Skip to main content
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1965 Jun 1;25(3):31–39. doi: 10.1083/jcb.25.3.31

THE MITOTIC APPARATUS

Structural Changes after Isolation

R E Kane 1, Arthur Forer 1
PMCID: PMC2106665  PMID: 5320473

Abstract

The fibrous structure of the mitotic apparatus (MA) isolated from dividing sea urchin eggs undergoes no changes visible in phase contrast during extended storage, but the solubility of the MA rapidly decreases after isolation. Polarization microscopy shows that a decrease in the birefringence of the MA also occurs after isolation and is correlated with the loss of solubility. This loss of birefringence indicates that some structural change takes place during this period, and such a change was demonstrated by means of electron microscopy. The tubular filaments which form the spindle of the intracellular MA and of the freshly isolated MA were found to break down during storage to rows of dense granules, this loss of continuity presumably accounting for the loss of birefringence. The interrelations of the observed changes and the significance of these observations for investigations on the isolated MA are discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (796.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. DALES S. ASSOCIATION BETWEEN THE SPINDLE APPARATUS AND REOVIRUS. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1963 Aug;50:268–275. doi: 10.1073/pnas.50.2.268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. HARRIS P. Some structural and functional aspects of the mitotic apparatus in sea urchin embryos. J Cell Biol. 1962 Sep;14:475–487. doi: 10.1083/jcb.14.3.475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. KANE R. E. The mitotic apparatus. Fine structure of the isolated unit. J Cell Biol. 1962 Nov;15:279–287. doi: 10.1083/jcb.15.2.279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. KANE R. E. The mitotic apparatus: isolation by controlled pH. J Cell Biol. 1962 Jan;12:47–55. doi: 10.1083/jcb.12.1.47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. MAZIA D., MITCHISON J. M., MEDINA H., HARRIS P. The direct isolation of the mitotic apparatus. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1961 Aug;10:467–474. doi: 10.1083/jcb.10.4.467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Mazia D., Dan K. The Isolation and Biochemical Characterization of the Mitotic Apparatus of Dividing Cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1952 Sep;38(9):826–838. doi: 10.1073/pnas.38.9.826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. ROBBINS E., GONATAS N. K. THE ULTRASTRUCTURE OF A MAMMALIAN CELL DURING THE MITOTIC CYCLE. J Cell Biol. 1964 Jun;21:429–463. doi: 10.1083/jcb.21.3.429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. ROTH L. E., DANIELS E. W. Electron microscopic studies of mitosis in amebae. II. The giant ameba Pelomyxa carolinensis. J Cell Biol. 1962 Jan;12:57–78. doi: 10.1083/jcb.12.1.57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES