Skip to main content
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1962 Sep 1;14(3):445–458. doi: 10.1083/jcb.14.3.445

THE VARIATION IN THE STRUCTURE OF ERYTHROCYTE NUCLEI WITH FIXATION

Howard G Davies 1, Michael Spencer 1
PMCID: PMC2106115  PMID: 14025414

Abstract

Observations have been made on the role of a divalent cation (calcium ion) during OsO4 fixation of nuclei of frog erythrocytes, mainly after isolation from cells. The volume of the nucleus depends partly on the molecular interaction of charged macromolecules, is controlled by the ionic strength of the medium, and hence may be used as a guide in attempts to preserve structure. When the isolation and fixation media contain 0.01 M calcium at pH 6.3 the volume changes, in the light microscope, during processing are small. When the fixative does not contain these ions, reversible volume changes occur during fixation and dehydration. The chromatin of nuclei processed with minimal volume change appears, in the electron microscope, to contain fine dots and lines about 20 to 40 A in diameter, relatively close together. The chromatin structure of nuclei in which volume changes have occurred consists of dense irregularly shaped patches, relatively far apart, and ranging in diameter from about 200 A down to the limits of visibility (20 to 30 A). It is suggested that the latter structure is a precipitation artefact.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.2 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ALLFREY V. G., MIRSKY A. E., OSAWA S. Protein synthesis in isolated cell nuclei. J Gen Physiol. 1957 Jan 20;40(3):451–490. doi: 10.1085/jgp.40.3.451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. ANDERSON N. G., WILBUR K. M. Studies on isolated cell components. IV. The effect of various solutions on the isolated rat liver nucleus. J Gen Physiol. 1952 May;35(5):781–796. doi: 10.1085/jgp.35.5.781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BAHR G. F., BLOOM G., FRIBERG U. Volume changes of tissues in physiological fluids during fixation in osmium tetroxide or formaldehyde and during subsequent treatment. Exp Cell Res. 1957 Apr;12(2):342–355. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(57)90148-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. BAHR G. F. Osmium tetroxide and ruthenium tetroxide and their reactions with biologically important substances. Electron stains. III. Exp Cell Res. 1954 Nov;7(2):457–479. doi: 10.1016/s0014-4827(54)80091-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. DAVIES H. G. Structure in nucleated erythrocytes. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1961 Mar;9:671–687. doi: 10.1083/jcb.9.3.671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. DE ROBERTIS E. Electron microscopic observations on the submicroscopic morphology of the meiotic nucleus and chromosomes. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1956 Nov 25;2(6):785–796. doi: 10.1083/jcb.2.6.785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. HUXLEY H. E., ZUBAY G. Preferential staining of nucleic acid-containing structures for electron microscopy. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1961 Nov;11:273–296. doi: 10.1083/jcb.11.2.273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. KENT P. W., HICHENS M., WARD P. F. Displacement fractionation of deoxyribonucleoproteins by heparin and dextran sulphate. Biochem J. 1958 Apr;68(4):568–572. doi: 10.1042/bj0680568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. PALADE G. E. A study of fixation for electron microscopy. J Exp Med. 1952 Mar;95(3):285–298. doi: 10.1084/jem.95.3.285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. PHILPOT J. S., STANIER J. E. Comparison of interphase and prophase in isolated rat liver nuclei. Nature. 1957 Jan 12;179(4550):102–103. doi: 10.1038/179102b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. RIS H., MIRSKY A. E. The state of the chromosomes in the interphase nucleus. J Gen Physiol. 1949 Mar 20;32(4):489–502. doi: 10.1085/jgp.32.4.489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. SCHNEIDER R. M., PETERMANN M. L. Nuclei from normal and leukemic mouse spleen. I. The isolation of nuclei in neutral medium. Cancer Res. 1950 Dec;10(12):751–754. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. STERN H., ALLFREY V., MIRSKY A. E., SAETREN H. Some enzymes of isolated nuclei. J Gen Physiol. 1952 Jan;35(3):559–578. doi: 10.1085/jgp.35.3.559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. WATSON M. L. Staining of tissue sections for electron microscopy with heavy metals. II. Application of solutions containing lead and barium. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1958 Nov 25;4(6):727–730. doi: 10.1083/jcb.4.6.727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. WILKINS M. H., ZUBAY G. The absence of histone in the bacterium Escherichia coli. II. X-ray diffraction of nucleoprotein extract. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1959 Jan 25;5(1):55–58. doi: 10.1083/jcb.5.1.55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. ZUBAY G., WATSON M. R. The absence of histone in the bacterium Escherichia coli. I. Preparation and analysis of nucleoprotein extract. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1959 Jan 25;5(1):51–54. doi: 10.1083/jcb.5.1.51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES