Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 1989 Mar;171(3):1623–1630. doi: 10.1128/jb.171.3.1623-1630.1989

Cyclic-AMP-dependent switch in initiation of transcription from the two promoters of the Escherichia coli gal operon: identification and assay of 5'-triphosphate ends of mRNA by GTP:RNA guanyltransferase.

M Irani 1, R Musso 1, S Adhya 1
PMCID: PMC209790  PMID: 2537823

Abstract

We have studied the initiation of transcription of the gal operon in Escherichia coli (i) by analyzing the 5'-triphosphate ends and (ii) by measuring the level of promoter-proximal gal mRNA made in vivo. The 5' termini were identified and quantified by capping with GTP:mRNA guanyltransferase, and the mRNA levels were determined by hybridization of pulse-labeled [32P]RNA with a specific DNA probe. Our results conclusively demonstrate the in vivo activities of two promoters, P1 and P2, with separate initiation sites (S1 and S2) as suggested before from in vitro and in vivo experiments (S. Adhya and W. Miller, Nature [London] 279:492-494, 1979; R. E. Musso, R. DiLauro, S. Adhya, and B. de Crombrugghe, Cell 12:847-854, 1977). We have also studied the effect of cyclic AMP (cAMP) on in vivo gal transcription and found that whereas total gal transcription remains largely unchanged, the relative proportions of the S1 and S2 mRNAs are influenced by the level of cAMP in the cell. In strains devoid of cAMP (cya), transcription initiates equally at S1 and S2; in cAMP-proficient cells (cya+), the S1 initiation increases twofold with a concomitant decrease in S2 initiation. Addition of a saturating amount of exogenous cAMP to cya mutant cells results in a relatively larger switch from S2 to S1. Our results clearly show that while cAMP is an inhibitor of S2, it is not an absolute requirement for transcription initiation at S1, but only acts to increase low-level transcription from the P1 promoter. Using these approaches, we have also studied gal promoter mutants (P211, P18, and P35) which show altered behavior in transcription initiations and in response to cAMP. On the basis of these results, we have discussed models by which transcription initiates at the two overlapping gal promoters (P1 and P2) and discussed how cAMP level modulates the switch between them.

Full text

PDF
1623

Images in this article

1625Image
on p.1625
1626Image
on p.1626
1627Image
on p.1627

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adhya S. L., Shapiro J. A. The galactose operon of E. coli K-12. I. Structural and pleiotropic mutations of the operon. Genetics. 1969 Jun;62(2):231–247. doi: 10.1093/genetics/62.2.231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adhya S., Echols H. Glucose effect and the galactose enzymes of Escherichia coli: correlation between glucose inhibition of induction and inducer transport. J Bacteriol. 1966 Sep;92(3):601–608. doi: 10.1128/jb.92.3.601-608.1966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Adhya S., Miller W. Modulation of the two promoters of the galactose operon of Escherichia coli. Nature. 1979 Jun 7;279(5713):492–494. doi: 10.1038/279492a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Aiba H., Adhya S., de Crombrugghe B. Evidence for two functional gal promoters in intact Escherichia coli cells. J Biol Chem. 1981 Nov 25;256(22):11905–11910. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Busby S., Aiba H., de Crombrugghe B. Mutations in the Escherichia coli operon that define two promoters and the binding site of the cyclic AMP receptor protein. J Mol Biol. 1982 Jan 15;154(2):211–227. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90061-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Busby S., Irani M., Crombrugghe B. Isolation of mutant promoters in the Escherichia coli galactose operon using local mutagenesis on cloned DNA fragments. J Mol Biol. 1982 Jan 15;154(2):197–209. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90060-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen C. W., Thomas C. A., Jr Recovery of DNA segments from agarose gels. Anal Biochem. 1980 Jan 15;101(2):339–341. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(80)90197-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. DiLauro R., Taniguchi T., Musso R., de Crombrugghe B. Unusual location and function of the operator in the Escherichia coli galactose operon. Nature. 1979 Jun 7;279(5713):494–500. doi: 10.1038/279494a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Feiss M., Adyha S., Court D. L. Isolation of plaque-forming, galactose-transducing strains of phage lambda. Genetics. 1972 Jun;71(2):189–206. doi: 10.1093/genetics/71.2.189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hawley D. K., McClure W. R. Compilation and analysis of Escherichia coli promoter DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 1983 Apr 25;11(8):2237–2255. doi: 10.1093/nar/11.8.2237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Herbert M., Kolb A., Buc H. Overlapping promoters and their control in Escherichia coli: the gal case. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 May;83(9):2807–2811. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.9.2807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hopkins J. D. A new class of promoter mutations in the lactose operon of Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol. 1974 Aug 25;87(4):715–724. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(74)90080-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Irani M., Orosz L., Busby S., Taniguchi T., Adhya S. Cyclic AMP-dependent constitutive expression of gal operon: use of repressor titration to isolate operator mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Aug;80(15):4775–4779. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.15.4775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Maxam A. M., Gilbert W. Sequencing end-labeled DNA with base-specific chemical cleavages. Methods Enzymol. 1980;65(1):499–560. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(80)65059-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mulligan M. E., Hawley D. K., Entriken R., McClure W. R. Escherichia coli promoter sequences predict in vitro RNA polymerase selectivity. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984 Jan 11;12(1 Pt 2):789–800. doi: 10.1093/nar/12.1part2.789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Musso R. E., Di Lauro R., Adhya S., de Crombrugghe B. Dual control for transcription of the galactose operon by cyclic AMP and its receptor protein at two interspersed promoters. Cell. 1977 Nov;12(3):847–854. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(77)90283-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Nisseley S. P., Anderson W. B., Gottesman M. E., Perlman R. L., Pastan I. In vitro transcription of the gal operon requires cyclic adenosine monophosphate and cyclic adenosine monophosphate receptor protein. J Biol Chem. 1971 Aug 10;246(15):4671–4678. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ponnambalam S., Webster C., Bingham A., Busby S. Transcription initiation at the Escherichia coli galactose operon promoters in the absence of the normal -35 region sequences. J Biol Chem. 1986 Dec 5;261(34):16043–16048. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Shanblatt S. H., Revzin A. The binding of catabolite activator protein and RNA polymerase to the Escherichia coli galactose and lactose promoters probed by alkylation interference studies. J Biol Chem. 1986 Aug 15;261(23):10885–10890. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Shanblatt S. H., Revzin A. Two catabolite activator protein molecules bind to the galactose promoter region of Escherichia coli in the presence of RNA polymerase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Mar;80(6):1594–1598. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.6.1594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Shapiro J. A., Adhya S. L. The galactose operon of E. coli K-12. II. A deletion analysis of operon structure and polarity. Genetics. 1969 Jun;62(2):249–264. doi: 10.1093/genetics/62.2.249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Silverstone A. E., Arditti R. R., Magasanik B. Catabolite-insensitive revertants of lac promoter mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1970 Jul;66(3):773–779. doi: 10.1073/pnas.66.3.773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Summers W. C. A simple method for extraction of RNA from E. coli utilizing diethyl pyrocarbonate. Anal Biochem. 1970 Feb;33(2):459–463. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(70)90316-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Taniguchi T., O'Neill M., de Crombrugghe B. Interaction site of Escherichia coli cyclic AMP receptor protein on DNA of galactose operon promoters. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Oct;76(10):5090–5094. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.10.5090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Taniguchi T., de Crombrugghe B. Interactions of RNA polymerase and the cyclic AMP receptor protein on DNA of the E. coli galactose operon. Nucleic Acids Res. 1983 Aug 11;11(15):5165–5180. doi: 10.1093/nar/11.15.5165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Venkatesan S., Gershowitz A., Moss B. Modification of the 5' end of mRNA. Association of RNA triphosphatase with the RNA guanylyltransferase-RNA (guanine-7-)methyltransferase complex from vaccinia virus. J Biol Chem. 1980 Feb 10;255(3):903–908. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Venkatesan S., Moss B. In vitro transcription of the inverted terminal repetition of the vaccinia virus genome: correspondence of initiation and cap sites. J Virol. 1981 Feb;37(2):738–747. doi: 10.1128/jvi.37.2.738-747.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Yamamoto T., Sobel M. E., Adams S. L., Avvedimento V. E., DiLauro R., Pastan I., de Crombrugghe B., Showalter A., Pesciotta D., Fietzek P. Construction of a recombinant bacterial plasmid containing pro-alpha 1(I) collagen DNA sequences. J Biol Chem. 1980 Mar 25;255(6):2612–2615. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES