Skip to main content
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1964 May 1;21(2):175–189. doi: 10.1083/jcb.21.2.175

STUDY OF BULL SPERMATOZOA

Quantitative Electron Microscopy

Gunter F Bahr 1, Elmar Zeitler 1
PMCID: PMC2106444  PMID: 14153480

Abstract

The electron microscope has been used to determine the characteristic dimensions and the distribution of the dry mass in bull spermatozoa. The most important result is that all characteristic data are occurring in logarithmic distributions. Furthermore, no correlation between such parameters as head weight and tail weight or head length and tail length was found. The occurrence in logarithmic distributions and the non-correlation of parts in the assembly of a spermatozoon are considered to reflect significant biologic principles. Methodologically, a new procedure is added to quantitative electron microscopy permitting the recording of the mass cross-section (total mass per unit length) of an object. This approach makes possible determinations of the distribution and the total mass of very long and narrow structures.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (865.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BAHR G. F., ZEITLER E. Determination of the total dry mass of human erythrocytes by quantitative electron microscopy. Lab Invest. 1962 Nov;11:912–917. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BAHR G. F., ZEITLER E. Study of mitochondria in rat liver. Quantitative electron microscopy. J Cell Biol. 1962 Dec;15:489–501. doi: 10.1083/jcb.15.3.489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BARER R., ROSS K. F. A., TKACZYK S. Refractometry of living cells. Nature. 1953 Apr 25;171(4356):720–724. doi: 10.1038/171720a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. BISHOP D. W. Sperm motility. Physiol Rev. 1962 Jan;42:1–59. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1962.42.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. BURGE R. E., SILVESTER N. R. The measurement of mass, thickness, and density in the electron microscope. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1960 Sep;8:1–11. doi: 10.1083/jcb.8.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. LEUCHTENBERGER C., WEIR D. R., SCHRADER F., MURMANIS L. The desoxyribose nucleic acid (DNA) content in spermatozoa of repeated seminal fluids from fertile and infertile men. J Lab Clin Med. 1955 Jun;45(6):851–864. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. MUELLER D., SANDRITTER W., SCHIEMER H. G., ENDRES K. [Roentgenohistoradiographic and interference-microscopic dry weight investigations on cell smears]. Z Zellforch Microsk Anat Histochem. 1959;1:438–444. doi: 10.1007/BF00736401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. NELSON L. Enzyme distribution in fragmented bull spermatozoa. II. Succinic dehydrogenase and cytochrome oxidase. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1955 Apr;16(4):494–501. doi: 10.1016/0006-3002(55)90269-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. VENDRELY R., VENDRELY C. La teneur du noyau cellulaire en acide désoxyribonucléique à travers les organes, les individus et les espèces animales. Experientia. 1949 Aug 15;5(8):327–329. doi: 10.1007/BF02172642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. van DUIJN C., Jr Mensuration of the heads of bull spermatozoa. Mikroskopie. 1960 Feb;14:265–276. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. van DUIJN C., Jr Photodynamic effects of vital staining with diazine green (Janus green) on living bull spermatozoa. Exp Cell Res. 1961 Oct;25:120–130. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(61)90313-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. van DUIJN C., Jr Toxic and photodynamic effects of toluidine blue on living bull spermatoza. Exp Cell Res. 1962 Mar;26:373–381. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(62)90189-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES