Skip to main content
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1965 Nov 1;27(2):263–272. doi: 10.1083/jcb.27.2.263

RENEWAL OF CELLS WITHIN TASTE BUDS

Lloyd M Beidler 1, Ronald L Smallman 1
PMCID: PMC2106718  PMID: 5884625

Abstract

Colchicine blocks mitotic division of the epithelial cells surrounding the taste bud of the rat tongue. Response to chemical stimulation decreases 50 per cent 3 hours after colchicine injection as measured by recording the electrical activity from the taste nerve bundle. Radioautography, using tritiated thymidine, shows that those epithelial cells surrounding the taste bud divide and that some of the daughter cells enter the taste bud and slowly move toward the center. The life span of the average cell is about 250 ± 50 hours, although some cells have a much shorter and others a much longer life span. These studies suggest that the cells within the taste bud, as well as the nerves, undergo considerable change with time. Corresponding changes in function are considered.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (801.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BEIDLER L. M. Biophysical approaches to taste. Am Sci. 1961 Mar;49:421–431. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BEIDLER L. M. Biophysical approaches to taste. Am Sci. 1961 Mar;49:421–431. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BERTALANFFY F. D., LEBLOND C. P. The continuous renewal of the two types of alveolar cells in the lung of the rat. Anat Rec. 1953 Mar;115(3):515–541. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091150306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. BERTALANFFY F. D. TRITIATED THYMIDINE VERSUS COLCHICINE TECHNIQUE IN THE STUDY OF CELL POPULATION CYTODYNAMICS. Lab Invest. 1964 Aug;13:871–886. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. DE LORENZO A. J. Electron microscopy of the olfactory and gustatory pathways. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1960 Jun;69:410–420. doi: 10.1177/000348946006900210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. GUTH L. The effects of glossopharyngeal nerve transection on the circumvallate papilla of the rat. Anat Rec. 1957 Aug;128(4):715–731. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091280406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. KIMURA K., BEIDLER L. M. Microelectrode study of taste receptors of rat and hamster. J Cell Comp Physiol. 1961 Oct;58:131–139. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1030580204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. QUASTLER H., SHERMAN F. G. Cell population kinetics in the intestinal epithelium of the mouse. Exp Cell Res. 1959 Jun;17(3):420–438. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(59)90063-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. TATEDA H., BEIDLER L. M. THE RECEPTOR POTENTIAL OF THE TASTE CELL OF THE RAT. J Gen Physiol. 1964 Jan;47:479–486. doi: 10.1085/jgp.47.3.479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES