450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 467.Telander D G, Hollander G, Wax M B.et al Rubeosis and anterior segment ischemia associated with systemic cryoglobulinemia. Am J Ophthalmol 2006142689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 468.Bryce A H, Kyle R A, Dispenzieri A.et al Response to rituximab in patients with type II cryoglobulinemia. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma 20077140–144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 469.Zaja F, De Vita S, Massaro C.et al Efficacy and safety of fituximab in type II mixed cryoglobulinemia. Blood 20031013827–3834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 470.Arzoo K, Sadeghi S, Liebman H A. Treatment of refractory antibody mediated autoimmune disorders with an anti‐CD20 monoclonal antibody (rituximab). Ann Rheum Dis 200261922–924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 471.Basse G, Ribes D, Kamar N.et al Rituximab therapy for de novo mixed cryoglobulinemia in renal transplant patients. Transportation 2005821560–1564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 472.Ghijsels E, Lerut E, Vanrenterghem Y.et al Anti‐CD20 monoclonal antibody (rituximab) treatment for hepatitis C‐negative therapy‐resistant essential mixed cryoglobulinemia with renal and cardiac failure. Am J Kidney Dis 200443e34–e38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 473.Lamprecht P, Lerin‐Lozano C, Merz H.et al Rituximab induces remission in refractory HCV associated cryoglobulinaemic vasculitis. Ann Rheum Dis 2003621230–1233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 474.Bryce A H, Kyle R A, Dispenzieri A.et al Natural history and therapy of 66 patients with mixed cryoglobulinemia. Am J Hematol 200781511–518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 475.Nehme S H, Korganow A S, Pasquail J L.et al Rituximab inefficiency during type I cryoglobulinaemin. Rheumatology (Oxford) 200544410–411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 476.Ring T, Kallenbach M, Praetorius J.et al Successful treatment of a patient with primary Sjogren's syndrome with rituximab. Clin Rheumatol 200625891–894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 477.Touma Z, Sayad J, Arayssi T. Successful treatment of Sjogren's syndrome with rituximab. Scand J Rheumatol 200635323–325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 478.Pijpe J, Van‐Imhoff G W, Spijkervet F K L.et al Rituximab treatment in patients with primary Sjogren's syndrome. Arthritis Rheum 2005522740–2750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 479.Pijpe J, Van‐Imhoff G W, Vissink A.et al Changes in salivary gland immunohistology and function after rutiximab monotherapy in a patient with Sjogren's syndrome and associated MALT lymphoma. Ann Rheum Dis 200565958–960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 480.Voulgarelis M, Giannouli S, Tzioufas A G, Moutsopoulos H M. Long term remission of Sjogren's syndrome associated aggressive B cell non‐Hodgkin's lymphomas following combined B cell depletion therapy and CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone). Ann Rheum Dis 2006651033–1037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 481.Voulgarelis M, Giannouli S, Anagnostou D.et al Combined therapy with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisone (CHOP) for Sjogren's syndrome‐associated B‐cell aggressive non‐Hodgkin's lymphomas. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2004431050–1053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 482.Gottenberg J E, Guillevin L, Lambotte O.et al Tolerance and short‐term efficacy of rituximab in 43 patients with systemic autoimmune diseases. Ann Rheum Dis 200564913–920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 483.Ahmadi‐Simab K, Lamprecht P, Nolle B.et al Successful treatment of refractory anterior scleritis in primary sjogren's syndrome with rituximab. Ann Rheum Dis 2005641087–1088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 484.Harner K C, Jackson L W, Drabick J J. Normalization of anticardiolipin antibodies following rituximab therapy for marginal zone lymphoma in a patient with Sjogren's syndrome. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2004431309–1310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 485.Somer G B, Tsai D E, Downs L.et al Improvement in Sjogren's syndrome following therapy with rituximab for marginal zone lymphoma. Arthritis Rheum 200349394–398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 486.Shih W J, Ghesani N, Hongming Z.et al F‐18 FDG positron emission tomography demonstrates resolution of non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma of the parotid gland in a patient with Sjogren's syndrome: before and after anti‐CD20 antibody rituximab therapy. Clin Nucl Med 200227142–143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 487.Ramos‐Casals M, Lopex‐Guillermo A, Brito‐Zeron P.et al SS‐HCV Study Group. Treatment of B‐cell lymphoma with rituximab in two patients with Sjogren's syndrome associated with hepatitis C virus infection. Lupus 200413969–971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 488.Kuek A, Hazleman B L, Gaston J H.et al Successful treatment of refractory polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis with rituximab. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2006451448–1449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 489.Kelaidi C, Tulliez M, Lecoq‐Lafon C.et al Long‐term remission of an EBV‐positive B cell lymphoproliferative disorder associated with rheumatoid arthritis under methotrexate with anti‐CD20 monoclonal antibody (rituximab) monotherapy. Leukemia 2002162173–2174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 490.Armstrong D J, McCarron M T, Wright G D. SLE‐associated transverse myelitis successfully treated with Rituximab (anti‐CD20 monoclonal antibody). Rheumatol Int 200626772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 491.Gomard‐Mennesson E, Ruivard M, Koenig M.et al Treatment of isolated severe immune hemolytic anaemia associated with systemic lupus erythematosus: 26 cases. Lupus 200615223–231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 492.Haddad E, Willems M, Niaudet P.et al Rituximab therapy for childhood‐onset systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol 200633390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 493.Jansson A F, Wintergerst U, Renner E D.et al Rituximab‐induced long‐term remission in two children with SLE. Eur J Pediatr 2007166177–181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 494.Kotani T, Takeuchi T, Kawasaki Y.et al Successful treatment of cold agglutinin disease with anti‐CD20 antibody (rituximab) in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 200615683–685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 495.MacDermott E J, Lehman T J A. Prospective, open‐label trial of rituximab in childhood systemic lupus erythematosus. Curr Rheumatol Rep 20068439–511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 496.Marks S D, Tullus K. Successful outcomes with rituximab therapy for refractory childhood systemic lupus erythematosus. Pediatr Nephrol 200621598–599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 497.Ng K P, Leandro M J, Edwards J C.et al Repeated B cell depletion in treatment of refractory systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis 200765942–945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 498.Rech J, Hueber A J, Kallert S.et al Immunoadsorption and CD20 antibody treatment in a patient with treatment resistant systemic lupus erythematosus and preterminal renal insufficiency. Ann Rheum Dis 200665552–553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 499.Risselada A P, Kallenberg C G M. Therapy‐resistent lupus skin disease successfully treated with rituximab. Rheumatology (Oxford) 200645915–916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 500.Tokunaga M, Saito K, Kawabata D.et al Efficacy of rituximab (anti‐CD20) for refractory systemic lupus erythematosus involving the central nervous system. Ann Rheum Dis 200766470–475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 501.Leandro M J, Cambridge G, Edwards J C. B‐cell depletion in the treatment of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a longitudinal analysis of 24 patients. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2005441542–1545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 502.Leandro M J, Edwards J C, Cambridge G.et al An open study of B lymphocyte depletion in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 2002462677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 503.Anolik J H, Barnard J, Cappione A.et al Rituximab improves peripheral B cell abnormalities in human systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 2004503580–3590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 504.Looney R J, Anolik J H, Campbell D.et al B cell depletion as a novel treatment for systemic lupus erythematosus: a phase I/II dose‐escalation trial of rituximab. Arthritis Rheum 2004502580–2589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 505.Anolik J H, Campbell D, Felgar R E.et al The relationship of FcãRIIIa genotype to degree of B cell depletion by rituximab in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 200348455–459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 506.Tokunaga M, Fujii K, Saito K.et al Down‐regulation of CD40 and CD80 on B cells in patients with life‐ threatening systemic lupus erythematosus after successful treatment with rituximab. Rheumatology (Oxford) 200544176–182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 507.Edelbauer M, Jungraithmayr T, Zimmerhackl L B. Rituximab in childhood systemic lupus erythematosus refractory to conventional immunosuppression. Pediatr Nephrol 200520811–813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 508.Carroll R P, Brown F, Kerr P G. Anti CD20 antibody treatment in refractory class IV lupus nephritis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 200722291–293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 509.Jacobson S H, van V R, Gunnarsson I.et al Rituximab‐induced long‐term remission of membranous lupus nephritis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006211742–1743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 510.Vigna P M, Hernandez C B, Paredes S O.et al Clinical and immunological effects of Rituximab in patients with lupus nephritis refractory to conventional therapy: a pilot study. Arthritis Res Ther 200681–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 511.Ahn E R, Lander G, Bidot C J.et al Long‐term remission from life‐threatening hypercoagulable state associated with lupus anticoagulant (LA) following rituximab therapy. Am J Hematol 200578127–129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 512.Ames P R J, Tommasino C, Fossati G. Limited effect of rituximab on thrombocytopenia and anticardiolipin antibodies in a patient with primary antiphospholipid syndrome. Ann Hematol 200786227–228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 513.Trappe R, Lowe A, Thuss P P.et al Successful treatment of thrombocytopenia in primary antiphospholipid antibody syndrome with the anti‐CD20 antibody rituximab‐monitoring of antiphospholipid and anti‐GP antibodies: a case report. Ann Hematol 200685134–135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 514.Veneri D, Ambrosetti A, Franchini M.et al Remission of severe antiphospholipid syndrome associated with non‐Hodgkin's B‐cell lymphoma after combined treatment with rituximab and chemotherapy. Haematologica 20059015–16. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 515.Rubenstein J, Arkfeld D G, Metyas S.et al Rituximab treatment for resistant antiphospholipid syndrome. J Rheumatol 200633355–357. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 516.Arlet J B, Dimitri D, Pagnoux C.et al Marked efficacy of a therapeutic strategy associating prednisone and plasma exchange followed by rituximab in two patients with refractory myopathy associated with antibodies to the signal recognition particle (SRP). Neuromuscul Discord 200616334–336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 517.Brulhart L, Waldburger J M, Gabay C. Rituximab in the treatment of antisynthetase syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis 200665974–975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 518.Dinh H V, McCormic C, Hall S, Prince H M. Rituximab for the treatment of the skin manifestations of dermatomyositis: a report of 3 cases. J Am Acad Dermatol 200756148–153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 519.Lambotte O, Kotb R, Maigne G.et al Efficacy of rituximab in refractory polymyositis. J Rheumatol 2005321369–1370. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 520.Chung L, Genovese M C, Fiorentino D. Rituximab in the treatment of patients with dermatomyositis: 12 week interim analysis of a pilot trial. Arthritis Rheum 2005524088 [Google Scholar]
  • 521.Levine T D. Rituximab in the treatment of dermatomyositis: an open‐label pilot study. Arthritis Rheum 200552601–607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 522.Noss E H, Hausner‐Sypek D L, Weinblatt M E. Rituximab for refractory polymyositis and dermatomyositis. J Rheumatol 2007331021–1026. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 523.Ahnadi S K, Lamprecht P, Jankowiak C. Successful treatment of refractory adult onset Still's disease with rituximab. Ann Rheum Dis 2006651117–1118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES