Skip to main content
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1964 May 1;21(2):169–174. doi: 10.1083/jcb.21.2.169

INITIATION OF MITOSIS IN RELATION TO THE CELL CYCLE FOLLOWING FEEDING OF STARVED CHICKENS

Ivan L Cameron 1, Günter Cleffmann 1
PMCID: PMC2106440  PMID: 14153479

Abstract

Cellular proliferation of newly hatched chickens was depressed by starving them for 2.5 to 3.5 days. Starvation may hold proliferative cells in different parts of the cell cycle. In order to find where in the cell cycle these cells are held, the animals were fed and the following events were measured as a function of time after the start of feeding: (1) the mitotic index, and (2) the DNA synthetic index (number of cells in DNA synthesis 1 hour after injection of H3-thymidine). The duration of the cell's DNA synthetic period (S) was measured, permitting a more exact description of the cell cycle. Analysis of the duodenal and esophageal epithelia shows that feeding initiates cell division by stimulating cells from the G1 part of the mitotic cycle in the duodenum. In the esophagus some of the cells were either stopped or slowed down in G1, and another group of cells in G2. Feeding simultaneously stimulates both cell groups; the former moves into S, the latter into mitosis. The S period in starved animals is a little longer than that in normally fed animals but the extension can be attributed to a slightly decreased body temperature.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (451.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. CAMERON I. L., GREULICH R. C. Evidence for an essentially constant duration of DNA synthesis in renewing epithelia of the adult mouse. J Cell Biol. 1963 Jul;18:31–40. doi: 10.1083/jcb.18.1.31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. GELFANT S. Initiation of mitosis in relation to the cell division cycle. Exp Cell Res. 1962 Mar;26:395–403. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(62)90191-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. HARDING C. V., SRINIVASAN B. D. A propagated stimulation of DNA synthesis and cell division. Exp Cell Res. 1961 Nov;25:326–340. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(61)90283-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. HARDING C. V., SRINIVASAN B. D. Stimulation of DNA synthesis and mitosis by injury. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1960 Oct 7;90:610–613. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1960.tb23277.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. LEDUC E. H. Mitotic activity in the liver of the mouse during inanition followed by refeeding with different levels of protein. Am J Anat. 1949 May;84(3):397–429. doi: 10.1002/aja.1000840304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. MESSIER B., LEBLOND C. P. Preparation of coated radioautographs by dipping sections in fluid emulsion. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1957 Oct;96(1):7–10. doi: 10.3181/00379727-96-23380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. QUASTLER H., SHERMAN F. G. Cell population kinetics in the intestinal epithelium of the mouse. Exp Cell Res. 1959 Jun;17(3):420–438. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(59)90063-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. YOUNG R. W. Regional differences in cell generation time in growing rat tibiae. Exp Cell Res. 1962 Mar;26:562–567. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(62)90161-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES