Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1964 Oct 1;23(1):39–51. doi: 10.1083/jcb.23.1.39

THE ROLE OF THE NUCLEOLUS

I. Tritiated Cytidine Activity in Liver Parenchymal Cells of Thioacetamide-Treated Rats

Sasha Koulish 1, Ruth G Kleinfeld 1
PMCID: PMC2106508  PMID: 14228517

Abstract

Male rats of the Sherman strain were fed for 2 weeks a diet of ground purina rat chow containing 0.04 per cent thioacetamide. Animals were injected intraperitoneally with tritiated cytidine, 200µc/100 gm body weight, and sacrificed in pairs, a control and a thioacetamide-treated rat, at prescribed intervals. Liver tissues were preserved with the freeze-substitution method and postfixed in anhydrous OsO4. Other samples were fixed directly with an acetic acid-ethanol mixture (1:3). AR-10 stripping film was applied to 2- and 4-µ sections and exposed for appropriate lengths of time. Nuclear and nucleolar volumes were obtained by direct measurement. Cytoplasmic volumes were obtained with the aid of Chalkley ratios. Nucleolar and cytoplasmic RNA concentrations were calculated from cytophotometric extinction (E540 mµ) measurements. Data were expressed as grains/unit area, grains/unit area/concentration (or specific activity) and grains/total structure. In the liver parenchymal cells of thioacetamide-treated rats, the nucleolus shows vast increases in volume, RNA content, and grain count/total structure, 14-fold, 25-fold, and over 30-fold, respectively. The nucleus increases 2-fold in volume and about 3-fold in total grain count. Cytoplasmic volume increases only 20 per cent and displays a total grain count about equal to that in the control. The time course of incorporation curves for nucleolus and non-nucleolar nucleus (NNN) contain 2 distinct turnover fractions, rapid and slow. Both fractions were increased after thioacetamide treatment but remained proportional to those of controls. The unique stimulated RNA turnover in the nucleus and nucleolus, coupled to a "normal" turnover in the cytoplasm, suggests that this nuclear-nucleolar loss of label does not represent an exclusive passage of formed nuclear RNA to the cytoplasm.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ADAMS H. R., BUSCH H. Effects of thioacetamide on incorporation of orotic acid-2-C14 into RNA fractions in liver. Cancer Res. 1963 May;23:576–582. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. AMANO M., LEBLOND C. P. Comparison of the specific activity time curves of ribonucleic acid in chromatin, nucleolus and cytoplasm. Exp Cell Res. 1960 Jun;20:250–253. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(60)90252-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. CANELLAKIS E. S. Pyrimidine metabolism. III. The interaction of the catabolic and anabolic pathways of uracil metabolism. J Biol Chem. 1957 Aug;227(2):701–709. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. FEINENDEGEN L. E., BOND V. P., PAINTER R. B. Studies on the interrelationship of RNA synthesis, DNA synthesis and precursor pool in human tissue culture cells studied with tritiated pyrimidine nucleosides. Exp Cell Res. 1961 Jan;22:381–405. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(61)90117-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. FITZGERALD P. J., VINIJCHAIKUL K. Nucleic acid metabolism of pancreatic cells as revealed by cytidine-H3 and thymidine-H3. Lab Invest. 1959 Jan-Feb;8(1):319–329. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Goldstein L., Plaut W. DIRECT EVIDENCE FOR NUCLEAR SYNTHESIS OF CYTOPLASMIC RIBOSE NUCLEIC ACID. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1955 Nov 15;41(11):874–880. doi: 10.1073/pnas.41.11.874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. HARRIS H., LACOUR L. F. SITE OF SYNTHESIS OF CYTOPLASMIC RIBONUCLEIC ACID. Nature. 1963 Oct 19;200:227–229. doi: 10.1038/200227a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. HARRIS H. Turnover of nuclear and cytoplasmic ribonucleic acid in two types of animal cell, with some further observations on the nucleolus. Biochem J. 1959 Oct;73:362–369. doi: 10.1042/bj0730362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. HIATT H. H. A rapidly labeled RNA in rat liver nuclei. J Mol Biol. 1962 Aug;5:217–229. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(62)80085-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. HOLLAND J. J. EFFECTS OF PUROMYCIN ON RNA SYNTHESIS IN MAMMALIAN CELLS. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1963 Sep;50:436–446. doi: 10.1073/pnas.50.3.436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. KLEINFELD R. G. Early changes in rat liver and kidney cells induced by thioacetamide. Cancer Res. 1957 Nov;17(10):954–962. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. KLEINFELD R. G., VON HAAM E. The effect of thioacetamide on rat liver regeneration. I. Cytological studies. Cancer Res. 1959 Aug;19:769–778. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. LAIRD A. K. Nuclear changes induced in rat liver cells by thioacetamide. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1953 Sep;46(1):119–127. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(53)90175-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. MCMASTER-KAYE R. The metabolic characteristics of nucleolar, chromosonal, and cytoplasmic ribonucleic acid of Drosophila salivary glands. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1960 Oct;8:365–378. doi: 10.1083/jcb.8.2.365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. McMASTER-KAYE R., TAYLOR J. H. Evidence for two metabolically distinct types of ribonucleic acid in chromatin and nucleoli. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1958 Jan 25;4(1):5–11. doi: 10.1083/jcb.4.1.5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. PERRY R. P. On the nucleolar and nuclear dependence of cytoplasmic RNA synthesis in HeLa cells. Exp Cell Res. 1960 Jun;20:216–220. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(60)90240-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. PRESCOTT D. M. The nuclear dependence of RNA synthesis in Acanthamoeba sp. Exp Cell Res. 1960 Feb;19:29–34. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(60)90034-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. REICH E., FRANKLIN R. M., SHATKIN A. J., TATUM E. L. Effect of actinomycin D on cellular nucleic acid synthesis and virus production. Science. 1961 Aug 25;134(3478):556–557. doi: 10.1126/science.134.3478.556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. SIRLIN J. L. The nucleolus problem. Nature. 1960 Apr 23;186:275–277. doi: 10.1038/186275a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. STENRAM U. Radioautographic studies with methionine-3H and cytidine-3H on protein deficiency in mice and rats with special reference to liver cells. Exp Cell Res. 1962 Mar;26:485–492. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(62)90153-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. WATTS J. W., HARRIS H. Turnover of nucleic acids in a non-multiplying animal cell. Biochem J. 1959 May;72(1):147–153. doi: 10.1042/bj0720147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. WILSON J. D. The nature of the RNA response to estradiol administration by the uterus of the rat. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1963 Jul;50:93–100. doi: 10.1073/pnas.50.1.93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. WOODARD J., RASCH E., SWIFT H. Nucleic acid and protein metabolism during the mitotic cycle in Vicia faba. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1961 Feb;9:445–462. doi: 10.1083/jcb.9.2.445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES