Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1964 Jan 1;20(1):131–155. doi: 10.1083/jcb.20.1.131

OOCYTE DIFFERENTIATION AND VITELLOGENESIS IN THE ROACH PERIPLANETA AMERICANA

Everett Anderson 1
PMCID: PMC2106352  PMID: 14105205

Abstract

The ovary of the roach Periplaneta americana has been studied by techniques of light and electron microscopy. Each ovariole (panoistic type) contains a linear array of oocytes in varying stages of development. Newly formed oocytes become encased by a layer of follicle cells and begin pinocytosis. All subsequent growth stages of the oocytes are dependent, in part, on this phenomenon. All of the pinocytotic caveolae show an unique surface modification; i.e., on their internal surface they have an amorphous or filamentous substance and their external surface is studded with many fine radially oriented spike-like projections. The pinosomes of early oocytes do not contain a demonstrable internal structure; they are thought to contain nutritive substances for the developing oocytes rather than yolk precursors. When the oocyte enters its last stage of growth, characterized by yolk deposition, the caveolae become filled with a dense material which is thought to be the precursors of yolk. Hence the conclusion is drawn that yolk formation is independent of any cytoplasmic organelle system of the oocyte and that the precursors of this deutoplasmic substance are manufactured outside the ovary and are internalized by the process of pinocytosis. Under the phase-contrast microscope the nucleoli of early oocytes are large irregular masses and show the phenomenon of nucleolar emission (fragmentation). These "emissions" become randomly dispersed in the nucleoplasm and some of them come to be intimately associated with the fenestrated nuclear envelope. After this process ceases, the main nucleolar mass becomes vacuolated. Electron micrographs suggest that the constituent particles of the nucleolar emissions migrate from the nucleus through patent pores of the nuclear envelope.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.5 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ANDERSON E., BEAMS H. W. Cytological observations on the fine structure of the guinea pig ovary with special reference to the oogonium, primary oocyte and associated follicle cells. J Ultrastruct Res. 1960 Jun;3:432–446. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(60)90021-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. ANDERSON E., BEAMS H. W. Evidence from electron micrographs for the passage of material through pores of the nuclear membrane. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1956 Jul 25;2(4 Suppl):439–444. doi: 10.1083/jcb.2.4.439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BEAMS H. W., KESSEL R. G. ELECTRON MICROSCOPE STUDIES ON DEVELOPING CRAYFISH OOCYTES WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE ORIGIN OF YOLK. J Cell Biol. 1963 Sep;18:621–649. doi: 10.1083/jcb.18.3.621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. BEAMS H. W., KESSEL R. Intracisternal granules of the endoplasmic reticulum in the crayfish oocyte. J Cell Biol. 1962 Apr;13:158–162. doi: 10.1083/jcb.13.1.158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. BRANDT P. W. A study of the mechanism of pinocytosis. Exp Cell Res. 1958 Oct;15(2):300–313. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(58)90032-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. FITZ-JAMES P. C. Participation of the cytoplasmic membrane in the growth and spore fromation of bacilli. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1960 Oct;8:507–528. doi: 10.1083/jcb.8.2.507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Goldstein L., Plaut W. DIRECT EVIDENCE FOR NUCLEAR SYNTHESIS OF CYTOPLASMIC RIBOSE NUCLEIC ACID. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1955 Nov 15;41(11):874–880. doi: 10.1073/pnas.41.11.874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. ITO S., WINCHESTER R. J. The fine structure of the gastric mucosa in the bat. J Cell Biol. 1963 Mar;16:541–577. doi: 10.1083/jcb.16.3.541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. KARNOVSKY M. J. Simple methods for "staining with lead" at high pH in electron microscopy. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1961 Dec;11:729–732. doi: 10.1083/jcb.11.3.729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. KEMP N. E. Electron microscopy of growing oocytes of Rana pipiens. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1956 May 25;2(3):281–292. doi: 10.1083/jcb.2.3.281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. KORSON R. A differential stain for nucleic acids. Stain Technol. 1951 Oct;26(4):265–270. doi: 10.3109/10520295109113222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. LUFT J. H. Improvements in epoxy resin embedding methods. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1961 Feb;9:409–414. doi: 10.1083/jcb.9.2.409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Laskowski M. The gonadotropic hormone and the level of blood phosphorus in the hen. Biochem J. 1938 Jul;32(7):1176–1180. doi: 10.1042/bj0321176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. MALONE T. E., HISAOKA K. K. A histochemical study of the formation of deutoplasmic components in developing oocytes of the zebrafish, Brachydanio rerio. J Morphol. 1963 Jan;112:61–75. doi: 10.1002/jmor.1051120106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. MARCHESI V. T., BARRNETT R. J. The demonstration of enzymatic activity in pinocytic vesicles of blood capillaries with the electron microscope. J Cell Biol. 1963 Jun;17:547–556. doi: 10.1083/jcb.17.3.547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. OKADA E., WADDINGTON C. H. The submicroscopic structure of the Drosophila egg. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1959 Dec;7:583–597. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. PALADE G. E. A study of fixation for electron microscopy. J Exp Med. 1952 Mar;95(3):285–298. doi: 10.1084/jem.95.3.285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. SCHUMAKER V. N. Uptake of protein from solution by Amoeba proteus. Exp Cell Res. 1958 Oct;15(2):314–331. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(58)90033-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. SJOSTRAND F. S., ELFVIN L. G. The layered, asymmetric structure of the plasma membrane in the exocrine pancreas cells of the cat. J Ultrastruct Res. 1962 Dec;7:504–534. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(62)90043-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. SOTELO J. R., PORTER K. R. An electron microscope study of the rat ovum. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1959 Mar 25;5(2):327–342. doi: 10.1083/jcb.5.2.327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. TELFER W. H. Immunological studies of insect metamorphosis. II. The role of a sex-limited blood protein in egg formation by the Cecropia silkworm. J Gen Physiol. 1954 Mar;37(4):539–558. doi: 10.1085/jgp.37.4.539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. TELFER W. H. The route of entry and localization of blood proteins in the oocytes of saturniid moths. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1961 Apr;9:747–759. doi: 10.1083/jcb.9.4.747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. TELFER W. H., WILLIAMS C. M. Immunological studies on insect metamorphosis. I. Qualitative and quantitative description of the blood antigens of the Cecropia silkworm. J Gen Physiol. 1953 Jan;36(3):389–413. doi: 10.1085/jgp.36.3.389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. YAMADA E. The fine structure of the gall bladder epithelium of the mouse. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1955 Sep 25;1(5):445–458. doi: 10.1083/jcb.1.5.445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. YAMADA E. The fine structure of the renal glomerulus of the mouse. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1955 Nov 25;1(6):551–566. doi: 10.1083/jcb.1.6.551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES