Skip to main content
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1963 May 1;17(2):363–373. doi: 10.1083/jcb.17.2.363

ELECTRON MICROSCOPIC STUDIES ON THE INDIRECT FLIGHT MUSCLES OFDROSOPHILAMELANOGASTER

II. Differentiation of Myofibrils

S Ahmad Shafiq 1
PMCID: PMC2106199  PMID: 13988340

Abstract

The differentiation of the indirect flight muscles was studied in the various pupal stages of Drosophila. Fibrillar material originates in the young basophilic myoblasts in the form of short myofilamants distributed irregularly near the cell membranes. The filaments later become grouped into bundles (fibrils). Certain "Z bodies" appear to be important during this process. The "Z bodies" may possibly be centriolar derivatives and are the precursors of the Z bands. The first formed fibrils (having about 30 thick myofilaments) are already divided into sarcomeres by Z bands. These sarcomeres, however, seem to be shorter than those of the adult fibrils.The H band differentiates in fibrils having about 40 thick myofilaments; the fibrils constrict in the middle of each sarcomere during this process. The individual myofibrils increase from about 0.3 µ to 1.5 µ in diameter during development, apparently by addition of new filaments on the periphery of the fibrils. The ribosomes seem to be the only cytoplasmic inclusions which are closely associated with these growing myofibrils. Disintegration of the plasma membranes limiting individual myoblasts was commonly seen during development of flight muscles, supporting the view that the multinuclear condition of the fibers of these muscles is due to fusion of myoblasts.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.4 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BENNETT H. S., LUFT J. H. zeta-Collidine as a basis for buffering fixatives. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1959 Aug;6(1):113–114. doi: 10.1083/jcb.6.1.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. CAPERS C. R. Multinucleation of skeletal muscle in vitro. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1960 Jun;7:559–566. doi: 10.1083/jcb.7.3.559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. COOPER W. G., KONIGSBERG I. R. Dynamics of myogenesis in vitro. Anat Rec. 1961 Jul;140:195–205. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091400305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. HIBBS R. G. Electron microscopy of developing cardiac muscle in chick embryos. Am J Anat. 1956 Jul;99(1):17–51. doi: 10.1002/aja.1000990103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. HOLTZER H., MARSHALL J. M., Jr, FINCK H. An analysis of myogenesis by the use of fluorescent antimyosin. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1957 Sep 25;3(5):705–724. doi: 10.1083/jcb.3.5.705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. LUFT J. H. Improvements in epoxy resin embedding methods. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1961 Feb;9:409–414. doi: 10.1083/jcb.9.2.409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. MOSCONA A. Cytoplasmic granules in myogenic cells. Exp Cell Res. 1955 Oct;9(2):377–380. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(55)90118-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. SHAFIQ S. A. Electron microscopic studies on the indirect flight muscles of Drosophila melanogaster. I. Structure of the myofibrils. J Cell Biol. 1963 May;17:351–362. doi: 10.1083/jcb.17.2.351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. VAN BREEMEN V. L. Myofibril development observed with the electron microscope. Anat Rec. 1952 Jun;113(2):179–195. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091130205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES