Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1965 Jun 1;25(3):563–576. doi: 10.1083/jcb.25.3.563

THE FINE STRUCTURE OF BRUNNER'S GLANDS IN THE MOUSE

Daniel S Friend 1
PMCID: PMC2106666  PMID: 5839256

Abstract

Examined with the electron microscope, the secretory cells of the submucosal glands of Brunner in the mouse present a curious combination of the fine-structural features of both serous and mucus-secreting cells. The cells have numerous mitochondria, abundant basal ergastoplasm, dense secretory granules that bear a superficial resemblance to pancreatic zymogen granules, and an unusually extensive Golgi apparatus. The prominence of the lamellar, vesicular, and vacuolar elements of the Golgi complex facilitates detailed observation of these components. More evident than in other glandular cells, aggregates of small vesicles appear to represent the transitional elements and are vehicles for transport of the product between the ergastoplasm and the Golgi complex. The numerous vesicular evaginations of smooth-surfaced regions on cisternae of the rough-surfaced endoplasmic reticulum and accumulations of innumerable vesicles of similar size in the area between the nearest profiles of the ergastoplasm and the Golgi complex support this contention. The cytological characteristics and physiologic properties of Brunner's glands in various species are discussed briefly. It is concluded that the submucosal glands of the mouse are excellent material for exploration of the ultrastructural correlates of both protein and carbohydrate secretion, and it is suggested that their secretion may have functions other than those generally attributed to them, namely, chemical and mechanical protection of the duodenal surface epithelium.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.9 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BENNETT H. S., LUFT J. H. zeta-Collidine as a basis for buffering fixatives. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1959 Aug;6(1):113–114. doi: 10.1083/jcb.6.1.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. CAULFIELD J. B. Effects of varying the vehicle for OsO4 in tissue fixation. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1957 Sep 25;3(5):827–830. doi: 10.1083/jcb.3.5.827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. CHOI J. K. The fine structure of the urinary bladder of the toad, Bufo marinus. J Cell Biol. 1963 Jan;16:53–72. doi: 10.1083/jcb.16.1.53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. FARQUHAR M. G., PALADE G. E. Junctional complexes in various epithelia. J Cell Biol. 1963 May;17:375–412. doi: 10.1083/jcb.17.2.375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. FAWCETT D. W. Physiologically significant specializations of the cell surface. Circulation. 1962 Nov;26:1105–1132. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.26.5.1105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. FAWCETT D. W. The membranes of the cytoplasm. Lab Invest. 1961 Nov-Dec;10:1162–1188. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. FLOREY H. Mucin and the protection of the body. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1955 Jan 27;143(911):147–158. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1955.0001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. GROSSMAN M. L. The glands of Brunner. Physiol Rev. 1958 Oct;38(4):675–690. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1958.38.4.675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. HARTIALA K., GROSSMAN M. I. Studies on chemical and physical changes in duodenal mucus. J Biol Chem. 1952 Mar;195(1):251–256. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. ITO S., WINCHESTER R. J. The fine structure of the gastric mucosa in the bat. J Cell Biol. 1963 Mar;16:541–577. doi: 10.1083/jcb.16.3.541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. LUFT J. H. Improvements in epoxy resin embedding methods. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1961 Feb;9:409–414. doi: 10.1083/jcb.9.2.409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. MARTIN B. F. Serous cells in Brunner's glands of the rabbit. Nature. 1954 Dec 25;174(4443):1195–1196. doi: 10.1038/1741195b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. MILLONIG G. A modified procedure for lead staining of thin sections. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1961 Dec;11:736–739. doi: 10.1083/jcb.11.3.736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. PEACHEY L. D., RASMUSSEN H. Structure of the toad's urinary bladder as related to its physiology. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1961 Aug;10:529–553. doi: 10.1083/jcb.10.4.529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. REVEL J. P., HAY E. D. AN AUTORADIOGRAPHIC AND ELECTRON MICROSCOPIC STUDY OF COLLAGEN SYNTHESIS IN DIFFERENTIATING CARTILAGE. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1963 Oct 8;61:110–144. doi: 10.1007/BF00341524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. REYNOLDS E. S. The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron-opaque stain in electron microscopy. J Cell Biol. 1963 Apr;17:208–212. doi: 10.1083/jcb.17.1.208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. YAMADA E. The fine structure of the gall bladder epithelium of the mouse. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1955 Sep 25;1(5):445–458. doi: 10.1083/jcb.1.5.445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. ZEIGEL R. F., DALTON A. J. Speculations based on the morphology of the Golgi systems in several types of proteinsecreting cells. J Cell Biol. 1962 Oct;15:45–54. doi: 10.1083/jcb.15.1.45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES