Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1964 Oct 1;23(1):135–150. doi: 10.1083/jcb.23.1.135

THE PREPARATION AND PROPERTIES OF BACTERIAL CHROMATOPHORE FRACTIONS

Patricia Barron Worden 1, W R Sistrom 1
PMCID: PMC2106510  PMID: 14228507

Abstract

Chromatophore material from the bacterium Rhodopseudomonas spheroides was freed of ribosomes by centrifugation in 27 per cent RbCl and then separated into "heavy" and "light" fractions by centrifugation through a sucrose gradient. The fractions differed from one another in the following ways. (a) The isopycnic density of the heavy fraction was between 1.15 and 1.18 gm/ml and that of the light fraction was 1.14 gm/ml. (b) The heavy fraction was able to bind ribosomes; the light fraction was not. (c) The light fraction was homogeneous in the ultracentrifuge and had a sedimentation constant, extrapolated to infinite dilution, of 153 s 20,w. The heavy fraction was grossly heterogeneous. (d) Both the amount of bacteriochlorophyll relative to protein and the ratio of bacteriochlorophyll to carotenoids were greater in the light fraction. (e) The spectra of the two fractions in the near infra-red were different. Comparisons of the chromatophore fractions from cells with different amounts of bacteriochlorophyll showed that the specific bacteriochlorophyll contents of the two fractions did not change to the same extent as did that of the whole cells. The amount of heavy fraction from pigmented cells was roughly independent of the cellular pigment content and was about equal to that from pigment-free cells. The amount of light fraction depended on the pigment content of the cells; no light fraction was obtained from cells devoid of bacteriochlorophyll. The cytochrome complements of both fractions underwent quantitative as well as qualitative changes with varying growth conditions. The size of the photosynthetic unit in R. spheroides appeared to increase as the total cellular bacteriochlorophyll content increased; however, the number of units per light fraction particle remained constant.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.0 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BOATMAN E. S., DOUGLAS H. C. Fine structure of the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodomicrobium vannielii. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1961 Nov;11:469–483. doi: 10.1083/jcb.11.2.469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. COHEN-BAZIRE G., KUNISAWA R. The fine structure of Rhodospirillum rubrum. J Cell Biol. 1963 Feb;16:401–419. doi: 10.1083/jcb.16.2.401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. COHEN-BAZIRE G., SISTROM W. R., STANIER R. Y. Kinetic studies of pigment synthesis by non-sulfur purple bacteria. J Cell Physiol. 1957 Feb;49(1):25–68. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1030490104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cohen-Bazire G., Kunisawa R. SOME OBSERVATIONS ON THE SYNTHESIS AND FUNCTION OF THE PHOTOSYNTHETIC APPARATUS IN RHODOSPIRILLUM RUBRUM. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1960 Dec;46(12):1543–1553. doi: 10.1073/pnas.46.12.1543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. DREWS G. [Studies on the substructure of "chromatophores" of Rhodospirillum rubrum and Rhodospirillum molischianum]. Arch Mikrobiol. 1960;36:99–108. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. DRYER R. L., TAMMES A. R., ROUTH J. I. The determination of phosphorus and phosphatase with N-phenyl-p-phenylenediamine. J Biol Chem. 1957 Mar;225(1):177–183. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. FRENKEL A. W. Photophosphorylation of adenine nucleotides by cell-free preparations of purple bacteria. J Biol Chem. 1956 Oct;222(2):823–834. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. FULLER R. C., SMILLIE R. M., RIGOPOULOS N., YOUNT V. Comparative studies of some quinones in photosynthetic systems. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1961 Nov;95:197–202. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(61)90135-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. GELLER D. M., LIPMANN F. Photophosphorylation in extracts of Rhodospirillum rubrum. J Biol Chem. 1960 Aug;235:2478–2484. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. GRIFFITHS M., STANIER R. Y. Some mutational changes in the photosynthetic pigment system of Rhodopseudomonas spheroides. J Gen Microbiol. 1956 Jul;14(3):698–715. doi: 10.1099/00221287-14-3-698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. LOWRY O. H., ROSEBROUGH N. J., FARR A. L., RANDALL R. J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951 Nov;193(1):265–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. NEWTON J. W., NEWTON G. A. Composition of the photoactive subcellular particles from Chromatium. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1957 Sep;71(1):250–265. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(57)90026-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. PARDEE A. B., SCHACHMAN H. K., STANIER R. Y. Chromatophores of Rhodospirillum rubrum. Nature. 1952 Feb 16;169(4294):282–283. doi: 10.1038/169282a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. SISTROM W. R. A requirement for sodium in the growth of Rhodopseudomonas spheroides. J Gen Microbiol. 1960 Jun;22:778–785. doi: 10.1099/00221287-22-3-778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. VATTER A. E., WOLFE R. S. The structure of photosynthetic bacteria. J Bacteriol. 1958 Apr;75(4):480–488. doi: 10.1128/jb.75.4.480-488.1958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES